Massage Parlor Reports

I am in agreement with you. I have had little time too talk it through with Lindsy and help her. Yes I believe she is throwing up her hands and she was not doubt intimidated yesterday. The irony of it all is she is one of a few that really gives a good honest massage and does not want to do extras.

[QUOTE=Top Floor; 1874615]Here's Arlington's requirements, effective November 1.

[url]http://www.arlingtonma.gov/Public_Documents/ArlingtonMA_Health/tanning/Bodyworkegs.pdf[/url]

Regarding Bedford, I'm amazed and wonder what legal right they have in doing what they did. I couldn't find anything posted on the town's website if they are going to start regulating bodywork like Arlington & Newton do. To just walk into a place and say you have to close and you can stop paying rent? What about the rent they already paid? Do you really think a landlord is going to give them back the remainder of Septembers rent that they already paid when they can't operate the business anymore? And most, if not all of the owners, will simply throw up their hands and say ok and walk away and not question the legality of what the town is doing. What if a place is legit? Just because they're Asian they're being targeted? We might as well go back to the days when businesses had "NINA" signs posted.

]My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MongerExpert;1870310]Don't mislead other non-mongers. 10. 40 is acceptable. Anything else is ridiculous. 50+, no way why? 50 is ridiculous. If everyone was like me it would be 40 w / UTC no problem, otherwise 10-20, with hh or hour, see'mon with utc 40, otherwise 10-20. UTC depends as well. The therapists don't give a sh.[/QUOTE]What about the Thai places that charge $80 at the door? Is $40 of or does that get bumped up to $50? I stay firm on $40 for HR and $60 for BJ unless it was over and above (gave Coco in CT 50 for going 1 hour plus and taking gret care of me throughout).

[QUOTE=Ledger6969;1873001]Anybody try this place lower level hair salon with massage rooms in the back. The former 2 pop Susan was there for years and years the owner has been very successful flying under the radar for quite sometime.[/QUOTE]You asked this question in post #14186, I gave you an answer. Then in post #14188, you answer your own question, and again in post #14206, you give another answer. Then in post #s 14214 & 14215 you again answer with a double post, along with ridiculing me for my answer.

I guess the response to ss is that MANY individuals at AMP providers make there own choices on what they will provide and to whom.

Guys talk about this all the time on this forum. Unique is no different they operate under the same set of rules in reference to the girls that work there.

I also saw Susan some years ago. She was truly exceptional but, back to the matter at hand. (no pun intended) Yes, hudson st. Is a business and has been a business that gentleman leave happy for many, many years now and it continues today. Just another comment no matter what AMP place you visit some individuals will not do extra services. But, the number has grown thin.

[QUOTE=BigDog001; 1873886]Just my guess, but the picture on the ad, the writing style of the ad, leads me to believe that Lavender / Ninja is back. Just my guess, but can anyone confirm?

Dog[/QUOTE]Yes, it's Jennifer from Ninja.

[QUOTE=CamperVan10;1874633]What about the Thai places that charge $80 at the door? Is $40 of or does that get bumped up to $50? I stay firm on $40 for HR and $60 for BJ unless it was over and above (gave Coco in CT 50 for going 1 hour plus and taking gret care of me throughout).[/QUOTE]Most of the Thai parlors will negotiate with you for 60 / HJ, but no harm in trying to give less. I don't understand why they think they are so special, I gave up on them, for what they want I prefer Brazilians or other than Thai Asians.

Believe I mentioned something about this several months ago. Hate to lose the Bedford spas, now I'll have to drive further.

Acid.

[QUOTE=Top Floor; 1874615]Here's Arlington's requirements, effective November 1.

[url]http://www.arlingtonma.gov/Public_Documents/ArlingtonMA_Health/tanning/Bodyworkegs.pdf[/url]

Regarding Bedford, I'm amazed and wonder what legal right they have in doing what they did. I couldn't find anything posted on the town's website if they are going to start regulating bodywork like Arlington & Newton do. To just walk into a place and say you have to close and you can stop paying rent? What about the rent they already paid? Do you really think a landlord is going to give them back the remainder of Septembers rent that they already paid when they can't operate the business anymore? And most, if not all of the owners, will simply throw up their hands and say ok and walk away and not question the legality of what the town is doing. What if a place is legit? Just because they're Asian they're being targeted? We might as well go back to the days when businesses had "NINA" signs posted.

]My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MrRogers; 1874323]Article is a few months old, but something to be aware of:

[url]http://www.patriotledger.com/news/cops_and_courts/x1968257701/Sex-trade-finds-a-new-way-into-the-suburbs?zc_p=0[/url][/QUOTE]It was shut down before I was going to partake, typically happens. This location was horrific. It's at an intersection down the street from Hanover mall, and up the street from Starland and some reputable Americanized Chinese takeout places. There's not too much going on in the burbs, but the location was way too obvious. It got good reviews that a lot was on the table. Not a big deal, just go north. The problem with all this BS, is they allow it for a lengthy (months to years) amount of time, like the big trafficking bust on the north shore. Mr. Keplin and company made hundreds of thousands of dollars and probably couldn't stop even if they wanted to get out. There was a report on here that a monger actually saw Keplin at a parlor. If I saw that I wouldn't say anything, but still that would be a clear signal of a ring in progress, unless you are in utter oblivion. I mean there was a prostitution ring in Quincy et cetera that got busted off of newbury ave et cetera, on other streets, if you didn't realize what was up there, mattress on floor, again utter oblivion. Most places think they are invincible, but as soon as surveillance reveils a ring in progress, even if the bad guys know who we are, they do, there are other ways to build a case. The Phoenix classifieds were in business because of underground stuff like this.

[QUOTE=Acid Black; 1874781]Believe I mentioned something about this several months ago. Hate to lose the Bedford spas, now I'll have to drive further.

