Hoax after hoax after hoax
People are losing site of the big picture. The goal of the mitigation was to "flatten the curve" and prevent the overwhelming of our health care system. We have accomplished that. The goal was NOT to prevent cases and deaths, which is an impossible task. And in the end, have we decreased the overall number of cases under the curve? Unless we shut down the economy and all interaction until a vaccine is available, also an impossible ask, as we cannot shut down that long.
So, when it's all said and done, have we really affected the overall outcome, while demolishing our economy and ruining peoples lives and businesses and ending up with trillions in future taxes and trillions in market losses? People are losing their businesses, livelihoods, savings, retirement, and their future and their children's futures. Having concern for that does not imply lack of concern for coronavirus cases. It is a rational balance that needs to be struck, while the question still remains, in the end, will there be much difference in overall coronavirus deaths?
The federal gov has taken unprecedented action and has done substantial amount of work during this modern day unprecedented pandemic. Whether we have done the right thing or not, the actions of the fed gov cannot be discounted.
And btw, it should more accurately be called “physical” distancing rather than “social” distancing.
Dumbass after dumbass after dumbass
[QUOTE=INeedAName;4758004]People are losing site of the big picture. The goal of the mitigation was to "flatten the curve" and prevent the overwhelming of our health care system. We have accomplished that. The goal was NOT to prevent cases and deaths, which is an impossible task. And in the end, have we decreased the overall number of cases under the curve? Unless we shut down the economy and all interaction until a vaccine is available, also an impossible ask, as we cannot shut down that long.
So, when it's all said and done, have we really affected the overall outcome, while demolishing our economy and ruining peoples lives and businesses and ending up with trillions in future taxes and trillions in market losses? People are losing their businesses, livelihoods, savings, retirement, and their future and their children's futures. Having concern for that does not imply lack of concern for coronavirus cases. It is a rational balance that needs to be struck, while the question still remains, in the end, will there be much difference in overall coronavirus deaths?
The federal gov has taken unprecedented action and has done substantial amount of work during this modern day unprecedented pandemic. Whether we have done the right thing or not, the actions of the fed gov cannot be discounted.
And btw, it should more accurately be called physical distancing rather than social distancing.[/QUOTE]Stoopid post of day!
Since you need a name, you could be Stoopid.
The country could have flattened the curve a month ago but had ignorant leadership in the Oval Office.
Two months of wasted time to do more testing was wasted. Because of ignorant leadership in the Oval Office.
Still don't have proper testing and have zero tracking capabilities. Due to ignorant leadership in the Oval Office.
In six months he will be gone.
Big question is will our party finally get back to normal going forward or will we allow foxnews to choose our leaders?
No one except you Techsticles
[QUOTE=TechSticles;4758125]I'd like to believe no one is that fucking stupid.[/QUOTE]You never agree with anyone on anything yet you feel the need to comment and call people out on everything. Did no one listen to you as a child? What the fuck is wrong with you? I think everyone has grown weary of you.
Golfguy, playing through.
[blue]He does it because he wants guys to do what you just did right here.
You can't beat trolls to death, you have to starve them.
A2[/blue]