General Reports

[QUOTE=Bouinage; 1098638]I am not a paying member, but I do belong to one of the review sites and have submitted my share of reviews.

I've found that the more negative it is the less likely it will be posted. Which makes no sense to me because thats why its there. When I submitted a negative review the last time and was declined "they" said it had information that could be deemed harmful to her profession! Crazy! I didn't feel like I was being unfair, her ad said she did certain things and she didn't do them. How much more straight foward can it be. Oh well, I do use it as a guide to decide whom to see or not, at least untill I become a SM some time in the future[/QUOTE]I have been a member since 02 after some of my reviews were decline as the same as you Bouinage. I myself stop doing reviews. If Her Add say's she does something then does not do it it should be posted to let everbody know.

An yes oneday we both will become SM then life will be good.

BE SAFE AN HAVE FUN

Found this on the way home! Sorry not a geek! Anyone know how to download a picture on to this web sit? PM me crap! Seems to be beyond my tallent level.

Chicken Head

[QUOTE=Chicken Head50; 1099342]Found this on the way home! Sorry not a geek! Anyone know how to download a picture on to this web sit? PM me crap! Seems to be beyond my tallent level.

Chicken Head[/QUOTE][url]Http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/faq.php?faq=photo_gallery_questions#faq_photo_gallery_questions_02[/url]

Hope this is helpful. Peace, JM

[QUOTE=John Marigold; 1099594][url]Http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/faq.php?faq=photo_gallery_questions#faq_photo_gallery_questions_02[/url]

Hope this is helpful. Peace, JM[/QUOTE]They chaned the website threw my for a loop. Really made me say@$&.

[QUOTE=Reggie1980; 1089087]No there's no concern about her fees or a persons safety. It's always nice to get as much information about a young lady before you see her, especially in this hobby. But it comes down to what you're willing to spend and what your time with the person is worth. I'm just saying "hey, this girl was worth twenty on the streets." Now what you do with that information is up to you. Some folks do not like to see "SW's" or former "SW's turned high priced escorts." It's all about making an informed decision, that's all.

Also, I would disagree that most of these girls are addicts. True, we don't know each person's background, but in terms of escorts, a lot of the ones I deal with are not addicts. They're women who love money and can't get enough of it. Now there are some addicts out there and it shows. However, there are quite a few legitimate young ladies out here who are clean.

On another note, after reading Hollowpiont1's post, its nice to see she's negotiable on her fees. [/QUOTE]Really I think this depends on if we are talking escorts or SW, most SW even if they don't start that way end up addicts, but I'll agree many escorts do not, and in most cases where an escort is an addict chances are she is / was a SW at one point. But I have found many escorts are just girls trying to make money the best way they know how, whether a single mother supporting her kids or a college girl looking for extra cash, maybe I've just been lucky but I have run into very few escorts who were addicts (at least if they were it didn't show, none of the telltale signs you normally look for)

[QUOTE=Redskinzzfans;1090377]Smoky, you are right on the money! She looks like her because it is her, or someone using her pics. I have seen a few mediocre reviews, but I've seen alot more positive ones. I just haven't had a chance to meet with her to see for myself.[/QUOTE]Yes from what I've heard it's Bliss and she is back, maybe the name change is to avoid all that mess from last time she was around? I always wanted to try her cause she had some good reviews and was told the pics were accurate, but then for whatever reason she started getting trashed on craigslist where she was posting her ads and started getting bad reviews, at that point it was hard to tell if her service actually slipped or if someone just had a grudge against her (from what I saw and read there I eventually figured it was the latter and someone was out to get her) but wasnt sure if I wanted that kind of drama (I mean what if anything did she do to get that person to go after her) it got so bad at one point that the person was posting stuff like she had aids. Kind of scared everyone away from Bliss, I ws 95% sure it was BS but that 5% kept me wondering. I'm sure someone knows the whole story, at one point Bliss herself posted that it was some guy who she had refused to see anymore after a couple bad dates with him, but then she went away before I ever decided to TOFTT.

[QUOTE=Curt828;1098606]It can take up to a few days for them to post reviews. Typically, it's about 24-48 hours. Being a negative review shouldn't be a problem. They post many of them. If it jumps out as as an anomaly among otherwise positive reviews for the provider, they may examine it more skeptically, especially coming from a new reviewer. If they reject it, they will tell you the reason, although that can be rather obtuse. I've had a few reviews rejected, but I've always been able to get them accepted by resubmitting with added detail. I think sometimes it just depends on which editor gets it and what kind of mood he's in.[/QUOTE]I've had similar issues, had posts rejected for bogus reasons but when I called them on it they ended up posting them. ONly reviews I couldn't get posted were reviews where they said I was posting too many for th same girl (posted for for my regular girl but I had seen her close to 30 times so it's not like I was writing a review every time I saqw her just every few months to keep her reviews up to date) I have also had them change ratings like for example I gave a girl a 10 for service and 9 for looks they changed it to 9 for service and 8 for looks I did send them a complaint but it didn't get changed and I didn't pursue it, but I have never had them change what I have written so I can kind of let the rating thing go (maybe they felt I rated her too high, but then why have a 10 rating if you don't want people to use it?) I have maybe 15 reviews posted there and all but 2 have made it unchagned the 2 that were changed it was only the appearance / service ratings that were changed and in both cases only changed by one point) so I take that into account when reading reviews there but from my experience you can trust the written part of the reviews to not be changed (however I do check to see how many reviews a guy has to see if he is trustworthy. Kinda like checking to see if a guy is a senior member who has contributed here before trusting him.

