Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=SolarisMan;6436797]The service is not really the issue in most cases, but it is rather the quality of looks that has been on a steady decline with increasing prices. I can't think of anyone that scored 7 or 8 in looks except Erika (WLA), Ina (WLA), Mariah (OC), NG (MW), Harper (MW), Ms. Hattie Ms. Ka (OC) in the past six months. Almost everyone else has been a 5 or 6 in terms of the face and been a dud in term of appearance. Some would have been even lower if they weren't offering BBFS.[/QUOTE]It's a bit of both. Most of the talent as of late has been women in their 30's to probably 40's at the oldest end of the spectrum. A few posters have said that we get talent at the end of their journey and I'm starting to believe that theory. I decided to see how 2023 is going and based my future visits on reports here. So far we're almost half way done and the issues that I have been seeing since 2021 to 2022 are still lingering on. Up charges, questionable talent, fake pictures are still coming up strong. If the up charge girls are leaving due to slow business then maybe there is an issue with what they're providing vs what they're really worth. The free market dictates on where demand goes and these girls want to inflate their value of their pussy where the price doesn't match with the looks + service we get. I know the K pussy cartel wants to keep the price high and if they lower it, they would perceive this as lowering their inherent value instead of just being a market correction.

Though the offer of BB is enticing, there still has to be a decent baseline of both looks and service for me to feel I got my money's worth. There is an additional cost that people never factor in which is your time and energy having to deal with traffic to their place. Most of these girls are located in traffic ridden areas and a 1 hour session with a girl is around 3 or so hours total for me after all said and done. The cost of a session is just very high for a guy to get a nut off for both direct and indirect costs. My first few years I didn't really mind too much about this but the later years it mattered alot more.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6441762]
Though the offer of BB is enticing, there still has to be a decent baseline of both looks and service for me to feel I got my money's worth. There is an additional cost that people never factor in which is your time and energy having to deal with traffic to their place. Most of these girls are located in traffic ridden areas and a 1 hour session with a girl is around 3 or so hours total for me after all said and done. The cost of a session is just very high for a guy to get a nut off for both direct and indirect costs. My first few years I didn't really mind too much about this but the later years it mattered alot more.[/QUOTE]I was planning to bring up those additional factors too on top of the critical aspects; time! Most providers just expect us to magically show up with a magic wand with magic cash to fulfill their hourly session, but they neglect the highlights that its both sided! We actually have to spend time to travel to reach their location (disregarding outcalls here); this can take anywhere between local or traveling couple hours which takes sky high dedications just like visiting ATF's (obviously its harder to TOFTT on freshmeats cas not much motivation to check newcomers that needs multiple hours of traveling). The girls are taking for granted our time is nothing compared to theirs and on top of giving us attitudes / poor reciprocations. How would they feel if this is the vice versa? And we are still paying everything not to mention the traffic time we provide. Even if we book the girl multiple hours or heck even whole day, that doesn't neglect the fact we are using extra time to reserve those premium spots. The girls are very spoiled in this market. Thanks for input Abc.

[QUOTE=Member#2210;6441501]Which girls do CIM With Swallow? Thanks.[/QUOTE]Try SFKLovely or Baby Yena. Both of those girls love to DT BBBJ too and vigorously. I would let them slob on my knob for a good 30 minutes. Those two know what they're doing with their motions. Those two are the best now that diva is running around in other markets. I can't say for sure WS because I didn't try but those two love to DT suck. I don't see if being an issue if you dumb down the pipe because on how long they can keep sucking.

