Printable View
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4899076]M.
Mini, Hazel, Cali. WLA.
Brooke. PV.
Eva. MW.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/yEEjZUhsKn6h[/URL][/QUOTE]I've seen brooke's photos around for years. She was a Norcal girl. Can't remember if she was a pse girl tho.
Anyone remember her name?
[QUOTE=LoveAsianGirls;4899248]Not according to BBFS rates that are listed on their site.[/QUOTE]Thanks. Maybe the site or my phone isn't working right. I can't see rate info other than pictures and names.
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4899552]Poppy from sexyangels = Minji from KCP.
I was disappointed.[/QUOTE]Thanks for info, you saved me $$.
I wonder if other girl Becky is Yuna from KCP?
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4899552]Poppy from sexyangels = Minji from KCP.
I was disappointed.[/QUOTE]Is she just disappointing in general? Never saw her.
[QUOTE=BleachChugger;4899855]Is she just disappointing in general? Never saw her.[/QUOTE]I would say she's 6 in looks, and 5 in service. Service very subpar.
No DFK, B cups with eraser nipples, decent ass. I would say I was disappointed because there no connection.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4897811]I agree with the person who said a few things about her!
Her face is 10/10! Hands down.
She just gives out pecks So no DFK!
She loves to please!
Her body is on the flip side with a little weight but not to bad!
I like petite girls but this I can manage!
She does have large nipples LOL.
She is tight! And does BBFS but always ask for you if you want a condom! Other than that I had a good time[/QUOTE]Long time member first time post.
I visited her today based on the reviews here, while I understand look can be very subjective and I meant no disrespect to previous reviewers, I strongly disagree she's a 10 in face. The moment I saw her I thought I got bait and switched and almost left because I was expecting someone to be around 8-10 in looks. Personally, I would rate her look 6. 5 in comparison to KPC Yuna 7, SA Luna 8. 5, SA Chanel 9, Topgirls Ravi 9, M Cona 8. 5, M Chanel 8, M Hazel 8. 5.
Other than her looks, the service was good, she's easy going, pussy is tight and sallow, soft skin and responsive in bed. However she's probably in her mid-late 30's and could use some workout to tighten that body.
Any reviews on her?
[QUOTE=Travon;4899930]Long time member first time post.
I visited her today based on the reviews here, while I understand look can be very subjective and I meant no disrespect to previous reviewers, I strongly disagree she's a 10 in face. The moment I saw her I thought I got bait and switched and almost left because I was expecting someone to be around 8-10 in looks. Personally, I would rate her look 6. 5 in comparison to KPC Yuna 7, SA Luna 8. 5, SA Chanel 9, Topgirls Ravi 9, M Cona 8. 5, M Chanel 8, M Hazel 8. 5.
Other than her looks, the service was good, she's easy going, pussy is tight and sallow, soft skin and responsive in bed. However she's probably in her mid-late 30's and could use some workout to tighten that body.[/QUOTE]I truly can back this up! Who knows I did like her face lmao!
Becky = Yuna KCP according to first time poster Ovrbst2777.
[QUOTE=TDLeafs;4899810]Thanks for info, you saved me $$.
I wonder if other girl Becky is Yuna from KCP?[/QUOTE]
Angela = 280
Sophia = 300
Grace was 300 in OC then 280 in LA and now probably no upcharge. Bastard Chorum recommended her for phat ass seeker: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4884752&viewfull=1#post4884752](Review)[/URL].
[QUOTE=NoClue02;4899778]Thanks. Maybe the site or my phone isn't working right. I can't see rate info other than pictures and names.[/QUOTE]
[blue]Thanks, I really appreciate you not reporting this so we could take care of it and instead giving them even more attention by reprinting it. I'm sure they appreciate you helping them get even more attention which will encourage them to make more fake users to post more ads posing as reports.
Great job
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4900059]Angela = 280
Sophia = 300
Grace was 300 in OC then 280 in LA and now probably no upcharge. Bastard Chorum recommended her for phat ass seeker: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4884752&viewfull=1#post4884752](Review)[/URL].[/QUOTE]I need that phat ass, but I can't handle smoker's breath. How would you handle this situation?
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4900059]Angela = 280
Sophia = 300
Grace was 300 in OC then 280 in LA and now probably no upcharge. Bastard Chorum recommended her for phat ass seeker: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4884752&viewfull=1#post4884752](Review)[/URL].[/QUOTE]There was an upcharge listed this morning. It would suck if she just stopped offering bb altogether. I mean why give it away for free if she was getting paid extra for it?
Sophia was a norcal girl who was doing bb for $220 previously, or whatever they're charging up there right now.
Covid forced me out of my AMP comfort zone, and I'm better off for it. I've been on HX for five years, but I didn't persue it because of the alleged difficulty of breaking in. But, at least in this instance, not only was it not hard, but it was easy! I guess so far the booker's like my profile, but I can't get most of them to rate me back.
At first I found the sheet number of different Korgs and providers over whelming. I started keeping notes and cross referencing RAs and menus. My ultimate goal was to get enough references to see the "legends" at M. I figured if I got twenty ratings from Korgs, M would have to let me in. But, now I'm seeing getting ratings is not so easy. At first I took it personally, but now I'm thinking maybe the Orgs don't want to level-up for their own reasons. I was planning my work and working my plan, you might say.
My first approach was LovliestAngels and Luna. I can't imagine a better way to break-in. Booker was great to work with, and Luna looked better and younger than any AMP girl I had ever seen up until that point in time. I think enough has been written about her in BB thread. My main thought during the encounter was that she was just "bringing it", always coming forward with an insatiable drive and energy!
Second time out was with Sophia at SweetMoments, who doesn't seem to get as much play in the BB forum. Although her face is a little plain, I thought she had the best body I had ever seen! Preview BBBJ in the shower. More BBBJ sitting on the side of the bed. More BBBJ on the bed. Then I had here come down to the end of bed. Very responsive to DATY. She was pushing on the top of my head. I had to check with her if I should proceed and got the go-ahead. After that ACG, CG, then RCG. Then bought the whole thing home in Mish. She's a pleaser!
I've had one other session since then, but I'm going to let a little time pass before I review it.
I've shared everything I care to in this post and will not be too responsive to PMs, like Hapa. At first I was a little ass-hurt that he wouldn't respond to a personal appeal, but now I see he's pretty much laid everything out on the boards. Like the rapper Apache said, "Do Fa Self"!
[QUOTE=Travon;4899930]Long time member first time post.
I visited her today based on the reviews here, while I understand look can be very subjective and I meant no disrespect to previous reviewers, I strongly disagree she's a 10 in face. The moment I saw her I thought I got bait and switched and almost left because I was expecting someone to be around 8-10 in looks. Personally, I would rate her look 6. 5 in comparison to KPC Yuna 7, SA Luna 8. 5, SA Chanel 9, Topgirls Ravi 9, M Cona 8. 5, M Chanel 8, M Hazel 8. 5.
Other than her looks, the service was good, she's easy going, pussy is tight and sallow, soft skin and responsive in bed. However she's probably in her mid-late 30's and could use some workout to tighten that body.[/QUOTE]Just saw her tonight. Save your nickels and dimes guys. If you use SAG for BBFS see Sophie. YMMV.