Printable View
[QUOTE=Newbie1961;4847339]The bottom line is if she lived up to her end of the bargain (sex) or not really. I learned a couple things over the years on there (non pro escorts) because I only do in-call on my turf 99% of the time. . ...[/QUOTE]Who have done this for some time have experienced both sides. Some looking for dash and some not even counting. And you don't give them upfront, either it is on the counter.
The OP didn't get his 2 hours,. So no, I don't think he got what he paid for.
[QUOTE=RegularJoe1985;4847180]About her. Was looking at her profile, she contacted me but I wasn't sold on her pics.
Are her pics accurate since I'd some doubts.
Great to know about her M. O. Assuming you gave her full amount before. Nowadays I tell them allowance after we're done, not before. If they don't agree then no deal.[/QUOTE]She is cute in face but body is just ok. I have her pics. PM me if anyone wants that.
[QUOTE=Grasshopping;4845499]Ditto. Whether trans means transgender or transsexual, she is definitely not the natural kind LOL.[/QUOTE]Seeking's Android app sucks. To read their details you need to login in web app. I think in her case I missed doing that.
[QUOTE=LikItFun;4847312]She moves to text quickly; sent some great pics. Her bikini shot had a Euro plug in the background, so that pic isn't taken here in the US. After setting a date and time, she sent me an address on 7th St SE almost at the DC / PG County line.
Finally, she asks for $9 for her Netflix bill. Told her I'd give her 25 x that in cash in person for the date we were planning. No reply. Sent a follow up text a couple days; no reply and now I'm blocked on SA.
So, I'd say she's not real.[/QUOTE]Good eyes on the Euro plug! I missed that.
I got a location that was 7th Street SE near Chesapeake, about the same area.
I got the Netflix request for $9 again.
Agree--great photos, but not real.
[QUOTE=InSearch69;4847336]This has been discussed recently. If they have no location listed 99.9% it is a fake account. You can play phone / test all day but you will never meet them.[/QUOTE]I always assume a SB is guilty until proven innocent. With that said, I still want to give them the opportunity to prove to me that they are a real deal. So despite of the location on the profile, I still spend a few minutes to feel them out.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;4847022]Thanks! I may try to meet her. If you get any info, please share it.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/f412ed17-2b26-4365-898b-7c8391925542[/URL]
So I responded to her after 5 days and gave her my GV number. She texted me and sent me a pic of "hers". After couple sentences of cordial exchanges she told me she's been stressed because she has been job hunting. And had to pay car insurance and phone bill yesterday so doesn't have anything left for groceries / gas for the week.
I think I have spent enough time already on her. Next thing she will say will be if I can cashapp her some change.
We have all seen too many of this. Blocking.
BTW the pic she sent me belongs to some chick named Sabrina that lives in Los Angeles. Came up on google image search.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4847619]Seeking's Android app sucks. To read their details you need to login in web app. I think in her case I missed doing that.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the app either. I only use it for two things: 1) Checking messages, and 2) Hiding / blocking profiles who aren't even in the DMV or are suspected scammers.
Too many "SBs" claiming to be near me when their last log-in location is Venezuela, or Peru, or Colombia, etc. With all the "favorites" I receive from there, maybe I ought to move down to South America and live like a god or something, haha!
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4847808]Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the app either. I only use it for two things: 1) Checking messages, and 2) Hiding / blocking profiles who aren't even in the DMV or are suspected scammers.
Too many "SBs" claiming to be near me when their last log-in location is Venezuela, or Peru, or Colombia, etc. With all the "favorites" I receive from there, maybe I ought to move down to South America and live like a god or something, haha![/QUOTE]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4848150]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?[/QUOTE]The SA App is no more. SA has been saying Apple won't support the App, so they shut it down.
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4848150]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?[/QUOTE]Had no idea there was an app for it on Apple. Is it new?
[QUOTE=BigFrog;4841555]I posted this trick in the Baltimore section. If you've shared your private pics with someone and they block you (or you block them) then they remain in the list of "people I've shared my private pics with. " If they deactivate or get taken down, then they're removed from that list. You can use this to get a link to someone who has blocked you.[/QUOTE]Kudos for this valuable tip! So the following SA profiles have all pushed for an online-only arrangement (see my screenshots) and not even remotely attempting to be coy about it:
Bbabe3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31d2c58a-fe17-42a3-9bfd-ab5e2ac2362c[/URL]).
