Printable View
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]douchebaggery[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
[QUOTE=NECreampie;2001591]No Problems Here Sonny...
Here's what I've got ... [URL]http://www.nps.gov/pefo/index.htm[/URL].
You'll probably be different with all those anxieties you have...[/QUOTE]Too funny, a dumb question, deserves a smart answer.
[QUOTE=NECreampie;2001591]No Problems Here Sonny...
Here's what I've got ... [URL]http://www.nps.gov/pefo/index.htm[/URL].
You'll probably be different with all those anxieties you have...[/QUOTE]Thanks for the help you stud.
[QUOTE=Jerkedpork;2001380]I was wondering if you take a Viagra before your massage? Or do you have any other remedies to help to get a good hard wood.[/QUOTE]A much better way is to take care of yourself with the right food, plenty of exercise, get enough sleep, keep the fat off, and stay the hell away donuts & McD's.
Doc Smoke.
I am newly registered but have enjoyed this forum in read only for sometime. I agree with Doc Smoke about how to stay healthy but would like to add: the weekly stress relief.
Speaking of stress relief, I visited the new location on Canterbury Street last night. Overall it was good. Was told two girls work there but only KeeKee was on duty last night. Reasonably attractive, 30 to 40 years and had a couple of nice Cs (almost D) which I was allowed to touch. The massage was very good and included walking on my back, minimal tease and a good finish. The bad point was we had to negotiate a price for the finish, instead of it being a tip. Ended up being 60 and 60. I was told there were no extras. I would only repeat if none of my regular haunts were available.
[QUOTE=Smokescreen;2001743]A much better way is to take care of yourself with the right food, plenty of exercise, get enough sleep, keep the fat off, and stay the hell away donuts & McD's.
Doc Smoke.[/QUOTE]I would also suggest performing kegel exercises, which involve the contraction of your PC muscle (the same muscle you use to stop urinating midstream). They are very convenient to perform and have improved my performance significantly since I started a few months ago.
That's worth taking note of given the how rare it is around these parts. Was that OTC or UTC I wonder? In my view, with the influx of new providers and accompaning increasing popularity of erotic AMPs overall, service and quality is way down across the board. For example, when was the last time you met a pretty provider under 30 that smiled, spoke some English, gave a top notch massge and enjoyed making you leave happy without any haggling? And, took all the sheets and towels out of the room instead of disposing of the paper and simply smoothing the rest? Exactly.
ARG.
[QUOTE=WiseOwl;2002822]I am newly registered but have enjoyed this forum in read only for sometime. I agree with Doc Smoke about how to stay healthy but would like to add: the weekly stress relief.
Speaking of stress relief, I visited the new location on Canterbury Street last night. Overall it was good. Was told two girls work there but only KeeKee was on duty last night. Reasonably attractive, 30 to 40 years and had a couple of nice Cs (almost D) which I was allowed to touch. The massage was very good and included walking on my back, minimal tease and a good finish. The bad point was we had to negotiate a price for the finish, instead of it being a tip. Ended up being 60 and 60. I was told there were no extras. I would only repeat if none of my regular haunts were available.[/QUOTE]
Apologies. Had meant to get this out sooner. Visited the new Canterbury location this past Monday (the 'minor' snow event starting the week). Late visit: area quiet; easy parking on neighborhood streets, or right in front (though exposed during high traffic). Set-up looked well done / tasteful, though I should have taken more of a tour. Room was comfortable and warm, and was told there were 3 session rooms. Now, there was one gal on duty, and there has only been one since the opening. This would be CiCi; will assume the same KeeKee mentioned by Wise Owl. Concur with description, though I would peg CiCi on the higher side of 30, and most likely over 40. Sized well, and accessible / utc. Small-ish negotiation up-front, which, as always, is an irritation.
As it turns out, CiCi came to recognize me, and I--her. We were both somewhat vague, but it appears to be from a short stint she had a 466 Park. Overall, an enjoyable half-hour. She gave it some effort, was accommodating, and pleasantly communicative (all, despite asking for the up-front). CiCi is off (back to NY) as of today / tomorrow? A replacement will be arriving; will check it out.
