-
[QUOTE=Mythbuster;6208191]Thanks Pleck and Ken Allen, that's some good info. I'm adding a picture so people know who we're talking about. Do you guys think this an old picture? In general were there any red flags in her new private pictures or just a matter of not being your cup of tea? I get the impression that she's pretty smart, but it's curious why someone seemingly well educated and capable of getting a good job would be at this for so long. The anything goes does have me interested. Are we talking BBFS or ball gags and Greek? PM me if you want to keep anything off the boards.[/QUOTE]That pic is from years ago.
She's not bad looking and has an average body.
At the time I just didn't want to drop 300 on her.
And I tend to avoid anyone in seeking who has been around for years.
I preferred new talent.
BBFS was definitely available. Not sure other kinks.
But I will say when I was active 5-7 years ago, almost everyone I met was fine with bbjcim and BBFS.
Few exceptions.
It was incredible. The number of single moms and college coeds that we're willing to meet for $100.
Those days are over.
-
4 photos
[QUOTE=KenAllen;6208215]That pic is from years ago.
She's not bad looking and has an average body.
At the time I just didn't want to drop 300 on her.
And I tend to avoid anyone in seeking who has been around for years.
I preferred new talent.
BBFS was definitely available. Not sure other kinks.
But I will say when I was active 5-7 years ago, almost everyone I met was fine with bbjcim and BBFS.
Few exceptions.
It was incredible. The number of single moms and college coeds that we're willing to meet for $100.
Those days are over.[/QUOTE]Long time lurker, first time caller.
I had a meet and great with her a couple years ago. Works from home in the computer science field. Was a very awkward lunch and she was not very attractive to me. Her are a few of her current picts. Didn't have these picts when I met her. Definitely suggest some kink potential to me.
-
[QUOTE=PhillYogynist;6208404]Long time lurker, first time caller.
I had a meet and great with her a couple years ago. Works from home in the computer science field. Was a very awkward lunch and she was not very attractive to me. Her are a few of her current picts. Didn't have these picts when I met her. Definitely suggest some kink potential to me.[/QUOTE]Hmm interesting, awkward computer nerd with a secret life. Pictures look ok but she doesn't seem to be smiling much. Are the pictures deceptive? Weird proportions? Looks like she has a nice rack for a small girl!
-
[QUOTE=Mythbuster;6208741]Hmm interesting, awkward computer nerd with a secret life. Pictures look ok but she doesn't seem to be smiling much. Are the pictures deceptive? Weird proportions? Looks like she has a nice rack for a small girl![/QUOTE]The first pic of her is like 7-10 years old.
She sent me multiple nudes couple years ago but I never saved them.
At least you know she's real and not a scammer or selling pics.
-
[QUOTE=KenAllen;6208770]The first pic of her is like 7-10 years old.
She sent me multiple nudes couple years ago but I never saved them.
At least you know she's real and not a scammer or selling pics.[/QUOTE]Good Point! I'll keep her in the mix! I've gotten a couple of other nibbles from some newbies rookies, closer to home. You can always tell when they want to know what you look like more than how much you're paying!
-
Some SA profiles
File under "FWIW". (I meant to originally post this here but somehow started a new thread that I'm trying to delete).
Maymia.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-c94e2e7349b3[/URL]
I think this is a fake profile because she's "new", she "favorited" me back without viewing my profile, asked me my name in her first response after I had already given one -- which I pointed out -- and her reply didn't even reference that slip up. Instead, I got what looked like a canned response asking for my phone number -- again, without asking to view my photos. This usually means that they disappear after they get the number. If she's still around after a few days, I might try again.
Chanelbabe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Attractive Asian. She can host, but it's in Voorhees. I asked rate and she bounced it back to me so she can probably be had for $300 or less. I'll keep her in my back pocket for a bit because the logistics of Voorhees aren't great right now.
Babydoll.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Real, attractive and responsive. I don't know about hosting because our correspondence took an almost immediate turn to platonic. Hard to explain. Maybe part of it was some familiarity / too close for comfort and maybe it was because I'm 50. But very cool and needs financial help according to her profile.
