Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

[QUOTE=Puntang Man;1714656]Totally agree GC and DN but why pay outlandish rates when Gem, Chantel, Margarita, Nikki S, are / where no where near CK's needs and are giving top level service. Look at SBl, Jordan, Jasmine, Silk, Rhonda, on USASG Every bit as good as CK and no where near her Elite needs. YMMV is the guide for us all and so is the word no if you can find as good for half or more unless people just have an overwhelming desire to go overboard. Just my opinion and as for jealousy among ladies true then true now. So what's in your wallet?[/QUOTE]I'm going to make P-Man's case. Candy Kemp was more expensive than the others.

Back in the day when all these girls were around:

Rhonda Day $300.

Chantel $350.

Gemini Starr $400.

Candy Kemp $450 (would do one hour in-call if in town and already set up, available and she had seen you before; otherwise two hour minimum at $900)

Agent Margarita. Have no idea.

Nikki Spence. Have no idea

Has anyone had an experience with babyniki?

[QUOTE=Golfcart; 1714780]I'm going to make P-Man's case. Candy Kemp was more expensive than the others.

Back in the day when all these girls were around:

Rhonda Day $300.

Chantel $350.

Gemini Starr $400.

Candy Kemp $450 (would do one hour in-call if in town and already set up, available and she had seen you before; otherwise two hour minimum at $900)

Agent Margarita. Have no idea. \Nikki Spence. Have no idea[/QUOTE]NS 200+100 each hour after Chantel 3 or 2 for six Help me Rhonda 200 and 100 after first hour, I am talking about help me Rhonda not Rhonda Day from Louisville, Margarita 250 and 450 for two. Gem 350 or two for six. Silk 200 and 1 to 150 second hour. All as good as CK and none hitting you for 900 for a two hour minimum first time I have nothing against CK except her prices for first timers were ridiculous. Even if you had seen her once her two hour was seven to 900 and that was way back in the day. China was 3 and hour and floated 2 or three for the second hour. Calia was 250 to 3 and same for the second hour. I appreciate the break down and forgot about RDay who seems has just come back out again. In Louisville there is a woman named Jordan who is hot as hell and two and hour and 1 to 150 a second hour. Thanks GC for the break down on some lovely ladies from the past. PT

Does anyone have any input on winwithjen.

So let me get this straight. The complaints against Candy Kemp is because you COULDN'T see her? All those hard feelings and negativity is because you were denied by your wallets? Isn't that unfair? That's like being pissed off at Lamborghini because you can only afford to drive a Mercedes or a Toyota.

What happened to old,"What a lady chooses to charge is her own business."? She didn't deny you. YOU denied you, by virtue of your career choices and your financial situation.

Publicly comparing her rates against the rates of other ladies does a disservice not only to Candy, but to the other ladies as well, and to the hobby in general. It's saying that the experience each lady provides are exactly the same and should be priced equally. One minute with Candy is the same minute with Rhonda, or with Chantal, or Gemini, or (among the new crop) Dawn, Molly, Brandy or Nicole the Nympho.

[QUOTE=D Nut;1714862][snip] What happened to old,"What a lady chooses to charge is her own business."? [snip][/QUOTE]Fully agree and there's an equally important flip side."what a guy chooses to pay is his own business". To extend DN's metaphor a little, why do I care if some guy is willing to pay for a Lamborghini. I'm not because it's just not a good value to me. Even if I could drop a couple hundred grand on a car, that's not where I'd spend it. For 200k, I could do a lot of other things first. But that doesn't make the guy who can (and does) get one a jerk.

I wouldn't know Cindy Kemp from Clark Kent but if she has a service model that can command $450 / hour I only have 3 words on the topic "fanf*ckingtastic for her". And if any of you guys have to cash to lay out for that and you think it's a value,"fanf*ckingtastic for you too". This is capitalism 101. Ain't America great.

