NoVA SugarBabies

Summary from the newsletter:

Dear Seeking Member.

I am back as CEO!

Dirty old man meets 23-year old gold-digging *hore and she marries up. She will be co-CEO and is helping rebrand. LOL, LMAO even.

New slogan: Changing from "Just Date Up" to "Experience Hypergamy".

"We are fixing our product by making it harder for scammers and spammers to join. ".

- Passwordless login.

- Requiring members to upload more photos.

- Multiple ways for members to verify themselves.

- Raising the standards of our community.

The Attention Economy: Further simplification of our platform, and the "launch of new features designed to give you more effective ways of attracting the attention of those you want attention from. A new gifting feature, as well as prompts, will give you more ways to flex and to stand out from the crowd. ".

New Discretion Features: Make it easier for you to get verified by [URL]Seeking.com[/URL]. This will allow you to demonstrate your trustworthiness, while maintaining your anonymity.

The at AskBrandonWade Podcast: blah blah who fucking cares about your podcast.

Thots?

PRMan, the first 4 are linked to your Inbox Messages. Link to the girls' URL instead. Please redo the links.

[QUOTE=PRMan12;6930813][URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/60a1b8aa-ff58-4c2f-9567-bb62aada9a44[/URL]

Good convo, planning to meet? Any inter, no ppm discussed yet.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/2f069428-4149-422c-b5b4-1b380f830939[/URL]

Messaging a bunch, haven't met yet. Seems definitely real.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/30851d75-a3d7-4092-b07a-1e16bf4a08e4[/URL]

Real, planning to meet but haven't pulled the trigger yet.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a69cb528-64eb-4454-a149-85d9a2648784[/URL]

Wants to video chat, wanted additional pictures, too many rules, haven't pulled the trigger.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0ca3b53a-98b5-4712-9b8b-4a66082974ef[/URL]

Strange convos, can't tell if she is real or not yet.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/35c5ab3d-c5c8-41e0-9d5c-4e90691e772f[/URL]

Good Convo planning to meet.

Hotgirlsummerforever.

Good Convo but additional pics not great.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dd6bb2bd-a403-4e08-9725-4f92a1f19c4f[/URL]

Seems like a scammer, wants $ upfront, did a video call so she is real, wants to move WhatsApp or Snap.

Happy hunting. Over and out.[/QUOTE]

I know some of the more senior brethren here say peak Seeking has been over for years. What do y'all who experienced Seeking at its peak day make of this announcement? The beginning of the end?

[QUOTE=ChrisCarr;6930986]Summary from the newsletter:

Dear Seeking Member.

I am back as CEO!

Dirty old man meets 23-year old gold-digging *hore and she marries up. She will be co-CEO and is helping rebrand. LOL, LMAO even.

New slogan: Changing from "Just Date Up" to "Experience Hypergamy".

"We are fixing our product by making it harder for scammers and spammers to join. ".

- Passwordless login.

- Requiring members to upload more photos.

- Multiple ways for members to verify themselves.

- Raising the standards of our community.

The Attention Economy: Further simplification of our platform, and the "launch of new features designed to give you more effective ways of attracting the attention of those you want attention from. A new gifting feature, as well as prompts, will give you more ways to flex and to stand out from the crowd. ".

New Discretion Features: Make it easier for you to get verified by [URL]Seeking.com[/URL]. This will allow you to demonstrate your trustworthiness, while maintaining your anonymity.

The at AskBrandonWade Podcast: blah blah who fucking cares about your podcast.

Thots?[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/de54b3e7-aac0-437a-9009-36b29c189b1b[/URL]

Location DC asked for a grand. Not a surprise pics led to some wannabe influencer.

[QUOTE=BuckNaked84;6929265]Elizabeth.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/206721b0-a5cb-40b9-ad6a-a1bf32d7f5b4[/URL]

Rainbows reincarnated. Went to text, but couldn't close. Same MO. Not sure what I did wrong. Whatever. Good luck and may the gods be with you.[/QUOTE]Oh yes, she is active on fet as well. There are videos of her getting fisted and other activities.

-Maz.

[QUOTE=TomFordModel;6929388]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/93ccac53-554e-4e16-950b-ba1d1ae2e0c4[/URL]

Porn chick as reported on here. Chatted with her a year ago in NYC but shoes in Fairfax this week. She's real.

300 hr.
[/QUOTE]Her profiles only seem to last a week. She messages you "meet tonight". If you can surface that discussion it would be appreciated.