Notorious Bunny.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a...3-9ecc19f7a38b[/URL]
Apparently, she's "bored" and her description seems TGTBT. I sent a brief intro and got what seemed to be an auto reply asking for my photos. No narrative. That -- like an immediate request for a phone # -- usually leads to them blocking / disappearing immediately after you provide access to pictures. I guess you can make money by selling photos to help the website create fake profiles somewhere else in the country. Pass.
Isabella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9...2-369a650a3baf[/URL]
Comes right out with the banner line, "Fetish Much? She's apparently in Quakertown. She was responsive. I think she's real, but it seems like she wants clients for fetish only. I had good correspondence but kind of let it fade. I'm posting this because I've seen some interest in the topic over the last week or so.
Pleaser.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-75b5f3a0de16[/URL]
Although her profile pics are nothing like Isabella's, my description is almost exactly the same. The only difference is that Pleaser seems to move around quite a bit, so I'm a little suspect.
Kourtney.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b...9-caa5f4185d47[/URL]
If this is a re-tread, I apologize. Attractive, responsive, expensive and cannot host. So I faded. Very nice though.
Cheeky Babe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-aab2dc452b33[/URL]
This one had a canned auto reply which was not responsive to my fairly specific intro. Probably fake.
Izzybella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-73a6bf57168a[/URL]
Got off to a great start with this one. Verified with local knowledge, but she didn't respond to my follow up message so I didn't push it. She's promising though.
Sinfully Sweet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-1ff8ea6d7562[/URL]
She's real. This started out good too but it's safe to say that we faded each other. So I don't have the details of hosting or cost. But she's real if you like her looks.
Cupcake.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2...8-c96418e93148[/URL]
48 year old hardbody cougar. Also has a profile on SB. Didn't get far with her but didn't press it either because she edited her profile to (over) emphasize that she's looking for a wealthy man to spend his money on her. She might be over-valuing since she's been on both sites for a couple months.
Miscellaneous. If you see a profile of a curvy 39 year old brunette from Montgomeryville, I think she's real. We had a good correspondence and she had local knowledge. Which is why I think she was real. She stated a preference to go slow. I wrote that I was fine with that and then. Blocked. Or she deactivated. Whatever.
I understand there's not a lot of concrete information here, but it could save you time or give you a lead. Good luck.
-
[QUOTE=Pleck2;6209756]File under "FWIW". (I meant to originally post this here but somehow started a new thread that I'm trying to delete)....[/QUOTE]Unsure if just me, but 0 of those links worked for me. All gave the Profile Not Available message.
-
No profiles are active
[QUOTE=Pleck2;6209756]File under "FWIW". (I meant to originally post this here but somehow started a new thread that I'm trying to delete).
Maymia.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-c94e2e7349b3[/URL]
I think this is a fake profile because she's "new", she "favorited" me back without viewing my profile, asked me my name in her first response after I had already given one -- which I pointed out -- and her reply didn't even reference that slip up. Instead, I got what looked like a canned response asking for my phone number -- again, without asking to view my photos. This usually means that they disappear after they get the number. If she's still around after a few days, I might try again.
Chanelbabe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Attractive Asian. She can host, but it's in Voorhees. I asked rate and she bounced it back to me so she can probably be had for $300 or less. I'll keep her in my back pocket for a bit because the logistics of Voorhees aren't great right now.
Babydoll.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Real, attractive and responsive. I don't know about hosting because our correspondence took an almost immediate turn to platonic. Hard to explain. Maybe part of it was some familiarity / too close for comfort and maybe it was because I'm 50. But very cool and needs financial help according to her profile.
Notorious Bunny.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a...3-9ecc19f7a38b[/URL]
Apparently, she's "bored" and her description seems TGTBT. I sent a brief intro and got what seemed to be an auto reply asking for my photos. No narrative. That -- like an immediate request for a phone # -- usually leads to them blocking / disappearing immediately after you provide access to pictures. I guess you can make money by selling photos to help the website create fake profiles somewhere else in the country. Pass.
