Sugar Daddy Sites

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4198966]Professional = pro. Uses any and all marketing tactics to get clients, as many as possible.

UTR. A pro on the down low. Uses the SD sites due to being busted on the street or some other bad experience.

SB = takes cash for sex (preferably monogamous, but no guarantees)(could be high or low mileage).

Non pro (conservative definition) = you are the first guy she has ever taken money from for sex.

Non pro (liberal definition) = may have taken money for sex a few times but still a novice (not hardened in any way).

Also an SB or non pro may want to do all the GF stuff and spend a bunch of time with you, get emotionally connected, etc. Something a pro or UTR is not likely to do. Its all very nuanced, but the bottom line is you can score a lot of very low mileage gals at good prices, many from middle class or even upper class homes. College girls galore, and girls with heavy sex fantasies, party girls, just all around fun girls. If that's what you want. Many guys do not for just as many reasons.

Today my SB/GF (not monogamous) says to me, "you never take me anywhere, every time I see you all we do is fuck"... Official GF status has kicked in. She doesn't ask for my cash, just the normal dating expenses, feels entitled to see me at least 3 times a week. etc. etc. When she was on allowance I saw her max once a week. Its all I could afford. But she wanted more, so she agreed to take less. Its all in the balance and where you want the pendulum to swing.[/QUOTE]I am very interested in having a sugar baby, or a few, but I am wary of it because with professionals, you basically make the decision that you want to go on a date, it costs a certain amount of money, and it's over. With a sugar baby, it seems like it is more of a long term arrangement in which you have to set aside a certain amount of money per month specifically, rather than going on dates as you feel like it.

Alas, I am very interested in the experience of having a sugar baby, as it seems to be a much safer arrangement than seeing professionals, and the nuances of it are quite appealing.

Even after laying it out for them on seeking, sometimes they still don't get it or are hoping for a miracle. As I never get overly explicit on the site.

HER
You'd pay 100 to meet me for a date to see if there's a connection?

ME
Pretty close. Email me at fuckme@email.com for the details. I like to make things as easy as possible.

Via email I will spell it out for her, one out of 3 or 4 take the T&C's.

[QUOTE=SWalkerRanger;4198974]I am very interested in having a sugar baby, or a few, but I am wary of it because with professionals, you basically make the decision that you want to go on a date, it costs a certain amount of money, and it's over. With a sugar baby, it seems like it is more of a long term arrangement in which you have to set aside a certain amount of money per month specifically, rather than going on dates as you feel like it.

Alas, I am very interested in the experience of having a sugar baby, as it seems to be a much safer arrangement than seeing professionals, and the nuances of it are quite appealing.[/QUOTE]Long term arrangements are very, very rare. Once you've had a girl once or twice, the appeal is diminishing very rapidly. In my experience less than 10% of all the girls you will meet will go beyond 1 month or a couple of meets. It takes an amazing gem to make it to the 6 or 12 months mark. As a paying customer your requirements will be higher for each meeting and you'll always wonder who else you can you meet with your hard-earned money (hey, a new toy!).

[QUOTE=EvilTmp;4199427]Long term arrangements are very, very rare...... In my experience less than 10% of all the girls you will meet will go beyond 1 month or a couple of meets. It takes an amazing gem to make it to the 6 or 12 months mark. [/QUOTE]This was the biggest surprise to me about SA. If you believe the bullshit the site pumps out, or the crap that gets posted on Reddit, you think that you have to commit to a monthly payroll. Absolutely nothing could be further from the truth. I would say it's a small percentage who are even looking for that, and even fewer who get it. The vast majority of girls are fine with PPM. Some of them prefer more of a "dating" interaction, where you don't give them cash but take them places and give them gifts. I prefer the simplicity of PPM, and am pretty sure that it is cheaper in the end.

The trick, the art, and in my opinion, part of the fun of the whole deal, is maneuvering them to the FC without acknowledging the P4 P aspect any more than you have to. This allows you to access girls who don't want to think of themselves as prostitutes. Done correctly, it enables you to nail a hot young girl who is very low mileage, trying really hard to make you feel good and who is not in a hurry. I just don't know where else I can get that.

[QUOTE=DogBert77;4199476]This was the biggest surprise to me about SA. If you believe the bullshit the site pumps out, or the crap that gets posted on Reddit, you think that you have to commit to a monthly payroll. Absolutely nothing could be further from the truth. I would say it's a small percentage who are even looking for that, and even fewer who get it. The vast majority of girls are fine with PPM. Some of them prefer more of a "dating" interaction, where you don't give them cash but take them places and give them gifts. I prefer the simplicity of PPM, and am pretty sure that it is cheaper in the end.

