Honey bunny 69 is a scammer.
Didn't copy the URL before I blocked, but this Jasmine W's crew is back.
Venmo is at jasmine-w-99559.
They say they have kids and no power of some sort. Many variations on the story.
Don't give them any money.
A little plumper in person too.
[QUOTE=JLZ61;4118771]Met this one last night. Nice enough young lady but she's not the girl in the photos. Well, more accurately, there are four photos and two of them are her and two aren't. Unfortunately, the nice profile photo and equally nice beauty shot are not of her. The bedroom and doorway photos are. While she's nice enough, I was not attracted to her and somewhat put off by the "false advertising". If you know you're going to meet someone, why post false photos? LOL.
She has no car (having gotten a DUI a little over a year ago) but is happy to bus or Uber, so that was no issue for me. Lives in Columbia Tusculum.
If she's to your liking, she is def up for a good time so have at it![/QUOTE]Definitely up for it. Likes to drink and play.
Try it out and see if it works for you.
I also will not see her again.
CincyBunny ska Kimber ska Lily aks list goes on
Escort for discreet desires in Dayton on seeking claiming to have disabled child. Not true. Can't remember all the names she's used on seeking. Paste reviews on here give her C grade performance. No CIM. Clock watcher. Fake porn movie noise maker. One and done. BSer. Wallet milker. YMMV.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/87fa0f9c-35a8-4150-9a2a-4df233ef8b7b[/URL]
Aggressive to meet means leverage or scary
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;4138218]Out of Dayton. Will drive to Cincinnati. Once $250 per visit. Says she is only 4 foot 6. Very aggressive desire to meet ASAP.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d5baec65-a364-43ff-965d-14929dc24910[/URL][/QUOTE]I was chatting with her on the site and wasn't going to discuss arrangement details on the site. She got frustrated and said bye.
Another New Profile Samantha3883
[QUOTE=Blowme12;4129656]You aren't kidding. Texted with her for about 5 minutes before the attitude showed up. Been on SA for a are a long time and the biggest case of GPS I have ever seen.[/QUOTE]Beware, this witch has changed profiles again. Somehow not surprising, as given here attitude she's probably dodging the guys she's pissed off.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6f8ff1a6-8c6c-47a8-a9ae-007ef7f3fb6d[/URL]
CFG.
Re: Viewing Messages on Seeking Without Premium Service?
[QUOTE=SandPiper540;4137828]Viewing messages without premium.
I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.
It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.
Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.
If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.
Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.).
Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".
Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.
It's not a substitute for reading messages in the inbox as usual, but it might be helpful for anyone who gets a message when they don't have premium active and wants to peek at it without having to immediately shell out the cash to read it.
As a programmer, I can tell that there's actually a _ton_ of useful information being returned whenever you view a profile page or inbox page. It would be possible for someone to write a browser extension that either extracted some of that info from a page, or re-requested that data from the server, and did something useful with it (up to and including modifying an inbox to show all the messages without needing premium enabled). Sadly, I don't have time to work on anything like that myself. I've got a lot of other things on my plate.
Hope that helps![/QUOTE]I was viewing the photo gallery section and when clicking to view one of the reports I found the above post. I got as far as turning on developer tools, but in the list of data requests returned I did not see the specific one mentioned.
Knowing there are many of you that like to play on seeking here in Cincy I thought I would share the post. Perhaps one of you tech savy mongers can determine if this really does allow reading messages without paying for premium service?