Printable View
[QUOTE=GadgetIT;5426802]I literally cut my teeth in the monger world with a fat babe many moons ago. Man she could blow like a hoover. GFE, multi pops, the works.
I won't turn away from a hot bbw.
Avoid the walking dead.
-G.[/QUOTE]But why would you pay for a fat one when you can get it for fee? In fact I'm pretty sure should would pay you to get some action.
[QUOTE=Prinohb;5427620][URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/22-cumplaydaddy140qv200hhdaty/230536094964[/URL]
Saw this one on STG and have been texting. Number search doesn't show much but did show a name (Jade) but that's pretty common. Prices are a bit high but she does look pretty good if the pics are accurate. Said she's at an Easton area hotel. Texts have been unusual in that they are in complete sentences with no misspellings or even abbreviations though some punctuation issues. Wanted to see if anyone had experience with her. May toftt tomorrow.[/QUOTE]This is potentially a sting. I would be careful.
Just a little bit of advice for you all out there. LE has been running sting ads through June and some of you are biting on them. You need to be more careful unless you want to go to "John school. ". My advice is to only see girls that you can verify.
FYI major signs to look for are:
- No face pics (or only one face pic).
- "Unusual" texts.
- Requests for you to send a selfies.
- Asking for a description of your car or for you to stop on the way to get her something so they can observe you.
- Increased age (though not always the case).
- Upper class hotel (not always).
- Lack of reviews.
There are other signs as well but those are just a few. FYI LE has been getting more sophisticated with their stings. Hence my advice to be more careful.
[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5428111]Just a little bit of advice for you all out there. LE has been running sting ads through June and some of you are biting on them. You need to be more careful unless you want to go to "John school. ". My advice is to only see girls that you can verify.
FYI major signs to look for are:
- No face pics (or only one face pic).
- "Unusual" texts.
- Requests for you to send a selfies.
- Asking for a description of your car or for you to stop on the way to get her something so they can observe you.
- Increased age (though not always the case).
- Upper class hotel (not always).
- Lack of reviews.
There are other signs as well but those are just a few. FYI LE has been getting more sophisticated with their stings. Hence my advice to be more careful.[/QUOTE]Also, the rates are usually very low, especially relative to the hotel they use.
[QUOTE=MidwestDude;5424781]Wanting to bang think chicks isn't the reason talent sucks in this town.[/QUOTE]What's the reason then? I mean this isn't helping and I think SA is where some of them went.
[QUOTE=KC7676;5428395]Also, the rates are usually very low, especially relative to the hotel they use.[/QUOTE]This is correct although I think they may be getting a bit more sophisticated in this area.
[QUOTE=EdB99;5427883]But why would you pay for a fat one when you can get it for fee? In fact I'm pretty sure should would pay you to get some action.[/QUOTE]And not presumptuous enough to pretend I bang women for free. Even BBWs.
With my sex addiction, even free would have limits.
-G.
[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5428082]This is potentially a sting. I would be careful.[/QUOTE]This may be a LEO ad; though LEO normally does not post visible genilalia, but maybe there's a shift in sting op practices driven by the new Cbus female police chief from MI. It'd be interesting to see what policy changes she would bring.
This ad looks like a LEO ad to me:
[URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/looking-for-weekend-fun-and-ga/351141852441[/URL]
[QUOTE=EdB99;5427883]But why would you pay for a fat one when you can get it for fee? In fact I'm pretty sure should would pay you to get some action.[/QUOTE]Right. If you wouldn't do a girl either because she was fat or ugly when you were at a stage in your life when you could do those types for free, why would you pay for them now? Some of these girls are universally nasty looking, just by using common sense standards.
[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5429214]This may be a LEO ad; though LEO normally does not post visible genilalia, but maybe there's a shift in sting op practices driven by the new Cbus female police chief from MI. It'd be interesting to see what policy changes she would bring.
This ad looks like a LEO ad to me:
[URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/looking-for-weekend-fun-and-ga/351141852441[/URL][/QUOTE]To me, having attorneys argue legality of sting with visible private parts in the listing would be excessive enticement.
Vague postings, no face, no reviews, and quick response with rates are all red flags I avoid.
-G.
