Escort Reports

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4859851]Fuck Fauci. He has publically contradicted himself several times about this virus.

How about just ask the girl herself if she's had the kung flu already, and recovered. If she has, ask her to show you a positive Abbott serum antibody test. Its covered by most drug programs, now available everywhere, and if she's positive and the test is at least 2 weeks old, you are good to go.

[URL]https://www.abbott.com/antibody-testing.html[/URL]

If she is antibody-positive, she cannot be a carrier. (Yes, its possible to test positive for antibodies but still not be immune. But that would be a first for a respiratory virus, and if prior exposure and development of antibodies can't prevent the disease as well as prevent carrier status, then there is no vaccine that would ever be expected to work, either. )[/QUOTE]Kung Flu? Really?

Hit up adultsearch and tried to find some locale Asian talent.

First Saugus (Red roof) - girl let me in. Ahh I've seen this girl before. She is older and got great looking. I just never got into it so I just said I left my cash in my car and left.

Next Woburn (Best Western) - Girl open door, was nice looking. Very petite and cute face. I was relieved.

I take off the clothes jump in bed. She makes me wear a mask. Fuck. It's already hot outside, last thing I want is a mask also that means no possibility of kissing. I already gave me cash away so I agreed.

Before I am even hard she puts the hat on and sucks for a bit. Not bad, but I wish more was done to keep me satisfied.

After maybe 5 minutes, she says fuck me. So we go mish and dammit. She is like a robot.

Just lays there no sound. Also tried to close legs so I don't go too deep. That's my issue with petite Asians. They cannot handle any decent sized cock.

So we go for a bit and I cannot get into it because she is so lifeless not to mention the mask is very uncomfortable making me sweat.

Switch to doggy and right away she closes legs again, I could tell I was not going to go like this. This lifeless sex kills me.

So she finishing with HJ, but took a while because I just wasn't feeling it and then she started to give me a death-grip. Had to tell her to chill out. Sucks because she is nice looking, but no personality. Didn't even say a word the whole time.

Deff not going to repeat and so not worth it. Wish I skipped. Waste of money.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4859450]I just dug up this picture from the first time I saw her, way back in 2002! (You will need to cut and paste the link, but it works.)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/107PIlnMvvPtow6M4vUvvg85GWa1qHkMn/view?usp=sharing[/QUOTE]Sorry I guess there was a problem with that link. Here is the 18 year old picture of her.

Do you generally pay extra to take pictures or do a video with an escort? How much is a fair price to offer?

[QUOTE=PewPewPewPew;4860954]Do you generally pay extra to take pictures or do a video with an escort? How much is a fair price to offer?[/QUOTE]Almost never. I've paid a nominal fee for a video shoot on some rare occasions--for example, I paid porn star Sammy Banks an extra 20 in an approx 200 dollar insemination session for videotaping. With other porn stars, like Chennin Blanc, I've done tapes of the CIPs for no extra charge. Occassionally, a backpage-quality girl will ask for a liitle extra--again usually never more than about 20 bucks. But 95% of the ones that allow taping did not upcharge--indeed, many are exibitionistic cumsluts, and actually get off while hamming it up for the camera. I rarely repeat more than once with a new hoe, but the absolutely stellar ones that I've been inseminating for many years, always let me videotape for no extra charge, and two of those actually really get off on it, big time.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4860980]Almost never. I've paid a nominal fee for a video shoot on some rare occasions--for example, I paid porn star Sammy Banks [/QUOTE]Is that Sammy Brooks (hot MILF)?

[QUOTE=STDKing;4860085]Between Fauci and random posters on a sex forum, I go with Fauci's advice.[/QUOTE]Suit yourself. But Fauci would actually agree 100% with what I posted about the Abbott serum antibody tests, and he indeed has. As the old saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4860986]Suit yourself. But Fauci would actually agree 100% with what I posted about the Abbott serum antibody tests, and he indeed has. As the old saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day.[/QUOTE]Nothing personal KingofFours, you give great advice when it comes to mongering. I just only heeding the experts on this one (still mongering but lately, the level of traffic I am seeing makes me think it is better to hold off for a while or find an equally cautious provider).

[QUOTE=STDKing;4860991]Nothing personal KingofFours, you give great advice when it comes to mongering. I just only heeding the experts on this one (still mongering but lately, the level of traffic I am seeing makes me think it is better to hold off for a while or find an equally cautious provider).[/QUOTE]The fact that antibody positivity is the best protection against carrying any respiratory virus, is actuallly NOT at all controversial. It is not disputed by Fauci nor any other of the so-called "experts", like Dr. Scarf, for example. (Hmmm, I wonder if SHE is a good lay? She used to be an army Colonel, you know!)

So, I would like to see those girls who have had the goddam kung flu and recovered, get the antibody test and show papers. And I think if more mongers would require them to show papers, indicating that they have had the virus and recovered and thus would not be expected, even by the so-calld "experts", to be carriers, that would be a very good thing for everyone, yes?

