Printable View
[QUOTE=About;7202454]When they hit you up for a deposit / gas money, etc before the meetup you'll know it's not her. Her tiktok never places her in DC.[/QUOTE]She seems real. She wants to meet by her apt complex. Probably isn't the same face girl but using someone similar.
The pics she sent. She's too fat for me. I don't even want to bother driving into ghetto ass dc for that.
It's all fat, ghetto, and the somewhat decent girls think they're worth 1 k and at best they're a 6.
The good old days of 400 for these.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/_its_hawa_?igsh=NmYzOWV1dGhnc2pz[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/peachforthestars_?igsh=MTh2MXAxbGh1enF3dg==[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/mariapaulaescamilla?igsh=MW15dmZzaHNvN3NleA==[/URL]
[QUOTE=PRMan12;7204803]So you on average pay 500 per meet.[/QUOTE]Pretty much, sometimes even more for the right girl, depends, recently had a high achiever pyt sb, who was very UTR and I gave her extra to go along with a rich experience of sugar dating with a very smart and pretty girl. My current SB hosts, there's something nice about being in her bedroom vs. A random hotel. Saves on hotels and I pass that on to her.
Yeah, Arty has his perspective, it isn't the only one.
I've operated at about that level in the past, but it isn't to be expected that all SBs are expecting to be able to live on their own w / the support of just one guy. That is, don't believe that making them a kept woman is your goal. Not all are looking for this, though some definitely are. In my area, southern California, there are definitely smoking hot girls who expect to get an apartment and a car out of an exclusive SD. I am not a Rolls-Royce SD like that, more like a BMW. LOL.
[QUOTE=PRMan12;7204298]This is a great post! Do a lot of what is outlined but will fine tune my game. My # of SB's is much higher in past year, but 300 is the # you should be looking for! Can't always get there, but its enough for most for their time. Some will still hold out for 5 or say they never go below 8, etc. This is a fun game, to try and get them for the lowest amount and then have them be ok with that amount for continuous times. I only go for for 8's or better so you will miss out on a few, but even those you can have for 5, and if you follow the game plan can possibly get some to be ok with 3 moving forward. We all are looking for the unicorn, but they are as well and for them, they also want to feel safe, have fun, and in their minds make sure they are valued. In their minds, the higher the # the higher the value, but they also would rather be spending their time with someone who they feel safe with and treats them nicely. They all have been on enough bad dates that the good ones stand out and those are the ones they are willing to take a little less from so they avoid the headaches.[/QUOTE]Personally, working at a disadvantage.
1. Post as married.
2. No profile pics at all (share covered face via SA text, and delete if doesn't get them offline).
3. Only 8-9's only (hide the rest). Prefer I'd verified*.
4. I have Facecheck, so I assume they do to. I Never share a face pic at all (ever).
5. Over 60, so age gap is usually 40+.
6. Always discuss expectations / boundaries via text.
7. Usually texting with Tito's in my hand, so not a good idea.
8. Surprising easy to get offline without a picture, but harder to close (thanks Titos).
It still works, but volume effort required, and not many new faces in the demographic searching. 5 yr average is 1/ mo.
Renewed last week, and a few new faces, so. Who knows. Wish I had known in my 40's.
Forgot to mention. If a profile only has I'd verified, or I'd verified + Selfie, they will not show up in regular search. Odd, but how SA incompetence work.
Always toggle I'd verified as a second search. Girls probably don't know, and most SDs probably don't either. SQL or vs SQL and.
[QUOTE=TomFordModel;7204938]It's all fat, ghetto, and the somewhat decent girls think they're worth 1 k and at best they're a 6.
The good old days of 400 for these.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/_its_hawa_?igsh=NmYzOWV1dGhnc2pz[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/peachforthestars_?igsh=MTh2MXAxbGh1enF3dg==[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/mariapaulaescamilla?igsh=MW15dmZzaHNvN3NleA==[/URL][/QUOTE]Every single one outclasses the round face Asian from last post. Not 400 for a reason.
But they will emerge. Girls on the site forever likely no, but sometimes circles back work.
[QUOTE=BuckNaked84;7205275]Every single one outclasses the round face Asian from last post. Not 400 for a reason.[/QUOTE]You need to look past the face!! A majority of the seeking girls are filtered they look just as good or worse than round face plus they're fat!
The insta girls in posted they look like their photos. Damn, I missed the good one days.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7205198]Yeah, Arty has his perspective, it isn't the only one.
I've operated at about that level in the past, but it isn't to be expected that all SBs are expecting to be able to live on their own w / the support of just one guy. That is, don't believe that making them a kept woman is your goal. Not all are looking for this, though some definitely are. In my area, southern California, there are definitely smoking hot girls who expect to get an apartment and a car out of an exclusive SD. I am not a Rolls-Royce SD like that, more like a BMW. LOL.[/QUOTE]Right, my methods suit my preferences. I also like them to be bb and cip, while getting them to be bb from first date on has not been a problem, the second one takes a bit of work and some never get there. Therefore the somewhat premium is for them to justify these things and somewhat being exclusive. I chose the type of girls carefully since I do bb and cip, I want to make sure she's likely clean, and I have my ways to get a reasonable understanding on this. Others may have different preferences, and that's fine.
[QUOTE=BuckNaked84;7205253]Personally, working at a disadvantage.
1. Post as married.
2. No profile pics at all (share covered face via SA text, and delete if doesn't get them offline).
3. Only 8-9's only (hide the rest). Prefer I'd verified*.
4. I have Facecheck, so I assume they do to. I Never share a face pic at all (ever).
5. Over 60, so age gap is usually 40+.
6. Always discuss expectations / boundaries via text.
7. Usually texting with Tito's in my hand, so not a good idea.
8. Surprising easy to get offline without a picture, but harder to close (thanks Titos).
It still works, but volume effort required, and not many new faces in the demographic searching. 5 yr average is 1/ mo.
Renewed last week, and a few new faces, so. Who knows. Wish I had known in my 40's.[/QUOTE]Fwiw. Facecheck will cut your time by 2/3. All the fakes (100%) have to steal photos from somewhere. Most show up on Facecheck. 3 today 🥲. Honestly too much effort for little reward (as opposed to easy reward with no effort).
Waste time?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e7c2c414-b0e1-4710-83d9-6dd9d3dd233e[/URL]
Yes, she replied that she has a sister. LOL.
[QUOTE=BuckNaked84;7205788]Waste time?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e7c2c414-b0e1-4710-83d9-6dd9d3dd233e[/URL]
Yes, she replied that she has a sister. LOL.[/QUOTE]Don't you have to use Bitcoin to pay for it though? That's a pain in the ass.
This one's a real charmer. She told me she's looking for a paypig, I replied telling her I was looking for a fuckdoll.
She wants you to cashapp her first, then she'll drive to you. LOL.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a869a26c-a955-4540-bab2-2324eb6399a5[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9bb31732-6268-4444-b327-49ca461caff7[/URL]
Beware. The photos are catfish. Person is real and different. However, she's big and thick. Like a linebacker and a hideous face. Hence, the reason she's using pics of another person that almost look like her.
I met this thi g a couple of years ago when she was doing some internship here. But she is dtf.