Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=SolarisMan;6649341]Fair Enough!

But isn't that interesting that only all exclusive MW CGLA girls that advertise have AI generated or IG model photos? On the other hand, Maia photos, Iris photos and all others in west LA are the true photos although some of these photos are dated or have some photoshop in it!

I think by deduction reasoning, it is a fair to say that don't rely on any exclusive models from CGLA from MW area.[/QUOTE]I mean CGLA isn't the only booker that books these girls, so does GKS, Booker Gray, etc. Sounds like you just have something against CGLA, LOL.

I saw Kona for BBFS after reading good things about her here.

Keep in mind my only other reference for Korean agency girls is Sunny who I saw once.

I prefer Sunny in most areas, except one key area:

Kona has a to die for pussy. I'm talking super tight and grippy and when she flexes her Kegels you are in heaven. I usually don't have problems cumming too early but I did with her. I was able to hold off until 45 minutes in but I had to go super slow. And even not moving and being inside her if she even twitched her Kegels I would come. I think I pre-came a little bit early which helped take the pressure off.

My fav position with her was Missionary because she is very pretty and is a decent kisser (I think Sunny was better / more passionate) and it is where I can feel her tightness the most. It is where I started and finished.

BJ was ok. Nothing great.

Looks wise. Like I said she has a very pretty face. Body is thin, but her tits and ass are simply aged. Not great tits, not great ass. But if you are focused on missionary then it wouldn't matter anyway.

Also tried doggy, spooning and her riding me on the couch.

Nice girl. I'd probably repeat just to experience that kung fu pussy grip again.

Wrong thread

[QUOTE=ZebraZebra;6649487]I mean CGLA isn't the only booker that books these girls, so does GKS, Booker Gray, etc. Sounds like you just have something against CGLA, LOL.[/QUOTE]All bookers for all I know throughout the years said most of the time they never met the ladies and pictures are always provided to them.

So lets drop this what booker use real or fake, its not them, it's the girls, LOL.

Booker just doing the booking, all they know is the feedbacks from the customer said its really her or fake.

[QUOTE=RonStefou32;6649513]Looks wise. Like I said (Kona) has a very pretty face. Body is thin, but her tits and ass are simply aged.[/QUOTE]Body is thin? Does anyone know if she lost weight since her debut? I've always avoided because I was under the impression she was built like a keg.

[QUOTE=ZebraZebra;6649487]I mean CGLA isn't the only booker that books these girls, so does GKS, Booker Gray, etc. Sounds like you just have something against CGLA, LOL.[/QUOTE]

Sorry but I don't think that my message is getting crossed properly!

FYI, I do book through CGLA once in a while but I do not book any girl that she advertise in MW area just because I do not trust that section.

Vivian's boobs felt great in my hands, and my mouth. I didn't see the scars until we were in mish. After watching them shake like jello, I realized they were breast reduction scars, and not breast enlargement scars. She is one of the first Sawtelle specials I immediately considered seeing again.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6647870]She's is Zara (TER: 382103) from VF in the Bay who saw in May. Pretty face fairly depicted by pics. She has MM scars that run vertical which I found tacky and distracting.[/QUOTE]

Just a thought! The use of word "Baby" send me three subliminal message: A) Your penis is too big (even if it is not), so go slow, B) She is very young, C) She is very inexperienced.

Seasoned girls like Allie, Nina, Maia and Hana never use "Baby" in from their names.

First off, she is a little older but nonetheless sexy as fuck. She's tall, thin, and definitely gave off MILF vibes. PSE for sure and on top of that her menu includes Greek. Can confirm her ass is fucking tight. Could tell she genuinely enjoys servicing because her BBBJ got real sloppy and intimate especially with the rimming.

Fav position was most definitely doggy, she has an ass I was able to grab on and take full control of. POV was beautiful.

Can't wait for my next paycheck to spin back to re-live this experience.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b][blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a [u]Sexually Transmitted Disease[/u], this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.

STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.

Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

Any other Kgirls that offer Greek?? Seems rare.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6649646]All bookers for all I know throughout the years said most of the time they never met the ladies and pictures are always provided to them.

So lets drop this what booker use real or fake, its not them, it's the girls, LOL.

Booker just doing the booking, all they know is the feedbacks from the customer said its really her or fake.[/QUOTE]That's because the bosses in Asia are keeping all the talent LOL.

Kbliss Tuesday lineup.

Viki Iris BabyAi Maia Juni and Nina.

She had her simps in the Bay in her prime. You can find her at TER: 347163.

[URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/albak/[/URL]

Looks fairly cute with Ds and nice hips; supposedly real pics too.

Alba aka Baby Peach.

[QUOTE=MiamiHeat2020;6650516][URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/albak/[/URL]

Looks fairly cute with Ds and nice hips; supposedly real pics too.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MiamiHeat2020;6650516][URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/albak/[/URL]

Looks fairly cute with Ds and nice hips; supposedly real pics too.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=JohnHada;6650518]Alba aka Baby Peach.[/QUOTE]So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.