Here's the thing. It is ALL about VALUE. I don't care if we're talking about dropping 0. 20 for a drive by BBBJ versus. 30 or paying $$/hr versus $.5 / hr. All this crap about how "it's raising prices for the rest of us" is just that. It's horsehockey. It only raises prices if you don't know what value you're willing to pay for. It's only raising prices if you spend your time negotiating with the little head instead of the big head. If it's not a value, don't buy it. Move on to the next place where you might find a value.

My friend. I know he overpays some provider partners but to him they're a good value even at the slightly higher price. For whatever reason. Location, ambiance, they remind him of an old high school girlfriend, or that tickle his nutsack with a feather while calling him "stallion". For whatever reason, those providers are a value to him.

You might not think they're worth the price. Who cares?

They may not charge you the same price he pays, they may charge you less. Who cares?

There are some providers who my friend has decided to not see because the value isn't obvious. Their prices seem high to him. They're not bad providers and they're not bad people, they're just not good providers FOR HIM. He's talked to several of them and they're smart women who run a good business and have an appropriately positive opinion of their worth in this area. My friend thinks they might be a little high. So what. If you can't pay the toll, don't drive the road.

No hard feelings. They're still good people and for many mongers, they may be perfect provider partners.

But com'on guys, don't slam a potential provider partner because she has built a business you can't afford. That's just un-American. LOL.

Have a great day.

Dz

[QUOTE=D Nut; 1714862]So let me get this straight. The complaints against Candy Kemp is because you COULDN'T see her? All those hard feelings and negativity is because you were denied by your wallets? Isn't that unfair? That's like being pissed off at Lamborghini because you can only afford to drive a Mercedes or a Toyota.

What happened to old,"What a lady chooses to charge is her own business."? She didn't deny you. YOU denied you, by virtue of your career choices and your financial situation.

Publicly comparing her rates against the rates of other ladies does a disservice not only to Candy, but to the other ladies as well, and to the hobby in general. It's saying that the experience each lady provides are exactly the same and should be priced equally. One minute with Candy is the same minute with Rhonda, or with Chantal, or Gemini, or (among the new crop) Dawn, Molly, Brandy or Nicole the Nympho.[/QUOTE]CK believed herself to be the queen bee as soon as she hit national #1 on the large canine board list and it was a classic case of believing her own press.

This resulted in her clashing with any lady that appeared to be ready to take #1 as well as offering deals for reviews in order to keep her name on top. The lady understood the value of marketing (which if I remember right was what her BA was in) and knew the value of having "Rated #1 on." in the header on her site.

Which in business we refer to as creating her brand.

I met her several times socially, but never opted to meet even though I had a "coupon" for 1 appointment of multiple hours at $200 / hr + 1 hr free with no expiration date that I received when she was helping Sara raise money to support the old escortamerica board (you got the coupon if you donated $100 to the board). For me there was nothing about CK that really made her stand out compared to her peers at the time unlike say Taylor Fox, Nikki Spence or Sara Jade so this was purely a matter of personal preference.

Strangely enough until I came across the screen saver that I built for CK back in 2003 about a month ago I hadn't even thought about her in years.

[QUOTE=Jalex;1714566]FYI, I can say that she's not really happy about the fake pic talk, so supposedly she is posting cropped real photos soon. Sorry for the double post, I was having problems using the edit function.[/QUOTE]Hahahaha. She doesn't like the fake pic talk. She has no problems with the fake pictures. She just doesn't like people calling her out on it. I love it. Thanks for a good laugh.

I can only shake my head. After being called out for posting fake pics of Nadia last night, his / her solution is to post ANOTHER FAKE PIC? Seriously?

Scroll down a little on this page: [url]http://blue-eyedvixen.com/2010/06/melting-in-his-hands-and-tft/[/url]

And here: http://images.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/coolnerd69/coolnerd69-1286319481.jpg

And here: http://discretedivasusie.com/photos.phtml

I can only shake my head, and go, WTF!

Thanks for pointing these out. Lots of good posts from you lately and greatly appreciated.

[QUOTE=TheStigyEh; 1713661]There goes my over-inflated sense of self. Oh well, it was nice while it latest. I had the same experience as well. She enjoys her "job".