As for the "experts", just look up that 180 degree self-contraditory advice that Fauci gave over a less than 6 week period--regarding mask wearing, the safety of allowing flights to the USA from China, etc, etc. But that's all I'll say about that, on this board.

But here's an important query: Has anyone run across a hoe knowledgeable enough to offer to show serum antibody results? This is by far the more important issue here! Has anyone found a hoe offering to show such papers? Because I've yet to see it in any ads.

People are careless, they don't even want to wear a mask, what makes you think they would get a painful COVID 19 test just you can safely stick your dick somewhere?

I notice the websites are pulling the old ads of girls, some ads showed they were posted 3 hours ago but none of them would answer the text. That makes sense, girls who still see people they either too desperate for money, or they don't care about COVID 19. Either case is good news.

[QUOTE=JimXuper90;4861069]People are careless, they don't even want to wear a mask, what makes you think they would get a painful COVID 19 test just you can safely stick your dick somewhere?

[/QUOTE]You are probably mistaking the now ancient deep nasal PCR swab for the antibody test? The antibody test only requires blood be drawn in the usual manner, nothing painful.

As for providing tests "just so I can safely stick my dick somewhere": MANY girls require STD tests from mongers who want raw service. And some high end porn stars, especially on the west coast, have no problem providing their test results in return. So there is nothing new or unusual about testing for diseases before going commando with a hoe.

Dam I wish I was young again. Take the pill most of the time. Got doctor to prescribe and get For $30.00 at Cosco.

I believe she is at least mid 50's.

[QUOTE=SlickWilly007;4860183]"god knows no one her age would be able to" how old are we talking here!? Ahh you young whippersnapper. How I envy you-.

Don't confuse wetness with orgasms. Old broads can actually orgasm more because they are less shy and do what they like. They do dry up a bit -- but they are fixing that with hormone therapy.

But 40's are their peak usually!! While men are chomping blue pills to keep up!

End of sex ed lesson.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4861087]You are probably mistaking the now ancient deep nasal PCR swab for the antibody test? The antibody test only requires blood be drawn in the usual manner, nothing painful.

As for providing tests "just so I can safely stick my dick somewhere": MANY girls require STD tests from mongers who want raw service. And some high end porn stars, especially on the west coast, have no problem providing their test results in return. So there is nothing new or unusual about testing for diseases before going commando with a hoe.[/QUOTE]Always fun reading about you exploits KoF. Recent findings are discovering the antibody tests are false 1/2 the time so I wouldn't hang my hat on those quite yet. [URL]https://whdh.com/news/antibody-tests-for-covid-19-wrong-half-the-time-cdc-says/[/URL]. But, then again CDC has been all over the place during this pandemic about the testing and masks so who the hell knows.

Just got nominated to make a pick-up at Logan tonight at 8:30, with Cityxguide being down, does anyone know of a lady (s) on Rt 1, or very close that I could get in contact with for a QV on my way through? PM is fine. I have a regular I see in Revere but texted her and she's out for the weekend.

Thanks,

AMP.

[QUOTE=Aluver;4861142]Always fun reading about you exploits KoF. Recent findings are discovering the antibody tests are false 1/2 the time so I wouldn't hang my hat on those quite yet. [URL]https://whdh.com/news/antibody-tests-for-covid-19-wrong-half-the-time-cdc-says/[/URL]. But, then again CDC has been all over the place during this pandemic about the testing and masks so who the hell knows.[/QUOTE]Even Dr. Colonel Scarf thinks that the CDC is an ass! Just google her quotes from the old Trump / Pence Daily Briefings, a few months ago.

The criticism in that article you cited does not apply to the newer Abbott antibody tests, Roche's, as well as several others, which now have MUCH higher predictive values. Here is the relevant statement:

"Roche's recently authorized Elecsys test showed 100% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity across multiple antibody types, with a positive predictive value of 96.5% and a negative predictive value of 100% at 5% prevalence. Similarly, Abbott's Architect test for IgG antibodies showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99.6%, and positive and negative predictive values of 92.9% and 100%, respectively. Meanwhile, a separate, two-step ELISA test developed by clinical laboratories at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York showed a sensitivity and specificity of 92.5% and 100%, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 99.6%. ".

Reference: [URL]https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/fda-publishes-first-validation-results-12-covid-19-antibody-tests[/URL].

I'd be glad to discuss the technical aspects of this further. But for any more discussion of this, please move it to the STD thread, or to Massholes, or whatever--because this particular thread is supposed to be about discussing actual hoes, and where to find them, yes?!

So I'll repeat one more time: Wouldn't it be a GOOD thing if we educated the hoes, and got them interested in getting the antibody test if they have already had the Wuhan? ? NO test is perfect, but these serum tests are getting better and better!