Printable View
[QUOTE=BigMacDaddy;5445802]Also, notice her number is using 860 area code (860-xxx-8664). It could be different in those other areas. I'm not surprised though as I've seen spammers here with local area codes.[/QUOTE]Must be a burner No valid phone number was what came up when I reversed the number.
[QUOTE=Vicr1911;5431220]OK so I took a trip to see this chick 100 for hhr. So before I get in to it some women can weigh 150 pounds soaking wet and considering themselves bbw / fat. So I ignored the fact that she said she's bbw thick her pics are very deceiving LOL. This chick is bbw bbw like very large bbw. She was way to big for me to smash so I made a deal with her. I told her I wanted head only told her if she can make pop within the 30 min she can have the 100 hhr if not I was leaving her with 50 she didn't like that but she damn sure was up for the challenge. Now before anyone thinks I'm trying to body shame her I'm not I just have a preference on what I like as does everyone else. Head was really good but still not better than Mulan in Hartford. So with that being said if you like super bbw then she's for you.
[URL]https://hartford.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/asian/cuban-baby/490234791356[/URL][/QUOTE]The big question is: did you end up paying 50 or 100?
WINDSOR, CT (860) 731-8664 is a voip number serviced by TextNow. Neutral Tandem. SVR.
BMD.
[QUOTE=RonOne;5445842]Must be a burner No valid phone number was what came up when I reversed the number.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BigMacDaddy;5445802]Also, notice her number is using 860 area code (860-xxx-8664). It could be different in those other areas. I'm not surprised though as I've seen spammers here with local area codes.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Woody50;5445617]Be careful. Image searches show her in Hartford, Athens, OH, and LaSalle County, IL, so beware. I think I even may have seen her pics posted on Reddit or porn sites.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CleverAndCoy;5445294]Can't find any info on this girl. Anyone see her?
[URL]https://hartford.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/latin/same-great-time-new-number-no/556012226417[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yea I opted for just the BBJ. Seems like the best way to go. I enjoy it thoroughly.
[QUOTE=BoyWonder9;5444294]Saw her yesterday she is real, nice girl, non-smoker and appears no drugs. 80 BBBJ no swallow and 100 QV with cover. Opted for the QV.
We undressed she is pretty thick not BBW though. Damn she has some BJ skills. Does some nice moves with her head. Too bad she doesn't take the load that would be awesome. Might repeat with a cover. And she paused several times as she was sucking my cock to make small talk (her words). LOL if I want small talk I'll stay home with the GF.
Slipped the cover on and before I entered did some dining. Pussy was clean and smooth and she liked it. Nice vocals. Then started fucking and not sure if she was into it maybe because her back hurt. Before I came she perked up and made it better. All in all very good BJ ok FS. Won't repeat for FS and probably not for great BJ with a cover.[/QUOTE]
I don't care how attractive she you NEVER send a provided your identification. You either have to be really dumb or really horny or the combination of both to do otherwise.
"I will accept 2 provider references. LinkedIn information. A pic of you holding your government I'd"
This shouldn't be an interview process shits absolutely ridiculous. Quite frankly I don't care how many reviews she has her process is messy and dangerous. Now if she goes down your information is now in possession of LEO that I'd and face photo you just sent they now have.
My fellow mongers I strongly advise that you think with your head not your Dick! But I'm sure most of you won't.
[URL]https://new-haven.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/visiting-mature-lonely-divorce/977094163472[/URL]
[QUOTE=RetiredbbcMonger860;5445969]I don't care how attractive she you NEVER send a provided your identification. You either have to be really dumb or really horny or the combination of both to do otherwise.
"I will accept 2 provider references. LinkedIn information. A pic of you holding your government I'd"
This shouldn't be an interview process shits absolutely ridiculous. Quite frankly I don't care how many reviews she has her process is messy and dangerous. Now if she goes down your information is now in possession of LEO that I'd and face photo you just sent they now have.
My fellow mongers I strongly advise that you think with your head not your Dick! But I'm sure most of you won't.
[URL]https://new-haven.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/visiting-mature-lonely-divorce/977094163472[/URL][/QUOTE]Not too surprising. She's not the standard STG trash we're used to seeing. I met her a couple times. I verified with her through Date-Check back when that used to be a thing.
I get your point, though. I wouldn't feel good about giving a reputable provider (or any provider) some forms of identification like what she's suggesting. If you have a few higher caliber references or a P411 account, however, that would definitely be the way to go.
[QUOTE=BigMacDaddy;5159266]I can confirm the info and review.
She is bigger than I prefer but it was a great time.
Non druggie, non boozer, etc. Very sane, clear and coherent.
BMD.[/QUOTE]Anyone know if Candy is still in CT? She was posting in Eastern CT but nothing there now.
