[QUOTE=VanillaStick;3640909]Maybe I don't fully get it, but it seems to me that the new restrictions would be easy to get around for the provider. Since they have to post a social media link, why would they not create a social media page with their working name pictures etc, they are generally free. Then they could post their pics, donations, information etc.[/QUOTE]I'd say it's not about how easy it is to get around the restriction, but rather the new risks it may bring. Like, the social media link was easy to get around because all you had to do was post a link to a social media platform, the site didn't differentiate between legit and bogus links. Many of those are dead links, and some are even what you described. However, to view a facebook profile, for example, you have to be logged into facebook. That alone presents a risk to hobbyists, and for the ladies it might introduce further risk of their actual identities becoming known (granted, there are plenty that are rather liberal with their actual phone number). Furthermore, if it becomes popular, eventually Facebook would have to then take some sort of action.
All I'm saying is that I think I may just be sticking to whoever pops on the sister site or a UTR if I can find a dependable one.