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6931179]I know some of the more senior brethren here say peak Seeking has been over for years. What do y'all who experienced Seeking at its peak day make of this announcement? The beginning of the end?[/QUOTE]Well, I endorse the idea of having measures to get rid of scammers. They are big time-sinks, and it can be hard even for experienced guys to tell right away. However, if they do things that compromise the OPSec of married guys, they are killing the goose that laid the golden egg. Surely they know this. However, I think / expect that there will be a difference between new profiles and pre-existing ones. That is, I am asked to provide more photos for my two current profiles. I am not "required" as that post said.

These are reasons to be supremely careful the type of messaging you do on the site, and how you treat girls off the site. "Mature" profiles that are somewhat grandfathered in to the old set of rules will be golden. You really don't want to get one of those banned or suspended (girls can 'report' your profile for the most trivial offense) pending the production of IRL actual identify information for yourself. Those profiles are essentially dead, I have one or two of them around. The emails I used for the logins are dead for use on SA as well.

It likely could get better but less active, if the activity of bare-faced escorts and their customers were subtracted.

[QUOTE=NovaNova;6928143]25 in two months is a lot of work. I might catch some flack for this but I look at the bowl as casual NSA dating. I am not super keen on just doing a hit and run as it is far less effort and cheaper to go to an AMP or get an escort. I am a married SD with a wife that does not give a shit what I do and has made it clear that I am just a paycheck. It was actually her suggestion that if I wanted sex or dinner dates to go out and find a girlfriend. Once my youngest graduates high school I'm out but until then I'll dabble in the bowl and date younger women that at least pretend to like me. I have deffinely met some of the straight to the FC one and done gals who are a lot of fun. I have also met some really interesting girls on here who will open up and share some great conversation over dinner if that is what you are into, which I am. Several of the women I have met on here ask for advice on everything from their car to career advice to everything inbetween and they actually are greatful to get that advice. I will also get some that share photos of what they are doing (not the good x-rated ones just the G-rated look what I made today), text me good morning, and ask me how my day went without asking to meet. For me, this is nice as I leave before anyone else wakes up in my house and I come home to a house where no one even bothers looking up to say hello. Many of these women lack a strong male influence in their lives which I suspect is why they are out banging older dudes in the first place. I am not nieve about the game and only pay for a visit to the FC. I also am well aware that all of these girls are fucking multiple guys and suppliment their income very well by doing so. Even if it is fake and they would all ignore me if I stopped giving them money to go to the FC, I genuinly enjoy our time outside of the FC as well. To each their own but in my case I look for quality over quantity alone.[/QUOTE]I think you captured how many of us view the bowl. Well said.

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6931179]I know some of the more senior brethren here say peak Seeking has been over for years. What do y'all who experienced Seeking at its peak day make of this announcement? The beginning of the end?[/QUOTE]It used to be UTR's, BP girls, sexually curious legit HS grads working shite jobs, and college coeds who needed male attention / validation that included a nice cash bonus. Now its pic / vid marketing insta-thots, data-gathering bots, girls that continue to make terrible life choices after having their first kid, and the newly-liberated sex-worker category whom are girls you happen to see advertising on Tryst or Slixa.

Sugaring was never as taboo as other sex work because most other sex work has almost always involved some dude in the background and not much degree of agency for the woman. That brings about imagery of streetwalkers, needles, graffiti, and yellow tape. Then came along Ana Nicole Smith. We know that there are many girls out there that believe and live their sugaring career in never having sex. They think sugaring really means 27 yr old plastic doll and 87 year old billionaire widower. Because the concept was always a tongue-in-cheek jab at what we would later start calling "gold-diggers" in popular parlance, Anna Nicole Smith was the original brunt of that joke. This made it appealing to the brave girls (who are probably the type of girls that figured out early on that they like anal sex) and made it mysterious to the remainder of our puritanized lives.

Then the internet becomes the thing and the pool of sex-seekers grew by a bazillion fold and the Brandon Wade guy, who looks like every other monger I've ever encountered, has this bright idea for seekingarrangement dot com. Over time word gets out that it is really just an exchange of sexual intimacy for money (prostitution) with another name and arguably better outcomes for everyone compared to what is being offered on backpage or listcrawler. This brought in sexually curious legit HS grads working shite jobs, and college coeds who needed male attention / validation that included a nice cash bonus. The ones that were hot, a little less risk averse, and assertive enough to take advantage of her smarts and youth. They were 20-24 years old. College or near graduation. Smart and well spoken, played high school sports, had a body count under 7 with that one long-term boyfriend that she did everything with. These girls knew how to keep a secret, knew what good sex could be, and the self control to keep her black book small, manageable, consistent, and enjoyable. And they read about seekingarrangement on reddit or some other pop-culture site that ran the story as "ooh, the hidden life of a sugar baby" and ended up steering a ton of girls to the site. This was the golden times for her and for us.

