Sugarbabies?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/722165e6-3069-4388-aeca-ce4d0f180cd8[/URL]

Comes and goes on SA used to have a strict no hotel rule.

859-XXX-X471.

Anyone have any info?

Oh, the rest of us are definitely between 18 and 33!! I, for example, am only 29. And have been so for, um, 28 years. LOL.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4058194]If a girl isn't interested in older guys, then she shouldn't be on a sugar *daddy* site. Right? Kind of like one of us going onto a gay dating site, and declaring "I'm not interested in men. " People would rightfully ask, "Then why are you here, dumbass?"

Seeking can't decide if it wants to be a sugar daddy site, or some version of Match.

I've also noticed that girls can now request guys in a certain age range. They also have the ability to screen messages from daddies above a particular age. This is the way Match does things.

Now, I understand perfectly that on a conventional site like Match, a 21 year old woman does not want to get messages from a 50 year old guy (me). But when I see some sugar babies requesting "daddies" between the ages of 18 to 33, I have to think: Do they really understand what's going on here? Most 30 year old men aren't interested in paying for 21 year old women. So it's a waste of time for all involved.

I understand that Seeking is only trying to preserve the fiction that it's a dating site. But I'm guessing that many of us are over 35.

Am I right? Or are the rest if you between the ages of 18 and 33, LOL?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4058080][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e9ca8f99-9c07-46db-9b2d-5b101ba29674[/URL]

We have been texting for a short time. She is wanting 500 per meet. Anyone else seen her?[/QUOTE]She's not worth your time or energy. I know who she is from meeting her a couple times a year ago. She never followed through with anything she says she'll do. She tries to say she's worth the wait and then sell you pictures. She had several friends on the site at one point who were much more willing to have fun at a more reasonable allowance (compared to her asking of $$.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;4058216][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/722165e6-3069-4388-aeca-ce4d0f180cd8[/URL]

Comes and goes on SA used to have a strict no hotel rule.

859-XXX-X471.

Anyone have any info?[/QUOTE]Either I am blocked or she deleted her profile. I sent her an approach five months ago when she was using 'Bambi" as her profile name.

Bam.

I think it is pretty clear that Seeking is presenting itself one way to the women they are recruiting and the public while winking and nodding to the men who are its heaviest users. They say no online only but every day new profiles pop up with that stated. By the same standard, there are multiple new profiles a day stating platonic and that is an option in the female drop down menu. Seeking is allowing women to think Seeking is a dating site where they can meet needy 18-35 millionaires (sheeesh!) and Seeking is expecting us to expand their understanding and convert them into the SB's. I am willing to accept the challenge as long as the flow of attractive young women remains high.

BAM.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4058194]If a girl isn't interested in older guys, then she shouldn't be on a sugar *daddy* site. Right? Kind of like one of us going onto a gay dating site, and declaring "I'm not interested in men. " People would rightfully ask, "Then why are you here, dumbass?"

Seeking can't decide if it wants to be a sugar daddy site, or some version of Match.

I've also noticed that girls can now request guys in a certain age range. They also have the ability to screen messages from daddies above a particular age. This is the way Match does things.

Now, I understand perfectly that on a conventional site like Match, a 21 year old woman does not want to get messages from a 50 year old guy (me). But when I see some sugar babies requesting "daddies" between the ages of 18 to 33, I have to think: Do they really understand what's going on here? Most 30 year old men aren't interested in paying for 21 year old women. So it's a waste of time for all involved.

I understand that Seeking is only trying to preserve the fiction that it's a dating site. But I'm guessing that many of us are over 35.

Am I right? Or are the rest if you between the ages of 18 and 33, LOL?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DeniaLusmc;4058073]I have a meeting set up with her well for Tuesday. Any info before would be greatly appreciated.[/QUOTE]Treat her well and respectfully and you will have a great time.

Hey fellas, sorry for no link, I currently do not have a profile on SA. This one reached out to me after months wanting to set something up. Anyone have any info on her? Get a feeling of GPS but was hoping for information before wasting time. Anyone?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d59e8e08-d9b9-4d3e-b97d-d0af20276dc5[/URL]

Have a meeting set up with her tonight. Anyone taken the plunge yet?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/965f8945-1021-4a77-822a-c30ffbf054ef[/URL]

Anyone played with this one?