[QUOTE=IronClad999;6441830]I was planning to bring up those additional factors too on top of the critical aspects; time! Most providers just expect us to magically show up with a magic wand with magic cash to fulfill their hourly session, but they neglect the highlights that its both sided! We actually have to spend time to travel to reach their location (disregarding outcalls here); this can take anywhere between local or traveling couple hours which takes sky high dedications just like visiting ATF's (obviously its harder to TOFTT on freshmeats cas not much motivation to check newcomers that needs multiple hours of traveling). The girls are taking for granted our time is nothing compared to theirs and on top of giving us attitudes / poor reciprocations. How would they feel if this is the vice versa? And we are still paying everything not to mention the traffic time we provide. Even if we book the girl multiple hours or heck even whole day, that doesn't neglect the fact we are using extra time to reserve those premium spots. The girls are very spoiled in this market. Thanks for input Abc.[/QUOTE]That, my friend, is the power of the pussy. Mongers can ***** and moan about price increases, bad service, dealing with traffic getting to and from, scamming bookers, a lack of young talent, rebrands etc., but at the end of the day, they know that the often irresistible lure of a wet Asian pussy (or mouth or lubed up ass) will keep them cumming back for more.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6441762] It's a bit of both. Most of the talent as of late has been women in their 30's to probably 40's at the oldest end of the spectrum. A few posters have said that we get talent at the end of their journey and I'm starting to believe that theory. Though the offer of BB is enticing, there still has to be a decent baseline of both looks and service for me to feel I got my money's worth. There is an additional cost that people never factor in which is your time and energy having to deal with traffic to their place. Most of these girls are located in traffic ridden areas and a 1 hour session with a girl is around 3 or so hours total for me after all said and done. The cost of a session is just very high for a guy to get a nut off for both direct and indirect costs. My first few years I didn't really mind too much about this but the later years it mattered alot more.[/QUOTE]All your points are valid and you brought up a good point that Time is money. The one hour session is actually something like 3. 5-4 hours for me because of the drive time.

Saw loro both for an hour and a quick BBBJ visit, overall the hour is nothing remarkable to write about. She definitely aims to please but you can tell she is on the older side. However her 15 min BBBJCIM special is amazing. Why get a HJ when you can have a slightly mature Korean girl put in some serious effort and give you a decently good BBBJ. She hasn't ever complained and it has always been BBBJ with dfk. Awesome value.

In short, Loro is amazing for her 15 min special and I have been seeing her almost daily now just for her 15 min special. I wouldn't recommend the hour as there are better options out there. Seriously though give the 15min session a shot.

Has anyone seen Seven? How is her service like and her age? She is offering 3. 2 and usually that means the girl is up there in age. She also offers Greek as well.

[QUOTE=Tbtbfftb;6441460]Tried the new Mimii today (with 2 iis) at Candy. Pretty girl, slim body (big MMs) with solid service. I think maybe one of the prettiest all in girls around at the moment at $340. I believe she was in OC a few weeks but still relatively new and fresh especially at the price point.[/QUOTE]Nahhh. This girl has been here awhile and just rebranded. And aren't you the one who was shilling for Mimi until her real picture was leaked?

A perpetual rebrander. Her previous reviews- Kaylee TER: 374935 Jain TER: 373182.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6064084]I know some of you OGs have seen her. C'Mon. Fellas. A quick blurb doesn't take long at all.

I wouldn't hold my breath if you're waiting on her pics. I love her body. Indeed she's "small and very nice" as advertised. Above average fitness. Natty Bs fit her frame. Nice round booty with some firmness. Room was darker than usual with some red lighting. With her petite body, she could pass for early-20's, but the smoke & mirrors suggests she's much older and is covering up. She said she's a student, so that could explain her low-mileage pussy. More on that later.

That she's darker-skinned and has facial features appearing more SE Asian may not be appealing to those seeking a traditional look. So despite not being conventionally pretty, her face did grew on me throughout our session.

She's a pleaser in general. Held her hair in a ponytail and pumped her face for a good bit. She literally tapped my leg to let me know each time I reached her threshold apparently. It was cute. Enjoyed FIV + DATY and 69 + FOA. She gets super slimy BTW. Which was ideal cause I made her lick her cum off my cock during P2M intermissions.

If you're still reading, that means my description of her face didn't dissuade you. I don't think anyone will describe her as DDG. But most should agree her box is pretty fkn tight and shallow; She doesn't even need kegels but damn she checks that box too. She's a pleaser like I said, so props to her for letting me stretch her out, albeit progressively. Her look of anxiety and apprehension, mixed with submission and self-indulgence was a site to see.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HiKeke;6442099]Nahhh. This girl has been here awhile and just rebranded. And aren't you the one who was shilling for Mimi until her real picture was leaked?[/QUOTE]Mimii's pics are currently used to advertise Alli SAG in SD. So do the math on this one fellas, because something ain't right. Good catch.

Btw, the “original” pics belong to Danna AKD in the Bay. TER: 381106.

And I leaked the photos, but I'm the shill LOL.

Anyone find any fun discount BB lately?

[QUOTE=HiKeke;6442099]Nahhh. This girl has been here awhile and just rebranded. And aren't you the one who was shilling for Mimi until her real picture was leaked?[/QUOTE]

I stand by my original Mimi (one I) post. To me she was very hot. Saw her multiple times. She is stand off ish but very hot. Fine square face but that pic did not do her justice. You have never taken a bad picture? Anyone else see Mimi with the tats?

