Philly Sugar

This one wants 800 ppm. She wouldn't negotiate with me.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/16e7cf6d-2439-4779-82c1-36be3ed043cd[/URL]

[QUOTE=TAway612;6004089]Is she on SA? Please share the link![/QUOTE]I did share the link in my original post. We have since blocked each other so can't copy it again from the site. She's posting in FL now anyway, which coincides with some of the discussion I had with her back then.

[QUOTE=HenryT458;6004429]This one wants 3,000/ month. Nope. Next.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7b04764a-2d75-45b4-b58a-66bf853a5113[/URL][/QUOTE]LOL her profile said if she only wanted 500 ppm per week, she'd work at mcdonalds. Yeah sure. Eating at nice restaurants and laying on your back for a few hours = working at mcdonalds 40 hours a week. What an attitude.

[QUOTE=Glhfddka;6004597]LOL her profile said if she only wanted 500 ppm per week, she'd work at mcdonalds. Yeah sure. Eating at nice restaurants and laying on your back for a few hours = working at mcdonalds 40 hours a week. What an attitude.[/QUOTE]Henry, I was going to write the same thing about the 3 K / month girl (re McDonalds) but GLh beat me to it.

As for the others.

1. The 3 K / m 750 ppm one always struck me as fake because she was back & forth from L. A. But she also telegraphs that she's expensive in her bio so I didn't bother. But yes, hot.

2. I've looked at the 4:30 weekdays one, which would work for me -- so thanks for the legwork -- but I'm on the fence as far as I like a little more curves.

3. Coincidently, I wrote about Chloexo earlier this week. I didn't get to the numbers but knew she couldn't host, so I was holding off on that for awhile. HOWEVER, I stumbled across her in another profile on escort directory e d you s a so I'm thinking that, if you want to meet her, she would have a lower price if you initiated contact through that profile.

[QUOTE=Pleck2;6004649]Henry, I was going to write the same thing about the 3 K / month girl (re McDonalds) but GLh beat me to it.

As for the others.

1. The 3 K / m 750 ppm one always struck me as fake because she was back & forth from L. A. But she also telegraphs that she's expensive in her bio so I didn't bother. But yes, hot.

2. I've looked at the 4:30 weekdays one, which would work for me -- so thanks for the legwork -- but I'm on the fence as far as I like a little more curves.

3. Coincidently, I wrote about Chloexo earlier this week. I didn't get to the numbers but knew she couldn't host, so I was holding off on that for awhile. HOWEVER, I stumbled across her in another profile on escort directory e d you s a so I'm thinking that, if you want to meet her, she would have a lower price if you initiated contact through that profile.[/QUOTE]I read that McDonald's thing as was thinking that she's in no way in that league. Lot of 6's thinking that are super models. At 3 k a week, I expect a gumade, not a SB.

Been talking with a lot of SBs lately expecting 500 or more ppm LOL. Typically most won't negotiate and cop an attitude if you try. I guess some of you boys are paying that. It takes time but after some work I can usually find a regular in the 250-300 range. I do have a long term fwb at 200 per but we set that up about 2 years ago. Seems like that's pretty rare they days.

Here's one below that said 400 but had more rules and regulations than the IRS LOL. She is in the stadium area.

BTW I just renewed SA for about 72 per month for 3 months. I know that site has its challenges but the unlimited messages makes it worth it at least for me.

Happy hunting!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/76e224f1-4a03-4023-83f6-60d4e362fbb1[/URL]

Talking to a girl and supposed to see her next week. We were just talking and I said guys who are poor don't get hot girlfriends. She says that she respects the poor. I replied yes, but you won't date them. She got mad and said it's rude to assume what income level is guys she dates. I said, v you are on Seeking, so by definition you are dating for money. So how are you telling me your date poor guys? She didn't appreciate me pointing out the flaw in her thinking.

[QUOTE=OverKill418;6010102]Talking to a girl and supposed to see her next week. We were just talking and I said guys who are poor don't get hot girlfriends. She says that she respects the poor. I replied yes, but you won't date them. She got mad and said it's rude to assume what income level is guys she dates. I said, v you are on Seeking, so by definition you are dating for money. So how are you telling me your date poor guys? She didn't appreciate me pointing out the flaw in her thinking.[/QUOTE]I have run into girls like that before and it's frustrating. At some point I get to the place where I have to recognize a girl ain't no Rocket Scientist and decide if that is OK and she's just pretty enough to flatback for me. I use to get into it with girls, then I realized that that was eliminating potential dates and with so many fakes, frauds and flakes out there decided eliminating girls based on academic achievement was cutting the pool pretty darn small. So many times it is tempting for me to "tell a girl off" or point out her logical flaws, but I now have learned to hold myself back, smile at how "brainy" she isn't and see if her temperament is enough for a few good romps in the bedroom. I guess those lessons from growing up finally took - "if you can't find something nice to say, say nothing at all. " Hey, I had to be polite or got punished!

Something else I noticed years ago when a GF and I were into the swing scene. We had a phrase for it "Hot Wife, Troll Husband". It was amazing how steadfast that rule held. Just about EVERY hotwife we saw at a club or online had dudes that were just average or worse. The point being that yeah, I was super attracted to the wives, but the Troll husbands were a definite turn off to my GF. I think we came to the conclusion, after talking with many of the couples, that girls go for average or lower dudes because it is security for them. They know they are hotter than anything the dude has ever gotten or would get and thus know the dudes won't cheat on them and their "higher status" puts the in a position of power, so to speak. They get treated like Princesses by grateful husbands. Plus many of these women didn't have expectations of Yachts, Caribbean vacation homes or private jets. They were happy with love and commitment even if they were less well off than if they were a gold-digger with some rich dude.

