Asian PLEASER discussion forum (please post reviews in the review forum)

[QUOTE=BadInfluence;4817512]Who's the Viet? Lily Love?[/QUOTE]No not lily love. She's a sp that I met thru an AMP, that operated both at AMP and mamasan's house.

[QUOTE=SkippedWords;4817550]The velvet in this picture is who I'm talking about. Is this velvet the same velvet currently at PG? The pictures do not match. I'm not saying the velvet at PG uses fake pics I'm just saying that she's not the velvet from cakdolls.[/QUOTE]I saw her when she was cakdolls and at P2G. It's the same girl but she gained some quarantine weight for sure.

[QUOTE=SkippedWords;4817550]The velvet in this picture is who I'm talking about. Is this velvet the same velvet currently at PG? The pictures do not match. I'm not saying the velvet at PG uses fake pics I'm just saying that she's not the velvet from cakdolls.[/QUOTE]Same girl. I saw her at both agencies. Just the ones you posted are more recent. She gained some quarantine weight.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4817303]I saw her when she was Apple in OC even before Newtopasia. I don't want to age a girl but those pics are 4 years old. Although I didn't recognize her in the second and third pic, I can still recognize her in the other pics.

First time guys here confused me LOL. I can't figure out how I would miss a different hot Velvet who didn't look like those pics or who used different pics. I also highly doubt PG booker would B&S or the girl there would use another Kgirl pics.

Check out this hot set of real pics. I don't know if she still looks like this: [URL=https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/velvet-650-720-1010-new-adorable-velvet/58fa9803221e530d938b46f9](Click here)[/URL].

Apple reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/apple-7148681854-339054](Click here)[/URL][/QUOTE]I saw her up north as Creed.

These were the photo set's they were using:

#1.

[URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=660[/URL]

#2.

[URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=675[/URL]

She looked like the girl in set #2, not #1.

[QUOTE=StraightOmar;4818377]I saw her up north as Creed.

These were the photo set's they were using:

#1.

[URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=660[/URL]

#2.

[URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=675[/URL]



She looked like the girl in set #2, not #1.[/QUOTE]I find it hard to believe that those 2 are the same girl. They don't look anything like each other imo. The velvet I saw looked like #2 100%. If it is her why would she use accurate pictures with one agency and not accurate pictures with another?

You missed the part where both of his links are for a girl named "Creed" at the same agency. Proof enough that a girl may use different set of pics even at the same agency. It's not unusual for a girl to use completely different or fake pics or change name when they feel like it. It's got to the point that I would point out identifying feature such as tattoo to help you guys identify a girl. I would not have done that before FOSTA.

If the Velvet you saw looked like #2 then I can almost guarantee she's at PG now. After all, she is using those same pics there too. I haven't come to verify yet.

I completely forgot her different pics in your attachment. My memory was imprinted by pics in #2 link. I didn't see her with the pics you attached only because I figured it was her and I wanted to see someone new. Same profile 5'4" or 5'5" and 33 C or 34 C. As I have shown before, she was in the Bay a lot too. Here are her reviews roughly at the time you saw here: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-346350](Click here)[/URL].

[QUOTE=SkippedWords;4818468]I find it hard to believe that those 2 are the same girl. They don't look anything like each other imo. The velvet I saw looked like #2 100%. If it is her why would she use accurate pictures with one agency and not accurate pictures with another?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SkippedWords;4817550]The velvet in this picture is who I'm talking about. Is this velvet the same velvet currently at PG? The pictures do not match. I'm not saying the velvet at PG uses fake pics I'm just saying that she's not the velvet from cakdolls.[/QUOTE]Iriz and Loren photos. Thise were the good ol days. So hot. So beautiful. So feminine. Stealth nymphos.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4818522]You missed the part where both of his links are for a girl named "Creed" at the same agency. Proof enough that a girl may use different set of pics even at the same agency. It's not unusual for a girl to use completely different or fake pics or change name when they feel like it. It's got to the point that I would point out identifying feature such as tattoo to help you guys identify a girl. I would not have done that before FOSTA.

If the Velvet you saw looked like #2 then I can almost guarantee she's at PG now. After all, she is using those same pics there too. I haven't come to verify yet.