Kelly403 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ee84b6f6-7047-4d4f-ae2d-4e4ca1c9a9b0[/URL]).
Matcha4 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/22267d85-1332-4115-9f86-a5934ed26fdc[/URL]).
Mariahj3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/449a530a-224a-492f-9e36-4c01bbc9cb3f[/URL]).
What's really disappointing, however, is that those profiles are all still up as of this afternoon. I did as BigFrog suggested and shared my private photos, took screenshots, then reported the users in question. At this point, Seeking automatically blocks them from being viewed but are indeed still populating the list of those with access to your private pictures. Two days have come and gone, and they're still around. So the way I see it, there's three possibilities: Seeking's content admins are either 1) Tired of my reporting and passively telling me to fuck off, 2) Preferring to give these girls the benefit of a doubt owing to the pandemic making it supposedly "risky" to meet in-person, or 3) Require multiple user reports in order to take down another user.
Nothing can really be done if it's the first two scenarios, unfortunately. But if it is the latter (which I suspect to be the case), then I highly recommend that those of you with SA accounts to report these "SBs" as well. If they're not willing to meet until [B]after[/B] the pandemic, then that's one thing. But if they flat-out say they only desire a cyber arrangement, then this runs contrary to Seeking's own guidelines and is reportable.
Has anyone ever used this site to book a massage?
This smells like a scam to me but wanted to check with you mongers first.
[URL]https://indulgencetouch.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=AdcFellow;4846470]I think this is her (thanks Jbunk).
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/702016ba-3925-412c-a7ef-f69034cf9475[/URL][/QUOTE]Has anyone met her? How is she anyway?
🙋127995;8205;9794;65039; The whole neighborhood I'm guessing LOL.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4848717]Has anyone met her? How is she anyway?[/QUOTE]
Posted in Richmond but just my thoughts.
They need as many young beautiful profiles on there so you and I will keep paying. They also don't mind because if FOSTA ever comes sniffing around they look more legit (no sex for sale here). There is a reason they even have a platonic tab you can add to what your seeking in your profile. They now permit online only wording in profiles it appears. It is worse than ever tho. I am wasting so much time sifting now I finally redid my search criteria to exclude platonic in my search menu. I know I will miss a few possibles, but if they added platonic my chances are usually slim to none with them anyway.
[QUOTE=Jbunk;4848761]🙋127995;8205;9794;65039; The whole neighborhood I'm guessing LOL.[/QUOTE]🧐 what are those numbers LOL?
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4848820]what are those numbers LOL?[/QUOTE]My guess is GPS coordinates.
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4848562]Kudos for this valuable tip! So the following SA profiles have all pushed for an online-only arrangement (see my screenshots) and not even remotely attempting to be coy about it:
Bbabe3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31d2c58a-fe17-42a3-9bfd-ab5e2ac2362c[/URL]).
Kelly403 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ee84b6f6-7047-4d4f-ae2d-4e4ca1c9a9b0[/URL]).
Matcha4 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/22267d85-1332-4115-9f86-a5934ed26fdc[/URL]).
Mariahj3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/449a530a-224a-492f-9e36-4c01bbc9cb3f[/URL]).
What's really disappointing, however, is that those profiles are all still up as of this afternoon. I did as BigFrog suggested and shared my private photos, took screenshots, then reported the users in question. At this point, Seeking automatically blocks them from being viewed but are indeed still populating the list of those with access to your private pictures. Two days have come and gone, and they're still around. So the way I see it, there's three possibilities: Seeking's content admins are either 1) Tired of my reporting and passively telling me to fuck off, 2) Preferring to give these girls the benefit of a doubt owing to the pandemic making it supposedly "risky" to meet in-person, or 3) Require multiple user reports in order to take down another user.
