Escort Reports

[URL]https://megapersonals.eu/public/post_detail/68662797[/URL]

Saw this one over the weekend, she's working out of the hotel by the Ameristar casino. Was quick to respond and send location asked for a verification photo sent her a poorly lit photo while driving to see her and arrived, she took about 15 minutes to respond once I got to location and said she was "on the phone" apologized and sent room number. Upon entry and first impression she definitely does not look like the photos posted (to be expected) she was a bit homely imo but passable, big thick ass and decently firm tits. Started with a CBJ that was decent then pretty much allowed any position I wanted. Started with her reverse cg, missionary, then switched up to doggie to finish. Did not take long to bust. She's got GRIP. Super tight. Multiple times throughout the session I had to slow up and make sure the condom was still on. 120 for the qv. Would repeat.

[QUOTE=Dasgtin123;6755248]That's odd's, my review is not for that ad but this one: [URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163409830[/URL], must had clicked the wrong one.[/QUOTE]It's alright brother, I understand. I knew there had to be some error. I've done the same thing as well.

[QUOTE=SouthCityGuySt;6755014]Anybody seen this one? I'm planning to reach out to her, but wanted to see if anyone has already talked to her or seen her. Pics past the smell test, but I'm always leery of LC posts.

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163528950[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]I was trying to meet up with her as well. She seemed legit, asked to FT for her verification. I was fine with that, girls often just want to get a sense of if you're a creep or not. But I had never done that on this burner phone yet, and never got the Apple I'd set up, which apparently you need. By the time I got it all sorted out she wasn't responding, and I had limited time so moved on too.

Any info on this one? Looks a little TGTBT.

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163585504[/URL]#.

As a side note I've been getting SO MANY page redirects on LC/EB after new years, getting frustrating using them. Anything I can do to prevent the page hijacking? Im using firefox.

[QUOTE=Colapo9421;6183130]Has anyone seen Siren? If so are her pics accurate and does she provide good service?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/96573054[/URL][/QUOTE]

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163589632[/URL]

I guess you mean this one, I've been curious as well but no info here. Would be nice to know the area and pricing. She looks fun but also. Intimidating I guess, LOL.

[QUOTE=Wfhff14;6756140]Any info on this one? Looks a little TGTBT.

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163585504[/URL]#.

As a side note I've been getting SO MANY page redirects on LC/EB after new years, getting frustrating using them. Anything I can do to prevent the page hijacking? Im using firefox.[/QUOTE]Olivia is a former Angel and she's legit. It was a pretty good GFE session even if a bit rushed, but not to a point that it ruined the experience. She's attractive for sure, but I'd say her pics, while definitely her, make her look hotter than she is. Not my first choice, but will probably see her again some time.

[QUOTE=BlueFox5;6755694][URL]https://megapersonals.eu/public/post_detail/68662797[/URL]

Saw this one over the weekend, she's working out of the hotel by the Ameristar casino. Was quick to respond and send location asked for a verification photo sent her a poorly lit photo while driving to see her and arrived, she took about 15 minutes to respond once I got to location and said she was "on the phone" apologized and sent room number. Upon entry and first impression she definitely does not look like the photos posted (to be expected) she was a bit homely imo but passable, big thick ass and decently firm tits. Started with a CBJ that was decent then pretty much allowed any position I wanted. Started with her reverse cg, missionary, then switched up to doggie to finish. Did not take long to bust. She's got GRIP. Super tight. Multiple times throughout the session I had to slow up and make sure the condom was still on. 120 for the qv. Would repeat.[/QUOTE]Who wouldn't want a thick ass that grips! Sounds fun to me but did she just old pics of her or were they completely fake?

[QUOTE=Wfhff14;6756153][URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163589632[/URL]

I guess you mean this one, I've been curious as well but no info here. Would be nice to know the area and pricing. She looks fun but also. Intimidating I guess, LOL.[/QUOTE][URL]https://callescort.org/314-939-2988[/URL]

She looks like she'd be a fun ride to me! No holes barred!

[QUOTE=Slimpicker;6756265]Who wouldn't want a thick ass that grips! Sounds fun to me but did she just old pics of her or were they completely fake?[/QUOTE]No not fake pics, just heavily filtered and she is extremely dolled up in those photos (make up, wig, etc). In person she was wearing no make up and what was possibly a very thin, wig cap. The skin on her face is that of someone that piles the make-up / foundation on a lot causing severe acne / blemishes. She isn't hideous, but definitely not as gorgeous as the photos make her out to be. Very average. Or how I would best describe her, homely. Still would repeat.

Lala posts constantly and but never any reviews and the comments look to be self posted. Anyone ever take the plunge? GPS for sure.

[URL]https://milfy.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163589112[/URL]

[QUOTE=MrJoeCool;6756557][URL]https://callescort.org/314-939-2988[/URL]

She looks like she'd be a fun ride to me! No holes barred![/QUOTE]She does looks like she'd be a lot of fun. I've seen her posts for a while and I've always been interested but never seen anything here or really anywhere so I haven't taken the plunge. That said, she seems like one of those girls you may not see on the regular or but only when you really want to let your freak flag fly. Anyone have experience with her?

[QUOTE=SouthCityGuySt;6756741]She does looks like she'd be a lot of fun. I've seen her posts for a while and I've always been interested but never seen anything here or really anywhere so I haven't taken the plunge. That said, she seems like one of those girls you may not see on the regular or but only when you really want to let your freak flag fly. Anyone have experience with her?[/QUOTE]Just me, but those face tats keep me a 100 miles away.

[QUOTE=Wfhff14;6756140]Any info on this one? Looks a little TGTBT.

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163585504[/URL]#.

As a side note I've been getting SO MANY page redirects on LC/EB after new years, getting frustrating using them. Anything I can do to prevent the page hijacking? Im using firefox.[/QUOTE]She is very sweet, limited GFE for my session she got the job done and I might see her again, former Angel left before they imploded. As far as your browser try using private browsing in the menu it will launch a new page in a sandbox so to speak.

[QUOTE=Prof30;6756870]Just me, but those face tats keep me a 100 miles away.[/QUOTE]Yeah, something tells me either she's got a nicely furnished timeshare in the penal system (and she visits there often) or her "daddy issues" are just officially at DEFCON-1...Or both.
Girls who are willing to tat and bolt their faces up like that kinda tells you something about them, and in "this" hobby it's usually nothing good, so unless you're literally looking for a potential shitshow, I'd look elsewhere as well.

[QUOTE=Snapped;6756704]Lala posts constantly and but never any reviews and the comments look to be self posted. Anyone ever take the plunge? GPS for sure.

[URL]https://milfy.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/163589112[/URL][/QUOTE]Yep, I took the plunge but on SA. Didn't know at the time she was on LC. I'm not sure what she wouldn't do for $.