Korean Agency BB

I've had the pleasure of meating Tina on a few occasions and since we click together so well, she's one of my go-to's right now. Sue is an outstanding option and I have a sneaking suscpition that Sue is Angel as previously reviewed, and who, BTW I really like as well. Having said that, Lovelygirls right now has a really nice stable with Sue and Tina at +60 for BB and Heri at +100. They are all wonderful and I think that you can't go wrong with any of them. My experience is that as a rule they are sweet and more a GFE experience than something like a Nana or Dahee whirlwind. I'm a little older now and I've grown to like a mellow session so these girls are right up my alley.

Photos of Tina are of her although heavily photoshopped. The close up of her face is the most accurate and yes, I found her to be that attractive. She has a very sexy mouth and does this naughty snarl like thing when she smiles that begs me to do her. A real turn on.

Looks are nice. I find her very attractive. She's not a gym rat tight, and she's a little soft with some meat but in no case would I call her fat. I have a hard time judging asian women and in an attempt at figuring out her age I told her that she looked about 22. She just smiled and didn't reply. Definitely natural B tits with small nipples and overall slender body. She looks like a nice GND korean girl who I would meet at starbucks and hook up with (yeah right.).

English was fine. Actually quite good and we had no problem communicating. Smart girl.

Attitude was that she was there to please me. I never got a restriction or hesitancy from her. From the moment I got in the room, she was making sure I had a good time. I will say though that the first time I went there that she asked for the money up front and left the room with it. I could see where that would piss off some guys. After that though on subsequent visits she knew I was good for it and didn't ask.

Service was nice. She'll kiss and maybe let you use a little tongue, but I wasn't able to DFK with her. Really I didn't push the issue becuae of the 'rona going around so I respect that. Usual shower routine but she did provide preview in the shower. Also, when drying off she is very playful as she dried me off and we wound up with her blowing me and us fucking in the bathroom before we ever got out of there. I will say though that if you love DT or very enthusiastic BJs I did not receive that. Not really a big thing with me but I could tell that she was doing it because it was part of the service, and not that she was an enthusiast. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't bad at all, but just not memorable, just standard. The deed has been performed in any position imaginable with an easy CIP, and what I especially like about her, is that she doesn't immediatley jump up and go wash off. She stay and play for as long as you want. Really she is a sweetheart, again more GFE than PSE.

Expense was 200/ hhr + 60 for BB. I'm a one shot guy so that's all I need.

Repeat. Definitely. Sometimes in this game the chemistry works out right. She pushes the proper buttons with me even though I know that there are other providers who do all the DFK, super BJs and energetic romps, somehow I just like to chill with her. That's the beauty of our hobby in that there is always a gem out there to find that will take care of us personally. Please treat her with respect if you should partake, she said she'll be here for another week or so.

[QUOTE=Shtupp;5112890]I've had the pleasure of meating Tina on a few occasions and since we click together so well, she's one of my go-to's right now. Sue is an outstanding option and I have a sneaking suscpition that Sue is Angel as previously reviewed.... [/QUOTE]So Sue from lovelygirls is same as Angel in oc_kangel? Damn, so confusing. They did referring me to see sue when nana wasn't avail but I decline. And tried to see angel next day but all booked up lmao.

Thanks for the review. If she is the girl with the close up then she is better than GND and you have found a real gem.

[QUOTE=Shtupp;5112890]Photos of Tina are of her although heavily photoshopped. The close up of her face is the most accurate and yes, I found her to be that attractive...

She looks like a nice GND korean girl who I would meet at starbucks and hook up with (yeah right.)...[/QUOTE]

Finally was able to visit. Decided to go see angel first before dahee. Was able to see her on time. Cute gnd, maybe in her mid 30's? English is almost non existent.

Blue toast and showered. No preview or anything. Beast size maybe A cup, natural so it was nice. Her body is good, not slim nor chubby. Ass is a bit loosey but good view from behind.

Like others mentioned, she allowed fiv and she's a squirter! One of my fav is to fiv. She allowed fia as well.

BBBJ is okay, too dry so it hurt. So I stopped after a couple minutes and just go for the main event. Kitty is nice, and she makes some small moaning noises that was a turn on for me. Seem legit but never know with these scripted ladies. Condom is nowhere in sight. Have to ask for it and seem like she doesn't like it. I try to avoid bb now, playing safe LOL. Allowed lfk and dfk. Everything is good but breath is pretty bad. Was a good visit!

