Always wondered why Jag gets so much slack on his BBFS activities?
I remember PinoBoy being chewed out for it but everyone ignores it for jag. It's just as dangerous when he does it as anyone else. Probably more dangerous because he sees every girl.
For the record I like Nikki (never cosigned the bs)
What's going on people.
I am not in the business of ruining any young girl's career or being used to do so. Nikki is a young girl, she got the potential to go to the top. She did say some things that was funny. But I rather a girl be confident in herself, opposed to being the opposite. Nikki's track record speaks for itself, last time I checked she is not being black balled and her performance is very strong. I do not play those games. Nikki has been a stand up girl in this game so far. If women are beefing with each other, why'all got to handle that on you're own. That goes for savannah too. Savannah overall has been a stand up girl in this game until she made a couple of mistakes. Hopefully she learns from it and move on. Cats are not really on it like that. Cats just want the best performance out of girls. This thread is entertaining but I wouldn't want anybody to get caught up over bs. I will say it again, if girls stayed out of the politics of the game and got their money. Everything would run smoothly. Look at Strawberry, Jersey girl, Froggy and etc are doing well. Lastly, Savannah you are good to go, stop engaging and all is forgiven. You cannot take you're anger out on 1 hobbyist on EVERYBODY. That is a losing situation.
Drewbruski.
Even Unsafe sex bragging is informational or revealing though isn't it?
[QUOTE=Admin2;2193052][BLUE]Note the blue ink, this is A2 the godlike presence on the forum, not my evil twin the douchebag speaking.
We have an infraction called "Unsafe Sex Bragging" if the point of the report is to glorify going raw dog then I throw a flag. If in a report about a chick a guy says "I hit it raw" or "I got BBFS" then that's informational.
I admit its subjective, members that make a habit of it end up getting a moderation note and I'm probably quicker pulling the trigger. I don't remember Jag ever going on about it. If I'm wrong report a couple posts where you see it and I'll look at it.
The difference is; is it informational, or reveling.
Please pardon the PSA in the middle of all this insanity.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]My question wasn't about your moderation but about the way board members treat him differently. I don't know if you thought I was questioning your moderation. I wasn't and appreciate your work. Though now that you brought it up. I couldn't care less if BBFS is reported as "Unsafe sex bragging" or as just another acronym in a review. I'd rather know about it than not know.
Why don't you go ahead and change your handle to Savanna?
[QUOTE=KingSwag69;2192756]You obviously don't know savanna, she turns down calls very frequently and you can ask woodjablomi how difficult it was to see her. I bet she may see 1 maybe 2 clients in a day and the fact she request no reviews and thanked the prior reviewers I guarantee she has never begged nor called anyone for a review. If she is contacted it's because she is receiving the call. But WimpFagVino kept begging her to post on her BP how hot he was and refer a comparison to vino being Danny devito. Still have the texts. And Fag enough of the PM bromance, just go with it.
Swag with balls of steel.[/QUOTE]Because you just confirmed and outed yourself 100% with that, "Still have the texts" remark. Oops!
BTW, again your remarks are totally ridiculous. Kinda contradictory that I would text you wanting you to post on BP how hot I was but yet I looked like Danny DeVito. People are playing you like a fiddle, Savanna. You're falling for it hook, line and sinker.
I get on an airplane and missed two pages
Well, yes and no. The button that quotes the previous post does not include the headline, and that headline said:
Se acabo la fiesta (Fag aka Wimp Vino because I can't say Pimp).
The rest of this is for other ass hole members, not A2.
And, frankly, the stupid continued attack on Vino is all I really saw or cared about. Yes, I can see the rest is for Jag, probably. But that is a stupid senseless attack, as well.
I know this is a no holds bared, bare knuckle zone, and I get that, but there is a point where it does become pointless. If at the end of the day it is about pussy and getting fucked then I have to give creds and points to both Vino and Jag because their reviews and tips have helped me get fucked by a few very fine ladies.