[QUOTE=JohnHada;6650518]Alba aka Baby Peach.[/QUOTE]Ah I hadn't seen baby peach- are the pics what she looks like?

I also saw baby peach listed seperately: https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babypeach/

Looks like it. I was debating whether to see her again when she went to GFE only. Now that she's back to BBFS, I'll be seeing her again.

The CG stats are more accurate. She is not 5'5. Probably 5'2. Breasts are likely Cs and not Ds.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6650547]So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.[/QUOTE]

Yes, for the most part. Of course, photosophed. She has a rounder face and not as pointy of chin. She is very cute.

[QUOTE=MiamiHeat2020;6650552]Ah I hadn't seen baby peach- are the pics what she looks like?

I also saw baby peach listed seperately: https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babypeach/[/QUOTE]

I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6650547]So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6649646]All bookers for all I know throughout the years said most of the time they never met the ladies and pictures are always provided to them.

So lets drop this what booker use real or fake, its not them, it's the girls, LOL.

Booker just doing the booking, all they know is the feedbacks from the customer said its really her or fake.[/QUOTE]I remember seeing a K-girl once and she asked me to see what pics of her were being used on the website because she had no idea, so it's not always the girls.

What needs to be dropped are the complaints about fake pics. Most of the girls don't want to use their real photos for obvious privacy reasons. There's no way in this universe they can be forced to reveal their identities lolol.

[QUOTE=InternDavid;6650796]I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.[/QUOTE]Just look on TER the girls constantly getting reviews are BB. I never understand why you would pay same price for GFE as bb when you can just go to an AMP and smash with a rubber.

[QUOTE=InternDavid;6650796]I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.[/QUOTE]BY Far BB girls are way more popular--especially BB no upcharge. GFE only girls generally struggle and end up touring whack cities.

[QUOTE=AsianAssEater;6650948]Just look on TER the girls constantly getting reviews are BB. I never understand why you would pay same price for GFE as bb when you can just go to an AMP and smash with a rubber.[/QUOTE]I always thought AMPs were old unattractive providers?

[QUOTE=InternDavid;6650796]I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.[/QUOTE]If all things are equal, then BB easily takes the cake. I would also argue that even if it's an upcharge, the BB girl will get slightly more business. BB has become so ubiquitous that it has forced some providers who were either GFE only or UTR BB into explicitly offering it to stay competitive and retain their average income stream from years prior. Only those that have superior looks, service, or a combination therefore have staved off going BB. The remaining girls dispersed to other areas where BB is less prevalent or hush hush. However, we're speculating where everything is equal so BB will either win outright or slightly lead. This is all based on my assumption that most guys will gravitate towards BB because it is unequivocally better than suiting up. Regardless of the platitudes warning of unprotected sex, a good portion of guys will still opt for it. Furthermore, this is supported by how active the BB threads are compared to the non-BB ones, the amount of reviews avalaible. Here and else where, and, most importantly, feedback from the girls and mongers themselves.

[QUOTE=MiamiHeat2020;6651134]I always thought AMPs were old unattractive providers?[/QUOTE]There are AMPs out there that do have decent lineups. Service aside, they can give most kgirls a good run for their money on looks.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6651185]There are AMPs out there that do have decent lineups. Service aside, they can give most kgirls a good run for their money on looks.[/QUOTE]Yep, there's a chain of AMP that run all along from Norcal to San Diego which has all the same girls just traveling throughout north and Socal. 150 for hot Chinese girls that all do BBBJ but no BBFS. I got tired of CfS so I did a little research and found Kgirls advertising their raw pussys and I've never looked back hahaha. Look up ocean spa in SD on RM if you interested in scoping it out. I recommend amber LOL.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6651182]If all things are equal, then BB easily takes the cake. I would also argue that even if it's an upcharge, the BB girl will get slightly more business. BB has become so ubiquitous that it has forced some providers who were either GFE only or UTR BB into explicitly offering it to stay competitive and retain their average income stream from years prior. Only those that have superior looks, service, or a combination therefore have staved off going BB. The remaining girls dispersed to other areas where BB is less prevalent or hush hush. However, we're speculating where everything is equal so BB will either win outright or slightly lead. This is all based on my assumption that most guys will gravitate towards BB because it is unequivocally better than suiting up. Regardless of the platitudes warning of unprotected sex, a good portion of guys will still opt for it. Furthermore, this is supported by how active the BB threads are compared to the non-BB ones, the amount of reviews avalaible. Here and else where, and, most importantly, feedback from the girls and mongers themselves.[/QUOTE]Also, a BB girl can and will do GFE, but a GFE girl is going to be much more selective about who they BB since it is UTR.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6651185]There are AMPs out there that do have decent lineups. Service aside, they can give most kgirls a good run for their money on looks.[/QUOTE]Please pray tell a few?

Kbliss wet humpday harlot lineup.

Viki Iris BabyAi Maia Juni and Nina (upcharge).