Nothing can really be done if it's the first two scenarios, unfortunately. But if it is the latter (which I suspect to be the case), then I highly recommend that those of you with SA accounts to report these "SBs" as well. If they're not willing to meet until [B]after[/B] the pandemic, then that's one thing. But if they flat-out say they only desire a cyber arrangement, then this runs contrary to Seeking's own guidelines and is re portable.[/QUOTE]When I created my profile and when I make changes to it, I get a message saying that the changes will be reviewed before being posted (or something like that). I don't know if there is an automated check or manual review, but I'm really surprised that all of those "online only" profiles were allowed. This may be overstatement, but it seems that there used to be occasional scammers and fakes. Now it seems that legit SBs are in the minority--and an increasing percentage of them have GPS. I think the site is still the best around, but I would have given it an A- or B+ about 5 years ago, but maybe a C- at best today.
Regarding the last SB link, the details say she is 38 and African American. The photos show a 28 year old Caucasian. WTF?!
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4847808]Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the app either. I only use it for two things: 1) Checking messages, and 2) Hiding / blocking profiles who aren't even in the DMV or are suspected scammers.
Too many "SBs" claiming to be near me when their last log-in location is Venezuela, or Peru, or Colombia, etc. With all the "favorites" I receive from there, maybe I ought to move down to South America and live like a god or something, haha![/QUOTE]It's not the app or likely any systems problem that is causing SBs locations to read Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, etc. The site had been flooded by foreign women; some of them are in dire need, some want a boyfriend or a plane ticket, and some want to rip us off.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4848820]🧐 what are those numbers LOL?[/QUOTE]Are those numbers for emojis?
Yea. Sorry LOL.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4848956]Are those numbers for emojis?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jbunk;4848981]Yea. Sorry LOL.[/QUOTE]Haha and I thought those numbers were secret ciphers that you use for giving reviews 😁 😉
BTW it seems we need to put space between emojis otherwise it only shows first one correctly not others .
[QUOTE=JonFisher;4844992]I think you posted that you saw her. Appreciate some feedback here or you can pm me. Chatting with her.[/QUOTE]She's terrific. Sexier than pictures. A real pleasure.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;4848910]When I created my profile and when I make changes to it, I get a message saying that the changes will be reviewed before being posted (or something like that). I don't know if there is an automated check or manual review, but I'm really surprised that all of those "online only" profiles were allowed. This may be overstatement, but it seems that there used to be occasional scammers and fakes. Now it seems that legit SBs are in the minority--and an increasing percentage of them have GPS. I think the site is still the best around, but I would have given it an A- or B+ about 5 years ago, but maybe a C- at best today.
Regarding the last SB link, the details say she is 38 and African American. The photos show a 28 year old Caucasian. WTF?![/QUOTE]For sure man, I suspect all male users are indeed manually checked. But female users? Highly doubtful! Otherwise, there wouldn't be such an overwhelming majority of scams compared to legits. I get what Newbie1961 said earlier about Seeking trying to have as many registered profiles as possible while attempting to ward off feds / cops. But there's a reason that ratio between the real and fake has gotten so out of whack. It stems from their mods opting for quantity over quality. "Numbers" of users instead of [U]real people.[/U] And while platonic is permitted on the site, there's a difference between that and online-only. But Seeking's mods can't even be bothered to check reports against a SB in a timely manner while not hesitating to flag accounts like mine on multiple occasions (objecting to my terminology in "About Me" and "Seeking" sections despite others having the same goddamn wording).
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;4848914]It's not the app or likely any systems problem that is causing SBs locations to read Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, etc. The site had been flooded by foreign women; some of them are in dire need, some want a boyfriend or a plane ticket, and some want to rip us off.[/QUOTE]Another fair point. Even though we can filter messages into a separate "Filtered Out" folder, there ought to be a way to automatically hide / block / mask users from accessing others' profiles if beyond a certain mileage. Tinder is also guilty of this, allowing premium users to mask their location.
Also, I'm sure some of these foreign girls are legit. But they have to have enough common sense to know that no average joe is going to fly her a thousand miles to him for some fun, put a ring on her finger, and bam happy ending's all-around. Just insanity. Seeking is still the better SB site out there, but it sure has taken a massive hit in quality.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;4848914]It's not the app or likely any systems problem that is causing SBs locations to read Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, etc. The site had been flooded by foreign women; some of them are in dire need, some want a boyfriend or a plane ticket, and some want to rip us off.[/QUOTE]This is true. I know there is a huge market for long distance mongering. Little payments and then you take a trip to see them.