Isabella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9...2-369a650a3baf[/URL]
Comes right out with the banner line, "Fetish Much? She's apparently in Quakertown. She was responsive. I think she's real, but it seems like she wants clients for fetish only. I had good correspondence but kind of let it fade. I'm posting this because I've seen some interest in the topic over the last week or so.
Pleaser.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-75b5f3a0de16[/URL]
Although her profile pics are nothing like Isabella's, my description is almost exactly the same. The only difference is that Pleaser seems to move around quite a bit, so I'm a little suspect.
Kourtney.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b...9-caa5f4185d47[/URL]
If this is a re-tread, I apologize. Attractive, responsive, expensive and cannot host. So I faded. Very nice though.
Cheeky Babe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-aab2dc452b33[/URL]
This one had a canned auto reply which was not responsive to my fairly specific intro. Probably fake.
Izzybella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-73a6bf57168a[/URL]
Got off to a great start with this one. Verified with local knowledge, but she didn't respond to my follow up message so I didn't push it. She's promising though.
Sinfully Sweet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-1ff8ea6d7562[/URL]
She's real. This started out good too but it's safe to say that we faded each other. So I don't have the details of hosting or cost. But she's real if you like her looks.
Cupcake.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2...8-c96418e93148[/URL]
48 year old hardbody cougar. Also has a profile on SB. Didn't get far with her but didn't press it either because she edited her profile to (over) emphasize that she's looking for a wealthy man to spend his money on her. She might be over-valuing since she's been on both sites for a couple months.
Miscellaneous. If you see a profile of a curvy 39 year old brunette from Montgomeryville, I think she's real. We had a good correspondence and she had local knowledge. Which is why I think she was real. She stated a preference to go slow. I wrote that I was fine with that and then. Blocked. Or she deactivated. Whatever.
I understand there's not a lot of concrete information here, but it could save you time or give you a lead. Good luck.[/QUOTE]Hey Pleck- I clicked on like 5 of these, none were active. Maybe repost?
-
You copied all of the links incorrectly.
[QUOTE=Pleck2;6209756]File under "FWIW". (I meant to originally post this here but somehow started a new thread that I'm trying to delete).
Maymia.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-c94e2e7349b3[/URL]
I think this is a fake profile because she's "new", she "favorited" me back without viewing my profile, asked me my name in her first response after I had already given one -- which I pointed out -- and her reply didn't even reference that slip up. Instead, I got what looked like a canned response asking for my phone number -- again, without asking to view my photos. This usually means that they disappear after they get the number. If she's still around after a few days, I might try again.
Chanelbabe.[/QUOTE]
-
Re: not active
[QUOTE=PokerShark11;6209845]Hey Pleck- I clicked on like 5 of these, none were active. Maybe repost?[/QUOTE]That's weird. I will say that, coincidentally, the one that I thought was TGTBT (Notorious Bunny) became inactive at some point this afternoon, but the rest are still there. I'll try to repost the links as you suggest. I retrieved the links from the original source, which means they work. If they don't work -- or come up as inactive -- it's probably an issue on your end. Good luck.
Maymia (update, she has since viewed my profile after I haven't responded to her knee jerk request for my phone number, but I'll wait).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/45c2c4e6-f5fc-4df1-bd5b-c94e2e7349b3[/URL]
Chanelbabe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a0dc56f-7d31-47f3-943d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Babydoll.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e6a48b69-0a1c-45db-97a4-e262b5b39697[/URL]
Notorious Bunny -- coincidentally (or not) blocked me or deactivated not long after I posted her link.
Isabella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9b11cd85-5448-416f-b622-369a650a3baf[/URL]
Pleaser.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cad92cb7-97d6-4712-b161-75b5f3a0de16[/URL]
Kourtney.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b3b0716c-64e7-4b37-8bd9-caa5f4185d47[/URL]
Cheeky Babe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b248c0a1-ddf1-415b-928e-aab2dc452b33[/URL]
Izzybella (who logged on today after a brief break to add some good photos).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/384a0116-ac17-4e43-927d-73a6bf57168a[/URL]
SinfullySweet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3fc80f47-f51c-48be-b290-1ff8ea6d7562[/URL]
Cupcake.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/24e76595-69f2-4da3-ada8-c96418e93148[/URL]
Miscellaneous: I now remember the 39 year old 's name was DeeDee.
