Printable View
Some guys said she allowed BBFS but if a girl goes to an upcharge agency chances are she will upcharge most guys too. Consider Ruby as YMMV.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4873956]This is K BB forum, when you say "lax with the rules" which rules you referring to specifically?[/QUOTE]
You can always ask the booker.
I saw Rika before the upcharge. I am not sure what she charges now because I avoid girls who upcharge. It sucks when I ran into some girls who tried to upsell me because of the girls who advertised openly LOL. TBH, I may relent for one or two visits if she is my type. There are many girls so the upsell girls would be one and done for me.
[QUOTE=Czar213;4873159]Can someone please pm me how much rose to go bb with Rika from ca kdoll.[/QUOTE]
So Ruby is fit, as opposed to what some other people said before here (about her being thick). Has anyone had footjob or good nuru from an AMP provider before?
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4873916]M.
Mini, Allie, Hazel, Cona, Kiss, Eva.
Pink starts Tuesday WLA.
Hera starts Monday PV.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/yEEjZUhsKn6h[/URL]
Sexy Angels.
Luna. WLA.
Ariel. Ktown.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Rebecca, Viki.[/QUOTE]Whos rebecca T? Is that Jennifer or someone dif entirely?
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4873512]Curious if any of you esteemed gents can provide any info on the one currently in Boston.
[URL]https://bostontopten10.com/tessa[/URL][/QUOTE]Go to TER it has the review on her and seems all are happy.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4874112]I think she was Vera at Kupcake, Jooah at AOV, and Dana at SA. She was in LV too. I believed I saw her before under other names couple years ago. If she is who I think then the BBFS alone will make it worthwhile. I am too busy with new girls and ATFs.
Probably worth a try if no upcharge like she did at other places: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/vera-9498997702-350890](Her review)[/URL].[/QUOTE]M said she starts Tuesday and wasn't sure in bb. More than likely since its M, we'll see.
Debating if I want to go back to Cona or see Dana.
Couple of reviews said her looks on the older side close to 40, also not 32 DD as M's website.
For gents out there, what do you think of her face compare to Cona?
Does she look younger or older?
As for body wise, M's website said 32 DD, compare to Cona real Ds.
Does she seem overall bigger body then Cona or smaller?
Thanks.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4873757]Anyone have info on pink m new girl!?[/QUOTE]Pink worked in Las Vegas at clubloveline. I don't remember the name she used there but she was worth the price of admission.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4874569]Debating if I want to go back to Cona or see Dana.
Couple of reviews said her looks on the older side close to 40, also not 32 DD as M's website.
For gents out there, what do you think of her face compare to Cona?
Does she look younger or older?
As for body wise, M's website said 32 DD, compare to Cona real Ds.
Does she seem overall bigger body then Cona or smaller?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]Dana's on "vacation".
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4874615]Dana's on "vacation".[/QUOTE]I think he is referring to Pink who starts with M on Tuesday and worked as Dana at SA.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4874615]Dana's on "vacation".[/QUOTE]Pink yes, she was Dana from SA I heard and Jooha or something like that from KPC.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4874079]I haven't seen Connie in a while. Last saw her in the Bay Area but they doesn't sound anything like her. Connie is a legend status girl and always gave me great service unless she has changed. She has a pretty good body, not super toned and not as curvy as pics but still nice. She has some of the best aftermarket tits out there, top 5 for sure imo. Also her BBBJ is damn good. She has this slow BJ routine that is sexy and sensual and she can go for a while. She moans during sex and can take a pounding.[/QUOTE]I doubt it's Connie with J. More likely than not, he's referring to Connie with January. This is why it's always important to state which org or booker she is from.
My list of good girls is quite long but I can't recommend them here. I love to recommend but my taste is different.
Still, there ought to be many more girls on the TDL. I nominate one legend. There can be only one Bunny / Glow! Can you handle BSC AF?
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4873262]Haha yea. Hazel is my Current Favorite at M's lineup. I have seen Cona yet. I can see why Chanel is popular but just wasn't my style. Hazel, then Allie & Mini in a tie because they are just entirely different experiences and women. I first saw Sweet Allie back in NorCal. Hazel as Alisha as well I would see at GFE but it wasn't the same experience. Like I've said, something about her sexuality but that is only my preference and my own CF. Eva I saw in NorCal and not my type entirely.
SA favorite is Luna hands down. Joonah aka Dana was good but not like Luna and her cuteness. I sadly didn't catch Jenny. But I had seen her at Lovely Angels in SJ.
My recent good experience Was Viki at SFK. Nice DT BBBJ. She has a nice slim body for her age. Likely will look older in the face for most but not as bad as many others. She is a nice winner. Nina seems back so that's another on the list.
I'm currently working on a LA legends BBFS to dos: Pepsi, Yoco (YMMV I hear), Cona (Made the list over Kiss), and Nana.
Feel free to recommend more anyone, even if CFS. I've already tried Jenny O, LA Sera (in NorCal), Jazmin (as baby in NorCal), Connie, Shana, Jude, & White-all in NorCal.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4874279]Whos rebecca T? Is that Jennifer or someone dif entirely?[/QUOTE]Whoops. It's Jennifer. Glad someone is proofreading my posts.
[QUOTE=LoveAsianGirls;4874619]I think he is referring to Pink who starts with M on Tuesday and worked as Dana at SA.[/QUOTE]I was told that Pink was not Dana. ?