I guess that depends on what you classify BBW as
[QUOTE=AltereEgo;3970778]I wondered how many members were into BBW ladies?[/QUOTE]I personally like women in a range. I definitely don't like fat women, nor do I like anorexic. What one might consider to be thick, another might consider to be fat. I won't say a woman's clothing size because much of that depends on height. Sometimes I am in the mood for a petite woman, sometimes I am in the mood for an athletic woman, and other times I am in the mood for a more voluptous woman. I personally think that Sophia Vergara is smoking hot and has all the right curves in all the right places, and yes, those boobs are natural. I wouldn't like a woman much bigger than that. Denna was a bit too skinny for my tastes. Amanda is about as skinny as I would like to go. She is what I would classify as thin rather than skinny. But I also like athletic, yet still feminine, looking women. I. e. Some soccer players, some figure skaters, some runners, etc. I am not talking about shot putters, cage fighters, 50 m sprinters etc. Some women that are bit thicker just pull it off, and others fail miserably. Regardless, the face is by and far the most important to me. With regards to beauty, I especially pay attention to skin complexion and teeth. Amanda earned very high marks with both. As soon as I saw Amanda, I knew that she didn't come from poverty. Not with teeth perfectly as straight as hers. She may have had teeth that naturally straight, but more than likely she had braces at one point in time, which is generally a mark of the middle class on upwards. My wife is curvy, has a big butt and busty. Would be viewed as thick, but is definitely not fat. I would say 5'6", 140-145. This is very common in her culture. She more or less has the proportions of Christina Hendricks, but much less exaggerated (I. E. Smaller bust, smaller butt and flatter stomach. And obviously darker skin, hair, eyes and substantially younger).