-
[QUOTE=Pleck2;6209917]That's weird. I will say that, coincidentally, the one that I thought was TGTBT (Notorious Bunny) became inactive at some point this afternoon, but the rest are still there. I'll try to repost the links as you suggest. I retrieved the links from the original source, which means they work. If they don't work -- or come up as inactive -- it's probably an issue on your end. Good luck.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the intel! The new links are working. I think the problem is when you copy / pasted it copied the trimmed links with the ellipses in it.
-
[QUOTE=Pleck2;6209917]That's weird. I will say that, coincidentally, the one that I thought was TGTBT (Notorious Bunny) became inactive at some point this afternoon, but the rest are still there. I'll try to repost the links as you suggest. I retrieved the links from the original source, which means they work. If they don't work -- or come up as inactive -- it's probably an issue on your end. Good luck.
Maymia (update, she has since viewed my profile after I haven't responded to her knee jerk request for my phone number, but I'll wait).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/45c2c4e6-f5fc-4df1-bd5b-c94e2e7349b3[/URL]
Chanelbabe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a0dc56f-7d31-47f3-943d-777220e40f1b[/URL]
Babydoll.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e6a48b69-0a1c-45db-97a4-e262b5b39697[/URL]
Notorious Bunny -- coincidentally (or not) blocked me or deactivated not long after I posted her link.
Isabella.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9b11cd85-5448-416f-b622-369a650a3baf[/URL]
Pleaser.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cad92cb7-97d6-4712-b161-75b5f3a0de16[/URL]
Kourtney.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b3b0716c-64e7-4b37-8bd9-caa5f4185d47[/URL]
Cheeky Babe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b248c0a1-ddf1-415b-928e-aab2dc452b33[/URL]
Izzybella (who logged on today after a brief break to add some good photos).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/384a0116-ac17-4e43-927d-73a6bf57168a[/URL]
SinfullySweet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3fc80f47-f51c-48be-b290-1ff8ea6d7562[/URL]
Cupcake.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/24e76595-69f2-4da3-ada8-c96418e93148[/URL]
Miscellaneous: I now remember the 39 year old 's name was DeeDee.[/QUOTE]Wow a wealth if intel! Thanks! And not to hate on anyone's tastes, but finally some women that I actually find attractive enough to spend money on!
-
[QUOTE=Mythbuster;6208741]Hmm interesting, awkward computer nerd with a secret life. Pictures look ok but she doesn't seem to be smiling much. Are the pictures deceptive? Weird proportions? Looks like she has a nice rack for a small girl![/QUOTE]Couple months ago. Body was nice. Great tits. But smelled like cigs with stank breath. BBBJ and BBFS are on table. Didn't advance to anything more. Mechanical. Can't host. Wouldn't repeat.
-
SA profiles
[QUOTE=Glhfddka;6210231]Wow a wealth if intel! Thanks! And not to hate on anyone's tastes, but finally some women that I actually find attractive enough to spend money on![/QUOTE]You're welcome. "To each his own" as far as other commenter's tastes and preferred cost and environment are concerned. I like quality and comfort over quantity and feeling nervous about my surroundings. So, I'm constantly on the hunt on SA for someone attractive and close, who can host. If I could get one (or two) of those, I would be happy to delete or pause my subscription. But that's why I have a little info on a lot of profiles. I have a few sure things that are good and reliable, just not exactly what I'm looking for. And, if I find myself in a rut or run-around on SA, I make a date with a visitor on eros. Which I might end up doing exclusively over SA because it's just easier and I don't get pulled into their personal lives. Which has happened a handful of times on SA. And it sucks.
-
[QUOTE=PokerShark11;6206843][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5b0776cb-cec6-4ea1-8481-0dbb62916343[/URL]
Has anyone had any luck? Finally got a reply from her. Wondering if she's definitely into meeting.[/QUOTE]Yes, I got reply too. She asked to see pictures and answered a few general questions but nothing about meeting yet. Really short answers without elaboration. She does seem to be on often so maybe she's got a lot of sticks in the fire.