[QUOTE=ARegularGuy;2003356]That's worth taking note of given the how rare it is around these parts. Was that OTC or UTC I wonder? In my view, with the influx of new providers and accompaning increasing popularity of erotic AMPs overall, service and quality is way down across the board. For example, when was the last time you met a pretty provider under 30 that smiled, spoke some English, gave a top notch massge and enjoyed making you leave happy without any haggling? And, took all the sheets and towels out of the room instead of disposing of the paper and simply smoothing the rest? Exactly.
ARG.[/QUOTE]
Another late night stop in the City. Thought I would follow with NaNa, based on report via Smoke and CB. Called for appmnt with her, and ran over within 10 minutes. Mimi answered the door, escorted me to the room, and said she would be taking care of me; that NaNa was napping. Told her I had just called and confirmed with NaNa; MiMi went off to collect her. Strangely enough, I had seen NaNa, if this really was NaNa, a few weeks earlier. Based on that visit, I would probably not have repeated. This visit was more of the same, and it was quite uneventful (not accomodating, to much of an extent). Yes, NaNa (this one, anyways) is cute and pleasant, but I can't imagine she is the cutest, and she is certainly far from the youngest.
Can't figure this one for sure. I know, and have had Mimi (twice), and from what I gathered from NaNa, there was one other provider, and the name was something to the effect of PhanPhan?? Ugh. May have to do another visit to satisfy my curiosity.
[QUOTE=Smokescreen;1998769]Choir Boy, she does work on weekends, or at least on Sun, I saw her yesterday and had a very enjoyable hour with her. I thank you for your report on her, it was from your report that I decided to see her, very pleasant woman to be with.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WaveSeek;2003442]Another late night stop in the City. Thought I would follow with NaNa, based on report via Smoke and CB. Called for appmnt with her, and ran over within 10 minutes. Mimi answered the door, escorted me to the room, and said she would be taking care of me; that NaNa was napping. Told her I had just called and confirmed with NaNa; MiMi went off to collect her. Strangely enough, I had seen NaNa, if this really was NaNa, a few weeks earlier. Based on that visit, I would probably not have repeated. This visit was more of the same, and it was quite uneventful (not accomodating, to much of an extent). Yes, NaNa (this one, anyways) is cute and pleasant, but I can't imagine she is the cutest, and she is certainly far from the youngest.
Can't figure this one for sure. I know, and have had Mimi (twice), and from what I gathered from NaNa, there was one other provider, and the name was something to the effect of PhanPhan?? Ugh. May have to do another visit to satisfy my curiosity.[/QUOTE]No, she is probably not the youngest nor prettiest, but I can say she is the most pleasant that I've seen in the area for a while. Also very easy to talk with. I got the same greeting as you. I didn't ask her name, but I could tell she wasn't Nana just by her looks. After I told her I wanted to see Nana, she said, "you don't like me? To which I replied, "I called and made an appointment with Nana, and that's who I expect to see". Then a taller woman came out and said "you called, ok, I'll get Nana". Now I'm wondering if I really did see Nana, guess I'll never know, but I suspect that was her, she gave me some detailed personal information, and that makes me believe it was her.
[QUOTE=Jerkedpork;2001380]I was wondering if you take a Viagra before your massage? Or do you have any other remedies to help to get a good hard wood.[/QUOTE]Hasn't been an issue and I'm 50 plus a few more years. I've always kept myself in shape with various sports and you should too if you want to enjoy the hobby.
I actually went to Canterbury about a week-and-a-half ago, just after they opened. It is an odd location, not much else around besides a bar and a convenience store. You can apparently park right in front, but if you do you're the only car there, so it feels weird. I parked around the corner. The place itself was OK. It was very warm inside, apparently because of the huge industrial heater in the back corner. Called ahead for a $40 HH on short notice. Was met by Amanda. I'll say 30 and very cute, maybe an 8. Her English was pretty good and she told me she was from Hong Kong.
Session was a little weird. I started to lie face down and she seemed surprised, so I quickly turned face up. Massage was very brief, and then the haggling started. Ended up with her bringing out the girls for 50, but she tried hard for 60. Ending was good, but not great. It should have been better, but the haggling put me off a bit. No indication of a broader menu. I was probably out in 20. From the other reports, it sounds like she may have already moved on. That's too bad, because she was pretty cute and even a little flirty.