"He also said that she had more pops than he did."[/QUOTE]My friend said she had 2 Mt. Dews, he only had 1. Maybe she was equally satisfied by you both, or really does love her job and has a few mt. Dews everytime she's thirsty.

Either way, you're over-inflated sense of self is still in tact.

PS. My friend was married once & can easily tell the difference between a fake Diet Mt. Dew and a real, fully caffeinated Mt. Dew.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy; 1714930]CK believed herself to be the queen bee as soon as she hit national #1 on the large canine board list and it was a classic case of believing her own press.

This resulted in her clashing with any lady that appeared to be ready to take #1 as well as offering deals for reviews in order to keep her name on top. The lady understood the value of marketing (which if I remember right was what her BA was in) and knew the value of having "Rated #1 on." in the header on her site.

Which in business we refer to as creating her brand.

I met her several times socially, but never opted to meet even though I had a "coupon" for 1 appointment of multiple hours at $200 / hr + 1 hr free with no expiration date that I received when she was helping Sara raise money to support the old escortamerica board (you got the coupon if you donated $100 to the board). For me there was nothing about CK that really made her stand out compared to her peers at the time unlike say Taylor Fox, Nikki Spence or Sara Jade so this was purely a matter of personal preference.

Strangely enough until I came across the screen saver that I built for CK back in 2003 about a month ago I hadn't even thought about her in years.[/QUOTE]Everyone has a choice as to how to spend their dollars and women what to charge for them. If we don't like it we say no. No argument there. My personal guidance has always been if I am going to spend top dollar on a lady what is she giving me that the others aren't? The other ladies mentioned in posts will all be a friend experience and are quite good at it. I never saw Rhonda Day time issues or Gemini due to distance, and wouldn't see CK due to her over inflated needs. Most of us work hard for our money and when we meet a lady for pleasure we want to get a lot of quality at needs that will allow us to see her often. If a guy has the $$s and wants to spend them his choice. I value my resources much more than just to say I "I saw Candy Kemp" I would much rather see the others. It has nothing to do with Lamborghini's and Toyotas, it has to do with service and enjoyment vs resources for me. For others it might be for other reasons. When I can see Silk at 2 and she is HOT, or Sasha Black, Jasmine, Help me Rhonda and numerous UTR's JJ, Mandy etc at their needs, don't have to look for the high rollers. Again it all comes down to personal preference. No one is right or wrong but as my Bro said, what is in your wallet? Let me add how deep are your pockets. Believe Warlock said it best. What happens when you become a victim of your status and own advertising. Have a great day and hope you all disn't get hit by the storm as we did.

Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.

[QUOTE=WyldeChild99; 1715360]Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.[/QUOTE]Thank you, I'm pleased you enjoyed yourself and for the great review! Hope to dream with you again real soon.

[QUOTE=WyldeChild99; 1715360]Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.[/QUOTE]I talked to Nadia (I think) on the phone and she said she just moved to Covington. We never did meet because I heard her pics are fake. Anyone know her story?

[QUOTE=WyldeChild99; 1715360]Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.[/QUOTE]". It is not much of a misrepresentation","She looks just like that anyway.","It's close enough.","She likes her privacy.". These are all the standard response when someone gets called out on using fake pics. However, what I really have a problem with, is after being called out for fake pics the first time, the response is MORE fake pics? Did she not think someone would check. AGAIN? Whoever SingleDad513 is, he really screwed up the girls he's representing with that little stunt. Anyone who has read the boards know someone ALWAYS checks. I know I do until one gets verified and vetted by someone 100% trustworthy.

The girls say they need 2 references from a guy to make an appointment. With the red flags using fake pics sends up, it sounds more like they need to provide 2 references themselves from WELL ESTABLISHED MEMBERS.

I don't want to seem like I'm attacking you WyldeChild, but you're pretty new. To me, you don't sling the same weight as Big Mack, or Warlock, or Golfcart.

Who is willing to stand up for these women? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

So is she real and worth it then? I have talked to her, but haven't met yet.

