Rants and Raves

[QUOTE=DRickGiver5;3963133]You have never tried to see how many times you can come in a night? I've done this numerous of times when I was younger. The key is "when I was younger". It is totally humanly possible to do it and any doctor can tell you that. The only scary part of it was one time, my little man down there got a little swollen afterwards and I didn't know what to tell the parents in order for them to take me to the doctor. The fact is that the average man can ejaculate once per hour and some can do it more.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I do think some folks embellish their stories just a bit. But I'm amazed at just how much my own performance varies. One day I'll have a hard time getting one off, the next day I'm not satisfied until the third. I guess it depends on a lot of things.

Many years ago when I lived in Florida, I would participate in two swingers clubs, one near Tampa and one near Orlando. I would actually watch the performance of other men and had some favorite couples I played with. Three shots was about it for any man I was familiar with. One time when I was about 30 years old, I nailed this incredible little blonde Barbie doll that I had wanted for months. A waitress whom I heard was a swinger and nympho but never saw at the clubs. She loved cum, loved anal, had serious skills. Looked like a young Pam (from the tool time days). I got my personal record of four shots that evening, probably because she was HOT, I had wanted it for a while, and she would do all the porn-dirty stuff like letting me pull out of her ass and cum in her mouth. She was just one of those girls, you know. I eventually hooked up with her a second time for a DP with her and her 'boyfriend'. We both got in three shots with her taking all six in the mouth, showing it to us, then swallowing. God bless her. They're out there. Not common, but they're out there. And, oh, wouldn't it be nice to be 30 years old again!

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Jesus you're a friggen idiot. Those guys in Seattle used to meet in a public restaurant and talk about fucking hookers so loudly and so graphically that somebody called the police. They figured out that they were actually taking about underage and in some cases real victims of human trafficking. The guys in the "club" who met in public made a website, they owned it, they boasted on the website about things WAY beyond commercial sex. Their little group got infiltrated by LE (they were meeting at a fucking Denny's I think for fuck sakes) and they all told him about fucking trafficked and underage chicks, he got access to the site, then busted the people in Reality which gave them access to the servers, which got them to the site.

So, what's different about us? Let me think.

Oh yeah, we are owned by non US nationals, our servers are not in the US, site registration is not in the US, WE are not in the fucking US. I don't know you, if asked to identify you I could say "well he's an asshole who shoots off his fucking mouth when he doesn't know what he's talking about" but beyond that I got nothing. I couldn't identify you if I was standing next to you. So, if I don't know who you are, and you don't let anybody here know who you are, then how in the fuck are the cops going to find out who you are?

You post 3-4 times a year and now for the biggest bit of horseshit you tell other guys not to post. Care to guess what's going to happen if you do this again?

A2[/blue]

My last twice-in-4 hours event was at the age of 59 at a high-end group sex club in London. I'd played for awhile after my first (and I thought only) orgasm, which I normally didn't do. But two ladies took me on as a project, and as everyone was leaving, with a bit of a crowd, coaxed one more out of me.

That was 8 years ago. Today, three times a week, not three times a day! Stay safe.

[QUOTE=JustMikey;3963327]Yeah, I do think some folks embellish their stories just a bit. But I'm amazed at just how much my own performance varies. One day I'll have a hard time getting one off, the next day I'm not satisfied until the third. I guess it depends on a lot of things.