Whether Mimii is a rebrand or not I'm not sure. As I mentioned I do know she worked in OC a bit before LA.

[QUOTE=HiKeke;6442099]Nahhh. This girl has been here awhile and just rebranded. And aren't you the one who was shilling for Mimi until her real picture was leaked?[/QUOTE]

Thursday roster sfk / kbliss.

Lovely Viki Jessica Nana Nina.

[QUOTE=BuildingGuy;6441588]There is a 100% accurate review of Kisum on TER: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/kisum-review-by-marcus84-2483461[/URL] . She's cute. Young and very friendly. Her photos are a Platonic ideal. Not what she really looks like. Short young (mid twenties probably). Megan / Roya type D boobs. She knows what she is doing but acts like a somewhat submissive girlfriend and reacts rather than innovates. Provides a full hour of entertainment. Probably won't see her again but don't regret the visit.[/QUOTE]For those who may not have seen Meagan or Roya, here are links to accurate pictures: https://www.foxylists.com/megan [/URL] ; and [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/roya-escort-los-angeles-314357[/URL] . Kisum has a similar body type. Meagan and Roya were legendary for their service.

Not sure if anyone has seen this one lately or is known. BG Sugar in DTLA.

Has anyone seen her recently? Currently am budgeting and got to release some steam after a stressful week.

Any update, suggestions, or info on this one is great.

Thanks!

[QUOTE=Tbtbfftb;6442247]I stand by my original Mimi (one I) post. To me she was very hot. Saw her multiple times. She is stand off ish but very hot. Fine square face but that pic did not do her justice. You have never taken a bad picture? Anyone else see Mimi with the tats?

Whether Mimii is a rebrand or not I'm not sure. As I mentioned I do know she worked in OC a bit before LA.[/QUOTE]I think she was Leah in OC with SAG. I was about to see her based on her reviews but then she vanished from OC. I'm a little skeptical now that she showed up in LA under a different name.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/leah[/URL]

Yep get it. I didn't see her before I'm just saying she looked pretty good for "all in" at that price. I don't understand the rhyme or reason for name changing. I've seen girls with a lot of strong reviews still want a new name. Maybe new persona or I have heard of a few stalker stories too. Who knows. I just pay my $ and hopefully enjoy myself.

[QUOTE=EddiePenisi;6442742]I think she was Leah in OC with SAG. I was about to see her based on her reviews but then she vanished from OC. I'm a little skeptical now that she showed up in LA under a different name.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/leah[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CallMeDad;6442065]Has anyone seen Seven? How is her service like and her age? She is offering 3. 2 and usually that means the girl is up there in age. She also offers Greek as well.[/QUOTE]I remember searching for this skill specifically on another website and her name come up. Any truth to it? I have a thing for that LOL.

[QUOTE=Tbtbfftb;6442865]Yep get it. I didn't see her before I'm just saying she looked pretty good for "all in" at that price. I don't understand the rhyme or reason for name changing. I've seen girls with a lot of strong reviews still want a new name. Maybe new persona or I have heard of a few stalker stories too. Who knows. I just pay my $ and hopefully enjoy myself.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tbtbfftb;6442247]I stand by my original Mimi (one I) post. To me she was very hot. Saw her multiple times. She is stand off ish but very hot. Fine square face but that pic did not do her justice. You have never taken a bad picture? Anyone else see Mimi with the tats?

Whether Mimii is a rebrand or not I'm not sure. As I mentioned I do know she worked in OC a bit before LA.[/QUOTE]Is this the girl you saw?

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6442197]A perpetual rebrander. Her previous reviews- Kaylee TER: 374935 Jain TER: 373182.[/QUOTE]These attached pics best depict her face. Just don't expect any make up. Like I said, a fantastic pussy on a great body. I wouldn't say she's worth the upcharge, but I could say that about anyone.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6442937]Is this the girl you saw?[/QUOTE]That pic compares to the photo shopped one bookers have is night and day, OMG.

I heard so so to bad reviews on this girl in this pic, so I never partake.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6443005]That pic compares to the photo shopped one bookers have is night and day, OMG.

I heard so so to bad reviews on this girl in this pic, so I never partake.[/QUOTE]Ha! If you really want to shit your pants, this is how she was advertised after being chased out of LA, like Kershaw on the mound in October.