So I'm browsing along the site tonight having a perfectly pleasant evening, enjoying a cocktail, relishing the after-glow positive feelings of my first visit to Blake which occurred earlier this evening (review forthcoming in the near future) and what do I happen upon?

Seriously? Say it isn't so Hannah2 / RemmeyLynn?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1715445&viewfull=1#post1715445[/url]

Note the publisher.

All I can think is "Sasha Gray take me away"?

Sigh,

The Stig

I've read several good things about the BP Sara in Norwood. The problem for me is that she NEVER answers her phone! Any pointers on how to actually get in touch with her would be greatly appreciated.

So is this "singledad513" guy Nadia's handle. Is that her?

[QUOTE=TheStigyEh; 1716097]So I'm browsing along the site tonight having a perfectly pleasant evening, enjoying a cocktail, relishing the after-glow positive feelings of my first visit to Blake which occurred earlier this evening (review forthcoming in the near future) and what do I happen upon?

Seriously? Say it isn't so Hannah2 / RemmeyLynn?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1715445&viewfull=1#post1715445[/url]

Note the publisher.

All I can think is "Sasha Gray take me away"?

Sigh,

The Stig[/QUOTE]Opps. I meant Sasha Black. That's the problem with posting after a couple cocktails.

You do what you feel dude. I'm not here to lie to anybody. I just wonder why you have such a hard on for this particular girl (see what I did there?) when every other ad on the internet is sporting fake pics. The first pic in the new ad IS REAL. That IS in fact the girl called Nadia. If you don't want to get with her don't.

[QUOTE=D Nut; 1715863]It is not much of a misrepresentation","She looks just like that anyway.","It's close enough.","She likes her privacy.". These are all the standard response when someone gets called out on using fake pics. However, what I really have a problem with, is after being called out for fake pics the first time, the response is MORE fake pics? Did she not think someone would check. AGAIN? Whoever SingleDad513 is, he really screwed up the girls he's representing with that little stunt. Anyone who has read the boards know someone ALWAYS checks. I know I do until one gets verified and vetted by someone 100% trustworthy.

The girls say they need 2 references from a guy to make an appointment. With the red flags using fake pics sends up, it sounds more like they need to provide 2 references themselves from WELL ESTABLISHED MEMBERS.

I don't want to seem like I'm attacking you WyldeChild, but you're pretty new. To me, you don't sling the same weight as Big Mack, or Warlock, or Golfcart.

Who is willing to stand up for these women? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?[/QUOTE]

After she posts on BP, she starts to take calls. She will not return them from voice mail so if you call during a session, you are out of luck.

I can tell you she is clean, willing and damn good. Very worth the $$$ and I have been a repeat.

[QUOTE=DickHerDown;1716344]I've read several good things about the BP Sara in Norwood. The problem for me is that she NEVER answers her phone! Any pointers on how to actually get in touch with her would be greatly appreciated.[/QUOTE]

Now that is an entertaining read and a very good way to make a point.

[QUOTE=Dweezil; 1714903]Fully agree and there's an equally important flip side."what a guy chooses to pay is his own business". To extend DN's metaphor a little, why do I care if some guy is willing to pay for a Lamborghini. I'm not because it's just not a good value to me. Even if I could drop a couple hundred grand on a car, that's not where I'd spend it. For 200k, I could do a lot of other things first. But that doesn't make the guy who can (and does) get one a jerk.

I wouldn't know Cindy Kemp from Clark Kent but if she has a service model that can command $450 / hour I only have 3 words on the topic "fanf*ckingtastic for her". And if any of you guys have to cash to lay out for that and you think it's a value,"fanf*ckingtastic for you too". This is capitalism 101. Ain't America great.

Here's the thing. It is ALL about VALUE. I don't care if we're talking about dropping 0. 20 for a drive by BBBJ versus. 30 or paying $$/hr versus $.5 / hr. All this crap about how "it's raising prices for the rest of us" is just that. It's horsehockey. It only raises prices if you don't know what value you're willing to pay for. It's only raising prices if you spend your time negotiating with the little head instead of the big head. If it's not a value, don't buy it. Move on to the next place where you might find a value.