[QUOTE=BoyWonder9;5446164]Anyone know if Candy is still in CT? She was posting in Eastern CT but nothing there now.[/QUOTE]After drilling, I grilled (nicely chatted) her. She told me she was generally in the Danbury area but was near Htfd because of a widespread CT power failure. I think it hit her area worse than Htfd. Her plan then, back in Jan, was to head up to Spgfld for a day or two then return home. After that, I never heard from her or tried to reach her. I never did see another ad for her after that week. If she were around now, she'd be booked solid. She was a fleeting gem!
She's Supposably pregnant just passing the ad along.
[URL]https://new-haven.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/cute-bridgeport-incall/011625104244[/URL]
[QUOTE=BigMacDaddy;5443485]That's what I recall from reading reviews but I guess, now, we can add thievery and battery.
(Let's call her Kayy for search purposes).
BMD.[/QUOTE]BMD has a great idea. Let's make it universal. For providers with names 3 letters or less, let's just repeat final letter out to four 'digits'.
Ex. 1 Name: Kay Instead We Use: Kayy.
Ex. 2 Name: Ann Instead We Use: Annn.
Ex. 3 Name: Lu Instead We Use: Luuu.
If we make this regular practice, we can avoid the dreaded unsearchable name problem.
- Keep it Fresh.
[QUOTE=FreshClamSauce;5446596]BMD has a great idea. Let's make it universal. For providers with names 3 letters or less, let's just repeat final letter out to four 'digits'.
Ex. 1 Name: Kay Instead We Use: Kayy.
Ex. 2 Name: Ann Instead We Use: Annn.
Ex. 3 Name: Lu Instead We Use: Luuu.
If we make this regular practice, we can avoid the dreaded unsearchable name problem.
- Keep it Fresh.[/QUOTE]Exactly, and ideally, it helps everyone when searching months later when the STG link is dead.
The other problem is when the girl has no name in her ad. We could include the ad's phone number but that can change over time.
Thanks,
BMD.
To add to that, I used to post the last four digits of their phone number on the subject line. Sometimes they change names but not the number. Other times they change numbers but not the name. Let's try to "catch" as many as possible.
[QUOTE=FreshClamSauce;5446596]BMD has a great idea. Let's make it universal. For providers with names 3 letters or less, let's just repeat final letter out to four 'digits'.
Ex. 1 Name: Kay Instead We Use: Kayy.
Ex. 2 Name: Ann Instead We Use: Annn.
Ex. 3 Name: Lu Instead We Use: Luuu.
If we make this regular practice, we can avoid the dreaded unsearchable name problem.
- Keep it Fresh.[/QUOTE]
Just adding: protect yourselves as best as you can. I suggest every member do so as I do. In this high end era of technology that's available to all of us. I suggest we all benefit by utilizing extensive fact checks on all providers before engagement. One member provided good option for gathering information. Post 13608.
This is a good tool. However if the provider has a solid nucleus around her chances of detailed info is limited as stated in post. I recommend all of us Fact checking providers, escorts, MP's, etc. , before embarking. It gives us a good understanding as to who they are and most important who's around them, plus it gives us control.
Example MP's: The young lady on Burnside has individuals around her that set her up pretty good. Well protected. Called in favors to obtain names, addresses, Friends, etc.
The older lady on Spruce isn't that lucky or intelligent. She's the open book. Americans, Asians, handlers names, addresses, marriage license, along with financial and LE issues that are associated with her. Many skeletons. Knowledge is power.
Yes, you may pay $10, $20, even $50 for a detailed fact check, but it could save you from an embarrassing situation, more so, save your life.
[QUOTE=RonOne;5444118]I ask this question with respect not as a smart alec. It appears with good reason for the last 30 or 60 days most guys have been posting warnings here an in the rip off thread. So I ask you. Have any of you in the last 20 or 60 days had a good experience. Did anyone get laid or sucked for a fair price an enjoyed it? I know covid has messed us up an the sluts want lots of money an are ripping us off. But I'd like to hear some positive posts If any exist. Has this escort / massage / SW world gone to hell?
Just my 2 cents. But with respect to all of you.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RetiredbbcMonger860;5446280]She's Supposably pregnant just passing the ad along.
[URL]https://new-haven.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/cute-bridgeport-incall/011625104244[/URL][/QUOTE]She was also pregnant in RI around 9 months ago and asking for donations for an ultrasound!
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;5446646]To add to that, I used to post the last four digits of their phone number on the subject line. Sometimes they change names but not the number. Other times they change numbers but not the name. Let's try to "catch" as many as possible.[/QUOTE]This also sounds helpful. I will try to follow as well. If enough people recognize and start doing so, hopefully it will become standard practice, like dropping the ad link.