Escort Reviews

[B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]Couldn't find a postingShe looks gorgeous, and your review is great. Can't find an ad either cin or dayton. Gat alink. Pm me.

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]Jack is the GOLD standard for reviews!

Just a quick shout out and huge thank you back to you, K Jack. Your reviews are consistently the best and most informative. Overall, I find your observations to be spot on and quite useful.

Newbies would do well to emulate your organization and style. It takes a considerable amount of work, thought and time to put these together. Were there a "Mongie" award to be handed out, I, for one, would vote for KJ!!

Thanks for all your reviews!! Very much appreciated!!

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JLZ61;3873883]Just a quick shout out and huge thank you back to you, K Jack. Your reviews are consistently the best and most informative. Overall, I find your observations to be spot on and quite useful.

Newbies would do well to emulate your organization and style. It takes a considerable amount of work, thought and time to put these together. Were there a "Mongie" award to be handed out, I, for one, would vote for KJ!!

Thanks for all your reviews!! Very much appreciated!![/QUOTE]Seems Kenwood Jack is really Jack (or King) of Mongering! I am new to Mongering!!

Where and how will I find SexySparkle.

Any good ones near Sharonville, West Chester or Mason area??

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]Jack, thanks as always. It would help to have a link the picture you posted doesn't link to any contact info.

The good dr.

Confirming K-Jack's review of SexySparkle as Spot On and accurate in every way. I have known SS for over 5 years and she has consistently been my ATF; and for several of those years the only young lady I spent any time with.

She is friendly, beautiful, has a killer body, great personality, skills as good as they get, and did I say beautiful?

She is not posting but her contact info is available from a number of us who have seen her and know her.

Great review Jack, she is definitely worth a visit (or many) and definitely a keeper. Boo.

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JoGreen;3869171]Not to beat a dead horse but those pics look nothing like Rachel. The only similarities are the dark hair and full rack. Rachel is great and I've been lucky enough to see her a half dozen times.[/QUOTE]Rachel will be back Friday an seeing people on Monday. Things looking better now. She is always missed when she is taking time off.

[QUOTE=HillbillyBob;3874299]Rachel will be back Friday an seeing people on Monday. Things looking better now. She is always missed when she is taking time off.[/QUOTE]Is she taking new clients or do her regulars keep her busy enough?

She she the girl who lived in Trenton a couple of years ago? If so, I agree that she was a lot of fun!

[QUOTE=KenwoodJack;3873247][B][red]A heartfelt shout-out to you, my fellow monger contributors - for without your help ... I could never enjoy this monger life in such relative safety with a seemingly endless stream of new providers - thanks to my brethren who contribute [/red][/B] .
To those who don't, you are just yesterday's [U]smegma[/U] - [I]please contribute to get my respect[/I].

[B] SexySparkle [/B]
General Area: North of Cincinnati (Miamisburg for now).
PM Kenwood Jack for for her number.
She seems to have been around years and years. Please read other reviews.
Gosh. I only saw her for the first time Sunday.

I found this old picture. She looked exactly like this on Sunday!
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=446695&d=1484958354[/URL]
Boobs: beautiful 34 c-cup (exactly like picture).
General body type: Athletic 5'3" 110 pounds 38 years old. Wow - pretty too!
Actually easy to schedule - 3 texts and I was at her door.
Was she on time? I had to wait 3 minutes. I actually am a stickler here. So I wonder how much she understands that my time is important also.

Incall was at a national chain motel (extended stay type).
Safety of incall and safeness of neighborhood. Incall was great. Outside the motel, it seemed a little sketchy. Spidey sense-o-meter score would be about a 2 for outside the motel.
Was the incall clean? Incall was lived in, but nice and clean!
Did I "do it" on the top cover (the same place the last 4 guys came)? I don't think so!

