KAngels Discussion

Celine is definitely not worth the bang for the bucks. She is young indeed. But she is absolutely no where near Molly. Only thing she has that's better than Molly is she is in fact tighter than molly.

Definitely not a repeat for me.

Looks I'd give her 8/10 with 8 being young. She is a very slim girl. Definitely spinner type if you're looking for a spinner. The room was very dark. No lighting at all. She said light not working. Would not let me rub her kitty. Lfk, definitely no dfk. I love kissing so that's a turn off. Daty for a bit and she was really wet and moaned pretty loud and bent her body in all directions. Pretty sure it was fake. Her body motion did not go with my tongue. After few minutes she pressured me into fucking. She was very wet. After few minutes I wanted her to ride me and she refused. I insisted and she complied. Then we switch a few more positions and I blew the load in doggy.

We cuddled and chat. She was in school for finance she said. Girl knows about stock market and cryptos. She knew about global stock market and how it's bear market even in Korea. She knew of support level of 40 k for bitcoin so she's a pretty damn smart girl with money. Too bad she didn't let me kiss that much and would not let me explore her body and kitty. Boob job is poorly done IMHO. I've seen much, much better silicons.

Service grade of 7/10. If she send you her IG, her IG pics and vids are probably edited or filtered because they sure look a lot better than her in real life. We laid there for 10 minutes talking and she showed me her IG. Showered and off I went. Oh and BTW, shower was solo. She did not give me shower which all other Kgirls did. If I was to compare her, she's at the level of the Chinese orgs that has 160 hh. Only good thing about her for me was young and tight.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5770676]This Momo? And not bait&switch?. Confirm please.

[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/momo[/URL][/QUOTE]The link you posted is for a girl who goes by Summer when she's in Seattle.

Momo's old photos had more P.S. Than the current ones and the photos made her tits look obscenely big. Prior to the first visit, I was expecting something closer to a Dolly Parton sized bosom or something. They're still great C / Ds. She's more on the thick / curvy side of the Asian physique, like CherryDD. I saw her when she was here last year. If memory serves, she looks pretty much like the photos below without tats and hasn't aged since they were taken.

[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/momo/[/URL]

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5770676]This Momo? And not bait&switch?. Confirm please.

[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/momo[/URL][/QUOTE]Both pics look the same to me. Although I don't trust kangel. They're too deep in providing photoshopped pics that no where resembles the girl. I am actually banned from their org because I walked away on 3 of their girls in one day. Wanted to see coco and she wasn't available. They recommended some other girls and I went with it anyways but they were much older and uglier than the pics. So I walked out on all 3. Bam I was banned. Get no reply from messages anymore when I wanted to see coco again. And the reviewer has very little posts about the same org which makes me think it's the handler that's posting.

I'm a long-term lurker, and I would love to book with Coco, Momo, or one of the other KAngels. What's stopped me from booking with GSL / KAngels / etc. Has been the screening requirements. There's no way I'm sharing my real I'd with the bookers. That seems like far too high a risk of blackmail.

Does anyone have any advice on how to book with these agencies, while preserving our privacy as much as possible?

I know this topic comes up here every few months, but it seems that policies change over time. Any up-to-date advice would be greatly appreciated!

Was going to pull the trigger on Celine, but saw a negative review here.

2 conflicting reviews saying she looks better than KAngel girls, but IG are photoshopped etc.

For $$$ and $$ hhr / hr, seems too risky.

Thoughts?

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5771575]Both pics look the same to me. Although I don't trust kangel. They're too deep in providing photoshopped pics that no where resembles the girl. I am actually banned from their org because I walked away on 3 of their girls in one day. Wanted to see coco and she wasn't available. They recommended some other girls and I went with it anyways but they were much older and uglier than the pics. So I walked out on all 3. Bam I was banned. Get no reply from messages anymore when I wanted to see coco again. And the reviewer has very little posts about the same org which makes me think it's the handler that's posting.[/QUOTE]Damn! Did they really ban you for face cancels? They are bad! It's about time to kick out Kangels from our town don't you think.

[QUOTE=Jsten0512;5772030]Was going to pull the trigger on Celine, but saw a negative review here.

2 conflicting reviews saying she looks better than KAngel girls, but IG are photoshopped etc.

For $$$ and $$ hhr / hr, seems too risky.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]Don't know why but usually Korean girls are prettier than any other Asian girls maybe their plastic surgeons are better?.

[QUOTE=GShumWay42;5771929]I'm a long-term lurker, and I would love to book with Coco, Momo, or one of the other KAngels. What's stopped me from booking with GSL / KAngels / etc. Has been the screening requirements. There's no way I'm sharing my real I'd with the bookers. That seems like far too high a risk of blackmail.

Does anyone have any advice on how to book with these agencies, while preserving our privacy as much as possible?

