Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=FlyDangler;2661166]Actually, in the case of the AMPs, I can't find where a single charge of human trafficking was ever even levied, even though it was so strongly alleged in news stories, testimony before legislative bodies and the like. Has anyone else here ever seen a single case charged?[/QUOTE]Nope. Not one. You are absolutely right. This all started with Donna Hughes. The so called "professor" who did a study that alleged rampant sexual trafficking and forced sexual labor. I read her work and it was ridiculous. She took one or two extremely anecdotal cases and said it applied to all. In fact she did not even speak to any of the spa girls, did not try to see what was really going on and in one case, she completely lied when claiming that a few of the spas were "related" and had the same owner. Which was untrue. I suspect maybe she caught her husband or SO at one of these places and decided to take them all down with her BS. I am shocked that a college would keep her hired with the shoddy research and ridiculous unproven claims and assertions. The problem is she was never called out or challenged on it. So all of us are to blame as well. If nobody speaks up then the moron spouting nonsense will be the person everyone believes. I hope someone someday calls her out on her unprofessional and shoddy research methods. Maybe it will be me.

It's been a long while, but finally made a visit to East St. Hostess was "CeCe". Said it was her first day there. Service was adequate but very mechanical, non-GFE and generic. Standard rates and service, about 50 minutes, and will not be in a hurry to return, and will not lament the eventual demise.

With less opportunity in RI this has led to most of us with less field reports. I do not even log in like I used to before the decline of the Roman Empire.

"Regular members" that don't know me stop emailing with "do you know this lady?

I can understand with less opportunity. If I saw someone recently I promise I will post.

You have to use your experience and judgment to dabble into other areas of opportunity with less AMP selection.

Google phone numbers, tinyeye, google images, RTF and also check TER.

If your info is still unsure after going through these progressions maybe you defer until there is enough Intel to make a decision to TOFT.

[QUOTE=TsLover42;2655211]Now I'll really give it a try.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't call my report a recommendation, like I said online reviews were consistently mediocre or outright bad a year after I visited. Plus taht was just one visit, I gues if you are pretty close it's worth stopping by to see how it is, but no way I wouldn drive over two hours based on one report that's several years old.

I posted the following on 10/3/15 on BP thread and thought it would be useful to post again here:

"Some of the most informative published articles in the general media supporting the idea of legalizing prostitution appear in the "Economist" weekly magazine, which can be found in most public libraries. For example, the August 2014 versions include a number of articles some of which are based on a 10-year study based on a variety of world-wide data. (see the links below for examples of two of the articles.) Rhode Island is cited in 2014 and also in an August 2015 article on this topic, for example: "When Rhode Island accidentally decriminalised prostitution in 2003—a legal loophole from 1980 was found to only criminalise the sale of sex outdoors—the state did see an increase in the amount of indoor sex work. But, according to one paper, the number of rape offenses also dropped by 31% between 2003 and 2009, when the trade was once again made illegal, while there were 39% fewer cases of female gonorrhoea. Making the purchase of sex between two consenting adults illegal is also deeply illiberal. " In my view, the paramount issue in Rhode Island is that certain local academic and select government officials are convinced that prostitution is overly represented by women who are forced to participate through human trafficking. These protagonists in turn influence a majority of elected state government officials as well as the regional media, that in turn "forces" the municipal and state police to take action of the type we have seen in the past year or so. The kind of information provided by the "Economist" or relevant articles from other sources seems not to have had an impact on these folks if indeed they are aware of the presented arguments. ".

[URL]http://www.economist.com/news/leader...ts-should-stop[/URL]

[URL]http://www.economist.com/news/briefi...226b1e574f5cc1[/URL]

[QUOTE=CrazyButTrue;2661198]Nope. Not one. You are absolutely right. This all started with Donna Hughes. The so called "professor" who did a study that alleged rampant sexual trafficking and forced sexual labor. I read her work and it was ridiculous. She took one or two extremely anecdotal cases and said it applied to all. In fact she did not even speak to any of the spa girls, did not try to see what was really going on and in one case, she completely lied when claiming that a few of the spas were "related" and had the same owner. Which was untrue. I suspect maybe she caught her husband or SO at one of these places and decided to take them all down with her BS. I am shocked that a college would keep her hired with the shoddy research and ridiculous unproven claims and assertions. The problem is she was never called out or challenged on it. So all of us are to blame as well. If nobody speaks up then the moron spouting nonsense will be the person everyone believes. I hope someone someday calls her out on her unprofessional and shoddy research methods. Maybe it will be me.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FlyDangler;2661166]Has anyone else here ever seen a single case charged?[/QUOTE]Not with the AMPs. IIRC there were a couple of charges AND convictions at Mexican brothels in Providence, not to mention local lowlifes pimping out 14-year-old girls and stuff like that. But the AMPs, never.

[QUOTE=VilunyaChert;2662322]Not with the AMPs. IIRC there were a couple of charges AND convictions at Mexican brothels in Providence, not to mention local lowlifes pimping out 14-year-old girls and stuff like that. But the AMPs, never.[/QUOTE]This is true. There was a reason that the police targeted Latino brothels when Rhode Island re-criminalized indoor prostitution. Spas continued to be opened even after the law was changed. Make no mistake the changing of the law was not due to human trafficking but the fact that it was an embarsement to the state of Rhode Island.

