Printable View
[QUOTE=DMizzle26;7437184]There's no way none of what she said in that interview was true. I find it hard to believe 10 let alone 30 damn men will stop for her in one day. I've seen her walking around and I can guarantee she goes days sometimes weeks and not get dates.[/QUOTE]Sheer economics. $20 for a BBBJCIM is a milkshake that would bring a lot of boys to the yard.
[QUOTE=RelaxMode;7436495]This is an attempt to cash in because you 100% miss the shots you don't take. The time period is eight years ago. "Should have known sex trafficking was going on" is subjective based on their reasoning. These lower end motels see people who regularly fit the descriptions of impaired, malnourished, yelling and make loud noises. Motels have policies that say they don't allow illegal activities on their property. Former employees could be charged but there needs to be audio or video evidence that they knew without any doubt and did nothing or knew and helped facilitate for profit.[/QUOTE]I recognize that most non-legal professionals don't follow legal cases and torte history like those of us who do this for a living, but your opinion is completely wrong. These cases against lodgers have been unbelievably successful in North Carolina. You simply would not believe the amounts that prostitutes have been collecting from hotel chains. You need zero evidence to win a civil judgment. You just need to convince a jury, which is pretty easy to do. This is one of the reasons why the NC Lodging Assoc welcomed the new law, even with all its burdens and penalties for that industry. The new law makes it very difficult for future plaintiffs to collect these judgments for damages incurred after 7/1/25. Obviously this case is about damages incurred before the new law, and there's a bit of a rush for lawyers to find prostitutes and file cases. This is the golden age for former prostitutes to sue hotels, and former customers for big paydays. The juries are very sympathetic.