[QUOTE=JohnWDick;6649901]Any other Kgirls that offer Greek?? Seems rare.[/QUOTE]There is a few but they come and go, right now currently would be Jaehee, Nancy aka Silk, aka Red, besides that there's some that are currently touring or out of town so keep an eye out for Nabi, Lovely the short stubby one kinda looks like Nabi, there's Yoona if she ever comes back, Rika aka Suzie she's really hot probably currently in Japan also UTR Nana but anal with condom only there are more girls but I have not confirm you just have to ask every girl you see you never know unless you ask. Then there's rumors that my personal friends have done anal with but I have not confirm so it can be YMMV and the is Bon / Emma, Niya / Anna and Sienna.

[QUOTE=PlutoKiller;6646665]Juni is as good at deepthroating as Lovelyn.[/QUOTE]Juni's dt / ff is a lot of fun and not often found. It was a bit toothy tho. The top of my shaft was scrapped up by the end of the session. Maybe she was just at an awkward angle for a while. To her credit though, those scrapes we at the base of my ween so she took it all in. Don't get me wrong. I'll be back to see her again because it was worth it, just thought I'd see if anyone else had that issue.

Did the booker known as M (aka Michelle) merge her business into one of the other bookers? I have been a customer of theirs for many years, and my last appointment was end of August or early September. Booked something recently and they had changed to the same à la carte menu and prices as the other LA bookers. Best thing about M was the flat price and you knew what you were getting (no à la carte upcharges). Any insight would be appreciated.

Apologies if this topic was already covered. Have been dormant on these forums for a while.

Drew Cindy on this lovely afternoon as time was short and she had a window for a nice romp before I had to go back to the grind. She remembered me surprisingly though I do believe I'm fairly recognizable being an Asian with a sweet neck tat. We caught up a bit before hitting it off smoothly as she leaned in for a hard french kiss and mounted me while helping me undress. I want to say we could've looked like a cheesy early 2000's sex scene in a B-list action movie but I know I'm not the best looking but I allowed myself to enjoy the setup. She let me undress her and had me get reacquainted to her girls before washing me down. She's always had a nice preview BBBJ in the shower but this time, she threw in some Russian with a lot of suds that hit the right spot on the underside of my shaft. Told her to keep going and I think she saw my tell as she picked up the pace and made me pop the first time in her mouth.

I was still hard thankfully and was able to stay ready for the second round and got her to go in her favorite position, doggy style and rode her for a bit before letting her get on her back so I could continue searching for the bottom of her throat with my tongue. Always a nasty time with her and given the price of admission, I will continue to have her on my rotation.

[QUOTE=DaeWrong;6651641]If you have something or are not getting tested regularly please stay the hell away from this hobby. Some of you dirty mongers out there spreading shit.

This is my 2nd time catching CLAP at WLA in the last 6 months period and will be staying away or going covered from now. I hate that there are people out there that know WTF they have and are yet still going around infecting these lovely ladies which then spreads to others. Shame on you; you know who you are.[/QUOTE]Thank you for the info. Mark the WLA as red zone. Avoid!

[QUOTE=KGFever;6652136]Thank you for the info. Mark the WLA as red zone. Avoid![/QUOTE]Because non-upcharge BB attracts the low lifes. I have noticed some BB girls change to GFE-only lately.

[QUOTE=SlaterHind;6652034]Did the booker known as M (aka Michelle) merge her business into one of the other bookers? I have been a customer of theirs for many years, and my last appointment was end of August or early September. Booked something recently and they had changed to the same la carte menu and prices as the other LA bookers. Best thing about M was the flat price and you knew what you were getting (no la carte upcharges). Any insight would be appreciated.

Apologies if this topic was already covered. Have been dormant on these forums for a while.[/QUOTE]Sometime during COVID, she didn't have exclusives anymore and started to become one of many bookers who just happened to book for alot of girls. Any exclusivity she once had is gone and now all the girls can be booked by multiple places and the girls seem to set their own prices more or less.

[QUOTE=AsianAssEater;6652431]Its bound to happen at some point I'm pretty sure the majority of the bb crew that visit girls weekly don't test unless they see visible signs. Hey tho it's part of the game when you go raw with girls that take 5-10 creampies a day.[/QUOTE]True! However, at a certain point, one has to evaluate the Risk Vs Pleasure paradigm.

I have heard some background chatter on STD from a few mongers and I am not going to rehash those discussions here to publicly discuss the provider names because it is somehow speculation and I have no hard evidence at hand. And in addition, the board policy does not allow us to discuss this matter publicly and I am not going to get into it but I can unequivocally say that each one of us have different tolerance for risk and each one of us can evaluate what is right or what is wrong for each one of us independently.

Just good luck, be safe and stay vigilant about your health. That is the least you can do for yourself.

[QUOTE=DannyFknKay;6651926]Juni's dt / ff is a lot of fun and not often found. It was a bit toothy tho. The top of my shaft was scrapped up by the end of the session. Maybe she was just at an awkward angle for a while. To her credit though, those scrapes we at the base of my ween so she took it all in. Don't get me wrong. I'll be back to see her again because it was worth it, just thought I'd see if anyone else had that issue.[/QUOTE]Yeah I felt a little teeth with Juni but nothing crazy will still repeat eventually. Mini was the worst I ever had in terms of teeth but also a provider annoying me her mannersisms.