I know this topic comes up here every few months, but it seems that policies change over time. Any up-to-date advice would be greatly appreciated![/QUOTE]Gsl and Mskimloubge bookers sound safe & friendly but I don't like Kangels booker I don't trust her or him we should just stop going to Kangels too risky wati bait and switch shit.

[QUOTE=GShumWay42;5771929]I'm a long-term lurker, and I would love to book with Coco, Momo, or one of the other KAngels. What's stopped me from booking with GSL / KAngels / etc. Has been the screening requirements. There's no way I'm sharing my real I'd with the bookers. That seems like far too high a risk of blackmail.

Does anyone have any advice on how to book with these agencies, while preserving our privacy as much as possible?

I know this topic comes up here every few months, but it seems that policies change over time. Any up-to-date advice would be greatly appreciated![/QUOTE]They all request I'd. You can block out your sensitive info. If you're still concerned then your next best options are the Chinese orgs that do 200 hr. They ask for race, age and sometimes profession. But don't ask for IDs. Kgirls have much better service I think. Southern Cal is even harder to get in the k-orgs.

Face it, if they really want to blackmail you, they can place a hidden cam. Which one of us really lurk around the room looking for hidden cams.

[QUOTE=Jsten0512;5772030]Was going to pull the trigger on Celine, but saw a negative review here.

2 conflicting reviews saying she looks better than KAngel girls, but IG are photoshopped etc.

For $$$ and $$ hhr / hr, seems too risky.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]My review of Celine is the real $h1 t. I TOFTT. I had a vibe that I should walk away first but She does look better than the Kangel girls I've seen. If you have seen Coco, I'd put her at Coco's level for looks only. She's younger and slimmer than Coco but Coco has a different kind of distinctive look. Can't really explain it. I've seen the face of a few Kangel girls and they're really in their mid 30's or above. GSL / Saphire and Lolipops girls are generally younger.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5772222]Don't know why but usually Korean girls are prettier than any other Asian girls maybe their plastic surgeons are better?.[/QUOTE]I disagree here. Chinese orgs have lots of young girls and also grandmas. You just have to spend time driving around. Bookers for the Chinese orgs are the worst. They tell you the girl is 21 and send you to a grandma in her 40's. But I've fucked many young and beautiful Chinese girls from bedpage ads. Their service just sucks compare to Koreans though. Many of them uses their teeth to blow. Can I get an amen from some of you here?

Vietnamese girls are the hottest to me but also the most stuck ups.

Comparing:

Service levels: Koreans score highest in my grade book.

Age: Chinese has youngest girls also oldest.

Vietnamese: most beautiful also most conceited.

I have yet to see a jav girl. Really want to see some though. Anyone has connections?

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5771575]Both pics look the same to me. Although I don't trust kangel. They're too deep in providing photoshopped pics that no where resembles the girl. I am actually banned from their org because I walked away on 3 of their girls in one day. Wanted to see coco and she wasn't available. They recommended some other girls and I went with it anyways but they were much older and uglier than the pics. So I walked out on all 3. Bam I was banned. Get no reply from messages anymore when I wanted to see coco again. And the reviewer has very little posts about the same org which makes me think it's the handler that's posting.[/QUOTE]You need more discerning eyes. Have a couple more photos.

I'm humbled that you think I'm their handler, but I assure you I'm not. Someone asked a question, I answered. Yes, Kangels has fake photos a lot of the time, they also have good talent sometimes. It is what it is. Momo's one of the few girls at Kangels with a normal (industry standard) amount of Photoshop.

The purpose of this board in particular was to suss out the wheat from the chaff. At least, I thot. Regardless, I put Momo in the wheat column. I saw her twice, attempted to see her 2 more times during her last visit.

If you cancel last minute at any place 3 times in a row they're going to ban you. These aren't AMPs. They don't do line ups LOL.

You are completely right. I don't know if Kangels will B&S you guys but I have seen that Momo in the pic. I considered her hot and young.

[QUOTE=WonkaMyWilly;5770929]The link you posted is for a girl who goes by Summer when she's in Seattle.

Momo's old photos had more P.S. Than the current ones and the photos made her tits look obscenely big. Prior to the first visit, I was expecting something closer to a Dolly Parton sized bosom or something. They're still great C / Ds. She's more on the thick / curvy side of the Asian physique, like CherryDD. I saw her when she was here last year. If memory serves, she looks pretty much like the photos below without tats and hasn't aged since they were taken.

[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/momo/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5773055]You are completely right. I don't know if Kangels will B&S you guys but I have seen that Momo in the pic. I considered her hot and young.[/QUOTE]Momo's Kangel add says GFE only. Does she offer PSE?

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5773697]Momo's Kangel add says GFE only. Does she offer PSE?[/QUOTE]Usually (from what I have read here), if the woman is GFE only, then she is GFE only, IE, no PSE. I guess it's possible that for some women, in the heat of the moment, she'll switch to PSE.