Printable View
Decent body for late 40's / early 50's but not my type. In and out in 35 min. Typical experience. First TS, then mediocre massage (4 out of 10). Massage included a thorough exam. Fully clothed but roaming encouraged. Second time here, while it was relaxing it is not my favorite.
[QUOTE=Tumass;3242757]Decent body for late 40's / early 50's but not my type. In and out in 35 min. Typical experience. First TS, then mediocre massage (4 out of 10). Massage included a thorough exam. Fully clothed but roaming encouraged. Second time here, while it was relaxing it is not my favorite.[/QUOTE]I've previously had Nana and Suzy (I think that's her name. I know she's on vacation). Was looking to see if there was anyone else besides Nana that is worth seeing.
[URL]http://turnto10.com/news/local/providence-spa-raided-amid-prostitution-investigation[/URL]
Back in WW II they used to say "loose lips sink ships" you guys are way to liberal with your info out here. This isn't the old loophole days.
[QUOTE=PAustin;3244875]Back in WW II they used to say "loose lips sink ships" you guys are way to liberal with your info out here. This isn't the old loophole days.[/QUOTE]Everything recent I read here recently was a standard / HE. Are they raiding for HE now? If I missed a report of a BJ or FS let me know the post #, please.
Probably someone in power just pissed they have to pay $70 door fee not 60.
[URL]http://www.providencejournal.com/news/20170124/smilers-day-spa-target-of-providence-police-raid-1-arrested[/URL]
"The notorious North Main Street Spa may have a new name. But police and neighbors, as well as internet postings on sex sites, say it was business as usual at the old massage parlor now called 'Smilers Day Spa. '.
Honestly, I'm surprised it took this long.
[QUOTE=PAustin;3244875]Back in WW II they used to say "loose lips sink ships" you guys are way to liberal with your info out here. This isn't the old loophole days.[/QUOTE]Well said, a main reason why I haven't been posting. The less said the better, and you guys with your "dreams" . Come on you really think you are fooling anyone?
[QUOTE=Ford1951;3245127]Well said, a main reason why I haven't been posting. The less said the better, and you guys with your "dreams" . Come on you really think you are fooling anyone?[/QUOTE]Kind of a double edge sword. Most of us would never viset most of these places if we did not know they offered extras. There us no way of knowing who is LEO or even who may be a news reporter looking for an easy scoop. Let's face it most guys don't viset spa's for a simple massage so finding one that mostly men viset is amost a no brainer that something is going on. All the above said, you cannot catch anything from a hand job and most these places are in more commercial settings. I really don't see how the general public really cares.
[QUOTE=Ford1951;3245127]Well said, a main reason why I haven't been posting. The less said the better, and you guys with your "dreams" . Come on you really think you are fooling anyone?[/QUOTE]I've been back to Smilers since they reopened. I've seen Suzy, Angie and Nana. Although Angie was the more playful, There was Never any hint of FS from these girls.
Reports of shorted time, and no sign of Mama.
Only 1 person gets arrested.
Tipoff??
It does not matter whether or not the limited services at Smilers "hurts anyone". Rhode Island is actually a pretty socially conservative, Catholic state. The bedroom police will always outnumber the libertarians and hobbyists combined.
Also, these busts are low-hanging fruit for the cops. And they will always want to make the bust before the media posts stories asking why they aren't enforcing the law.
I'm pretty sure that this would have happened regardless of what was posted here. But folks here certainly didn't make it harder for the police to make their case.
[URL]http://wpri.com/2017/01/25/providence-spa-worker-faces-judge-on-prostitution-charge/[/URL]
Photo of person arrested in court
Was thinking about hitting this place up last night. Settled (putting it lightly) for deb instead.
Seems like I made the right choice.
[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/wpri.com/2017/01/24/providence-police-shut-down-spa-for-prostitution[/URL]
[QUOTE=Krappenschitz;3245564][URL]http://wpri.com/2017/01/25/providence-spa-worker-faces-judge-on-prostitution-charge/[/URL]
Photo of person arrested in court[/QUOTE]So the big deal with all this is human trafficking, why is she a defendant and not a witness in protective custody testifying against her abductors.
[QUOTE=HappyDave;3245904]So the big deal with all this is human trafficking, why is she a defendant and not a witness in protective custody testifying against her abductors.[/QUOTE]The article specifically says that no human trafficking is believed to be involved. She's been charged with simple solicitation for sex.