Many years ago when I lived in Florida, I would participate in two swingers clubs, one near Tampa and one near Orlando. I would actually watch the performance of other men and had some favorite couples I played with. Three shots was about it for any man I was familiar with. One time when I was about 30 years old, I nailed this incredible little blonde Barbie doll that I had wanted for months. A waitress whom I heard was a swinger and nympho but never saw at the clubs. She loved cum, loved anal, had serious skills. Looked like a young Pam (from the tool time days). I got my personal record of four shots that evening, probably because she was HOT, I had wanted it for a while, and she would do all the porn-dirty stuff like letting me pull out of her ass and cum in her mouth. She was just one of those girls, you know. I eventually hooked up with her a second time for a DP with her and her 'boyfriend'. We both got in three shots with her taking all six in the mouth, showing it to us, then swallowing. God bless her. They're out there. Not common, but they're out there. And, oh, wouldn't it be nice to be 30 years old again![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;3960529]...And what gets me is you got guys actually believing these outlandish stories and asking guys for the links or names of these chics or telling them how impressed they are by the stories. Guys, let's please get back to reality and discontinue this bullshit "I dream of Jeanie" story writing. No one is bussing 5-9 nuts a night. Smdh. I don't care how many viagrow pills you take. That is absolutely ridiculous and inhumanely impossible. Please let's get back to factual review writing and discontinue the bullshit sex story fantasies and chest beating.
[/QUOTE]I learned everything I needed to know about human sexuality from my pilfered copy of this esteemed tome:

[URL]https://www.amazon.com/Call-Me-Brick-Munroe-Howard/dp/B00005XB4B[/URL]

Wherein the heroine's boyfriend popped 4 in one night. So back then I set about doing the same thing, although I happened to be alone at the time. That still stands as a personal record.

Having experienced actual sexual intercourse with females in the intervening years, I've come to appreciate the complexities and possibilities that different individuals bring to the table. Since an O is ultimately unleashed by the brain, I can imagine a 9-pop marathon happening if the multiple partners were exciting enough. Probably 3 through 9 we're pretty lame from the ladies' perspective, but ya can't please them all.

-Jeepster1.

[QUOTE=Admin2;3932277][BLUE]I moved this here because it's probably going to generate a lot of responses from idiots that will require evisceration for crying WOLF!

We were not being censored. I know that a lot of you guys have been brainwashed into believing that the "long arm" of the US law enforcement agencies is all powerful (maybe you might want to think about why they want you to think like that) but they can't block (block not censor) a site who's servers are not within the USA world wide. I was unable to access the site yesterday either and I wasn't in the USA. The servers were down. It happens. We don't make the kind of money that it takes to have an all the time up site like facebook with fail over servers and mirrored databases all around the wold. We have a server, actually two, one for the USASG and USAAC and another for the ISG, they are in Malaysia (you could find that out by running a trace) and there were issues at the server farm yesterday so the site was fucked. Again, regrettable but it happens on little bitty sites like ours.

Had I known the tinfoil hat brigade was coming out I would have said something. Wait, no I couldn't because I couldn't access the site from Brazil either.

Here's what you do in the future.

1. Install a VPN that lets you move your ip around the world.
2.If the site is down and you can't access it from a US, Russian, or Netherlands IP then the issue is the server and we are working on it.
3. If you can access it fine from other countries but you can't from inside the US then the thought police have won, you are fucked, and you missed your chance to escape.

Net Neutrality is a different issue, had nothing to do with what happened yesterday but is probably one of the most important issues of the day and you should educate yourself about it.

[url]https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/06/even-though-net-neutrality-protection-end-today-congress-can-still-act-save-them[/url]

Sorry for the trouble but it looks like it's over

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I read this again and A2 while I agree with you that servers can go down some times which is what happened the other night again I think for a few minutes I think you may be mistaken that your site can't be blocked in the USA Just because you don't have servers that are not in the USA Unless something has changed and I'm on wifi somewhere like Starbucks I doubt I am going to be able to get on your site. I was wrong about net neutrality being tested a month ago as your servers were down for a small site like this one. I am pretty sure your site can be blocked though if an internet provider was to do so while on a wifi connection.

[QUOTE=Zipper34;3966697]I read this again and A2 while I agree with you that servers can go down some times which is what happened the other night again I think for a few minutes I think you may be mistaken that your site can't be blocked in the USA Just because you don't have servers that are not in the USA Unless something has changed and I'm on wifi somewhere like Starbucks I doubt I am going to be able to get on your site. I was wrong about net neutrality being tested a month ago as your servers were down for a small site like this one. I am pretty sure your site can be blocked though if an internet provider was to do so while on a wifi connection.[/QUOTE]Zip, You are still thinking Starbucks is an internet service provider. They sell coffee not internet access. Starbucks owns the wi-fi router that connects you to the internet, that they can block access to any site they want to block. It could block The weather channel if they wanted to. Comcast sells internet, they sell to Starbucks, Comcast isn't blocking you from anything.