Always99, started talking to this one, any info on her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/771f3547-e16a-43b3-9540-16a8070c32f2[/URL]
She's out of Fredrick.
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4848562]
...
What's really disappointing, however, is that those profiles are all still up as of this afternoon. I did as BigFrog suggested and shared my private photos, took screenshots, then reported the users in question. At this point, Seeking automatically blocks them from being viewed but are indeed still populating the list of those with access to your private pictures. Two days have come and gone, and they're still around. So the way I see it, there's three possibilities: Seeking's content admins are either 1) Tired of my reporting and passively telling me to fuck off, 2) Preferring to give these girls the benefit of a doubt owing to the pandemic making it supposedly "risky" to meet in-person, or 3) Require multiple user reports in order to take down another user.
Nothing can really be done if it's the first two scenarios, unfortunately. But if it is the latter (which I suspect to be the case), then I highly recommend that those of you with SA accounts to report these "SBs" as well. If they're not willing to meet until [B]after[/B] the pandemic, then that's one thing. But if they flat-out say they only desire a cyber arrangement, then this runs contrary to Seeking's own guidelines and is reportable.[/QUOTE]There's a fourth scenario. SA doesn't want to delete profiles of SB's unless it's something that will get them in legal trouble. SB profiles attract paying SD's. This is almost like the Ashley Madison bots back in the day.
[QUOTE=BikeRider;4850080]There's a fourth scenario. SA doesn't want to delete profiles of SB's unless it's something that will get them in legal trouble. SB profiles attract paying SD's. This is almost like the Ashley Madison bots back in the day.[/QUOTE]At the least they should allow only one location, that the person is in at that moment.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;4848197]Had no idea there was an app for it on Apple. Is it new?[/QUOTE]It's been around for about a year or so, maybe longer. It just started acting up on me a few days ago.
Interesting about the comment saying it's no more. On the App Store there are so many other similar apps available for other sites and 'dating' platforms.
Anna-loves-you ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/eb1a0f14-daf8-487d-b048-b92077c6e04d[/URL]).
Thegoldenathena ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/872a04e2-f659-47ab-82e2-5ce120e1c5f7[/URL]).
A few months ago, I remembered KevinCalormis' report regarding Anna-loves-you being a fantastic time. I would've reached out to this vetted SB / "sure thing" long ago as she's certainly my type; however, I've been very busy with work and opted to stick with my regular rotation instead. Then COVID started taking a turn for the worse, and I decided to follow the stay-at-home order like everybody else.
Now after all these months, her "Seeking" description somehow stood out to me, so alarm bells started going off when I recently viewed the latter's profile. Not sure if Thegoldenathena is the same chick (unlikely), lacks imagination (possible), or is a scam (probable), so I figured I'd share here and let you all decide. Personally, I believe KevinCalormis and that the latter profile's a fraud. But I'll be the first to apologize and walk that accusation back if proven wrong.
Buyer beware. Unfortunately the chances of actually meeting this little smoke show aren't very high. Image search pulls up an Instagram model by the name of Daisy Keech.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e134a1db-f92e-4c5e-b653-a55c1a4e5700[/URL]
[URL]https://instagram.com/daisykeech?igshid=1riplnsnb707a[/URL]
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4851109]Anna-loves-you ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/eb1a0f14-daf8-487d-b048-b92077c6e04d[/URL]).
Thegoldenathena ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/872a04e2-f659-47ab-82e2-5ce120e1c5f7[/URL]).
A few months ago, I remembered KevinCalormis' report regarding Anna-loves-you being a fantastic time. I would've reached out to this vetted SB / "sure thing" long ago as she's certainly my type; however, I've been very busy with work and opted to stick with my regular rotation instead. Then COVID started taking a turn for the worse, and I decided to follow the stay-at-home order like everybody else.
Now after all these months, her "Seeking" description somehow stood out to me, so alarm bells started going off when I recently viewed the latter's profile. Not sure if Thegoldenathena is the same chick (unlikely), lacks imagination (possible), or is a scam (probable), so I figured I'd share here and let you all decide. Personally, I believe KevinCalormis and that the latter profile's a fraud. But I'll be the first to apologize and walk that accusation back if proven wrong.[/QUOTE]A google search of the first sentence in each profile yields no hits. Using the last six words only also produces no hits.