Anyway the condensed version, I haven't ever paid have been a member since '04 have gotten around 15 free VIP temporary memberships for my reviews, (please only submit honest reviews to get your free VIP, posting fake reviews doesn't help anyone) and have found them to be MOSTLY reliable, (if the only thing you have to worry about is "ok they say she is an 8 but the guy who posted might have said she was a 9", oh well)

[QUOTE=John Marigold;1098616]I too had one of my reports there posted and then deleted. It was a negative but honest report. I guess the girl must have paid some money and got the review deleted? I don't trust the site either. I think some guys just fabricate reviews in order to get free VIP for 2 weeks. This board here has the most reliabile info IMHO.[/QUOTE]Couple questions JM, when did this happen? A couple years ago the owner / founder of another site was arrested and then it was found out that he used the website to get free visits with escorts (I got a bad review for you come fuck me or ill post it, or even come fuck me or ill make up a bad review and post it, even heard he went to some girls and said I have good reviews for you but I won't post them unless you fuck me) I guess some girls were doing him to keep their bad reviews off the page some were doing it just to get their own honest good reviews posted. Anyway early '08 the guy was arrest6ed and since that time another site has been trying to clean up their act and from my own experience have gotten much more reliable. (LOL in fact I have sent complaints to them when reviews of mine got rejected saying my review was honest and asking if they were going back to their old ways and my review was posted the next day. LOL) so take it with a grain of salt but if your problems with them were early '08 or before that you might want to give them another chance.

Second question well not really a question, but personally I only post honest reviews to get my free memberships, and ask anyone I refer to that site to do the same or else theres no point using the site, and this might be why guys are getting more posts rejected lately maybe a new post by a guy with no posts about a girl not reviewed might be hard to get posted just for the reason you mentioned. I haven't had too much trouble getting mine posted, but I have been a member for 6 years. SO please anyone using another site please only post honest stuff or the site becomes useless. Again this os one of the reasons I not only look at the review itself, but who the reviewer is how many do they have have they written a reliable review for a girl I have seen and confirmed their review was solid?

I agree JM this site is probably the most reliable, you can trust what most members write here, but it's more hit and miss, what I mean is I might see a girl on BP, and want to know more about her, MAYBE I can find someone on here who knows me and has seen my posts enough to trust me who also has seen the girl in question, but theres no guarantee. If you know how to use the site and know what to look for to see if posts are trustworthy, you can see a girl on BP and find her review on another site instead of posting here waiting a few days and hoping someone gives some good info.

And don't get me wrong I don't hold another site up as the only source, ********* and a couple others are good too as well as this site, I have just had the most luck with another site

Concord, if you read their terms and stuff they only allow the max rating if they provide certain services. For example, they may not let the girl get a 10 if she don't provide kissing or BBBJ? I am not sure what all the criteria is, but they will knock your rating of the girl down if they don't provide certain services.

[QUOTE=ConcordGuy; 1101241]I've had similar issues, had posts rejected for bogus reasons but when I called them on it they ended up posting them. ONly reviews I couldn't get posted were reviews where they said I was posting too many for th same girl (posted for for my regular girl but I had seen her close to 30 times so it's not like I was writing a review every time I saqw her just every few months to keep her reviews up to date) I have also had them change ratings like for example I gave a girl a 10 for service and 9 for looks they changed it to 9 for service and 8 for looks I did send them a complaint but it didn't get changed and I didn't pursue it, but I have never had them change what I have written so I can kind of let the rating thing go (maybe they felt I rated her too high, but then why have a 10 rating if you don't want people to use it?) I have maybe 15 reviews posted there and all but 2 have made it unchagned the 2 that were changed it was only the appearance / service ratings that were changed and in both cases only changed by one point) so I take that into account when reading reviews there but from my experience you can trust the written part of the reviews to not be changed (however I do check to see how many reviews a guy has to see if he is trustworthy. Kinda like checking to see if a guy is a senior member who has contributed here before trusting him.

Anyway the condensed version, I haven't ever paid have been a member since '04 have gotten around 15 free VIP temporary memberships for my reviews, (please only submit honest reviews to get your free VIP, posting fake reviews doesn't help anyone) and have found them to be MOSTLY reliable, (if the only thing you have to worry about is "ok they say she is an 8 but the guy who posted might have said she was a 9", oh well) [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1101312]Concord, if you read their terms and stuff they only allow the max rating if they provide certain services. For example, they may not let the girl get a 10 if she don't provide kissing or BBBJ? I am not sure what all the criteria is, but they will knock your rating of the girl down if they don't provide certain services.[/QUOTE]Specifically, according to their Review FAQ, for each point for performance above a 7, the provider must offer one of four services: BBBJ, DFK, Greek or GG. I've ignored that on a few ratings, and they've never changed my ratings. I've also read many reviews by others where they appeared not to be enforcing it. It's not a big issue for me either way, because the descriptions always mean a lot more to me than the ratings. What I think that site should pay more attention to is keeping the information on a provider's profile page up-to-date. IMO, that's the weakest aspect of their review section.

