Printable View
[QUOTE=JohnPot;3879209]Thanks bud, for the details on KOI and GUCCI. We need detail like that to make decision.[/QUOTE]Definitely no BB from my experience and a very controlled kissing. No passion, just going through the motion. But from looks dept. , found her looking good than any Palace girls, presently.
[QUOTE=Jack926;3880205]Not good, not bad. Truly middle of the road.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I'll have to set something up with them and then try out the other agencies. I'm tired of dealing with these so called Indy ladies.
Namu BBFS. At first she said no CIP but she changed her mind in the middle and ended up CIP.
Julie no BBFS and she was adamant about it.
[QUOTE=JimThome;3879757]Saw your post right before I had already scheduled an appt with her and started having some doubts. When I saw her in person I was pleasantly surprised. Her body was a pretty nice spinner body as you mentioned and to me her face was actually decently attractive. Considering bb services she's young with a nice spinner body and decently attractive face so I put her on my repeat list pretty easily. Wish you didn't mention the ass tag haha it made me look for it during doggy. No CIP but possibly its a YMMV thing. I asked if next time would be OK but she has zero English skills so I'm not sure but I'll try again and see. Also I concur with the boobs. I think she got a boob job since she had a pretty nice rack that was fun to play with.[/QUOTE]Which haven is this one? I can't keep track who is M's girls or who is with what booker.
[QUOTE=JimThome;3879757]Saw your post right before I had already scheduled an appt with her and started having some doubts. When I saw her in person I was pleasantly surprised. Her body was a pretty nice spinner body as you mentioned and to me her face was actually decently attractive. Considering bb services she's young with a nice spinner body and decently attractive face so I put her on my repeat list pretty easily. Wish you didn't mention the ass tag haha it made me look for it during doggy. No CIP but possibly its a YMMV thing. I asked if next time would be OK but she has zero English skills so I'm not sure but I'll try again and see. Also I concur with the boobs. I think she got a boob job since she had a pretty nice rack that was fun to play with.[/QUOTE]CIP is YMMV because I got it easily on the first try, she didn't seem to mind it at all but I can take a guess as to why. I think it might be because I was her last client for the day and she was going to wash out anyway. Because of my graveyard schedule I'm practically always a providers last client, which has it's share of downsides but a on rare occasion it has some upsides.
I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;3880949]I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.[/QUOTE]I have read couple reviews as well as seeing the girl myself. I would say 50/50 fake and real reviews. Not to mention the fact that they stole TER reviews as well. This is just erotic monkey took advantage of the situation and cash out fortune.
I get what you're saying and what you're saying could be possible and sure it's easy for anyone to do but realistically, I highly doubt they (the Bookers) will waste their time with trying to come up with a review for on the their girls and in the hopes of bringing traffic. But for the most part, Bookers tend to upload escort profiles and not do anything else to it at that point. I'm not a Booker but I can assure you every one of my reviews (under the same moniker) are legit. I get where you can become skeptical about it, but in my experience, I haven't come across a review that seems fake to me at least. Some are obvious though, that's for sure.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;3880949]I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3880527]Namu BBFS. At first she said no CIP but she changed her mind in the middle and ended up CIP.
Julie no BBFS and she was adamant about it.[/QUOTE]I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.
Hey, been lurking the forum recently researching the Kgirl scene but I've mongered for a couple years now, what are everyones thoughts on Ktownescorts? I was recently verified by them and am currently interested in seeing Nana or Diamond, but I'm struggling to find reports on any of the girls there besides Julie, who I guess used to be Lily. Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
Oh and as a random side note / sign of good faith since this account is new, if anyone has questions about the scene in Tokyo I spent some time there and can help.
Go see Gyubeche if Skinny is your thing.
[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;3881698]I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
Since there have been a few inquiries about Eroticmonkey on the forum, I thought I would give my two cents. There is a lot to say, but I think it is worth taking the time to say it.