I completely forgot her different pics in your attachment. My memory was imprinted by pics in #2 link. I didn't see her with the pics you attached only because I figured it was her and I wanted to see someone new. Same profile 5'4" or 5'5" and 33 C or 34 C. As I have shown before, she was in the Bay a lot too. Here are her reviews roughly at the time you saw here: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-346350](Click here)[/URL].[/QUOTE]I'm sorry I meant she looked like #1.

[QUOTE=SkippedWords;4818468]I find it hard to believe that those 2 are the same girl. They don't look anything like each other imo. The velvet I saw looked like #2 100%. If it is her why would she use accurate pictures with one agency and not accurate pictures with another?[/QUOTE]Yes, they definitely aren't the same girl. And before I saw the booker provided photos #1. I didn't notice pics #2 until after I saw her, because #1 obliviously ain't her.

Bookers are weird or just do things they are used to. I would bet easily over 50% of the girls photos are fake for this booker. So the booker is used to just using fakes, rather than her pics, even though original photos are great / attractive. I doubt it was Velvet's decision to use the fake pics. It's not like she needs re-branding, to me she was attractive and she was solid, I would repeat for sure. It would be smarter to use #2. As fake photos can be a let down even though you're satisfied by the girl's looks.

Other things I noticed is using "new in town" when the girl has already visited. Awhile back, I had to confirm with OC-Cadolls if Estee was the same Estee as they also used different fake photos, and she was great, had the best natural body.

The bad thing with fake photos, is getting if you get the wrong provider you have no clue, unless they are dramatically different. I booked Chanel (with J) and at the door greets me is Vivian, even though Vivian attractive, I was like WTF is going on here, as no blonde hair, taller, skinnier and not the big ass I was looking for. Luckily Vivian was very professional and cool, and I was able to switch to Chanel she was great too, but also like WTF was the other dude doing. I did noticed him when was walking into the apartment and elevator, and knew he was going up there, kept my distance and took the next elevator. It is definitely funny the things you notice from mongering.

The other let down that it's not same provider.

[QUOTE=Humyiy;4818533]Iriz and Loren photos. Thise were the good ol days. So hot. So beautiful. So feminine. Stealth nymphos.[/QUOTE]Iriz is my ATF. Booker still communicated with her, she may come back one day. Never tried Loren. Is she retired for sure?

[QUOTE=NoClue02;4817316]Finally visited Flynn, the one that everybody here talk about. For sure I almost shit myself after seeing her face the first time. She looks just like one of my thai friend, so I was shocked hahaha. Not much to review her since she is well reviews here.

Imo, amora is better in term of BJ and her sex drive. Flynn is more gnd, calm and easy to talk to. Does not allow fiv but dfk is pretty awesome with her. I think flynn and 1 hot ass viet chick I seen are the only 2 I do any dfk, both got me horny-er lmao! So sad the viet chick hasnt been working or switch places, haven't seen her since. Flynn speaks decent English unlike most at this agency so that's a plus. Otherwise, good time with her, pretty calm session.

Seen a few in wla and ktown, girls are a bit cuter, service is more into it, and bb as a bonus. So far my rating from those I've seen.

1. Chanel and lulu from sa.

2. mini from m.

3. amora from asian2 k.

4. Flynn from asina2 k.

5. Yoji from asian2 k.

6. hana from sfk.[/QUOTE]That's funny because when I saw lulu from sa afterwards I told booker the lulu I saw sure looks a lot like channels pictures he then told me lulu and channel are the same girl?

Anyone got any info on Juju from Asianworld?

I've seen Flynn and Yoji, but never heard of Juju.

[QUOTE=PsuGuy911;4819233]That's funny because when I saw lulu from sa afterwards I told booker the lulu I saw sure looks a lot like channels pictures he then told me lulu and channel are the same girl?[/QUOTE]LOL they might have recycle those pictures? Lulu is slimmer and smaller racks than chanel. Chanel is more vocal and more active, can speak some english while lulu is very quiet, not a lick of English.

Jemma is now back at AW.

Hey sorry if this is a dumb question. Wanted to know the perceived differences in the agencies discussed here versus the asians listed on sites such as city x guide. Hope I didn't break rules citing that. Waiting to pull trigger on agencies due to the verification process. I'm scared shitless of being exposed. I mean you guys are all still here so what am I afraid of LOL. Love the idea of a warm up in the shower and better quality than AMP.

Also any way to bypass that verification? Or agencies with lower standards of verification? Pm if you wish.