Tale of two titties (4 actually)
Not meaning to tread old ground, complaining about GPS, but two contacts recently provided odd / interesting data points.
MnG w / an absolutely true high fashion model, 20's, knockout, tall, Slavic like they all are. SA username includes Lula. I asked her the craziest offer she'd had and she replied 8 K / mo. However, she said no b / c he was a creep. I'm a nice guy, she said she liked me, invited me over. Hmm. She said we should have a trial date before concluding an arrangement. I offered 800, and she turned me down - 1000 was her minimum. Not broken-hearted. I didn't feel any connection w / her.
Messaging today w / a 21 YO girl Ashley0895. She complains she can't find any guys she connects w / on SA, but thinks I'm nice. We're talking about meeting, and she wants to know what's possible. I direct her to the lifestyle on my profile (hers is Negotiable). The reply? Not good enough. She claims two friends get 10-15 k / mo, and one GF got a deposit put on a house (whatever that means. To buy? To rent? Vastly different). Finally she comes out with: "I know what I'm looking for is out there. " My reply was of course, I don't believe you, and if that guy is out there, go for it, girl. But, her complaint she couldn't find a 'connection' was actually that she couldn't find a guy who would pay insane amounts.
Thread: Sugarbaby Thread Highlights, Index, and FAQ
[QUOTE=WillyHost;3218707]Hi sorry for non info post seeking assistance. I see many posts referring to "SA" I'm guessing this is not referring to the site "[URL]https://www.sa.org/[/URL]" aka Sexaholics Anonymous rather something which more along the line of the term seekingarrangement? Thanks in advance from a new guy.[/QUOTE]Also, you might want to make use of this resource, right here on the Richmond thread (below this one on the list).
[B]Sugarbaby Thread Highlights, Index, and FAQ[/B]
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?15100-Sugarbaby-Thread-Highlights-Index-and-FAQ[/URL]
Post #2 has Common Acronyms and Phrases.
Not always GPS. Part of the charade
Not every gal who has high expectations -- especially relative to HWG's low ball strategies -- is about GPS.
A lot of it is about them keeping up the masquerade that they aren't escorts.
One recent GND, masters degree type drowning in student debt was pretty straight forward -- she does not want lavish gifts or experiences, just a nice dinner out and the ability to cover the monthly $1 k student loan payment. So she is looking for someone to meet 2-3 x a month for $4-500 per. Seeing someone regularly feels less whorish.
You have to play into the mindset -- when called for -- it can go along way and can easily turn those looking for LT into a fun fling.
The flip side to GPS is moderate expectation serial cock gobblers. Met a seemingly nice GND type, agreed to $500 for a full afternoon of fun. Over the course of her time together, she made it quite clear, she has no intention of working a 9-5 job so long as she has the looks and appetite for cock that can land her 4-5 dates a week and she would be happy to work me in to the rotation whenever our sdchedules permitted. NTY -- one of the appeals of SBs is the illusion that she was not gargling with some other guys cum earlier in the day within the past 24 hours!
Good thing you prescreened her on SA.
[QUOTE=BikeRider;3219770]You find the profile of the Whole Foods cashier you've been flirting with for a few weeks on SA. Asking her out next time I'm in her line. .
I think it may be a good year![/QUOTE]Had been flirting with the cashier at the new costco. Young, thin, pretty -- no boobs, but I can overlook that.
One days she she is sporting a diamond fleck engagement ring. I ask "who is the lucky guy?" She points to the dumpy African American girl working the next register and says "Her, we met here at work".
At least I know the cute little redhead asst manager of the bank across the parking lot has a boyfriend, but at Christmas I asked if she was on the Naughty or Nice list and she said "always on the Nice list, without even blushing. " Should have asked if she wanted to change that!