[QUOTE=Curt828;1101368]Specifically, according to their Review FAQ, for each point for performance above a 7, the provider must offer one of four services: BBBJ, DFK, Greek or GG. I've ignored that on a few ratings, and they've never changed my ratings. I've also read many reviews by others where they appeared not to be enforcing it. It's not a big issue for me either way, because the descriptions always mean a lot more to me than the ratings. What I think that site should pay more attention to is keeping the information on a provider's profile page up-to-date. IMO, that's the weakest aspect of their review section.[/QUOTE]Fair enough, but if the girl I reviewed did 3 of the 4 so that should have given her a 10, I only rated her a 9 and they moved it to an 8 like I said not that big a deal because they did not change what I had written and only changed rating by one point each (1 for attitude 1 for appearance) , but its just something to be aware of when looking at thier reviews.

As for keeping the provider info up to date, I sort of disagree, for one thing, the site itself does not post or edit the profiles and I like it that way, if you let them start editing you might get some unfair bias in the profiles, but all info is provided by the guys doing the reviews, and new reviews keep the girls profiles up to date, if the girl isn't getting any reviews either her service has slipped or she is no longer working so "out of date" profiles to me are the same as a bad review and a signal to stay away from the girl. JMHO

[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1102187]As for keeping the provider info up to date, I sort of disagree, for one thing, the site itself does not post or edit the profiles and I like it that way, if you let them start editing you might get some unfair bias in the profiles, but all info is provided by the guys doing the reviews, and new reviews keep the girls profiles up to date, if the girl isn't getting any reviews either her service has slipped or she is no longer working so "out of date" profiles to me are the same as a bad review and a signal to stay away from the girl. JMHO[/QUOTE]Concord, maybe profiles were handled that way in the past. In my experience, it's very different. Since I've been a member, it appears profiles are taken from the first reviewer only. Although subsequent reviewers are required to fill out all the fields, the information doesn't get used unless a member submits a Problem Report. If anybody knows otherwise, I'll stand corrected. At least that is how it has worked with the several reviews I've submitted with updated profile info. Only after I followed up with a Problem Report pointing out the changes in her services offered, price, or whatever, have the profiles been updated. So new reviews alone don't keep a girl's profile up-to-date. The editors have to have it called to their attention and then go in and edit the profile. It appears that many members either don't know about this or don't care enough to use Problem Reports. It's a lousy system IMO.

I'm not as concerned about who does the updating. I'd just like to see it get done. Because with the current system what you can get is the first guy might see a girl for just 30 minutes, and leave most of her services as "No" or "Don't know". Then, other guys will describe seeing her a full hour for other fun, like BBBJs or DATY, and yet the profile will still have only the first guy's limited info and her 30 minute rate. That's just one example. IMO, as long as they make everyone fill out a full profile, they should share that info, and not just some of it haphazardly.

[QUOTE=ConcordGuy;1101247]Second question well not really a question, but personally I only post honest reviews to get my free memberships, and ask anyone I refer to that site to do the same or else theres no point using the site, and this might be why guys are getting more posts rejected lately maybe a new post by a guy with no posts about a girl not reviewed might be hard to get posted just for the reason you mentioned. I haven't had too much trouble getting mine posted, but I have been a member for 6 years. SO please anyone using another site please only post honest stuff or the site becomes useless. Again this os one of the reasons I not only look at the review itself, but who the reviewer is how many do they have have they written a reliable review for a girl I have seen and confirmed their review was solid? [/QUOTE]I went back and checked the review I tried to post about the old Sky Spa. I was actually surprised to see it was still there. It was in June of '08. As I said before, I had to post 2x and email them asking basically WTF! First excuse was there wasn't enough evidence I was even there. Then the detailed review was declined. This is still listed on my profile there as the reason

: From time to time another site chooses not to post reviews from users with limited history for providers with no other reviews. Once the provider receives more reviews your review can be resubmitted for approval.

I think I posted 1 more review later on, but by that time, I had discovered how useful this site was, so I canceled over there. I decided why pay them when they were useless!

Had a little encounter at lunch time today. Her name was sherry. So she said. Was not far from my office. If you know me PM me. She was 5 in the face scale, great flute skills. Little chunky for my tastes. Seemed unstoned. She was in a old hot area. Was willing to do photo shoot, or what ever. I had only enough time for the lesson. No didgets. Would play again, with more intent.

Chicken head

I was checking the arrest records, saw they got a blonde girl Amiee on the 28th. From the charges, I can only assume she was a SW.

Be careful out there!