[QUOTE=Prinohb;5427620][URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/22-cumplaydaddy140qv200hhdaty/230536094964[/URL]
Saw this one on STG and have been texting. Number search doesn't show much but did show a name (Jade) but that's pretty common. Prices are a bit high but she does look pretty good if the pics are accurate. Said she's at an Easton area hotel. Texts have been unusual in that they are in complete sentences with no misspellings or even abbreviations though some punctuation issues. Wanted to see if anyone had experience with her. May toftt tomorrow.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the advice. I did have some concerns about the ad and conversation. That said, I tried to get together with her last night. I texted a few times with no response. I noted she did repost her ad later last night but I'd already gone to bed. She did reply as well overnight. Likely won't try again though.
[QUOTE=GadgetIT;5429370]To me, having attorneys argue legality of sting with visible private parts in the listing would be excessive enticement.
Vague postings, no face, no reviews, and quick response with rates are all red flags I avoid.
-G.[/QUOTE]The ad I noted as a potential LEO ad is gone?! It probably was LEO's.
In terms of the excessive enticement, I do not know whether the legality of instruments used in an ad in a sting NEED to be argued, if the entrapment argument by and large do not work any more in court as a valid defense. Stings are in effect entrapment, and they are legalized in the US system of law. Apart from the UK, in the vast majority of European countries, stings are not permissible.
[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5429594]The ad I noted as a potential LEO ad is gone?! It probably was LEO's.
In terms of the excessive enticement, I do not know whether the legality of instruments used in an ad in a sting NEED to be argued, if the entrapment argument by and large do not work any more in court as a valid defense. Stings are in effect entrapment, and they are legalized in the US system of law. Apart from the UK, in the vast majority of European countries, stings are not permissible.[/QUOTE]Clarification. You do have a point, GadgetIT. I see entrapment as the greater degree than enticement of essentially the same possess. And if entrapment in the form of stings is totally acceptable legally, then enticement should also be acceptable. I do agree that the means and tools of enticement and entrapment can be questionable morally (meaning, can the public servant and representatives of the state use private parts—the morally reprehensible material in their stings). No, the police as presumably the keeper of law and order (and by implication, morality) cannot use sexually explicit material in their work—by doing this the police likens itself to criminals, as the argument might go. But morality is a very malleable area and can be interpreted from various and different viewpoints. For instance, sting ops in the form of entrapment.
I think it's an immoral and inappropriate practice. In a sting op, the police provoke you by asking you questions and eliciting incriminating responses; the police lead you into responses they need, which in a natural situation you would not even have thought of certain issues or would have responded differently when actually seeing the girl face-to-face. The police create a reality for you (needed to ensnare you into incriminating yourself)—you do participate in that construction of reality but you are led into saying incriminating things. So the police, courts, and legal practice equate a manufactured and engineered situation / reality (that they devised and constructed themselves to ensnare you) with a real situation that never happened (The courts convict you on intent but not on the actual act). I know of cases when people were convicted on the basis of text messages alone. They came to the hotel and were arrested in the parking lot; never gave any money to the girl, never touched the girl, never entered the room, but the text messages had enough incriminating implications that might lead to a conclusion beyond the reasonable doubt, a concept easy to manipulate.
So practical implications: when not sure of the provider, never initiate any incriminating acts or information in text exchanges-do not say I want this and that; do not ask for prices first, or if you ask, say I do not want anything sexual but could pay for time and companionship only, no unlawful or sexual acts; wait till they initiate questions and respond vaguely or ambiguously in a way that may be interpreted in a couple of ways.
I see lakes is back in town. I haven't seen her adds in a couple years and always wanted to see her years ago and never did.
She's just using the same photos from years ago so I'm wondering what she really looks like now? Anyone seen her recently or am I going to have to bite the bullet and do her LOL.
Seen the Newark girl Friday she's got a nice rack and takes direction well. I'll see her again.
[QUOTE=HotRod4305;5430609]I see lakes is back in town. I haven't seen her adds in a couple years and always wanted to see her years ago and never did.
She's just using the same photos from years ago so I'm wondering what she really looks like now? Anyone seen her recently or am I going to have to bite the bullet and do her LOL.
Seen the Newark girl Friday she's got a nice rack and takes direction well. I'll see her again.[/QUOTE]Lake is back? Got a link? I always wanted to hit that. I saw the skip the games chick in Dairy Aisle Saturday LOL. I will definitely be balls deep in her sometime this week.