My reaction to this discussion, that has occurred in this thread and then in other threads in other locales just now, is that one doesn't want to draw too great a conclusion from this one case, in terms of our behavior. Yes, guys were convicted of using USASG once. The prosecutors elected to charge them for that because, of all the things they had on them, they thought that would be the most successful course of action. Maybe even they were hoping to establish a useful precedent for future prosecutions. However, it does not appear that has occurred. It hasn't turned in to a big deal one needs to worry about anywhere guys are mongering.
The Brit term is 'too clever by half'. Don't over-emphasize the importance of this 8 years old case. This happening, yeah, it was bad. It gives all of us chills, just like the Ashley Madison hack. A good reminder to try to keep good OpSec at all times. It is way better never to have to face such daunting prospects than to try to figure out how to extricate oneself. The reasons dudes here will sometimes say their 'spidey sense' went off and they extricated themselves from some potentially touchy situation.
New Year's Resolutions?