[QUOTE=PSmith0380;5356131]What number is everyone using to book with Sira? The one on TER or the one on the website with the agency?[/QUOTE]The # on the agency website is the correct one. The number on TER reviews is outdated.
TH.
Printable View
[QUOTE=PSmith0380;5356131]What number is everyone using to book with Sira? The one on TER or the one on the website with the agency?[/QUOTE]The # on the agency website is the correct one. The number on TER reviews is outdated.
TH.
[QUOTE=Xquisitely4;5357040]Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.
[URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL][/QUOTE]Just spoke with her. Sounds nice. She asked me how old I was and when I told her I'm 35 she was like "you know I'm 60 right? I told her I didn't know but thanked her for the update. She's more GILF age than MILF age to me. I do like Caucasian MILFs but guess there aren't too many here.
[QUOTE=SexFrustrate23;5357426]Anyone have info on her? I definitely want to try this fetish once, don't see it available often.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/files/1849449.htm?cat=6208&wn=1[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.
Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/beautiful-pregnant-sweetheart/37262609[/URL]
[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;5358236]Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.
Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/beautiful-pregnant-sweetheart/37262609[/URL][/QUOTE]Do the pregos allow BBFS?
Does anyone know what happened to Tyson Girls? I used them twice and now it looks like the site is gone. DM if you prefer that.
[QUOTE=PSmith0380;5358294]Do the pregos allow BBFS?[/QUOTE]I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.
[QUOTE=Xquisitely4;5357040]Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.
[URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL][/QUOTE]My landscaper has visited a couple of time over the last 2 years. She's a cool gilf. Easy to talk to and good consistent service. Pics are about 20+ years old, but she's upfront about it. He said the price point is consistent with the service. She good in a pinch.
[QUOTE=HardanFast;5356010]I saw her recently right after she returned to the area. I agree about the age, and she has gained about 15 pounds from when she was here several months ago. Also, are you sure you are looking at the right Samantha on TER when you say she is on there? When I checked, I saw no mention of her in this area anymore and the only thing I could find were 3 reviews from a couple of months ago in Irvine, CA (search on Orange County). Interestingly enough, the link to Happy Zone where she worked there is also down with the same message as the one for CVIP. I will grant you that someone may have stolen her pictures and name, but she told me she had recently worked there when I saw her.[/QUOTE]I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: [URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL]. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on [URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL] are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.
Hope this helps.
Because the original message had no link, I thought you were talking about the Asian Samantha that several of us know, not the nycgirl one you know. The Orange County website, which is down now, used the same photos as CVIP. The TER number for her in OC is 357607 and is still active.
[QUOTE=Rhinopole;5359240]I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: [URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL]. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on [URL]http://www.nycgirl.net[/URL] are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.
Hope this helps.[/QUOTE]
Found a girl in Seeking Arrangements who was pregnant over a year ago. I creampie her a few times. It's out there you just have to look around.
P.S.: delete and block her number, because she kept asking for money. So don't msg me for it.
[QUOTE=PSmith0380;5358294]Do the pregos allow BBFS?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SexFrustrate23;5359055]I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.[/QUOTE]Might give her a try depending where she's at.
[QUOTE=FunDreams;5359876]Might give her a try depending where she's at.[/QUOTE]No return on texts and her phone now appears to be disconnected.
[QUOTE=PSmith0380;5358294]Do the pregos allow BBFS?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SexFrustrate23;5359055]I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.[/QUOTE]Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.
Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.
Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.
I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.
The answer is, it depends.
[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;5360268]Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.
Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.
Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.
I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.
The answer is, it depends.[/QUOTE]Absolutely agree. Zariah was great when pregnant. Only downside was no CIP. Sorry to see her off the circuit and now making money from porn videos and her pay-per-view website. Pregnant providers are more likely to go for BBFS than non-pregnant girls.
Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?