[QUOTE=FriskyDoc1975;6441921]Saw loro both for an hour and a quick BBBJ visit, overall the hour is nothing remarkable to write about. She definitely aims to please but you can tell she is on the older side. However her 15 min BBBJCIM special is amazing. Why get a HJ when you can have a slightly mature Korean girl put in some serious effort and give you a decently good BBBJ. She hasn't ever complained and it has always been BBBJ with dfk. Awesome value.

In short, Loro is amazing for her 15 min special and I have been seeing her almost daily now just for her 15 min special. I wouldn't recommend the hour as there are better options out there. Seriously though give the 15min session a shot.[/QUOTE]I concur with Friskydoc, after seeing his review I decided to reach out to them as well. Her 15 min BBBJCIM really is worth it. It's not rushed, she aims to please and I overall left very satisfied. Take it from both of us, jump through the hoops they ask of you to be "verified". You'll arrive at a nice safe location and have yourself a good time.

Budget-minded HYA-seeking horndogs rejoice! Stella / Sienna CG just removed her All of her upcharges, and is now 340 all-in. That's only 20 bucks more than when she debuted a year ago.

[QUOTE=SunsetMando;6437952]Why is sushi more expensive on Rodeo vs Ventura blvd if it's the same toro?

I know I don't have to explain that to you.

Maybe a boycott forum can be created so the why is it less expensive elsewhere energy can be figured out.

BB forum. Seems pretty straightforward.[/QUOTE]I don't see any "mkg shills" or "kgirl shills" forums either, yet people who shill post in this forum thread all the time.

It makes sense since it's the most prolific and popular kgirl thread for this region. And it also makes sense that people discuss their displeasure with price changes here.

Now, who would have any motivation to stifle price displeasure discussion, the buyers or the sellers? A rather rhetorical question here.

[QUOTE=EddiePenisi;6442742]I think she was Leah in OC with SAG. I was about to see her based on her reviews but then she vanished from OC. I'm a little skeptical now that she showed up in LA under a different name.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/leah[/URL][/QUOTE]Mimii / leah is really hot. I saw her in OC. She has beautiful breasts, nice petite body. That bikini pic is basically her. Go for it.

Not the doll, Barbie is, to me, service queen. Allow me to elaborate.

I hit up BG initially for Angel2 or Niya, neither were available and I was on a time crunch. They suggested I try Barbie. It was a last min thing so had to go in blindly.

Looks: 8. TBH based on recent reviews about other kgirls on here, I was genuinely waiting for a MILF to open. To my surprise, it was better, she does look like the photos just dyed her hair blonde.

Body: 7. 5, she has that nice slender body, no flaps, all solid and shiny, tits were good handfuls and the pepperonis were popping. Literally. Plus she was the right size!

Service: 9 overall. Even tho it was just for hhr, I wasn't rushed, she aims to please. She enjoys complimenting you about how your skills are, she gave a great preview, and from there it was amazing.

Repeat: A solid Hell yeah for me. But next time, ima go for a longer time and possibly get another shot in.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/tt_mw/barbie/?page=4[/URL]

Saw Ina today again. I think it's my sixth or seventh visit, I lost count already. Last appointment of the day but she was still clean and fresh as a fruit down there. Love those juicy D cup titties in my face. Dined at the V, love her DFK + HJ combo, then gave her a lovely creampie. She's perfect!

[QUOTE=TempletonRat;6440536]I was going to schedule with Hana but now she's at 340 for the standard bb.

I refuse to go that high and got some Cfs kgirl that was 320, and not worth it.

Rates ridic, going to boycott FOREVA![/QUOTE]You are really boycotting Hana over $20 increase? Hopefully more people follow suit so that she will become easier to book. IMO, she should be $400 already so we can weed out these other mongers.

That is a bad picture of the girl I saw. In fact that pic itself could be photoshopped b / c the Mimi I saw was pretty hot. Look at her TER reviews. I looked again yesterday b / c of your post. Mostly 8/9, a few 7's and one 6. Yes she has a squarish face but so does Angelina Jolie.

If you never saw her in person (and you obviously you shouldn't if you don't think she's attractive.) I don't think it's useful to keep pointing at a bad / (fake-maybe) picture.