The trick, the art, and in my opinion, part of the fun of the whole deal, is maneuvering them to the FC without acknowledging the P4 P aspect any more than you have to. This allows you to access girls who don't want to think of themselves as prostitutes. Done correctly, it enables you to nail a hot young girl who is very low mileage, trying really hard to make you feel good and who is not in a hurry. I just don't know where else I can get that.[/QUOTE]There's a real disconnect between the marketing of SA and the reality. I've been on reddit and it was absolutely mind-blowing. All it is is girls snipping and sabotaging each other:

Girl 1: well all I do is a BJ once in a while and I get $400 every week.

Girl 2: giiiirl!, you're getting played! I get $1000 every week and all we do is shop and eat dinner.

Girl 3: you two are losers. I get a new BMW every single week and all I do is send him 1 text message per day.

And on, and on.

Meanwhile, all the guys are going: I pay $150 to maybe $300 for FS, multi-hours. I have no idea what all them bitches are talking about.

My only concern with sugar babes is that they are not true professionals. This might be good until things work well, but I wonder whether the lack of professionalism might come and bit you in the ass once the relationship is over, or if the sugar babe is not happy about the treatment you are giving her. Any experience with sugar babes blackmailing you after the relationship is over? Or calling you to get more money or telling you "I'll spill the beans with your wife or girlfriend"?

[QUOTE=EvilTmp;4199515]There's a real disconnect between the marketing of SA and the reality.[/QUOTE]Word. I don't think it's accidental. I think SA has two motivations: (1) avoid getting shut down; and (2) getting the girls on the site. They know if the girls are there, the paying members (men) will show up.

Really, our interests are aligned with SA on this. I don't want them to get shut down (and I don't think it's at all likely). And I do want the girls there, lots of them.

The problem is that for (1) SA has to pump out the marketing bullshit that it is a "dating" site, so naturally some girls show up expecting that. That is not that big a problem, just need to educate those girls on how the world works. I am happy to educate them with my dick. (2) is a bigger problem, because to get the girls on the site, they inflate their financial expectations enormously. Educating the girls about market prices is harder work and dicier.

But the combination of (1) and (2) has resulted in an absolute metric shit ton of tasty young girls on the site, so even though it makes our work harder, it's not all bad.

[QUOTE=EvilTmp;4199427]Long term arrangements are very, very rare. Once you've had a girl once or twice, the appeal is diminishing very rapidly. In my experience less than 10% of all the girls you will meet will go beyond 1 month or a couple of meets. It takes an amazing gem to make it to the 6 or 12 months mark. As a paying customer your requirements will be higher for each meeting and you'll always wonder who else you can you meet with your hard-earned money (hey, a new toy!).[/QUOTE]My average over the years has been 1 out of 30 girls makes it to LTR status.

[QUOTE=EvilTmp;4199515]There's a real disconnect between the marketing of SA and the reality. I've been on reddit and it was absolutely mind-blowing. All it is is girls snipping and sabotaging each other:

Girl 1: well all I do is a BJ once in a while and I get $400 every week.

Girl 2: giiiirl!, you're getting played! I get $1000 every week and all we do is shop and eat dinner.

Girl 3: you two are losers. I get a new BMW every single week and all I do is send him 1 text message per day.

And on, and on.

Meanwhile, all the guys are going: I pay $150 to maybe $300 for FS, multi-hours. I have no idea what all them bitches are talking about.[/QUOTE]Every girl has a one time story of some guy they (or a friend, or some girl they read about online) played and got lucky. I know of a few crazy true stories myself. But even the HEF only paid his girls 2k a month plus room and board. Which is a pretty hefty load (no pun intended) when you are talking about a dozen girls at a time. Not counting his x wife and two kids in that equation.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4199688]My average over the years has been 1 out of 30 girls makes it to LTR status.[/QUOTE]HWGuy wins the SA award for most successful downloads of all time. Damn I hope you keep a scrap book!

A) You should teach a course (is there still a Learning ANNEX?

B) Just curious are you a rain coat or BB kind of player? If I may ask when and how you determine to cover up or go BB?

[QUOTE=BigBadNut;4199915]HWGuy wins the SA award for most successful downloads of all time. Damn I hope you keep a scrap book!

A) You should teach a course (is there still a Learning ANNEX?