Last week I decided to try Milton. It's a little out of the way, but I did find it. The ad is a little confusing. You can actually get there from either of the streets they mention. If you come from the Milton side, look for a sign pointing to the back side of the building. I walked in for a $40 HH. Lucy was the only provider there. I'll call her a 6 or 7, but YMMV. Massage room was a little cold, but she did a nice job of draping areas she wasn't working on, so it made it a little better. Also, the ceiling must be thin, because I heard a lot of people walking around. Until I realized it was upstairs, it freaked me a little.
The massage was nice. Not the most therapeutic, but she had a habit of occasionally doing these very slow strokes that were sort of teasing in a way. After the flip, I actually got the "Where else do you want" question. I gave her some guidance and she started in without haggling or hesitation. Technique was good and I got OTC but was mostly blocked trying for UTC up top. Cleanup was nice and I got the full 30. I tipped 40. I might repeat if I was right in the area and was willing to pass on UTC, but I would probably wait for a warmer day.
I hit the Canterbury place late yesterday afternoon. I was met at the door by Lucy, who I would say was about 40'ish. Nothing was horrible; nothing was wonderful. Everything about the experience; face, body, clothes, cup size, massage skills, massage technique, English skills, attitude; absolutely everything was a shining example of Massachusetts mediocrity.
The place was nice and there was no haggling. She wasn't attractive enough to haggle.
Pretty much the same as Choir Boy but less generous! Place is nice enough, looks new inside. My room, in fact both rooms are parallel to the street so you hear the road traffic easily. I peg Lucy at 50 years old, maybe more, with a shape that does nothing for the hungry monger. Massage skills, if you want to call them skills, are a blend of amateur techniques that leave you waiting for and wanting a tease because not much else is happening, it was boring. Finish was better than nothing at all, nothing more. Definitely will not repeat.
By the way, the standards I use to evaluate an AMP go back to the 80's when one found an AMP in the yellow pages. Upon arrival you were quoted a fee and asked to undress, offered water, etc. A table shower and brief sauna was standard fare. The massage was typically extensive and soothing to the point of falling asleep with inquiries about room temperature, pressure, oil, lotion, tight spots, covering even toes and fingers until a faint tease was detected to see if you reacted. Upon confirmation of your level of interest (moans & sqirming for me) the teasing intensified including light breathes in the groin, licking, nibbling the ears, etc. Once at attention, maybe some of her clothes vanished and the options, according to where you were and in some cases who you were with, were offered. Agreement came quickly because the "demands" were fair and reasonable (not to mention her "hotness"). Softly spoken compliments and light kisses were the norm. BTW, the mamasan looked more like the women that we see around hear doing the masssages. Back then, everyone I saw was around 25-30, some older, some younger. After the deed (s) you got a brief additional massage, maybe the scalp or face, usually going up to and over a full hour. Next you got water or soda and help getting dressed including preparing all your clothes, putting on your socks, tying your shoe laces, etc. , Taking your hand, you were escorted to the exit with a smile, offered candy, kisses and sent off with "come back soon Honey." That was then, the above is now, ugggh.
[QUOTE=ChoirBoy;2004759]I hit the Canterbury place late yesterday afternoon. I was met at the door by Lucy, who I would say was about 40'ish. Nothing was horrible; nothing was wonderful. Everything about the experience; face, body, clothes, cup size, massage skills, massage technique, English skills, attitude; absolutely everything was a shining example of Massachusetts mediocrity.
The place was nice and there was no haggling. She wasn't attractive enough to haggle.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ARegularGuy;2006810]Pretty much the same as Choir Boy but less generous! Place is nice enough, looks new inside. My room, in fact both rooms are parallel to the street so you hear the road traffic easily. I peg Lucy at 50 years old, maybe more, with a shape that does nothing for the hungry monger. Massage skills, if you want to call them skills, are a blend of amateur techniques that leave you waiting for and wanting a tease because not much else is happening, it was boring. Finish was better than nothing at all, nothing more. Definitely will not repeat.[/QUOTE]This is why I usually make the run the rhody when possible. I'm tired of leaving these places disappointed and in RI the odds are much better that won't happen. I'm at the point now that I over-tip when I have a satisfying session. To me it's worth it.