I have been using Eroticmonkey both as a reviewer and a lurker since quite a bit before that other, superior alternative went dark. It has changed and grown quite a bit since the draconian laws were passed, and it definitely has its pros and its cons.
Let's start with the cons. I can understand where the skepticism is coming from. To start, in the early days of E. M. , many, if not most of the reviews were literally stolen verbatim from that other site. Moreover, it was free, and had (and still has) very little screening and relatively low standards regarding what types of reviews can be posted. For example, it allows reviews of providers who advertise on classified sites. The other site did not allow that simply because the fake ads, phishing scams, bait and switch ads are so prevalent on those types of sites. This creates a situation where the posters of fake and malicious ads can easily post false and misleading reviews of their own scandalous and / or fake providers. Thus, you have to be very careful and scrupulous when reading E. M. Reviews and determining whether or not you will pursue a particular provider who is reviewed there. Nonetheless, it is very easy to filter out the BS--google numbers and providers, look at the profiles and reviews of the reviewers themselves. If a provider has only one or two reviews, and those reviewers themselves have ONLY reviewed that particular provider, it is a major red flag and you should pass. However, if that provider has a large amount of reviews left by reviewers who have written about many different providers, you are most likely safe. Another thing you can do is PM other reviewers. Most are willing to communicate with you. Of course, a response does not guarantee anything, but a lack of a response regarding a provider who is already iffy is further indication that you should avoid that provider. Lastly, reviews of well-known and extensively reviewed providers are almost always legit and reliable on E. M. If the girl has double digit reviews and you have seen her discussed here, those reviews are generally valid.
Now to the cons of the new them system. It is no longer free. However, like the now defunct site, it allows free access to reviewers. The downside, however, is that each review only provides seven days of free access, which is significantly less generous than the other site. This creates its own problems. Many mongers do not have the time and / or money to hobby once a week, but you damn well know they are lurking and are always looking for that next girl to book. Couple this with the fact that there are no time restrictions on reviews (the other site, for example, requested that your reviews be written no more than three months after the appointment), and it creates a temptation for people to either post fake reviews to gain access, or to review providers who are retired or have disappeared. I have seen reviews that say things like "this is a review of a session that look place before so and so retired / left the area. " Obviously, these reviews are of no use to anyone and have only been written to give the reviewer access to the site. E. M really needs to reconsider this and give members longer access for each review.
Finally, the pros. E. M is rapidly filling the void left by that other site, and is supplying for its demand. That being said, the members and reliable posters of the other site are now flooding E. M. With their reviews an insights. They have no alternative. The result is that E. M. Has exploded since the laws were passed and it is rapidly becoming a more vast and reliable source of legitimate information. The regular influx of k girl reviews is a testament to that. I can tell you, E. M. Was not like that BEFORE the other site went dark.
Ironically, E. M's low standards for reviews, namely the allowance of reviews of providers who advertise via classified sites, creates a VERY large pro. BP girls and other girls of that sort were not very well-reviwed on the other site--that was E. M's niche. Therefore, E. M. Has become an excellent tool to track down BP and CL girls who have vanished since those sites went dark! Many of them are still active, and you can find their contact info on E. M. !
All that being said, I believe E. M. To be a great source of information that will keep growing and getting better, at least until the other site comes back (if it does). It has its downsides, but those can be avoided if you do you research and know what you are doing.
I haven't seen any of their girls since that website went up. But their contact number ending with 1690. I remember that number since CV days and have note for that number that they always use fake pics and copy other agency's girls name.
[QUOTE=Jl0991;3881825]Hey, been lurking the forum recently researching the Kgirl scene but I've mongered for a couple years now, what are everyones thoughts on Ktownescorts? I was recently verified by them and am currently interested in seeing Nana or Diamond, but I'm struggling to find reports on any of the girls there besides Julie, who I guess used to be Lily. Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
Oh and as a random side note / sign of good faith since this account is new, if anyone has questions about the scene in Tokyo I spent some time there and can help.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opus109;3882108]Since there have been a few inquiries about Eroticmonkey on the forum, I thought I would give my two cents. There is a lot to say, but I think it is worth taking the time to say it.