B) Just curious are you a rain coat or BB kind of player? If I may ask when and how you determine to cover up or go BB?[/QUOTE]I used to go bare. But after too many scares, I go covered. I dont really trust anyone anymore.

So I am taking a chance on a pepperdine freshman. A genuine NP looking for a first time experience. Lots of txting and planning required for this one. I am going to uber her to santa monica and go from there. She can think its a date. But for me its going to be an M&G. If she isn't enamored, then off she goes back to malibu.

But we already discussed the FC and she seems "excited". Her words. Hope she doesn't flake, as the date is like 10 days away. Hit her up her first day on the site. But I can see she logs on a lot. She could be off the site before I even get to see her. Meaning she is either long gone due to cold feet, or maybe just gets frustrated with the site, but not me. Lots of variables to contend with.

Talking to another NP, freshman at CSUN. I used to relish the chase to get a true NP. Not so much anymore. Usually the sex isn't as great. The txting and messaging is a lot more extensive. Most of the deals fall through. But I used to think it was the holy grail. For me any hot 18-20 is just fine, just no heavy drama please.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4200247]I used to go bare. But after too many scares, I go covered. I dont really trust anyone anymore.[/QUOTE]I did the math and figured post post that you had to. All these guys going BB are having to spend time at the free STD clinic and that's if you get lucky. I have had my share to not go bare now!

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4201118] I used to relish the chase to get a true NP. Not so much anymore. [/QUOTE]We appreciate you taking one for the team, HG. With the volumes you are running, I guess sticking your dick into a sweet, inexperienced, hot 18 year old college girl seems like work. Not sure if I'll ever get to that point. Not sure I want to. Personally, I still like the true NP's. I guess I'm just a neophyte.

[QUOTE=DogBert77;4201298]We appreciate you taking one for the team, HG. With the volumes you are running, I guess sticking your dick into a sweet, inexperienced, hot 18 year old college girl seems like work. Not sure if I'll ever get to that point. Not sure I want to. Personally, I still like the true NP's. I guess I'm just a neophyte.[/QUOTE]It is more work. My current SB/GF was 18 and 2 weeks when I met her. But she was a wild child. Pretty low mileage overall but not a pay to play virgin. After a year she stills needs a little warming up to take it balls deep. But no complaints. Here are the 2 ppm virgins I am courting rn. One pretty cute, the other not so cute but with a true spinner body. Both have agreed to the T&C's. But it don't mean a thing if they don't take my bling.

I agree two of the biggest risks SDs have with SBs is being blackmailed and dealing with a crazy scorned SB when the relationship ends or they feel they've been wronged.

Many escorts have migrated to Seeking . Com so the risks of being robbed or cash and dash associated with escorts is still there. There are examples of being blackmailed by escorts, but it is more common with SBs since they often have more access to your personal info.

The biggest risk for me in the bowl is the crazy psycho SBs. Many of these girls don't understand the competitive disadvantage they are at it the bowl, have never been rejected before and have unrealistic expectations of what they can demand in the bowl.

When I've rejected a hot young girl because I've found a better option they can go crazy and make crazy threats. In their anger, they may not think rationally and could be willing to put themselves at risk if needed to hurt me. A blackmailer is more rational and doesn't want to put themselves at risk and can be reasoned with.

[QUOTE=NewLit;4199526]My only concern with sugar babes is that they are not true professionals. This might be good until things work well, but I wonder whether the lack of professionalism might come and bit you in the ass once the relationship is over, or if the sugar babe is not happy about the treatment you are giving her. Any experience with sugar babes blackmailing you after the relationship is over? Or calling you to get more money or telling you "I'll spill the beans with your wife or girlfriend"?[/QUOTE]

After reading the reports it sounds like most of the SB action is through seeking and done with hefty screening, but worth it. If that's the case then it seems to me that a seeking membership is required to get SB traffic going for myself. True? It's quite pricey.

Hello gentlemen,

Does any of you guys met this girl?

I'm just about to sell my left kidney.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/370add69-afab-4440-86db-7876ebf2c99c[/URL]

Catholic Confession.

Confiteor. Mass prayer:

I confess to the almighty Bowl.

And to you, my brothers and babies.

That I have fucked nearly beyond my capacity.

In my bed and in a few hotels.

In who I have fucked and those I've failed to get to.

And I ask blessed Baby, Never virgin, all the babies and POTs.

And you, my seeking gals.

To wait for me for I will get to you.

Having such a great time, just couldn't help but write a little prayer about it.

