Printable View
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/280f9c9e-e5a6-4ae1-9ea9-5e62c658f530[/URL]
From brazil. Said ppm was between 8 and 1 k. Said nah. She negotiated against herself down to 5. Apparently bouncing between hotels in baltimore and georgetown. For those who may be interested in the "real housewives" experience.
[QUOTE=Whistles;7170204]I've only ever paid for seeking in the past and it's been up or down (my last paid month I found a couple of winners but fewer hits than in the past.) If they follow through with the new requirements (send in a 360 scan of your head) I'll get away from seeking and try another site. Secret Benefits seems promising. There's a ton of overlap in women between the various sites.[/QUOTE]I've used both seeking and secret benefits. They both have their advantages and disadvantages; but let me tell you, it is super irritating when your on secret benefits and only respond to a verified profile who ends up turning into a babysitting scammer. Yes, while you can weed out more scam profiles, nothing prevents a verified account from only asking for gas and babysitting money without actually intending to meet.
My post about the advantages and disadvantages of each site with more details about the pros and cons of each is on the Baltimore page.
[QUOTE=TheCurve;7170960][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/280f9c9e-e5a6-4ae1-9ea9-5e62c658f530[/URL]
From brazil. Said ppm was between 8 and 1 k. Said nah. She negotiated against herself down to 5. Apparently bouncing between hotels in baltimore and georgetown. For those who may be interested in the "real housewives" experience.[/QUOTE]And she requires protection as well. She was very adamant about that.
[QUOTE=ProCatHunter;7171018]I've used both seeking and secret benefits. They both have their advantages and disadvantages; but let me tell you, it is super irritating when your on secret benefits and only respond to a verified profile who ends up turning into a babysitting scammer. Yes, while you can weed out more scam profiles, nothing prevents a verified account from only asking for gas and babysitting money without actually intending to meet.
My post about the advantages and disadvantages of each site with more details about the pros and cons of each is on the Baltimore page.[/QUOTE]Having used both as well as Sugar Daddy Meet, I'd say SB is clearly the worst and phoniest of the set. Wouldn't waste time on it again. The only thing it's good for is double-checking that a girl might be for real by virtue of having an account on both SB and Seeking.
Seeking is getting too weird and too expensive with its handling of stuff to ever go back; it'd have to be closer to a sure thing. Granted, all the women I ever met were off there (though many of them were reachable another way).
But I pulled more numbers and had more conversations, relative to what I spent and time committed, from SDM than either of the other sites combined. It's definitely a smaller pond, so there aren't the stone-cold lookers to find all the time, but at least the people there are people and they respond. You'll also find the sex worker in denial types, like Iranian Zara and some of the other Asians that are heavily reviewed here, on all three places, so SDM is definitely a way to meet some.
This one's wanting a 3 k ppm LOL. I asked if she meant as a monthly allowance or a ppm? She clarified as a ppm. Delusional.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7bfb6bde-2e15-43fb-b0f1-71b293f2e8eb[/URL]
[QUOTE=Dimples572;7171113]This one's wanting a 3 k ppm LOL. I asked if she meant as a monthly allowance or a ppm? She clarified as a ppm. Delusional.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7bfb6bde-2e15-43fb-b0f1-71b293f2e8eb[/URL][/QUOTE]Imagine marketing at that level with such basic low quality photos.
So if I've been talking to a girl and she shows up as "attractive member" in my inbox, does that mean she blocked me, or something else? Because I can't see her profile when I click on it.
But normally, other girls who have blocked me their picture / thumbnail doesn't even show up in the inbox, and it won't have the little chat box to send them a message. With this one, that box is still there.
What gives?
Also any guys with local Latina SB experience around here hit me up in my PM's please.
Thanks.
[QUOTE=MrFairfax;7171514]So if I've been talking to a girl and she shows up as "attractive member" in my inbox, does that mean she blocked me, or something else? Because I can't see her profile when I click on it.
But normally, other girls who have blocked me their picture / thumbnail doesn't even show up in the inbox, and it won't have the little chat box to send them a message. With this one, that box is still there.
What gives?
Also any guys with local Latina SB experience around here hit me up in my PM's please.
Thanks.[/QUOTE]They could have deleted their profile. It might also be the case that you get that if you have gotten blocked. If you really care, have a 2nd profile you can lot in on (not paid) to check. But she is lost to you one way or the other.
Someone just getting going on the site who hasn't chosen a profile name also gets attractive member assigned by default until they pick something.
[QUOTE=MrFairfax;7171514]So if I've been talking to a girl and she shows up as "attractive member" in my inbox, does that mean she blocked me, or something else? Because I can't see her profile when I click on it.
But normally, other girls who have blocked me their picture / thumbnail doesn't even show up in the inbox, and it won't have the little chat box to send them a message. With this one, that box is still there.
What gives?
Also any guys with local Latina SB experience around here hit me up in my PM's please.
Thanks.[/QUOTE]This isn't accurate based on my experience.
When you're blocked, and their account is still active, previous messages will remain in your inbox AND their username will remain.
When they have disabled their account, messages should still remain in your inbox, but that's when the username changes to "Attractive Member".
If they get banned / suspended, they will disappear from your inbox altogether, and there should be no trace of any interactions. This is also true if they choose to completely delete their account and their data, as opposed to just disabling.
There's some nuance to this, and there are some one off scenarios that don't fit into these three categories, but that covers most cases.
Wants $250 upfront for the "babysitter".
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5ee9683c-f8bf-45fc-a044-a07bdb5a7e3e[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fea73f42-14e0-4804-bc0d-aec237d8aea8[/URL]
Pics tripped on google search.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9f590817-15b6-4efd-96d1-b8c39e40c707[/URL]
Great body. Very very fun girl. Raw BJ covered fuck.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;7171823]Wants $250 upfront for the "babysitter".
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5ee9683c-f8bf-45fc-a044-a07bdb5a7e3e[/URL][/QUOTE]Her URL ID pops up on the Seattle boards earlier this month with a guy claiming she is fake and using photos from an IG girl.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7364e32f-d4f6-4e84-9bf6-c4282951cf8b[/URL]
Full on escort, and will share her escort ad. Says she just started a couple days ago. Good news is she is easy to setup since she's an escort. Bad news is she is clearly already very high volume, and potentially unreliable. Asked me three times in one day if I was available "tonight," each time forgetting she had already asked me. Then she texted me to cancel on our noon appointment that we never made, clearing getting me confused with someone else yet again. Getting all her johns mixed up this early on and canceling on some guy within an hour of an appointment made me opt out. She quoted escort rates of 200 ss, 300 hhr, and 400 hr.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/65b0356f-5114-441c-952e-f8ffa1202aeb[/URL]
Saw this girl 3-4 years ago, and she was slightly bigger than her photos imply even back then. She's using some of the same photos as back then and has blown up even more since. The concert photo I would guess is the most recent and representative. Wasn't a bad time back then, and considered reaching out again, but after looking her up, the extra size turned me off. Not to mentioned this whole preference for online thing is new.
Hey guys, I am somewhat new to seeking, but I just wanted to check with you boys that out of the girls who give you their number to take it to text, what percentage of them do you end up meeting with? I am trying to figure out if its something wrong with my approach or if its the fact I'm a younger (mid / late 30's) SD, or something else that's off. I've literally not been able to meet with a single girl out of 15 active text threads, one was willing to meet last night but she kinda pinged me out of the blue and she wasn't super attractive, and the whole "Can you meet right now and host" thing kinda threw me. I've heard Seeking is like pulling teeth, but 1/15 texting (on phone, not the app) -to-meet rate is pretty bad, no?
Thanks.