Wrong , Let me correct you again
Thank you for proving my points. First, and believe it or not, I'm trying to help you. This is what happens when you let your passion over rule your logic and judgement. So be careful,. OK? I really don't care what you think. What you believe is up to you. But here are the truth points.
Antifa, etc: I didn't say 1/6/21, but rather 2016. Read my post carefully,. And it's a known fact that both Antifa and BLM and other groups were involved back in "DC" 2016 , among other havoc. No one can dispute that.
Muller INv: Actually it went from May 2017 to March 2019, about 2 years. Look it up. Barr's report even had a redacted verison in April 2019. Again, circa 2 years, just like I said. Keep your facts straight OK?
Trump Exoneration: here are direct quotes from the report, and later, Barr himself on several interviews.
"there was insufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy charges against Trump or his associates. The report did not reach a conclusion about possible obstruction of justice of Trump, citing a Justice Department guideline that prohibits the federal indictment of a sitting president. The investigation resulted in charges against 34 individuals and 3 companies, 8 guilty pleas, and a conviction at trial" These are distractions, and "scope creep" form the initial charter of the investigation. You will notice that even with all that, still no connection to Trump of any wrong doing.
Side note: We could witch hunt multitudes of Bush's friend, Obamas, Clintons etc, and find plenty of wrong doing. These "side" cases were nothing more than a distraction against the fact they could find no wrong doing. BTW, he's out of office now. Still no charges. BTW, if you continue to read the report, it says there was overwhelming evidence that Trump did NOT obstruct justice, and that witnesses were found to have LIED, UNDER OATH against Trump further discrediting the credibility of the accusations. AND HERE YOU GO.
1. this one's amazing (: -) . An ex-FBI lawyer is expected to admit falsifying a document that was used as part of the inquiry into alleged Russian interference with the 2016 US presidential election.
"Mueller report: FBI lawyer 'altered email' to wiretap Trump aide":
[URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53784048[/URL]
2. And McCabe lied to the FBI about Trump (ultimately): "Andrew McCabe said he lied to FBI about Wall Street Journal Leak":
[URL]https://nypost.com/2020/01/02/andrew-mccabe-said-he-lied-to-fbi-about-wall-street-journal-leak[/URL]
3. And it was a witch hunt by the liberal media to keep the spin going: Here's a CNN whistleblower comment "Project Veritas says it caught CNN staffer admitting network pushed anti-Trump propaganda" :
[URL]https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/project-veritas-says-it-caught-cnn-staffer-admitting-network-pushed-anti-trump-propaganda.[/URL] And there's even more, but I don't feel like wasting my Sunday evening on this. This is old news.
Do you at least see it? The Russian investigation against Trump. It was all a hoax! And to think people, many intelligent people, fell for that! The actual interference was Hillary, Obama, DNC, Steel (phoney Steele dossier) illegal FIA warrants, etc. And when Trump became president, much to their chagrin, they had an "oh crap" moment, and decided to spin their own web of lies accusing Trump of the same crime they committed. To hide their crimes. It's as clear as day.
Lastly Bennie Thompson (D-MO) . All your article says is he pushed the orders through. I know that. You didn't address my point! He said he believes it's an over reach! Hello! LOL. Look at what I wrote. Amazing. Anyway, here's the article.
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/11-house-republicans-back-kevin-mccarthys-threat-telecoms-over-1-6-committee-1626092[/URL]
Here's the direct quote in the article: " copy of Friday's letter shared by Biggs asserted that Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, "made an obvious admission" in making the records request, insisting that Thompson is "aware he lacks the authority to rile through the private data of individuals. ".
There you go man. My suggestion, I mean this sincerely. If you're going to debate someone, have the facts, and present the whole truth OK? Like I said, I honestly don't care what you believe, I just live by the truth. And frankly I'd much rather be writing about AMP;'s than this forum. Anyway, I think I proved my points, not about its about winning. I don't care. I'm hungry now and would like to get something to eat. LOL Good luck with your endeavors!