[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4202099]Many of these girls don't understand the competitive disadvantage they are at it the bowl, have never been rejected before and have unrealistic expectations of what they can demand in the bowl.[/QUOTE]Except for the seasoned pros. This is 99% accurate. As there are always exceptions.

[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4202099]The biggest risk for me in the bowl is the crazy psycho SBs. Many of these girls don't understand the competitive disadvantage they are at it the bowl, have never been rejected before and have unrealistic expectations of what they can demand in the bowl.

When I've rejected a hot young girl because I've found a better option they can go crazy and make crazy threats. In their anger, they may not think rationally and could be willing to put themselves at risk if needed to hurt me. A blackmailer is more rational and doesn't want to put themselves at risk and can be reasoned with.[/QUOTE]Please tell us more. I would like details here. I've gone into the bowl super-hard and I'm in the shallow end of the non-pro pool, mostly searching 18-21, Asian and White. Don't these girls all have multiple dudes lined up to take our places? Why would they be so angry? Please share!

[QUOTE=SharpWanker;4202370]Hello gentlemen,

Does any of you guys met this girl?

I'm just about to sell my left kidney.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/370add69-afab-4440-86db-7876ebf2c99c[/URL][/QUOTE]She looks pricey for sure. GPS.

My SB / GF is a free spirit. Hope the neighbors don't go too crazy.

I tried, but she just seems to like attention.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4203632]My SB / GF is a free spirit. Hope the neighbors don't go too crazy.[/QUOTE]Do you only go after black SB's because they're cheaper or is it a sexual preference?

It was bound to happen one day. My live in (pic 2) caught me in bed with my SB/GF (pic 1) when she got home from work. Its not like she doesn't know (and they have crossed paths before in the living room). But I always schedule one around the other. But after our time in the FC we both fell asleep. It wouldn't have been so bad except she was sleeping on my live ins side of the bed. This led to a very quiet night at home last night.

Most likely my total living situation is going to change one way or the other fairly soon. I may move or just move her out. Either way its becoming a bit tiresome. And I have way overspent on no-tels in the last few months. If my income would just go back up, that would solve a lot of problems. But that's still somewhere down the road a few months.

Like my x brother in-law used to say "money won't solve all your problems, but it will definitely solve your financial problems". And most of the problems I have encountered in the bowl seem to circle around the cost of being in it.

[QUOTE=Blarharse;4204238]Do you only go after black SB's because they're cheaper or is it a sexual preference?[/QUOTE]It's my preference, I grew up in a mixed neighborhood and developed an appreciation for them at an early age. And they are certainly more affordable. I can get a much better looking black girl than a white one for what I spend. I would say its half the cost or less. There are some very pricey black girls out there ($$$ and up), but they are the 10's (looks and skills combined). Overall the black girls are physically superior in muscle tone and shape, and yes I think much prettier overall. And their skills and attitude in the FC are more chill and and adventurous as well. If I had more money I would just get hotter black girls, but I am sure I would venture out more to the latina, asian and white girls in that order. And no matter the race I would always lean towards the tanned or darker skinned ones. And hands down I love brown nips and pussy over pink. (but its all pink on the inside... lol).

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4204511]It's my preference, I grew up in a mixed neighborhood and developed an appreciation for them at an early age. And they are certainly more affordable. I can get a much better looking black girl than a white one for what I spend. I would say its half the cost or less. There are some very pricey black girls out there ($$$ and up), but they are the 10's (looks and skills combined). Overall the black girls are physically superior in muscle tone and shape, and yes I think much prettier overall. And their skills and attitude in the FC are more chill and and adventurous as well. If I had more money I would just get hotter black girls, but I am sure I would venture out more to the latina, asian and white girls in that order. And no matter the race I would always lean towards the tanned or darker skinned ones. And hands down I love brown nips and pussy over pink. (but its all pink on the inside... lol).[/QUOTE]I grew up in a mostly white neighborhood, but there weren't any cute white girls. There was a cute Latina and a rocking hot Italian girl (Who knew it very early). I have crushes on white girls and dated a number in 20's and 30's but I prefer dark skin women. Also, just my opinion but I don't find many of the white girls on seeking attractive. Like HG, if I had the capital, I would venture out but I have rarely been disappointed by and Latinas or Black girls. They are very passionate and love sex.