My friend. I know he overpays some provider partners but to him they're a good value even at the slightly higher price. For whatever reason. Location, ambiance, they remind him of an old high school girlfriend, or that tickle his nutsack with a feather while calling him "stallion". For whatever reason, those providers are a value to him.

You might not think they're worth the price. Who cares?

They may not charge you the same price he pays, they may charge you less. Who cares?

There are some providers who my friend has decided to not see because the value isn't obvious. Their prices seem high to him. They're not bad providers and they're not bad people, they're just not good providers FOR HIM. He's talked to several of them and they're smart women who run a good business and have an appropriately positive opinion of their worth in this area. My friend thinks they might be a little high. So what. If you can't pay the toll, don't drive the road.

No hard feelings. They're still good people and for many mongers, they may be perfect provider partners.

But com'on guys, don't slam a potential provider partner because she has built a business you can't afford. That's just un-American. LOL.

Have a great day.

Dz[/QUOTE]

I saw her last week, pics are accurate, decent incall. But a far drive out to New Richmond. Very nice girl but she is kind of shy, no clock watching, no rushing, I stayed the full hour. BBBJCIM skills are excellent. Hope this helps.

[QUOTE=Hillbilly Bob;1714822]Does anyone have any input on winwithjen.[/QUOTE]

For what it's worth, I just spoke with Hannah2 and she clarified that SingleDad513 is NOT handling her, but that she had previously asked him to make a post for her due to her lack of computer access. It does sound, though, that he IS handling Nadia and that since Hannah and Nadia know (and like) each other, he was just promoting their availability for doubles. Hannah seemed pretty adamant about not having people think that she was being handled, and she might add some additional comments here via her new smart phone.

Now, onto the review of Blake, please. Details, details.

[QUOTE=TheStigyEh; 1716097]So I'm browsing along the site tonight having a perfectly pleasant evening, enjoying a cocktail, relishing the after-glow positive feelings of my first visit to Blake which occurred earlier this evening (review forthcoming in the near future) and what do I happen upon?

Seriously? Say it isn't so Hannah2 / RemmeyLynn?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1715445&viewfull=1#post1715445[/url]

Note the publisher.

All I can think is "Sasha Gray take me away"?

Sigh,

The Stig[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=WyldeChild99;1716423]You do what you feel dude. I'm not here to lie to anybody. I just wonder why you have such a hard on for this particular girl (see what I did there?) when every other ad on the internet is sporting fake pics. The first pic in the new ad IS REAL. That IS in fact the girl called Nadia. If you don't want to get with her don't.[/QUOTE]

I don't have a problem with Nadia specifically. I have a problem with ANYONE who comes here and posts fake information. Just ask anyone. And using that,"every other ad on the internet is sporting fake pics" as an excuse does not fly, specially not here. Specially after someone gets popped TWICE IN A ROW. Yeah, she got multiple pops. (see what I did there?)

Entire threads are devoted to outing fakes and posers. Why do you think this board exists? This is not a place just for Ads; it's not Backpage or Craigslist. This is a DISCUSSION BOARD for the sole purpose of exchanging GOOD INFORMATION. We self-police the community. We watch out for scams, and we watch out for each other. Bait-and-switch ranks almost as high as cash-and-dash in offenses, and posting fake pics here is attempted bait-and-switch.

The best thing SingleDad513 could have done after getting busted the first time was to issue a [b][i]mea culpa[/i][/b] And post REAL photos. That would have been the polite thing to do. Does an apology ever come? Of course not. Instead, he tries to post another fake pic.

As for seeing Nadia or dealing with SingleDad513, I'm going to pass. There are too many honest providers and handlers out there who deserve my business and my cash.

I will say this for SingleDad513 though. When he posted that she was "TGTBT body and look" along with the fake pics (post #3740), he was telling the truth. The pics really were TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. (see what I did there?)

To be honest I was a bit skeptical that sasha could be nearly as great as advertised. After my first session with her today I've got to admit I was dead wrong. Sasha is every bit as special and amazing as others have stated regularly on the cincy boards. I simply can't believe it took me so long to book an appointment with her. Dealing with buddah was a breeze and the screening was simple yet thorough. I will definitely be back for a visit soon.