[blue]yes, exactly, Starbucks doesn't want people surfing porn on their laptops in the store. They themselves probably don't even do it, I'm sure there is a service they use that updates their lists of blocked URLs

Same same at many McDonald's.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Airmantroy;3966814]Zip, You are still thinking Starbucks is an internet service provider. They sell coffee not internet access. Starbucks owns the wi-fi router that connects you to the internet, that they can block access to any site they want to block. It could block The weather channel if they wanted to. Comcast sells internet, they sell to Starbucks, Comcast isn't blocking you from anything.

[blue]yes, exactly, Starbucks doesn't want people surfing porn on their laptops in the store. They themselves probably don't even do it, I'm sure there is a service they use that updates their lists of blocked URLs

Same same at many McDonald's.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]Pretty sure it's the internet service provider that does it and no I didn't think Starbucks is an internet service provider. I think an ISP like Comcast or AT&T or whoever has their own deal set up with public places. So if net neutrality repeal was to ever be truly enforced by ISPs, I'm sure they could do it with anybody who gets on wifi. Probably won't do it because they'd obviously lose a lot of business.

[QUOTE=Zipper34;3967667]Pretty sure it's the internet service provider that does it and no I didn't think Starbucks is an internet service provider. I think an ISP like Comcast or AT&T or whoever has their own deal set up with public places. So if net neutrality repeal was to ever be truly enforced by ISPs, I'm sure they could do it with anybody who gets on wifi. Probably won't do it because they'd obviously lose a lot of business.[/QUOTE]Just Google 'router based porn blocking'. When you request a site, the router consults the DNS to find out how to reach the site. If it is 'naughty', you will either be blocked, or referred to a server that does some fancier presentation before blocking you. If 'nice', the DNS will provide the real location and permit access. A simple, elegant, low cost solution chosen by the owner of the router (Starbucks, McDonalds, etc).

Thanks to our friends on Capitol Hill, we will soon be 'paying' for packages to access content on the Internet. So for instance, for an additional $5. 00 a month you'll be able to access (say 1,000 websites. Yahoo, cnn, google, ajc, espn, etc) and for $10.00 additional to your already high Internet connection you'll get access to (say 10,000) websites and for the low-low price of an additional $20 per month you'll get even more. I'm sure this will be a fine way to shut down porn of all types across the Internet while at the same time restricting free speech, which is what the President wants to do as well as make the already super-rich people even more rich.

The killing of Net Neutrality reaches far and deep, we just don't know it yet, but I tell you now, in the next year or two you will see how it affects everyone.

If you want to move forward put your car in (D) EMOCRAT.

If you want to go backwards put your car in (R) EPUBLICAN.

Plain and simple.

[QUOTE=Dkuym1;3967840]Thanks to our friends on Capitol Hill, we will soon be 'paying' for packages to access content on the Internet. So for instance, for an additional $5. 00 a month you'll be able to access (say 1,000 websites. Yahoo, cnn, google, ajc, espn, etc) and for $10.00 additional to your already high Internet connection you'll get access to (say 10,000) websites and for the low-low price of an additional $20 per month you'll get even more. I'm sure this will be a fine way to shut down porn of all types across the Internet while at the same time restricting free speech, which is what the President wants to do as well as make the already super-rich people even more rich.

The killing of Net Neutrality reaches far and deep, we just don't know it yet, but I tell you now, in the next year or two you will see how it affects everyone.

If you want to move forward put your car in (D) EMOCRAT.

If you want to go backwards put your car in (R) EPUBLICAN.

Plain and simple.[/QUOTE]Don't let one particular political issue guide your brain. The world is bigger than that (and obviously you). I suggest you learn / comprehend the history of this country from a minimum of 1900 on and the stifling effects of Democratic Party policies at least as far back as the Johnson administration. Keep an open mind instead of that tunnel vision.

Never mind that. You need to redress further and understand basics on your level. SMH.