Here's another way to think about it. Lets say your picture is accurate. Have you ever seen / heard of Any provider being that ODD looking?? She would have no customers and only 2/3 star reviews. Lets stop discussing a random pic if you care to continue please DM me, I'm sure others are bored of this topic too.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6442937]Is this the girl you saw?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ZzzBoy14;6443191]Mimii / leah is really hot. I saw her in OC. She has beautiful breasts, nice petite body. That bikini pic is basically her. Go for it.[/QUOTE]She is also short; very short maybe 4'10" or 4'9". Nice girl and a bit with plumb body. I don't think she is hot or pretty but that is my perspective.

Sorry!

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6442937]Is this the girl you saw?[/QUOTE]The first time I saw this picture I swear I saw her ir a dopelganger at Kim's Center off Olympic with two other women who all had swollen faces from injections. One of them was perfect 5'6", tiny frame, with blonde hair, even with the filler lips I was looking for them to be advertised to hit it Alas, maybe the other two weren't working though and I was in a hurry.

There are two Mimi's right now.

One is the ugly one who SS linked in a previous post with the purse.

The other was known as Leah in OC or Hara on TER. She is hot. She is the one currently at CGLA. Go see her. The white bikini pic is how she looks. You can even find her old pics at CGLA if you type in Hara at the end of the link after clicking on someone.

[QUOTE=ZzzBoy14;6443588]There are two Mimi's right now.

One is the ugly one who SS linked in a previous post with the purse.

The other was known as Leah in OC or Hara on TER. She is hot. She is the one currently at CGLA. Go see her. The white bikini pic is how she looks. You can even find her old pics at CGLA if you type in Hara at the end of the link after clicking on someone.[/QUOTE]IDK, seem like they're talking about same girl.

[QUOTE=Tbtbfftb;6443402]That is a bad picture of the girl I saw. In fact that pic itself could be photoshopped b / c the Mimi I saw was pretty hot. Look at her TER reviews. I looked again yesterday b / c of your post. Mostly 8/9, a few 7's and one 6. Yes she has a squarish face but so does Angelina Jolie.

If you never saw her in person (and you obviously you shouldn't if you don't think she's attractive.) I don't think it's useful to keep pointing at a bad / (fake-maybe) picture.

Here's another way to think about it. Lets say your picture is accurate. Have you ever seen / heard of Any provider being that ODD looking?? She would have no customers and only 2/3 star reviews. Lets stop discussing a random pic if you care to continue please DM me, I'm sure others are bored of this topic too.[/QUOTE]That was the non P.S. Pic that was sent by mistake. The P.S. Pic has her looking very attractive.

Friday sfk / kbliss funtime availability.

Lovely Viki Jessica Nana Nina.

[QUOTE=SolarisMan;6443522]She is also short; very short maybe 4'10" or 4'9". Nice girl and a bit with plumb body. I don't think she is hot or pretty but that is my perspective.

Sorry![/QUOTE]I met up with Leah as well. She does some real nice BBBJ and let me CIM. Her teeth were kind of a turn off, looks weren't my cup of tea, but she did have nice soft skin tho.

[QUOTE=ZzzBoy14;6443588]There are two Mimi's right now.

One is the ugly one who SS linked in a previous post with the purse.

The other was known as Leah in OC or Hara on TER. She is hot. She is the one currently at CGLA. Go see her. The white bikini pic is how she looks. You can even find her old pics at CGLA if you type in Hara at the end of the link after clicking on someone.[/QUOTE]We all know. Mimii aka Hara was never even a popular choice and she been around for awhile. I guess finally decided to rebrand due to lack of business and ask for few reviews.

Anyone here know which one might possibly accurately describe her? She's posted all over and I don't even know if it's the same girl. This shit is a puzzle mystery trying to decipher all this BS.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/lovely2[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/lovely[/URL]

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/oyZLAAdX2wqS/[/URL]

https://kbliss.net/lovely

Are there any names that she used to go by? Someone made a review of a Lovely back in March, I was wondering if it's the same girl since he didn't post a link. He mentioned that Lovely had 2 tats.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6444103]Anyone here know which one might possibly accurately describe her? She's posted all over and I don't even know if it's the same girl. This shit is a puzzle mystery trying to decipher all this BS.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/lovely2[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/lovely[/URL]

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/oyZLAAdX2wqS/[/URL]

https://kbliss.net/lovely

Are there any names that she used to go by? Someone made a review of a Lovely back in March, I was wondering if it's the same girl since he didn't post a link. He mentioned that Lovely had 2 tats.[/QUOTE]These are two different lovely. Top 2 x is GFE lovely (no Korean customers), and bottom 2 x link is of sfk lovely.