[QUOTE=LargeEss;4204805]I grew up in a mostly white neighborhood, but there weren't any cute white girls. There was a cute Latina and a rocking hot Italian girl (Who knew it very early). I have crushes on white girls and dated a number in 20's and 30's but I prefer dark skin women. Also, just my opinion but I don't find many of the white girls on seeking attractive. Like HG, if I had the capital, I would venture out but I have rarely been disappointed by and Latinas or Black girls. They are very passionate and love sex.[/QUOTE]And they come into their own at an earlier age. By 18 many of them are already fairly experienced. And very open to learn more. I am old enough to say inter-racial dating wasn't really allowed when I was in high school. It may have been legal, but everyone was against it. But as soon as I graduated that changed fast (although it was always on the down low). And when i moved to cali, the doors flung wide open. lol ... I mean no one really gives a shit what you do out here. I live on an all white street (except for one black guy, who of course only dates white girls), so my neighbors have seen plenty, but I think they are more surprised about their ages than their race. Mostly older married couples over here. Gay and straight. But all white.

After reading quite a few posts about guys being banned. I am pretty sure the girls making most of the complaints are white girls, the prissy little things that they are, so easily offended. JMHO.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4204511]It's my preference, I grew up in a mixed neighborhood and developed an appreciation for them at an early age. And they are certainly more affordable. I can get a much better looking black girl than a white one for what I spend. I would say its half the cost or less. There are some very pricey black girls out there ($$$ and up), but they are the 10's (looks and skills combined). Overall the black girls are physically superior in muscle tone and shape, and yes I think much prettier overall. And their skills and attitude in the FC are more chill and and adventurous as well. If I had more money I would just get hotter black girls, but I am sure I would venture out more to the latina, asian and white girls in that order. And no matter the race I would always lean towards the tanned or darker skinned ones. And hands down I love brown nips and pussy over pink. (but its all pink on the inside... lol).[/QUOTE]In other words, non pro black gals, who are actually pros, are cheaper.

Her: Do you want to go again?

Me: Yep.

Her: Does that mean I have to take another Plan B?

Facepalm. Haaaa! I love these girls.

Silly question. Does [URL]seeking.com[/URL] accept prepaid debit cards and do they work? They seem to indicate that I need a debit card that accepts international charges so I was not sure. Can't exactly put it on the credit card.

[QUOTE=PriscillaM;4205084]In other words, non pro black gals, who are actually pros, are cheaper.[/QUOTE]Sorry your feigned ignorance on this topic has to be continually repeated. Your question makes me question your reason for even being here. Other than a real resentment against anyone who has courted and bagged an NP first timer. A pro is a pro and a non pro is a non pro. You can't be both at the same time.

But pretending for a moment that you are just ignorant on the topic (and for any truly new people that might be and want clarity) I will post it one more time. A non pro is a girl who prior to you giving it to her, has not received money for sex at any time in the past. So in the courting stage of trying to get her affection she is a non pro. Once you give her the money she is no longer a non pro in the strict definition of the word (more on this later)**. She then becomes what is known in general parlance on this thread as a SB. SB stands for sugar baby. A girl that gives sexual favors for sugar/money. Which then puts her in the pro status. Are we clear now... or should it be repeated yet again?

**In some other threads and even this one, people will continue to refer to a girl as a non pro in her very early forays into the pro world. These are very low mileage girls that still give off that barely driven scent of naivete that many guys crave that hit the SD sites. and thanks for listening

So now to answer your question had it been worded correctly... non pro black gals are cheaper than non pro white gals... and pro black gals are cheaper than pro white gals. BTW, you may have noticed that this site is called "Sugar Daddy Sites". A sugar daddy is a guy that pays for sex. There is a local non pro thread on this site. Maybe you would be happier posting there?

I am so bored now that I have to take a nap. Maybe the tempo will pick up after I awake from all this sarcasm.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;4205150]Sorry your feigned ignorance on this topic has to be continually repeated. Your question makes me question your reason for even being here. Other than a real resentment against anyone who has courted and bagged an NP first timer. A pro is a pro and a non pro is a non pro. You can't be both at the same time.

But pretending for a moment that you are just ignorant on the topic (and for any truly new people that might be and want clarity) I will post it one more time. A non pro is a girl who prior to you giving it to her, has not received money for sex at any time in the past. So in the courting stage of trying to get her affection she is a non pro. Once you give her the money she is no longer a non pro in the strict definition of the word (more on this later)**. She then becomes what is known in general parlance on this thread as a SB. SB stands for sugar baby. A girl that gives sexual favors for sugar/money. Which then puts her in the pro status. Are we clear now... or should it be repeated yet again?