[QUOTE=Bear47374;1717009]To be honest I was a bit skeptical that sasha could be nearly as great as advertised. After my first session with her today I've got to admit I was dead wrong. Sasha is every bit as special and amazing as others have stated regularly on the cincy boards. I simply can't believe it took me so long to book an appointment with her. Dealing with buddah was a breeze and the screening was simple yet thorough. I will definitely be back for a visit soon.[/QUOTE]Welcome to the club. You can send your membership dues to:

Sasha Black Fan Club.

C.O. D'Nut, President

P. O. Box 69.

Cincinnati, OH 45202

I love this. So true. We each seek something we want and need. The provider who offers this menu, gets proper rewards and reviews!

There is not a single cost and delivery fomula that is one size fits all. Buyers need to shop carefully, and providers need to choose what works in this very risky market for them to offer. Let's not all get dramatic about this.

Most of us on here who purchase are senior guys with cash to spend. We all seek different things, but NONE of us needs drama, rip offs, silly false pictures that waste our time traveling and risking our personal lives for a littel fun. This forum assures we will punish severely those who cannot honestly offer what they post both visually and in words!

Simple! Stupid is as stupid does. Why my handle is Forest! Ladies post what you honestly have to offer, guys invistagate, post freely and let's let this forum be an honest place to shop!

[QUOTE=Cinyguy C;1716589]Now that is an entertaining read and a very good way to make a point.[/QUOTE]

[blue][Commercial Message deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted because it appeared to be a commercial message and/or it contained links to a commercial website. Please post reports consisting primarily of a commercial nature and/or reports with links to commercial websites in the Classified Advertisement section of the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines and the Forum's FAQ for further information.[/blue]

Has anybody been with spinner Ella? If so did you explain what the word spinner means? Also did you explain if she lost half those pictures and I mean the pouty lip picture the middle finger picture the picture with her obnoxious boobs hanging down and the hood rat photos she might not have to cut her rates down to SW rates. On the streets she would get action but on this site I'm not buying.

After looking at her pics. Just what I was thinking.

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;1717348]Has anybody been with spinner Ella? If so did you explain what the word spinner means? Also did you explain if she lost half those pictures and I mean the pouty lip picture the middle finger picture the picture with her obnoxious boobs hanging down and the hood rat photos she might not have to cut her rates down to SW rates. On the streets she would get action but on this site I'm not buying.[/QUOTE]

Saw the two ladies yesterday.

They are very sweet girls and friendly.

The time was not so much fun though and even though the cost is good, the selection was limited and not so good.

Won't be back.

If you visit LynnFromNorwd don't be surprised if her ex shows up "unexpectedly" and you make a hasty retreat. AFTER paying of course. She's not even particularly attractive. Stay away you don't need this hassle.

All I can say is stay clear. She's a total ripoff and isn't worth the effort. I won't even preface that with YMMV because it won't. I would rather go to that hell-hold Sycamore Hotel and see LilJewel because she is awesome and the ONLY reservation about her is the locale. Anyways, safe mongering.

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;1717348]the picture with her obnoxious boobs hanging down[/QUOTE]Obnoxious? I actually like her tits. Glad she showed them.

[QUOTE=Anderson74;1717456]Obnoxious? I actually like her tits. Glad she showed them.[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen her yet, I like big tits. Like to no if she is clean and what's wrong with her teeth

I texted her a short while ago and she replied within 5 to 10 min. She was text friendly and very cooperative with questions aside from the obvious one. I'm going to give her a call in a little while to see if she has a bedroom voice or the ghetto voice that a few seem to think she is from her fbomb photo. Anywho set up an appointment for after work so a review will be posted afterwards unless someone beats me to the draw or I can't reach her. But like I said texts seems friendly enuf although she asked for a slightly higher price than listed but it was for 1. 5h but she is honoring the h price listed here and for the 1/4 extra for the additional hh is prolly worth it but only time will tell.

EFU Hunt capture release.