Printable View
[QUOTE=Emesdee;6835945]Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.[/QUOTE]Had an initial phone conversation. Heard the entire crazy life story and about several of her SD's. She was persistent about the fee for meeting, which I declined repeatedly. Never saw private photos, but it sounds like I'm not missing much.
[QUOTE=Emesdee;6835945]Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.[/QUOTE]Privates not flattering? What does this mean?
[QUOTE=Pathfinder04;6837383]Privates not flattering? What does this mean?[/QUOTE]Private photos. Not good.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6834094]I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.
That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).[/QUOTE]Scammer hit me this week. Sends me aa text with all sorts of info threatening to out me. Told them to fuck off and eat my ass.
Face check using my SA pics my linkedin came up came up using that.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;6837159]Start chatting with this one, her name is Scarlett. Tells me she's in town (Fairfax) visiting for two weeks because her sister just had twins. We text and she sends me some ssssssmoking hot nudes. So I ask what's her ppm, that's when she mentions she's a pornstar, her screen name is Scarlett Alexis and she charges a deposit upfront fml. Says she can either host at the Airbnb she's renting or come to you. Once she mentioned the deposit I stopped with the conversation so idk what her actual ppm is but she's hot if you're willing to pay the deposit upfront.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f3cdbfaa-f2be-4320-905d-0424c215a7f4[/URL][/QUOTE]Just searched on her name. Yep, she's a legitimate porn star.
[QUOTE=Pathfinder04;6837383]Privates not flattering? What does this mean?[/QUOTE]Yep, I get you, I thought he meant her private parts.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;6837159]Start chatting with this one, her name is Scarlett. Tells me she's in town (Fairfax) visiting for two weeks because her sister just had twins. We text and she sends me some ssssssmoking hot nudes. So I ask what's her ppm, that's when she mentions she's a pornstar, her screen name is Scarlett Alexis and she charges a deposit upfront fml. Says she can either host at the Airbnb she's renting or come to you. Once she mentioned the deposit I stopped with the conversation so idk what her actual ppm is but she's hot if you're willing to pay the deposit upfront.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f3cdbfaa-f2be-4320-905d-0424c215a7f4[/URL][/QUOTE]She just happens to be my favorite performer at the moment. Going to try and lock this down. However, scam detection will be on high alert as any scammer can lift a popular porn stars pics.
[QUOTE=BDM1227;6837459]Scammer hit me this week. Sends me aa text with all sorts of info threatening to out me. Told them to fuck off and eat my ass.
Face check using my SA pics my linkedin came up came up using that.[/QUOTE]Makes my blood run cold when I do a search on my real pics and a site has hits. It is really good that the sites permit you to exclude your results from a search, but of course this is something that you must maintain diligence about. Read the companion thread here on OPSEC. There was extensive discussion concerning facial rec there earlier.
BTW, the person threatening you was most likely not a real sugarbaby, right? A guy w / w conniving mind like ours more likely.
There are ways to fight facial rec by modifying the real photos of you that are out there. It can prevent the software from forming the data needed to include you in their database. But everything that is really you out there needs to be pre-treated. Something to think about.
[QUOTE=BDM1227;6837459]Scammer hit me this week. Sends me aa text with all sorts of info threatening to out me. Told them to fuck off and eat my ass.
Face check using my SA pics my linkedin came up came up using that.[/QUOTE]BTW, there is discussion on here periodically, in the OPSEC threads, and the sugar threads, concerning threats. This is the best defense:
While cheating on my spouse maybe isn't the nicest thing, so far as IK it isn't criminal. However, extortion definitely is, and it is a Federal crime. You have provided in your messages to me all of the evidence the FBI would need to put you into Federal prison. So, if you persist in carrying out your threats, I'll have no alternative than to go to law enforcement, and you can be certain they have the resources to track you down, in person.
So I visited an SB three times in late 2023 - say once in Oct, Nov and Dec. For $400 each visit. I texted her tonight to see if she wanted to meet later this week. She says sure, but that'll be $800! After texting a little with her back and forth, she said she needs at least 1 visit per month to maintain the relationship. Am I the asshole for allowing a 3-month lapse in visits? I kinda understand her position, but reality sometimes intervenes in scheduling SB visits.
I have another SB that I saw a few weeks ago after a 3-month lapse and she didn't bat an eye letting me unload in her.
Any thoughts?
[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6839102]So I visited an SB three times in late 2023 - say once in Oct, Nov and Dec. For $400 each visit. I texted her tonight to see if she wanted to meet later this week. She says sure, but that'll be $800! After texting a little with her back and forth, she said she needs at least 1 visit per month to maintain the relationship. Am I the asshole for allowing a 3-month lapse in visits? I kinda understand her position, but reality sometimes intervenes in scheduling SB visits.
I have another SB that I saw a few weeks ago after a 3-month lapse and she didn't bat an eye letting me unload in her.
Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]You got the escort rate instead of the SB rate because you treated her like an escort.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6838346]Makes my blood run cold when I do a search on my real pics and a site has hits. It is really good that the sites permit you to exclude your results from a search, but of course this is something that you must maintain diligence about. Read the companion thread here on OPSEC. There was extensive discussion concerning facial rec there earlier.
BTW, the person threatening you was most likely not a real sugarbaby, right? A guy w / w conniving mind like ours more likely.
There are ways to fight facial rec by modifying the real photos of you that are out there. It can prevent the software from forming the data needed to include you in their database. But everything that is really you out there needs to be pre-treated. Something to think about.[/QUOTE]Well, I knew something wasn't kosher once I found the IG profile with the pics and the person was sitting in the UK. I noted on the SA profile the person was in the UK. My faux pas was that I was playing with the person seeing how far they would take it, I. E. , suggesting meet for a drink.
Of course I'm not sure how well going to the feds does on this situation if their in the UK, but what appears to have worked for me is to cut off the oxygen to the fire. I did say I was going right to the authorities and told them to fuck off. Give them any indication that you can be extorted, actually comply with them and they will exploit that.
Damn, seeking DC is like dumpster diving. All these posts asking about these crack looking hoes it's just disgusting.
I'm in NYC now and I was debating if I should fuck with seeking but tinder, hinge are yielding decent results so fuck it.
[QUOTE=BDM1227;6839222]Well, I knew something wasn't kosher once I found the IG profile with the pics and the person was sitting in the UK. I noted on the SA profile the person was in the UK. My faux pas was that I was playing with the person seeing how far they would take it, I. E. , suggesting meet for a drink.
Of course I'm not sure how well going to the feds does on this situation if their in the UK, but what appears to have worked for me is to cut off the oxygen to the fire. I did say I was going right to the authorities and told them to fuck off. Give them any indication that you can be extorted, actually comply with them and they will exploit that.[/QUOTE]So, look, if the 'recent location' on a SA profile does not list the US, it is 100% a scammer, and you really don't have any reason to continue w / them. Sometimes they will say stuff like they were visiting there, or they use a VPN, or something like that, but I can say after several years on the site I have never had one of those situations turn into an actual meeting w / a person.
[QUOTE=Emesdee;6835945]Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.[/QUOTE]Her previous profiles indicated she lost money in the market. YOLO WSB type shit. Saw her for a QV once. All about money. No idea what the real story is or if she does have a monkey besides spending / bad bets. Private pics are accurate BTW.