**In some other threads and even this one, people will continue to refer to a girl as a non pro in her very early forays into the pro world. These are very low mileage girls that still give off that barely driven scent of naivete that many guys crave that hit the SD sites. and thanks for listening

So now to answer your question had it been worded correctly... non pro black gals are cheaper than non pro white gals... and pro black gals are cheaper than pro white gals. BTW, you may have noticed that this site is called "Sugar Daddy Sites". A sugar daddy is a guy that pays for sex. There is a local non pro thread on this site. Maybe you would be happier posting there?

I am so bored now that I have to take a nap. Maybe the tempo will pick up after I awake from all this sarcasm.[/QUOTE]I am going to guess that the majority of the girls I have met on Seeking have been nps until we did the deed. A slim majority but still. One reason I suspect this is I try to get them when they are first on the site. The first few days. My long term I met the first day she was one the site. She never met anyone else. I have another like that that I have never given more that transportation money. One that I never gave a dime to. A few more that I paid but they admitted it was there first time with an older guy. I have had plenty of utrs and some straight out pros. I think their are more NP's on their than you think, but you have to be looking for the girl next door type. Maybe a little heavier than you like. The knockouts are pros. I had two that were models and had arrangements before but I don't think they were hitting every guy that was interested. The spectrum of experience is vast.

[QUOTE=LargeEss;4205345]One reason I suspect this is I try to get them when they are first on the site. The first few days. My long term I met the first day she was one the site. She never met anyone else. [/QUOTE]The girl I live with, same story. Met her six years ago, dated for a year, then she had a couple of GF's in between, now back with me for the last 2 years. My current SB/GF stopped taking my sugar 3 months ago, but still dates for cash to cover her expenses. Like you said. Lots of nuances. I used to chase those NP's all out. And still do, but just casually. Low mileage (GFE) is good enough for me or any seasoned pro willing to show some real affection (rare but it happens).

I'm certainly not new at this, but it drives me nuts when some one does short hand with a description. Where's the urban dictionary for this stuff located?

What does, FC, mean or stand for??

[QUOTE=FrontPage;4206172]I'm certainly not new at this, but it drives me nuts when some one does short hand with a description. Where's the urban dictionary for this stuff located?

What does, FC, mean or stand for??[/QUOTE]FC = Fuck Chamber. The place you take your SB to fuck her. There is a tab for abbreviations in toolbar at top, but inexplicably it leaves out this very popular one.

21. There are a huge number of very short girls on SA. I can't believe how many 4'11" and under chicks are listed. I've seen 4'6" for fuck's sake. Maybe it's because I'm searching a lot of Asians but, Lordy.

22. There is a rising tide of tranny listings and two-girls-at-once listings on SA.

23. There is a small percentage of girls whose profiles keep disappearing and re-appearing under different names with the same photos and profile info. Either they are scammers and want to avoid the blocks which they are getting or they're getting shut down for breaking the rules and need to come back in under a different name.

24. When a girl posts a photo of herself in a bathroom mirror and there is an open toilet in the shot, she is completely self-obsessed. She literally doesn't notice that she's featuring a shit bucket in her photo because she only sees herself.

25. There are an annoying number of SB profiles with "Platonic" tags and it's impossible to tell without spending valuable time questioning whether the tag is just there to give them plausible deniability if they are ever charged or whether it's genuine. The genuine ones irritate the shit out of me. You want me to pay you a monthly fee to take you to lunch? Are you out of your fucking mind?

26. There is a small but annoying number of accounts who DM you from a distant location and then try to sell you nude photos. Who would fall for that?

27. There is a Venmo scam where an account with pix of a hot-looking local girl quickly agrees to see you and claims to be pretty close to you. She says that she needs a token of good will so please Venmo her a few dollars for gas money. She doesn't specify how much, so it seems like a harmless ask, but the "girl" rakes in $5-20 per sucker and then disappears. It's a volume business for the guy running the scam.

28. If a chick only has one profile pic and it doesn't show her face, she is either surprisingly ugly or surprisingly pretty. The ugly ones do it for obvious reasons. The pretty ones do it because they are genuinely afraid of being recognized and are trying to keep what they're doing on the DL.

29. If a chick's profile has a picture of her doing the splits, it's a very good sign.

30. An annoyingly large number of accounts show L. A. As the location of the SB when they actually live somewhere else. They claim to want to move to L. A. Or they just moved away from L. A. , but what they're really trying to do is get you to fly them to L. A. And they sucker you in with the L. A. Tag. I instantly block anyone who pulls this shit.