[QUOTE=LTL429;4065434][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d59e8e08-d9b9-4d3e-b97d-d0af20276dc5[/URL]

Have a meeting set up with her tonight. Anyone taken the plunge yet?[/QUOTE]I have been speaking with her too. How did it go?

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4065725]I have been speaking with her too. How did it go?[/QUOTE]SW looks with SA aspirations 😂128514;. Is my take on her. Is real, will meet, was open to Fc for 100. I declined and we parted ways. Heavily tatted super nice just not my thing. Very short and skinny. Rough wore out look.

[QUOTE=LTL429;4066154]SW looks with SA aspirations 😂128514;. Is my take on her. Is real, will meet, was open to Fc for 100. I declined and we parted ways. Heavily tatted super nice just not my thing. Very short and skinny. Rough wore out look.[/QUOTE]Thanks for that. She seemed eager and in need. I get worried when the urgency is really high and what else they may be doing on the side or in addition to me.

Just to confirm. Is there a dictionary of abbreviations? LOL.

Not sure what SW and FC mean and the string of numbers. Is that significant?

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4066244]Thanks for that. She seemed eager and in need. I get worried when the urgency is really high and what else they may be doing on the side or in addition to me.

Just to confirm. Is there a dictionary of abbreviations? LOL.

Not sure what SW and FC mean and the string of numbers. Is that significant?[/QUOTE]SW = street walker.

Fc = Fuck chamber aka hotel.

String of numbers was just a emoji that didn't get converted.

[QUOTE=LTL429;4066615]SW = street walker.

Fc = Fuck chamber aka hotel.

String of numbers was just a emoji that didn't get converted.[/QUOTE]Perfect. Thanks.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ac8f8c36-33e1-4b5e-aad6-9ae1dd3105ef[/URL]

I've seen that a couple members inquired about this person recently. My advice would be to steer clear. I'll provide details privately. Do yourself a favor, don't get caught in her web of drama.

[QUOTE=TallCoolOne69;4067582][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ac8f8c36-33e1-4b5e-aad6-9ae1dd3105ef[/URL]

I've seen that a couple members inquired about this person recently. My advice would be to steer clear. I'll provide details privately. Do yourself a favor, don't get caught in her web of drama.[/QUOTE]Saw her once and won't go back. Definitely into something.

Could this be our very own?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fd867a8b-7b80-420d-ae42-7197fd741a1d[/URL]

Kimberr Lane is Discreet Desires Lily. Was Kgirl on USA. Search board for reviews which have said $300-400 CFS No CIM. Clock watcher. She said she's looking for one person. Does anybody ever believe that when a girl says that?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c84b7fce-d749-46eb-9662-313caa77ef54[/URL]

[URL]https://www.yourdiscreetdesires.com/new-page-1/[/URL]

And yes CristenCremes is on Seeking.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fd867a8b-7b80-420d-ae42-7197fd741a1d[/URL]

As beautiful as her reviews say she is. [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31df2b3d-4949-8cfc-db37-0367f1672db9[/URL].

[QUOTE=SDaddy9;4072010]As beautiful as her reviews say she is. [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31df2b3d-4949-8cfc-db37-0367f1672db9[/URL].[/QUOTE]Was it worth the price of admission?

[QUOTE=JLZ61;4071615]Could this be our very own?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fd867a8b-7b80-420d-ae42-7197fd741a1d[/URL][/QUOTE]What's the story with this one?

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;4071981]Kimberr Lane is Discreet Desires Lily. Was Kgirl on USA. Search board for reviews which have said $300-400 CFS No CIM. Clock watcher. She said she's looking for one person. Does anybody ever believe that when a girl says that?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c84b7fce-d749-46eb-9662-313caa77ef54[/URL]

[URL]https://www.yourdiscreetdesires.com/new-page-1/[/URL]

And yes CristenCremes is on Seeking.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fd867a8b-7b80-420d-ae42-7197fd741a1d[/URL][/QUOTE]That's her. And her running mate is on that page too. The site name was Hailey.