After the pandemic the next batch of 18-32 year olds are going to be very different. More entitled, and more confident in their youthful ideologies and grossly less educated than ever before. They will always be asking for more money, they will always be highly risk averse, they will all be taking some psychiatric prescription cocktail. You will not want to get to know them outside of just sex, and because their politics are driven by algorithm you would be right not to trust them at all. They are more likely to be heavier in the wrong way, not as attractive, not as interesting, and not worth your time and money. I do wonder how much of this is to blame seeking dot com for ruining sugaring vs much how this new generation has been responding to the latest version of youth indoctrination and thought-programming.

Exhibit A:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0f7262a2-de49-4185-847f-9a2fd9c81fd9[/URL]

Her headline reads "why does no one ever respond to me:

The recent K-pop bust in Tysons is a reminder that the real goal of those brick-and-mortar sex parlors is to fish for customers that are far more than just $100 tips, and doing so on a site like seeking is fertile ground for cyber exploitation. To what degree have they engaged in state-sponsored intel and LEO ops? How many warrants do they get? How many do they comply with vs how many do they play the legal back-and-forth game? Which countries and jurisdictions do they interact with? How easy is it to get hired and get access to their datacenter space? They want more pictures and more ways to verify you as if they ALREADY DON'T KNOW WHO TF YOU ARE LOL.

"As*leyMa*ison kept customer info in an encrypted Excel spreadsheet. Seeking is probably doing more but c'Mon. What do their day-to-day data-security practices really look like after the boiler-plate privacy policy statements?

I'd also be curious to know how many pimps have tried to leverage seeking, and what steps Seeking uses to weed out pimps, pimped girls. Again, prostitution has always been crap because of dudes that have no objection to exploiting a woman's free agency for the meager amount of value he brings, which is just physical protection from other dudes that have no objection to exploiting a woman's free agency for the meager amount of value he brings. Seeking has been great because that dude element seems removed. Now that guy just texts you directly with requests for babysitter money instead of opening the door with the other key while you are naked and demanding all your money.

Traveling Pro from California posing as a SB.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/eceb00dc-dff8-4349-ba1a-72766d62a9e2[/URL]

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/us/washington/bellevue/body-rubs/3061932[/URL]

Staying in seven corners. Asked if I would come this afternoon for a massage. Nope blocked.

Pic Seller.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a624dc68-3cc3-4194-9093-af627cf309fd[/URL]

Had high hopes for this one as conversation was really good, she asked all the right questions and had all the right answers. 24 or so messages back and forth then comes the dreaded "naughty pics line". Blocked after that.

[QUOTE=PRMan12;6930813][URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/60a1b8aa-ff58-4c2f-9567-bb62aada9a44[/URL]

Good convo, planning to meet? Any inter, no ppm discussed yet.



[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0ca3b53a-98b5-4712-9b8b-4a66082974ef[/URL]

Strange convos, can't tell if she is real or not yet.



Hotgirlsummerforever.

Good Convo but additional pics not great.



Happy hunting. Over and out.[/QUOTE]My guess is that Ashley 38 is fake. Her headline, about me, and what I am seeking make absolutely no sense at all.

"Heart like a butterfly, lively and dynamic" WTF does that even mean?

HotGirlSummerForever has been on SA for a long time but no positive reports that I ever saw. I chatted with her previously but she abruptly blocked me. Never got to her actual pics so glad I did not miss anything.

Who knows if she is real or what she is looking for but for me anyway a total waste of time.

[QUOTE=BDM1227;6931185][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/de54b3e7-aac0-437a-9009-36b29c189b1b[/URL]

Location DC asked for a grand. Not a surprise pics led to some wannabe influencer.[/QUOTE]LOL. She's ethnic. No more than 3.

Sapphire 24.

Chatted over the course of a few days and sent me a number to text. Quick search of the number brings up ads for a pro and obviously not the same girl.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/40f78295-5d69-43cf-83f0-9f5711337ac2[/URL]

[URL]https://www.yesbackpage.com/325/posts/8-Adult/122-Female-Escorts/7705376-TEXT-ME-646-244-4654-I-LL-GIVE-YOU-A-NIGHT-TO-REMEMBER-.html[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/af56f6a9-916e-4e05-9d89-8559efbde4ec[/URL]

Wants 5 for cover. Too thick I'll try to get 3.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e886957c-8d49-47ba-8f9f-5c2c722f1880[/URL]

Reviewed before by others.

Asked for 950. Would settle for 650. I'm fucking hot under 25 chicks for under 500 for overnights in NYC can't pay more for a thick 30 something.