The Do-Gooders who pushed this wouldn't listen to anything anyone said. It is basically a feminist hatred for male sexuality. If you could prove that no one was trafficked in the massage spas they wouldn't listen. It is not reason, logic or common sense for them, it is religion to them. Now, under a new federal law, anyone who comes into the sex industry under the age of 18 is said to have been trafficked no matter what the circumstances were. This new law has netted nothing but petty pimps on the lowest level and a stripper who gave a ride to a fellow stripper not knowing she was under 18.

The Subway sandwich guy paid a million dollars and was not charged under this law. He also got off easy. The rich get off, no pun intended and the little guy will get the full extent of the law.

[QUOTE=Rebrobate218;2662711]...The Do-Gooders who pushed this wouldn't listen to anything anyone said. It is basically a feminist hatred for male sexuality. ...[/QUOTE]I dn't think that's quite it, it seems to have two elements. At the top, the anti-trafficking movement is largely driven by either people with a puritanaical bent who feel all prostitution is immoral so should be outlawed or by radical feminists (not all feminists are radicals and many feminists don't have an issue with prostitution) agenda that believes that ANY exchange of sex for money involves exploitation of women by men (they don't seem to care about male-to-male prostitution so that reveals the lie that their motivation is to stop exploitation) so is wrong and shouldn't be allowed.

That radical view drives thinking behind the smokescreen of 'trafficking'. 'Trafficking' is a false issue the radical feminists / anti-prostitution forces used to generate media buzz which gets 'regular' people to support. So there are different groups allied together fighting prostitution under the rallying banner of 'anti-trafficking' but I don;'t think the opposition to prostituion is really about male sexuality.

All the anti prostitution folks yelling about "trafficking" are shutting down places run by known people who are well established and not actually trafficking anyone.

Being against prostitution is like being against gay marriage. But being against "trafficking" is like being against cruelty to animals or cigarettes.

Truth is the Internet has made retail prostitution a level field for women who can be in control.

As my favorite Asian body worker says "they don't want their husbands getting massages".

The last straw for this place? See "Massage parlor owner says she'll leave if city doesn't want her".

[URL]http://www.valleybreeze.com/2015-11-03/pawtucket/massage-parlor-owner-says-she-ll-leave-if-city-doesn-t-want-her[/URL]#. VjpUAberQdU.

I know CC doesn't like that I do this but called SS the other day and found that Atari and Sabrina are gone.

Anyone know if they can be contacted?

I was in Taunton last Tuesday and had some extra time, so, I decided to give that place a second try. I have been there previously but didn't leace with a smile. I guess it was because I opted for the 30 mn. Anyway, I parked in the parking lot which is very exposed across from a business plaza. The massagr place itself resembles a single family house and situated in a residential st facing the main st, which is not a probkem because you enter from the back entrance. As I was walking up to the door, an older asian lady came out to greet me and lead me to the room which is pretty big. They have a massage table. I lied on it face down and was draped. She told me before we began. "No funny business" . I was like sure but I'm not a cop so no worry. Just in case tou want to change your mind. She proceded to give me the massage. It seems like she knew what she was doing. Not the best but felt like a professional one. She worked my shoulders to my toes. After 45 mn or so, she asked me to flip and started rubbing my thighs. She noticed my uprising and ask no trouble right?,I said no. She gave me a hug then throw the cover off, oiled her hands then went ro work. It was decent, OTC roaming, no emotions from her really. After I erupted. Hot towel and clean up was provided. 60/40.

[QUOTE=TsLover42;2673190]I know CC doesn't like that I do this but called SS the other day and found that Atari and Sabrina are gone.

Anyone know if they can be contacted?[/QUOTE]That, s Yari.

[QUOTE=CaribbeanGuy;2673378]I was in Taunton last Tuesday and had some extra time, so, I decided to give that place a second try. I have been there previously but didn't leace with a smile. I guess it was because I opted for the 30 mn. Anyway, I parked in the parking lot which is very exposed across from a business plaza. The massagr place itself resembles a single family house and situated in a residential st facing the main st, which is not a probkem because you enter from the back entrance. As I was walking up to the door, an older asian lady came out to greet me and lead me to the room which is pretty big. They have a massage table. I lied on it face down and was draped. She told me before we began. "No funny business" . I was like sure but I'm not a cop so no worry. Just in case tou want to change your mind. She proceded to give me the massage. It seems like she knew what she was doing. Not the best but felt like a professional one. She worked my shoulders to my toes. After 45 mn or so, she asked me to flip and started rubbing my thighs. She noticed my uprising and ask no trouble right?,I said no. She gave me a hug then throw the cover off, oiled her hands then went ro work. It was decent, OTC roaming, no emotions from her really. After I erupted. Hot towel and clean up was provided. 60/40.[/QUOTE]Said you opted for 30 min, but after 45 min flip? Then 60/40 tip which is an hour's rate?

I think he meant the first time he was there he opted for 30 mts. This time it was hr.

[QUOTE=HappyDave;2673911]Said you opted for 30 min, but after 45 min flip? Then 60/40 tip which is an hour's rate?[/QUOTE]