[QUOTE=Zipper34;3967667]Pretty sure it's the internet service provider that does it and no I didn't think Starbucks is an internet service provider. I think an ISP like Comcast or AT&T or whoever has their own deal set up with public places. So if net neutrality repeal was to ever be truly enforced by ISPs, I'm sure they could do it with anybody who gets on wifi. Probably won't do it because they'd obviously lose a lot of business.[/QUOTE]You're my comical lifeline, Zip. Keep those IT-centric posts coming.

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;3967868]Don't let one particular political issue guide your brain. The world is bigger than that (and obviously you). I suggest you learn / comprehend the history of this country from a minimum of 1900 on and the stifling effects of Democratic Party policies at least as far back as the Johnson administration. Keep an open mind instead of that tunnel vision.

Never mind that. You need to redress further and understand basics on your level. SMH.[/QUOTE]Damn did he hurt your feelings or something?

[QUOTE=Infatuated;3967783]Just Google 'router based porn blocking'. When you request a site, the router consults the DNS to find out how to reach the site. If it is 'naughty', you will either be blocked, or referred to a server that does some fancier presentation before blocking you. If 'nice', the DNS will provide the real location and permit access. A simple, elegant, low cost solution chosen by the owner of the router (Starbucks, McDonalds, etc).[/QUOTE]I didn't know this myself but yes this seems possible too. Thanks for the info. I don't know everything about technology obviously and just find things out as I go along.

[QUOTE=Dkuym1;3967840]Thanks to our friends on Capitol Hill, we will soon be 'paying' for packages to access content on the Internet. So for instance, for an additional $5. 00 a month you'll be able to access (say 1,000 websites. Yahoo, cnn, google, ajc, espn, etc) and for $10.00 additional to your already high Internet connection you'll get access to (say 10,000) websites and for the low-low price of an additional $20 per month you'll get even more. I'm sure this will be a fine way to shut down porn of all types across the Internet while at the same time restricting free speech, which is what the President wants to do as well as make the already super-rich people even more rich.

The killing of Net Neutrality reaches far and deep, we just don't know it yet, but I tell you now, in the next year or two you will see how it affects everyone.

If you want to move forward put your car in (D) EMOCRAT.

If you want to go backwards put your car in (R) EPUBLICAN.

Plain and simple.[/QUOTE]Politics aside, if net neutrality appeal does go into gear (no pun intended) then ISP will feel the pinch.

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;3967868]Don't let one particular political issue guide your brain. The world is bigger than that (and obviously you). I suggest you learn / comprehend the history of this country from a minimum of 1900 on and the stifling effects of Democratic Party policies at least as far back as the Johnson administration. Keep an open mind instead of that tunnel vision.

Never mind that. You need to redress further and understand basics on your level. SMH.[/QUOTE]Damn night, that was harsh. I can actually understand why you may be for what most of us are against right now but the logic is flawed. You must really want some things to be the old fashion way again I bet.

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;3967873]You're my comical lifeline, Zip. Keep those IT-centric posts coming.[/QUOTE]Yes I can see why you find me funny, because you really want it to happen.

[QUOTE=RollingStoner;3968455]Very nice! [b]If I was in Atlanta I'd be in[/b].

Question, is she cool with you putting her out on the world wide web like this (face pics, name, and where she works)? Because it's only a matter of time before someone shows her your post.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DRickGiver5;3968507][b]Obviously[/b]

That question alone shows you're not from around here or haven't read much of this thread.[/QUOTE]Really. Was it the part where I said "if I was in Atlanta I'd be in," or was it the 80 something posts I have in the Detroit forum that gave me away (you know you checked out my previous posts)? One thing for sure, no one can ever call you a dumb-ass inbred redneck after you showed how smart you are with that post.

Now go home and get your fucking shine box.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a [u]threat made towards other Forum members[/u]. Threatening other members in any way, either veiled or directly, is strictly prohibited and will result the the perpetrator being banned from the forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Before you write me and say it wasn't, yes, it was and know it was.

Hope it was worth it

A2[/blue]