LOL. I def don't miss those two.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/173471f4-62be-4dcb-b091-bbb62ab9ee8d[/URL] - Red Emma Rex. She looks familiar.

[QUOTE=SDaddy9;4072523][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/173471f4-62be-4dcb-b091-bbb62ab9ee8d[/URL] - Red Emma Rex. She looks familiar.[/QUOTE]From almost a year ago; she is totally legit and looking for a respectful SD. She's a very, very nice young lady and very attractive in all regards with a super nice and fun personality. She somewhat resembles Saffron in her photo and description but they are definitely not the same. Be advised that she is a naturist and doesn't shave at all and there's lots and lots of hair, everywhere, so if you are into that or can get beyond it, she's super nice.

CFG.

[QUOTE=SDaddy9;4072010]As beautiful as her reviews say she is. [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31df2b3d-4949-8cfc-db37-0367f1672db9[/URL].[/QUOTE]Is she your SB now. Her ad went down real quick. LOL.

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;4072678]From almost a year ago; she is totally legit and looking for a respectful SD. She's a very, very nice young lady and very attractive in all regards with a super nice and fun personality. She somewhat resembles Saffron in her photo and description but they are definitely not the same. Be advised that she is a naturist and doesn't shave at all and there's lots and lots of hair, everywhere, so if you are into that or can get beyond it, she's super nice.

CFG.[/QUOTE]I think she needs to provide some body pics in her profile for a better overall perspective of her appearance. Will she send some photos? What's her allowance expectation?

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4065724][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/965f8945-1021-4a77-822a-c30ffbf054ef[/URL]

Anyone played with this one?[/QUOTE]She is one I have been seeing off and on for 3+ years. Pics are Accurate she lives in east Dayton area. She's not a pro or utr from what I know. Worth meeting.

Anyone have any info on this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/03c496ce-a381-40ee-b14e-d5f2683fc0e3[/URL]

Looks TGTBT, but on SA you never know. I couldn't find any pics on tineye or google but my fu is not the greatest. Profile says Cbus but saying in Springfield.

Checking with other locations.

[QUOTE=OverSpun;4074637]Anyone have any info on this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/03c496ce-a381-40ee-b14e-d5f2683fc0e3[/URL]

Looks TGTBT, but on SA you never know. I couldn't find any pics on tineye or google but my fu is not the greatest. Profile says Cbus but saying in Springfield.

Checking with other locations.[/QUOTE]Her old profile name was kristaiskinky or something like that. Gets bored with messaging fast and wants money and attention fast. Never met her in real life, but good luck.

[QUOTE=OverSpun;4074637]Anyone have any info on this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/03c496ce-a381-40ee-b14e-d5f2683fc0e3[/URL]

Looks TGTBT, but on SA you never know. I couldn't find any pics on tineye or google but my fu is not the greatest. Profile says Cbus but saying in Springfield.

Checking with other locations.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't say that anyone is THTBT unless you hear what the donation /"compensation" request is. Hell, there are actresses and models out there who could be yours for the right price. So is it possible that this girl's pics are real and you could have her for the right price? Sure!

But then again, she could be TGTBT.

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;4072678]From almost a year ago; she is totally legit and looking for a respectful SD. She's a very, very nice young lady and very attractive in all regards with a super nice and fun personality. She somewhat resembles Saffron in her photo and description but they are definitely not the same. Be advised that she is a naturist and doesn't shave at all and there's lots and lots of hair, everywhere, so if you are into that or can get beyond it, she's super nice.

CFG.[/QUOTE]Any idea what kind of $ transaction she's looking for? Seems like that could be the most important info we could assist each other with on this thread.

[QUOTE=LiamBrennan;4075743]Any idea what kind of $ transaction she's looking for? Seems like that could be the most important info we could assist each other with on this thread.[/QUOTE]Then 2. 5 roses was quoted to me. This was a weekly meet.