I have been using Eroticmonkey both as a reviewer and a lurker since quite a bit before that other, superior alternative went dark. It has changed and grown quite a bit since the draconian laws were passed, and it definitely has its pros and its cons.
Let's start with the cons. I can understand where the skepticism is coming from. To start, in the early days of E. M. , many, if not most of the reviews were literally stolen verbatim from that other site. Moreover, it was free, and had (and still has) very little screening and relatively low standards regarding what types of reviews can be posted. For example, it allows reviews of providers who advertise on classified sites. The other site did not allow that simply because the fake ads, phishing scams, bait and switch ads are so prevalent on those types of sites. This creates a situation where the posters of fake and malicious ads can easily post false and misleading reviews of their own scandalous and / or fake providers. Thus, you have to be very careful and scrupulous when reading E. M. Reviews and determining whether or not you will pursue a particular provider who is reviewed there. Nonetheless, it is very easy to filter out the BS--google numbers and providers, look at the profiles and reviews of the reviewers themselves. If a provider has only one or two reviews, and those reviewers themselves have ONLY reviewed that particular provider, it is a major red flag and you should pass. However, if that provider has a large amount of reviews left by reviewers who have written about many different providers, you are most likely safe. Another thing you can do is PM other reviewers. Most are willing to communicate with you. Of course, a response does not guarantee anything, but a lack of a response regarding a provider who is already iffy is further indication that you should avoid that provider. Lastly, reviews of well-known and extensively reviewed providers are almost always legit and reliable on E. M. If the girl has double digit reviews and you have seen her discussed here, those reviews are generally valid.
Now to the cons of the new them system. It is no longer free. However, like the now defunct site, it allows free access to reviewers. The downside, however, is that each review only provides seven days of free access, which is significantly less generous than the other site. This creates its own problems. Many mongers do not have the time and / or money to hobby once a week, but you damn well know they are lurking and are always looking for that next girl to book. Couple this with the fact that there are no time restrictions on reviews (the other site, for example, requested that your reviews be written no more than three months after the appointment), and it creates a temptation for people to either post fake reviews to gain access, or to review providers who are retired or have disappeared. I have seen reviews that say things like "this is a review of a session that look place before so and so retired / left the area. " Obviously, these reviews are of no use to anyone and have only been written to give the reviewer access to the site. E. M really needs to reconsider this and give members longer access for each review.
Finally, the pros. E. M is rapidly filling the void left by that other site, and is supplying for its demand. That being said, the members and reliable posters of the other site are now flooding E. M. With their reviews an insights. They have no alternative. The result is that E. M. Has exploded since the laws were passed and it is rapidly becoming a more vast and reliable source of legitimate information. The regular influx of k girl reviews is a testament to that. I can tell you, E. M. Was not like that BEFORE the other site went dark.
Ironically, E. M's low standards for reviews, namely the allowance of reviews of providers who advertise via classified sites, creates a VERY large pro. BP girls and other girls of that sort were not very well-reviwed on the other site--that was E. M's niche. Therefore, E. M. Has become an excellent tool to track down BP and CL girls who have vanished since those sites went dark! Many of them are still active, and you can find their contact info on E. M. !
All that being said, I believe E. M. To be a great source of information that will keep growing and getting better, at least until the other site comes back (if it does). It has its downsides, but those can be avoided if you do you research and know what you are doing.[/QUOTE][URL]https://sangabrielvalley.adlist24.com/womenmen/a181025[/URL]
For now I think this site is better. If anyone else has something better.
[QUOTE=Jl0991;3881825]Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
[/QUOTE]There have been a couple of Nana I have read about on this forum. I don't think this ktownesc* Nana is either of those. And don't know if her services will meet expectations of the readers of this thread either.
Otoh the other Nana's are definitely worth a visit.