Why would you expect different
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5537805]Hillbilly, that was some Ignorant post. Damn, dude, stick to hookers instead of worshipping trump and defiling anyone in the other party. Fuck. "Murder"? The Hillary nonsense was cooked up by crazies crazier than Rudy, and of course, Joe strapped the bomb on the Isis suicide terrorist. Fuck. This is exactly what's wrong with my party, why can't we be sane and intelligent as a Republican??[/QUOTE]Then the loser football team you have probably rooted for your whole life. I don't think anyone who is a Bengal fan should comment on anything since you are obviously clinically insane. Always expecting a different result. Truthfully I have no idea why people hitch their horses up to either one of these wagons. Neither one could give two shits about none of you but you argue and call names like little kids defending them. Both parties are a big shit stain and should be embarrassed when they steal tax payers money.
Decided to delete this post
I don't come here to talk about politics, but I succumbed to a moment of weakness. I deleted it, but the delete function didn't work. Sorry, mod.
OF customer base is different, too?
[QUOTE=BamBam;5539660]I am cross-posting this from the Escort thread to get additional perspectives.
I do some small business consulting and take a professional interest in how these things work. I have chatted with some women who are successful on OF. I typically catch them when they visit a sugar site trying to generate interest in their OF page. There are women in our area making $2-10 K+ per month with it. As with a lot of things, there is a power curve at work with a small percent of the women making the vast bulk of the money. However, these were not women who left an escort site. It is usually women who started in the cam world. Or who join OF as an alternative to being a sugar baby. Some of migrated from trying to do something similar on IG. The ones who earn the most are usually the ones who look the best.
The ones who are good at OF treat it as a job. They are putting in 5-6 hours a day, or more, creating and posting content. They also have to work their SM sites daily like a trapper working his trap lines. They need to post teaser content and cajole people in their DM's to give it a try. They lure men from Tinder to IG to Twitter and then to OF. They need a presence on Snap, Tinder, Twitter, IG and sometimes a few others like ManyVids. They have to post on OF about three times a day and they have to check frequently for special requests. They watch the sites of other women looking for ideas for new content. Most guys have no idea how hard it is to come up with fresh ideas, new costumes and new activity to avoid repetition.
The math is not as easy as some people make it sound. At a $20 subscription price, they need 100 steady customers to make $2 K. That's before the site takes its 20% cut. However, those men are fickle. Some are always leaving and new ones must be added. They can supplement the subscriptions by taking special requests but those take a lot of time that cannot be leveraged with the other subscribers. In short, OF is a business and takes an entrepreneurial spirit and approach to make money doing it. People who say OF has reduced the supply of other sex workers have to assume that these same women have the drive, energy, ambition and organizational skill to pull it off. I am skeptical.
BAM.[/QUOTE]I'm also thinking that the OF customer base is different, too. I personally have very little interest in paying for photos and videos. I haven't paid for porn or photos for *years*.
Speaking of which, the OF girls are competing with free. The hub sites seem to have just about everything, from vintage porn to rough gangbangs. It's hard to imagine how the OF girls can compete with that.
Also: Thanks, Bam, for putting a post in this thread that did not include the words "Biden" or "Trump".
