Rants and Stupid shit in Hartford

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7363233]Well I don't want to talk them up too much because this site won't like that, but what you're suggesting is just not true. I was a reviewer on there for many years and they had very high standards and honest reviews. I forget what happened when they shut down. But they've never been the same since coming back. One of their stupid rules is you have to provide a link to the girl you're reviewing. Duh. That stops you from reviewing anyone on a site like Seeking that requires you to login to view profiles. That is the sort of failure to modernize that killed companies like Blockbuster and so many others.[/QUOTE]I've posted numerous real reviews of providers there for about 10 years. Depending on the editors, a number of my reviews had to be edited / reposted since they didn't fit all of the rules that they have in place. However, things must have changed as I read one review which literally violated all kinds of rules. I raised it as an issue and complained about the lack of information in the review. They credited my account, but never took down the original review. That was pretty much the last time I used their website.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7363588]
There's a site predominantly used in SoCal and another in Texas that require levels of vetting providers and mongers to get into higher levels of access. One in Texas looks just like USASG but the site is green instead of blue and red. I'm not there enough to get better access but requires like 2 providers to vet a monger or 2 mongers to vet a provider. The one used in SoCal, the providers can give mongers ratings. USA gives a number based on posts. Their site gives a number based on provider feedback. Some girls have a minimum level before they will respond to you through the site.
[/QUOTE]I think I know at least one you might be alluding to. Starts with Humani. What a pain that thing is.

In general I just hate that advertising + reviewing get a local / regional following, so I've got to jump around sites depending on region. It's not terrible if the barrier to entry isn't high, but I give up if I can't even read / research much less contact a girl without 2+ girls to vouch my profile, review scores, points from girls, points for reviews, etc. USAG is prob the best in ease-of-access and current info on a fairly national / USA basis. Some areas better than others, but enough info to get my dick wet almost anywhere in USA.

[QUOTE=BoltonChaser;7364328]I think I know at least one you might be alluding to. Starts with Humani. What a pain that thing is.

In general I just hate that advertising + reviewing get a local / regional following, so I've got to jump around sites depending on region. It's not terrible if the barrier to entry isn't high, but I give up if I can't even read / research much less contact a girl without 2+ girls to vouch my profile, review scores, points from girls, points for reviews, etc. USAG is prob the best in ease-of-access and current info on a fairly national / USA basis. Some areas better than others, but enough info to get my dick wet almost anywhere in USA.[/QUOTE]I think the idea of those stricter sites are for a variety of reasons like an added level of protection for clients and providers as well as for states that have higher penalties and enforcement actions. Some providers and agencies here in CT have strict screening processes to control their level of protection. We have to vet the reviews posted as if they are from a credible reviewer, but providers here have no real review site for clients. They have no idea who is coming through their door or if that client will show up, be respectful, assault them, rob from them, or try to pimp them. If you've ever talked to these girls beyond their service, many, if not all, have had multiple bad experiences.

[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7364385]We have to vet the reviews posted as if they are from a credible reviewer, but providers here have no real review site for clients. [/QUOTE]I've heard there are client review sites. I don't know any more about them specifically as standalone sites, but I have seen Reddit channels where pros can share info about clients.

I think for the most part it's limited to apps like Mr Number where anyone can leave a 1-2 sentence review (usually negative) about a particular client (phone number). It has limited credibility because you can't see any info on the reviewer. I pay no attention to it because I mostly only deal with amateurs and they don't check these types of apps.

[QUOTE=Woody50;7364635]I've heard there are client review sites. I don't know any more about them specifically as standalone sites, but I have seen Reddit channels where pros can share info about clients.[/QUOTE]

It was a great source for this hobby a decade ago but reviewers now on that site are mostly advertisers. Totally fu*ked up by admin. They repeatedly post on the same spots or indy providers thus you only can find info very limited. Bummer.

[QUOTE=ArviK88;7366258]Donny, you are Rocco Siffredi of Connecticut. .[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7366280]No he isn't like Rocco (bad guy). He's more like Manuel Ferrara (nice guy). I'm a huge fan of Rocco. I posted this a while back and it landed into a black hole. If you want to trade Rocco stories I am totally game!