What evidence do you have that the latter SB is a fraud?
Personally, I have no opinion either way. It could be the SB's are friends. It could also be that the latter SB copied the former's intro. Pretty much anything is possible on SA.
[QUOTE=BikeRider;4851900]A google search of the first sentence in each profile yields no hits. Using the last six words only also produces no hits.
What evidence do you have that the latter SB is a fraud?
Personally, I have no opinion either way. It could be the SB's are friends. It could also be that the latter SB copied the former's intro. Pretty much anything is possible on SA.[/QUOTE]Compare those profile's first four sentences, then compare Anna-loves-you's second-to-last sentence and Thegoldenathena's last sentence. While the latter's "Seeking" section is indeed shorter than Anna-loves-you's, they are nevertheless practically identical in both wording and sentence structure. That's no coincidence. And the idea that the two are friends makes it even more of an unbelievable stretch.
So no, I technically don't have concrete evidence that Thegoldenathena is a fraud, but it's still highly suspect. I'd sooner see Anna-loves-you based off KevinCalormis' vetting than some random SB who, [U]at a bare minimum,[/U] suffers from a lack of creativity by copying someone else. But that's just me. I only wanted to highlight the issue after it caught my eye last night.
This IG girl was made insta famous a few months back due to her mom having an article written about her on fox news because she looked hot and young instead of her actual age. If you have ig and look up Meilani you'll see the pics being used on this account. I entertained for a few messages to see what was up but the person only wants to talk on kik or what's app. I wasn't going to exchange info. When confronting them about the photos they stated that they were actually the model which I know is bs. Best to skip this one.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/feb30fc4-84c0-4a6e-a336-026d3c4e99fd[/URL]
[QUOTE=Dimples572;4851702]Buyer beware. Unfortunately the chances of actually meeting this little smoke show aren't very high. Image search pulls up an Instagram model by the name of Daisy Keech.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e134a1db-f92e-4c5e-b653-a55c1a4e5700[/URL]
[URL]https://instagram.com/daisykeech?igshid=1riplnsnb707a[/URL][/QUOTE]Daisy is über HOT!
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4851943]Compare those profile's first four sentences, then compare Anna-loves-you's second-to-last sentence and Thegoldenathena's last sentence. While the latter's "Seeking" section is indeed shorter than Anna-loves-you's, they are nevertheless practically identical in both wording and sentence structure. That's no coincidence. And the idea that the two are friends makes it even more of an unbelievable stretch.
So no, I technically don't have concrete evidence that Thegoldenathena is a fraud, but it's still highly suspect. I'd sooner see Anna-loves-you based off KevinCalormis' vetting than some random SB who, [U]at a bare minimum,[/U] suffers from a lack of creativity by copying someone else. But that's just me. I only wanted to highlight the issue after it caught my eye last night.[/QUOTE]That something is amiss. Thank you for bringing it to everyone's attention.
Seriously, Do we need concrete proof for everything? Have we not gone with our gut, spidey sense on many many occasions?
Anytime something seems out of the ordinary, chances are that there is something going on. Might not be but chances are.
