[QUOTE=SR7D1;5793462]So may Laura's to search, LOL.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/cleveland-baby/44598603[/URL]
Anyone partake?[/QUOTE]That seems very clearly fake.
Printable View
[QUOTE=SR7D1;5793462]So may Laura's to search, LOL.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/cleveland-baby/44598603[/URL]
Anyone partake?[/QUOTE]That seems very clearly fake.
[QUOTE=NCoastLover;5791888]I second that: I have seen her a couple of times a month for a few years. I called her yesterday and she texted me back immediately that she would call me later (and she did call me).
Don't pull any crap on her and don't cheap out. I know it will go against the safeguards we have read lately to protect against being caught in a sting but if you use a burner, text app or VoIP number Hailey will likely block you. Follow her rules and she will be great to you!
P.S. I provided my number to Hailey years ago.[/QUOTE]Definitely a great go to. Thought she left the area already. No response lately.
Hey gang,
Longtime member, who left and attempted recovery, and is now back in the fold, with a friendly public service reminder: up front deposits are always, always, a scam. Harley, below, engaged in a lengthy and very friendly conversation with me, and when it came time to leave for a meeting, insisted that I buy content to prove I was serious. She sent a photo specific to a request, showing someone very close to the advertised girl, so I figured (against my better judgment) she was a real person. Was assured her word meant everything, blah blah blah, you know the story, and it ended with me out of cash. Just $30 bucks, which is pocket change, fine, but still makes me the victim of my own stupidity. Harley advertises (today) in STG under phone number (216)xxxx992. (Link wouldn't paste).
[QUOTE=Metal134;5793500]That seems very clearly fake.[/QUOTE]I think the ad is fake also, but I sent a request for more info anyway.
[QUOTE=Fuzzyek;5793043]Looks like she would be kind of cute if she were to lose some weight.[/QUOTE]I saw her a few times when she wasn't a balloon. Pic 6 yrs ago.
[QUOTE=Metloaf;5793512]Definitely a great go to. Thought she left the area already. No response lately.[/QUOTE]Did you text her? She is west this week-I spoke with her last night.
[QUOTE=Udon42;5793719]I saw her a few times when she wasn't a balloon. Pic 6 yrs ago.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the mammarys!
[QUOTE=Fuzzyek;5793682]I think the ad is fake also, but I sent a request for more info anyway.[/QUOTE]She responded to me, said she would offer outcall. I think I saw her on SA before I blocked her for asking for $ to meet for lunch.
[QUOTE=OldBrausa;5793594]Hey gang,
Longtime member, who left and attempted recovery, and is now back in the fold, with a friendly public service reminder: up front deposits are always, always, a scam. Harley, below, engaged in a lengthy and very friendly conversation with me, and when it came time to leave for a meeting, insisted that I buy content to prove I was serious. She sent a photo specific to a request, showing someone very close to the advertised girl, so I figured (against my better judgment) she was a real person. Was assured her word meant everything, blah blah blah, you know the story, and it ended with me out of cash. Just $30 bucks, which is pocket change, fine, but still makes me the victim of my own stupidity. Harley advertises (today) in STG under phone number (216)xxxx992. (Link wouldn't paste).[/QUOTE]Harley is same person as Kayla. Reviewed multiple times as scam artists.
[QUOTE=Ceasar160;5793106]She blocked me about a year ago due to a disagreement. She used to message me all the time, asking me to visit when she needed money. I proposed a multi-pop session for a considerable amount more than usual. She started complaining about not wanting to do the multiples, but wanted the larger amount of dough. I kind of chewed her out a bit, and that was that. I used to see her 3 or 4 times a month. Now I just laugh when I see her posting 6 ads a day. Her loss.[/QUOTE]Pretty much the same here, would see her once or twice a week for our agreed apon price, then out of no where she said she can't do it for that anymore and how that was just supposed to be a one time price blah blah blah, I was seeing her for at least a year at the said price, I told her I would give her a extra. 10 from now on and she said she won't do anything for under. 90 now. I told her a qv on her couch wasn't worth that, some things were said back and forth and now pow, I'm on her blacklist.
[QUOTE=NIkko777;5792181]Can any senior members confirm she is still around? Alexa is an ATF PSE and would like to see what she's lookin like nowadays.[/QUOTE]As everybody else has posted, she is much, much larger than the photos show.
She is a sweet girl and a fun time. She is very accommodating but really big. Her breasts are mammoth. . . Too mammoth.
[QUOTE=CTom86;5794570]As everybody else has posted, she is much, much larger than the photos show.
She is a sweet girl and a fun time. She is very accommodating but really big. Her breasts are mammoth. . . Too mammoth.[/QUOTE]Yes that's why she uses outdated pix on stg.
[QUOTE=CTom86;5794570]As everybody else has posted, she is much, much larger than the photos show.
She is a sweet girl and a fun time. She is very accommodating but really big. Her breasts are mammoth. . . Too mammoth.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Udon42;5795219]Yes that's why she uses outdated pix on stg.[/QUOTE]She had an ad last summer that had more recent pics and she was a lot bigger in some of those pics.
[QUOTE=Rafter17;5795284]She had an ad last summer that had more recent pics and she was a lot bigger in some of those pics.[/QUOTE]More cushion for the pushin is what I like LOL.
[QUOTE=Udon42;5795219]Yes that's why she uses outdated pix on stg.[/QUOTE]I don't get who she is trying to fool though. She is obviously way skinnier in the stg pics vs irl, so like, if someone see's her they are obviously going to see she is huge vs online. So why try to lie about it?