Guys, sorry for the long msg. I have moved out of state and am not very active on the Cincy board any longer. Two years ago, I had an UTR that Raider and I were seeing. She found a significant other for a time and dropped from the hobby. She was never a full fledged provider, only saw a few guys during that time. She reached back out to me last week that she is looking for a few regulars SDs to see why I am posting on the SB forum. She is early / mid 20's, 5'6", 125-130, brunette, very nice body, no kids, face is just ok, not a drug user when I knew her or that I know now, all her teeth, good hygiene. I always had a good time with her. She currently cannot do incall, anything else though. She is currently in the north western part of of the city though she plans to move closer in early in 2019. She is looking for a few nice, friendly guys. She is a little shy or careful until she knows you, then 2 thumbs up!! That may have changed since the time I saw her, so YMMV. Please don't PM me if you have a handful of posts unless you have a reference from a known provider, include that reference and I will have this young lady reach out to them and tell me what she decides. Even if you are a senior member, if you have someone she can reach out to to verify you, will help your cause. She is not on USA and has no idea what a senior member is. In the end, this is her call on who she sees.

Be safe and Happy Holidays everyone.

TB.

Anybody know her?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/81ebe1d8-c716-40a3-a36b-6d59b2839921[/URL]

I have a meet scheduled tomorrow at 11 am.

This is her second profile so the spidey sense is going off a little.

[QUOTE=ThunderBoat;4078576]Guys, sorry for the long msg. I have moved out of state and am not very active on the Cincy board any longer. Two years ago, I had an UTR that Raider and I were seeing. She found a significant other for a time and dropped from the hobby. She was never a full fledged provider, only saw a few guys during that time. She reached back out to me last week that she is looking for a few regulars SDs to see why I am posting on the SB forum. She is early / mid 20's, 5'6", 125-130, brunette, very nice body, no kids, face is just ok, not a drug user when I knew her or that I know now, all her teeth, good hygiene. I always had a good time with her. She currently cannot do incall, anything else though. She is currently in the north western part of of the city though she plans to move closer in early in 2019. She is looking for a few nice, friendly guys. She is a little shy or careful until she knows you, then 2 thumbs up!! That may have changed since the time I saw her, so YMMV. Please don't PM me if you have a handful of posts unless you have a reference from a known provider, include that reference and I will have this young lady reach out to them and tell me what she decides. Even if you are a senior member, if you have someone she can reach out to to verify you, will help your cause. She is not on USA and has no idea what a senior member is. In the end, this is her call on who she sees.

Be safe and Happy Holidays everyone.

TB.[/QUOTE]All,

What is a reference here?

How do you become a senior member?

How often do the gents in the forum share the same SB?

Any info is appreciated.

Lilboopeep. Has had several past arrangements. Any info?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/04f60834-552f-5c4e-4ce5-c58ddecd09a7[/URL]

Honestfox. Real? If TGTBT.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/58650eac-b068-407a-a152-e2df0bb46bee[/URL]

Catherinne. SB pro. On seeking alot. Anyone actually see her as a SB and get private time?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4a0b220f-a1c1-cb71-e560-ee8a2988e7e6[/URL]

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4079343]All,

What is a reference here?

How do you become a senior member?

How often do the gents in the forum share the same SB?[/QUOTE]Senior member- 25 post and an account older than 6 months without pissing off the admin.

The truth is almost all the "SB" are shared. They just don't tell you about the other guys. The true 1 on 1 SB is almost nonexistent.

[QUOTE=Blowme12;4079460]Senior member- 25 post and an account older than 6 months without pissing off the admin.

The truth is almost all the "SB" are shared. They just don't tell you about the other guys. The true 1 on 1 SB is almost nonexistent.[/QUOTE]All of them are shared? Eek.

Thanks for that though.

[QUOTE=Cincy;4079317]Anybody know her?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/81ebe1d8-c716-40a3-a36b-6d59b2839921[/URL]

I have a meet scheduled tomorrow at 11 am.

This is her second profile so the spidey sense is going off a little.[/QUOTE]As I recall, the post indicated she was a bit rough. Very eager though. Was willing to go to the FC for 1 rose.

[QUOTE=Blowme12;4079460]

The truth is almost all the "SB" are shared. They just don't tell you about the other guys. The true 1 on 1 SB is almost nonexistent.[/QUOTE]Nonexistent for us because most of us can not afford the allowance these GPS SB's want /'need'. I bet any of them would go with just one SD if he could match their economic appetite. LOL.