Time to throw this one back into the water. I met her about a month ago. Kind of odd how it all played out. I was texting with her for a couple days, there wasn't really much playful back-and-forth like there normally is for me. She was a little standoffish but I was persistent. There was no flirty dirty talk, kinky type stuff. There was no exchanging "personal pics". Very straightforward, Very buttoned up if-you-will. Then we eventually got to the point of talking about donation, she said 375 on the first meet and then we could discuss the arrangements if it was going to be a thing moving forward, like maybe it'd be a little cheaper if it was going to be a consistent thing. So for a couple days I kept asking if she was available, never got a reply. Then late on a Friday night at like 730 I hit her up again. She surprisingly replied back and said she could meet. Now keep in mind at this point we haven't even discussed sex at all, so I had no idea what was going to happen when we met. So I'm in Northern Virginia and she is in Silver Spring so I told her I'd get a room in the Bethesda area, kind of a halfway meeting point for the two of us. So she got there around nine, She came to the room, sat down her purse we said hi, exchanged pleasantries and then our tongues are down each other's throat's and we were all over each other for about three or four minutes. She then stopped and excuse her self to the bathroom and came out about five minutes later in some sexy ass lingerie and some fuck me pumps. Needless to say from that point it was on and we fucked till like 4 or 5 in the morning. She is very submissive, there's nothing she'll say no to. Other than BDSM type shit pretty much whatever you want she's down for, anal, every acronym in the book, everything bare. Needless to say we had an amazing time. Long story short, we saw each other again the next day and again we fucked till 4-5 in the morning. Up until the minute she HAD to go home to be there before her daughter woke up. Over the next three or four weeks I saw her total of seven or eight times. Other than the first time when I paid her 400, I never paid another dime again. It was kind of understood that both of us knew the chemistry and the sex was unbelievable and we were both more than willing to be together without having to pay for it. Now again like always YMMV with situations like this but for me it was incredible sex and other than hotel rooms and carry out to eat it didn't cost me a dime. As far as her body goes and how she looks, she looks just like her pics. She's got a little bit of baby damage on her stomach and she breast-fed her daughter, So there's a little bit of baby damage there as well. But her tits are unbelievable. Natural DD's. When she got pregnant her boobs blew up like a lot of women do, and then they never went away, she never lost them so they look great. She's super protective of her daughter and her home so you'll never meet her daughter or get to go to her house. She's very protective of her privacy and her family. She's REALLY into dirty talk and super submissive so she's all about calling herself your dirty little ***** and talks about wanting to drink all Daddys nut and all that type of stuff. That's not my bag at all so it got a little annoying tbh. But it's almost like she's got two different personalities. Because she's super professional classy woman, very religious when you're just hanging out, and then there's this side of her when you're having sex with her she's super dirty and super slutty. I'm in my 40's, been with alot of women in my day and I don't think I've ever been with a woman who was basing two completely different people in and out of the bed.
But the issue is and the reason I'm done with it is that she's definitely high maintenance. She wants and expects to be taken care of emotionally in ways that I just didn't really have any interest in putting that kind of effort into. Almost like she wants treated like an actual girlfriend. And then towards the end she started to ***** about money a little bit. But she's the one that set the precedent that the pussy was for free, so don't give it up for free and then come back and expect to be paid for it. So once she started to get that in her head and becoming much more needy I decided to cut it off. So best of luck, stay safe and happy hunting. I'm happy to answer any questions but don't ask for her number, I've been burned too many times in the past with giving out that info and please don't reference me or my situation with her if you end up meeting her. Thanks.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4fd0f413-4206-4148-9a3a-10dc5dd69098[/URL]
[QUOTE=Wrangler84;4852253]This IG girl was made insta famous a few months back due to her mom having an article written about her on fox news because she looked hot and young instead of her actual age. If you have ig and look up Meilani you'll see the pics being used on this account. I entertained for a few messages to see what was up but the person only wants to talk on kik or what's app. I wasn't going to exchange info. When confronting them about the photos they stated that they were actually the model which I know is bs. Best to skip this one.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/feb30fc4-84c0-4a6e-a336-026d3c4e99fd[/URL][/QUOTE]About the only good thing I can say is that some of these crooks have good taste in photos.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;4852990]Time to throw this one back into the water. I met her about a month ago. Kind of odd how it all played out. I was texting with her for a couple days, there wasn't really much playful back-and-forth like there normally is for me. ...Other than the first time when I paid her 400, I never paid another dime again. It was kind of understood that both of us knew the chemistry and the sex was unbelievable and we were both more than willing to be together without having to pay for it......[/QUOTE]That gives 400! No wonder, many girls are expecting 400-500. :D :D
This one asked for 400 and I got better options at 300, so I wished her all the best. Though you did come out ahead because of the free meets but not everyone would be able to do that and 400 seems to be her standard ask now.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e110120e-783b-444a-899b-98fbf3175fcd[/URL]
Very nice girl and very attractive, at least she's my type. Went to text quickly where I found out that it is 250 hh or 350 h and all activities are covered (yes including BJ, I asked). Also she is not a sugar baby, she is a traveling escort with a Tryst page. I passed but she would probably be fun if this is what you arr looking for.