Acid.[/QUOTE]MC got craigs adult encounters stopped, now look what blossomed backpage et cetera, it's all political. MC is covering her position currently on all this crap. Who gives a sh- about Arlington? Lots of $$$$ needs to be made, I guess LE forgot to inspect the coercion from the top down. Coercion doesn't just happen at the surface level. This is ultimately why the sentencing is so weak.

What happened in Bedford, if it really happened as described, was patently illegal. The police don't have the power to terminate a contract between two parties. Only a court of law can do that, and then, only with difficulty. No, this is a classic example of good old fashioned civil extortion. LEO shows up and tells the AMP to cease and desist and then trots on over to the landlord and says, if you don't forget all about that lease we'll charge you as an accessory to running a house if ill reputation. Even if the landlord doesn't roll over, his tenant has flown the coop, and the damage is done. Uncle Leo knows there is no Civil Liberties Union for AMPs, so no one with any knowledge or power is going to come to their rescue, no matter wronged they were. It's a technique that's nearly as old as the world's oldest profession itself.

I posted some time ago warning about the regs taking effect on Nov 1 and that it's going to virtually end the AMP as we know it here. This is all being driven from the top. I think old Mahthah hasn't had an orgasm in at least twenty years, if ever, and so, can't understand why anyone else would want to. People like that feel that sexuality is something that needs to be suppressed because of fear of that which they don't understand. The same thing happened with professor what's her name down in Rhode Island that got the law changed. I'm sure she never had an orgasm so just wanted to keep hubby home at night. By the way, have you ever noticed that you never see a smokin' hot advocate for these "reforms"? Hmmm, I wonder why that is.

Are the bad things that happen in the trade? Sure there are, and that needs to be addressed. But there are many more hard working providers that have simply chosen to make a living this way. And now they can't. Everybody loses.

[QUOTE=HighAmperage; 1875562]What happened in Bedford, if it really happened as described, was patently illegal. The police don't have the power to terminate a contract between two parties. Only a court of law can do that, and then, only with difficulty. No, this is a classic example of good old fashioned civil extortion. LEO shows up and tells the AMP to cease and desist and then trots on over to the landlord and says, if you don't forget all about that lease we'll charge you as an accessory to running a house if ill reputation. Even if the landlord doesn't roll over, his tenant has flown the coop, and the damage is done. Uncle Leo knows there is no Civil Liberties Union for AMPs, so no one with any knowledge or power is going to come to their rescue, no matter wronged they were. It's a technique that's nearly as old as the world's oldest profession itself.

I posted some time ago warning about the regs taking effect on Nov 1 and that it's going to virtually end the AMP as we know it here. This is all being driven from the top. I think old Mahthah hasn't had an orgasm in at least twenty years, if ever, and so, can't understand why anyone else would want to. People like that feel that sexuality is something that needs to be suppressed because of fear of that which they don't understand. The same thing happened with professor what's her name down in Rhode Island that got the law changed. I'm sure she never had an orgasm so just wanted to keep hubby home at night. By the way, have you ever noticed that you never see a smokin' hot advocate for these "reforms"? Hmmm, I wonder why that is.

Are the bad things that happen in the trade? Sure there are, and that needs to be addressed. But there are many more hard working providers that have simply chosen to make a living this way. And now they can't. Everybody loses.[/QUOTE]What new regs starting this Nov are you referring to? As this article states, there is a loophole in the current Mass massage law that allows shops to avoid licensing requirements by simply not using the title "Massage" and instead something else like "Bodywork" in naming their business.

[url]http://www.patriotledger.com/news/cops_and_courts/x1968257701/Sex-trade-finds-a-new-way-into-the-suburbs?zc_p=0[/url]

If you drive into Chinatown you can visit the salon at Hudson st. I tried for the first time several weeks ago a new "hot looking" babe good looking and pretty nice personality. There was two woman working. The day I visited both appeared in their 30s both. Nice looking, shapely and ready to offer their massage which is 60 mins for 50 bucks. Not a bad price!

[QUOTE=MongerExpert;1874843]It was shut down before I was going to partake, typically happens. This location was horrific. It's at an intersection down the street from Hanover mall, and up the street from Starland and some reputable Americanized Chinese takeout places. There's not too much going on in the burbs, but the location was way too obvious. It got good reviews that a lot was on the table. Not a big deal, just go north. The problem with all this BS, is they allow it for a lengthy (months to years) amount of time, like the big trafficking bust on the north shore. Mr. Keplin and company made hundreds of thousands of dollars and probably couldn't stop even if they wanted to get out. There was a report on here that a monger actually saw Keplin at a parlor. If I saw that I wouldn't say anything, but still that would be a clear signal of a ring in progress, unless you are in utter oblivion. I mean there was a prostitution ring in Quincy et cetera that got busted off of newbury ave et cetera, on other streets, if you didn't realize what was up there, mattress on floor, again utter oblivion. Most places think they are invincible, but as soon as surveillance reveils a ring in progress, even if the bad guys know who we are, they do, there are other ways to build a case. The Phoenix classifieds were in business because of underground stuff like this.[/QUOTE]Rockland has its sister AMP. Both offered table showers and the one in Rockland is the same way with its location right in a busy downtown area and within steps of Town Hall. I would suspect that the one in Norwell double relax U will be next on the shut down list and it just opened. It also offered table shower service.

I assumed she opened a sperm bank with a lifetime collection from donors.

[QUOTE=Amp Slave;1874564]Now she wasn't the best looking but she could have you on all fours. What ever happened to her? Did she go back to China?[/QUOTE]

D, your mailbox is full.

[QUOTE=Diogenesbarrel;1876041]I assumed she opened a sperm bank with a lifetime collection from donors.[/QUOTE]