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?10221-Porn-sites-actors-videos[/URL][/QUOTE]I'm just me but thanks. If I was similar to either, which I'm not their status at all, I'd be more agreeable to DarkClouds, Manuel Ferrara. Manuel is more playful and sensual like showing off a GFE type scene. Rocco on the other hand is more dominating and intense.

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6653124]I did a tally the other day, just for kicks, and it turns out I've been with 11 ladies who maybe aren't all porn stars per se (some arguably are more than others), but they all do have publicly available sex videos. Pretty cool, huh? Turns me on to know that!

What are your tallies?[/QUOTE]LOL. Conservatively I'd say about ***

Bless me Father, for I have sinned. I have been with a loose girl.

The priest asks, "Is that you, little Joey Pagano?

"Yes, Father, it is. "

"And who was the girl you were with?

"I can't tell you, Father. I don't want to ruin her reputation. "

"Well, Joey, I'm sure to find out her name sooner or later so you may as well tell me now. Was it Tina Minetti?

"I cannot say. "

"Was it Teresa Mazzarelli?

"I'll never tell. "

"Was it Nina Capelli?

"I'm sorry, but I cannot name her. "

"Was it Cathy Piriano?

"My lips are sealed."

"Was it Rosa DiAngelo, then?

"Please, Father! I cannot tell you."

The priest sighs in frustration. "You're very tight lipped, and I admire that. But you've sinned and have to atone. You cannot be an altar boy now for 4 months. Now you go and behave yourself. "

Joey walks back to his pew, and his friend Franco slides over and whispers, "What'd you get?

"Four months vacation and five good leads. "

Am I the only one that cracks up when The BLS commissioner makes the news?

[QUOTE=PutMeInCouch;7370672]Am I the only one that cracks up when The BLS commissioner makes the news?[/QUOTE]There was a BLS commissioner until last week. Guess somebody has to 'make up' numbers. Ridiculous thinking. Bad jobs numbers would lower demand (less money to buy stuff) which means lower inflation, thereby, induce fed to cut interest rate, which was his goal?. SMH.

[QUOTE=PutMeInCouch;7370672]Am I the only one that cracks up when The BLS commissioner makes the news?[/QUOTE]Too obscure maybe.

[QUOTE=PutMeInCouch;7371502]Too obscure maybe.[/QUOTE]Got it now, thanks.

Interesting article pointing out the absurdity that sex workers are all trafficked and further criminalization of the 'buyers' will bring about peace on earth and morale bliss.

[URL]https://reason.com/2024/12/04/north-carolina-goes-drug-war-on-prostitution/[/URL]

I was surprised to learn that both Texas and North Carolina make it a felony to solicit sex for money.

You'd think that after 250+ years the puritanical lunacy of the country's forefathers would have faded away by now.

Who are these people that demand everyone live under their moral umbrella! Freest country on earth huh – not even f_ close.

[QUOTE=MaxThrust;7372652]Interesting article pointing out the absurdity that sex workers are all trafficked and further criminalization of the 'buyers' will bring about peace on earth and morale bliss.

[URL]https://reason.com/2024/12/04/north-carolina-goes-drug-war-on-prostitution/[/URL]

I was surprised to learn that both Texas and North Carolina make it a felony to solicit sex for money.

You'd think that after 250+ years the puritanical lunacy of the country's forefathers would have faded away by now.

Who are these people that demand everyone live under their moral umbrella! Freest country on earth huh not even f_ close.[/QUOTE]Texas recently passed a law stating every public school had to display the 10 commandments.

I thought that was against a constitutional precept, but that's just me.

[QUOTE=Woody50;7373000]Texas recently passed a law stating every public school had to display the 10 commandments.

I thought that was against a constitutional precept, but that's just me.[/QUOTE]LOL, one article actually stated the move (in Texas) was driven in large part by the states desire to ". Indoctrinate their values and moral code."

There you go, the government prescribing (their) values for all.