She had just showered. I kissed, licked, or smelled [i]everywhere[/i] on her and everything was fresh and clean. No perfume as I requested. I did not smell smoky smells, but my equipment (even olfactory) does not work very well anymore.
Attitude: Bright and shiny eyes, and an innocent willingness.
Skill: 10.
Performance: 9+ (She lost a tiny bit on lack of aggression).
Comfortability level. Great for a first date.
Chemistry: [i]With me?[/i]
Rushed? Our 2 hour date turned into an over 4 hour experience. She was compensated for her extra time. Remember brothers, you are paying for their time - [I]do not take advantage of your provider if she has not been watching the clock[/I] . You know how long you've been there.

[B]Constructive criticism - What could I have done or she have done to make the experience better?[/B]
[I]She was three minutes late. She could have been ready before I got there. I made the appointment the night before.[/I]
[U]I should have shown up 30 years younger[/U], [U]30 pounds lighter[/U], [U]3 inches longer[/U] (for a grand total of 6), [U]and not limp[/U].

What's on the menu for everyone? We know it's always YMMV, but her menu is fairly full:
[B]BBBJ, CFS, DATO, CIM, GFE, DATY, MSOG, CFS, different positions, lfk, dfk.[/B] [I]
No butt stuff.[/I].
She is very adventurous. I really liked that. Her smile was very endearing.

A clean shower and clean towels were provided. I appreciate when this happens.

Overall pros: (reasons a monger might want to see her). Cute, hot body, priced fairly, easy set-up, open to suggestions, adventurous, clean incall, great menu, low volume, shower fresh, a very safe experience, [B][red] she actually enjoys the sex[/red][/B] (very few providers like [U]any[/U] sex with mongers), she had a superior skill set, she did not seem jaded like most providers, she is just plain fun.

Overall cons: (reasons a monger might not want to see her). Above 30 (she still looks great), she needed to take a cigarette break at 2 hours. She just was not very aggressive (I like aggressive). She was 3 minutes late.

Overall value: Exceptional value.

[B]I will repeat[/B] personally and often. [B]I heartily recommend[/B].[/QUOTE]

SexySparkle is the young lady from Trenton.

[QUOTE=Tuffy12;3874627]She she the girl who lived in Trenton a couple of years ago? If so, I agree that she was a lot of fun![/QUOTE]

I would give my left arm for somebody to PM me Sexy Sparkle's contact info. She sounds amazing!

[QUOTE=TapThat;3871432]The review in her ad is real.

Pm the gentlemen and ask for specifics.[/QUOTE]Here is the to my review here last November. I have seen her a couple of times since and once just two weeks ago. She is a pleasant looking (if you like chocolate spinners like I do) young, and patient and sensible and reasonable, be polite and I can only imagine you'll be pleased.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?8698-Backpage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=3637712[/URL]#post3637712.

[QUOTE=RolSub18;3871173]Can anyone tell me much about Diamond? Here is her ad.

[URL]https://backpage.com.cincinnati.listcrawler.com/post/26718349/Diamond[/URL]. Thinking of taking the leap, looks incredibly hot in her pics. Thanks guys.[/QUOTE][POST=3636310]Link to IlvblckGrls review of Diamond[/POST]

Saw Ella a couple of years ago when she was doing doubles with Skylar. I know she has had some ups and downs but decided to give her a ring. Communication was good and timely. Got together and she pretty much looks like she did 2 years ago. I liked her body back then but she has put on a few pounds but nothing to throw a fit over. Donation was reasonable and she was upbeat and friendly just like I remembered. As before her menu is wide open. BBBJ, FS, bls, greek, cim and pretty much anything else suggested. Was even suggesting different BJ positions. Was not a clock watcher and didn't rush at all. Service was as good as ever it was with her. Is she back on drugs? Idk, she says not but I don't really give a shit. She seemed fine and I didn't at least see any evidence. Like I said she has good and bad reviews but my session with her was just fine and everything promised was enthusiastically delivered. As usual YMMV.