I cannot say that about some of the frequent fliers in this thread.
I am not on anybodies side. If anything, I am an equal opportunity ass hole and called out Vino, Jag and many others when I saw the need. And my opinion is the one that matters to me. Yes, they have quirks. Me, too. It is far easier to take the quirks of guys that leave good intel on the site than those, guys or girls, that waste our time.
And who gives a fuck if it is wasted band width or wasted bandwidth. Is that all you got?
So, go fuck yourselves.
And have a nice day.
C3.
[QUOTE=Camera3;2192204]Your constant attack on Vino is way out of line. The gentleman may be many things, and many may have issue with him, but his intel and reviews are always spot on.
Now, I just spent two minutes of my life checking your reviews. Let's see, hmmmmmmmmmmm, oh, there is one from six weeks ago. There. There is a second. Now, maybe. No, that one doesn't count because you are commenting on someone else's review. Is that it? Two reviews?
So, let's see, your score is two and Vino is worth a million because he gives a shit about the integrity of his intel.
You pretty much continue to be a total waste of band width.
Just sayin'.
C3.
[blue]Point of information, this post you quoted was attacking Jag not Vino. Just trying to provide a scorecard.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]
I always take his PM about BBFS to mean he had first hand experience.
[QUOTE=Otwist;2193507]The Jag does not post about BBFS activities. In several of his reviews after his descriptive prose about finishing inside the lady, he will say covered of course. So he is covering up. Sometimes he will add PM about BBFS. I have not asked him what he means by this. I took it to mean that there is a possibility of BBFS if you want it, but he is not going to post about it on the board. I may be wrong, but why don't you PM him and ask him. He is very willing to talk to any of the board members and help wherever he can. Jag is a good guy IMHO.[/QUOTE]I guess that's an assumption that other people aren't making. The point of my question here isn't really about whether or not he does but why he's treated differently than Pino was.
I think it's simply the case that few board members have seen him mention BBFS and no one on this board thinks he does BBFS (And maybe he isn't. I'm just assuming that he does when he mentions it but he told me that he doesn't).
You're kind of starting to piss me off
[QUOTE=ImpliedFoldeq;2193578]The point of my question here isn't really about whether or not he does but why he's treated differently than Pino was.[/QUOTE]Are you saying you think I should lock Pino down in a fucking cage and prohibit him from posting a single word that isn't [B]Specifically and Directly[/B] about an experience with a chick? Do you think I should ask Pino if that's what he wants? Or should I just do that because you want to make sure I treat everybody the same in your eyes? Do you think Pino would thank you for that or be a little pissed off?
You can keep talking about this if you want, I didn't post this in blue on purpose, but this is a hardhat area if you keep talking about me playing favorites I'm going to respond.
A2.
Not trying to piss you off.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2193685]Are you saying you think I should lock Pino down in a fucking cage and prohibit him from posting a single word that isn't [B]Specifically and Directly[/B] about an experience with a chick? Do you think I should ask Pino if that's what he wants? Or should I just do that because you want to make sure I treat everybody the same in your eyes? Do you think Pino would thank you for that or be a little pissed off?
You can keep talking about this if you want, I didn't post this in blue on purpose, but this is a hardhat area if you keep talking about me playing favorites I'm going to respond.
A2.[/QUOTE]My question was, and always has been, about how board members treat the two of them differently, not the moderators. I don't think of the moderators as board members. I'm not asking you as a moderator to do anything, not criticizing you, and not accusing you of playing favorites.
My original question was never about you or intended for you. I wasn't asking if / why the mods treat Pino differently from Jag but why everyone else seemed to. (Though I appreciate you clarifying that you treat mentions of BBFS in a review differently from bragging about BBFS).
Concerning my original question: it seems that people don't think Jag is doing BBFS and is just reporting that it's available when he happens to come across that information. Hence he's treated differently from Pino who did admit to BBFS sometimes.