I learned that it's interesting how the world works and not everyone fits into my preconceived notions.

But in the long run, I appreciate it when someone points out when I am factually incorrect so I might learn and grow. But someone calling me an idiot because they have a different view or opinion, tends to be irritating. I can imagine that others operate in a similar fashion? But hey, what do I know?

Hang in there, for every Jack there is a Jill!

[QUOTE=Shampoo55;6010275]I have run into girls like that before and it's frustrating. At some point I get to the place where I have to recognize a girl ain't no Rocket Scientist and decide if that is OK and she's just pretty enough to flatback for me. I use to get into it with girls, then I realized that that was eliminating potential dates and with so many fakes, frauds and flakes out there decided eliminating girls based on academic achievement was cutting the pool pretty darn small. So many times it is tempting for me to "tell a girl off" or point out her logical flaws, but I now have learned to hold myself back, smile at how "brainy" she isn't and see if her temperament is enough for a few good romps in the bedroom. I guess those lessons from growing up finally took - "if you can't find something nice to say, say nothing at all. " Hey, I had to be polite or got punished!

Something else I noticed years ago when a GF and I were into the swing scene. We had a phrase for it "Hot Wife, Troll Husband". It was amazing how steadfast that rule held. Just about EVERY hotwife we saw at a club or online had dudes that were just average or worse. The point being that yeah, I was super attracted to the wives, but the Troll husbands were a definite turn off to my GF. I think we came to the conclusion, after talking with many of the couples, that girls go for average or lower dudes because it is security for them. They know they are hotter than anything the dude has ever gotten or would get and thus know the dudes won't cheat on them and their "higher status" puts the in a position of power, so to speak. They get treated like Princesses by grateful husbands. Plus many of these women didn't have expectations of Yachts, Caribbean vacation homes or private jets. They were happy with love and commitment even if they were less well off than if they were a gold-digger with some rich dude.

I learned that it's interesting how the world works and not everyone fits into my preconceived notions.

But in the long run, I appreciate it when someone points out when I am factually incorrect so I might learn and grow. But someone calling me an idiot because they have a different view or opinion, tends to be irritating. I can imagine that others operate in a similar fashion? But hey, what do I know?

Hang in there, for every Jack there is a Jill![/QUOTE]We talked about it and I played it off as a comment about people in general. She is good at playing the girl who wants a long term and serious arrangement, then says she's not. She's hot as hell, but have a couple other ones to meet and one that I see up in NEPA when we are both around.

[QUOTE=OverKill418;6010102]Talking to a girl and supposed to see her next week. We were just talking and I said guys who are poor don't get hot girlfriends. She says that she respects the poor. I replied yes, but you won't date them. She got mad and said it's rude to assume what income level is guys she dates. I said, v you are on Seeking, so by definition you are dating for money. So how are you telling me your date poor guys? She didn't appreciate me pointing out the flaw in her thinking.[/QUOTE]There is perhaps a flaw in your logic, I think. If she's on seeking she's a prostitute. If a poor schlep can pay her ppm (stimulus check came in), she'll lick his taint same as any other.

Is a GFE same as a Sugar Baby? Thanks!

[QUOTE=OverKill418;6010102]Talking to a girl and supposed to see her next week. We were just talking and I said guys who are poor don't get hot girlfriends. She says that she respects the poor. I replied yes, but you won't date them. She got mad and said it's rude to assume what income level is guys she dates. I said, v you are on Seeking, so by definition you are dating for money. So how are you telling me your date poor guys? She didn't appreciate me pointing out the flaw in her thinking.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't call seeking and sb / sd relationships "dating". There's money changing hands. The relationship would not exist without that.

Who she dates in her civilian life is probably completely different from who she meets with on seeking.

Just like I'd never actually consider seriously dating a lot of the people I see on seeking.

[QUOTE=JohnDoe3428;6010664]Is a GFE same as a Sugar Baby? Thanks![/QUOTE]No! GFE does not equal Sugar Baby.

Perhaps one could negotiate GFE from a SB? I think most would expect a SB to do GFE, but hey, ya never know.

You should look up both terms on [URL]UrbanDictionary.com[/URL] so you understand the terms.

[QUOTE=Shampoo55;6011330]No! GFE does not equal Sugar Baby.

Perhaps one could negotiate GFE from a SB? I think most would expect a SB to do GFE, but hey, ya never know.

You should look up both terms on [URL]UrbanDictionary.com[/URL] so you understand the terms.[/QUOTE]Thanks, man! I was considering to make Suzie at LoveKPhilly my SB, but it seems SB isn't the right concept. She truly enjoyed my gorgeous dick, and she suddenly become shy when I gently started licking her clit to taste her liquid. I donated $$ but she returned 60 indicating 'I would like to see you for a long time, save your money. " How lovely! I just felt that she could be my Sugar Baby. But she's already a GFE, maybe I am becoming a simp? But my giant boy is too handsome to become.

A simp! LOL.

Thanks, my friend!

[QUOTE=Grafenberg;6010423]There is perhaps a flaw in your logic, I think. If she's on seeking she's a prostitute. If a poor schlep can pay her ppm (stimulus check came in), she'll lick his taint same as any other.[/QUOTE]If she's sleeping with a guy for money, she's a sex worker. These girls like to play the Madonna role when they are one step above an escort.