[QUOTE=NoClue02;5113302]So Sue from lovelygirls is same as Angel in oc_kangel? Damn, so confusing[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen Sue? Or better yet, can someone confirm if Sue / Angel are the same girl?

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5103391]HX: Lucky-k-ladies.

The pic of her playing billiards is the best representation of her face. 25 yo. 5'7" Slender body. B cups. Innocent smile. Not gym toned. GFE experience with plenty lfk / dfk. Slow and sensual and sloppy BBBJ throughout, though could be deeper. Seemed to offer rim but I passed. Opted for bb; cip YMMV.[/QUOTE]The description is right on money. Not a model material but she is nice, sweet and lovable. I adore her demeanor and while I won't describe her as DDG, I would have not mind her as a girl friend. I like this one a lot because of her genuine smile and how sweet she was. I will plan to visit her again before she leaves OC.

Looks like Dahee's back in record time. To those that saw her for an hour, is it two shots or as much as you can do? Just asking because I don't last long.

[QUOTE=TheZorak;5118866]Looks like Dahee's back in record time. To those that saw her for an hour, is it two shots or as much as you can do? Just asking because I don't last long.[/QUOTE]When I saw her we went for round 2. If there was enough time I could see her letting you go again but YMMV.

[QUOTE=TheZorak;5118866]Looks like Dahee's back in record time. To those that saw her for an hour, is it two shots or as much as you can do? Just asking because I don't last long.[/QUOTE]The times that I've seen her, she's always initiating round 2 whether I'm up for it or not.

[QUOTE=Maxxxstud;5120474]When I saw her we went for round 2. If there was enough time I could see her letting you go again but YMMV.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5122639]The times that I've seen her, she's always initiating round 2 whether I'm up for it or not.[/QUOTE]Hmm. Well, I'll try to see her soon. Two rounds definitely wouldn't take a whole hour for me, so I'll report back if she allows it.

From [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Rebecca313870[/URL].

Pictures are somewhat her looks irl. The fees were $60 for hhr. Overall the session was good enough for the time and the money spent. Not great BJ but it was bare and she was ok with 69. On the flip she allows for some bare teasing but was quick to wrap jr when she felt it going in. Her tits are nice D cups a bit saggy but natural with good suckable nipples. We did mish and cg and finished in doggy. I took my time with doggy and was rubbing her pussy while I was stroking her. I grabbed her neck and pushed her back for best position and she was very willing. Exploded in the bag and went for a shower. It was worth the trip and she's a pretty girl hitting MILF status. Pretty fast screening and nice neighbourhood in hb.

I wish one of the top agencies would at least make an effort to bring Jamie back to town for about a week. I would love to hit it.

[QUOTE=Rei311;5127083]From [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Rebecca313870[/URL].

Pictures are somewhat her looks irl. The fees were $60 for hhr. Overall the session was good enough for the time and the money spent. Not great BJ but it was bare and she was ok with 69. On the flip she allows for some bare teasing but was quick to wrap jr when she felt it going in. Her tits are nice D cups a bit saggy but natural with good suckable nipples. We did mish and cg and finished in doggy. I took my time with doggy and was rubbing her pussy while I was stroking her. I grabbed her neck and pushed her back for best position and she was very willing. Exploded in the bag and went for a shower. It was worth the trip and she's a pretty girl hitting MILF status. Pretty fast screening and nice neighbourhood in hb.[/QUOTE]What's her number?

In this Thread, you must use usual monetary notation, not this what turns into a confusing notation of $.

I take it, you spent $160, as in one hundred sixty?

The use of the $, is totally useless and only serves to add to endless confusion here.

[QUOTE=Rei311;5127083]From [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Rebecca313870[/URL].

Pictures are somewhat her looks irl. The fees were $60 for hhr. Overall the session was good enough for the time and the money spent. Not great BJ but it was bare and she was ok with 69. On the flip she allows for some bare teasing but was quick to wrap jr when she felt it going in. Her tits are nice D cups a bit saggy but natural with good suckable nipples. We did mish and cg and finished in doggy. I took my time with doggy and was rubbing her pussy while I was stroking her. I grabbed her neck and pushed her back for best position and she was very willing. Exploded in the bag and went for a shower. It was worth the trip and she's a pretty girl hitting MILF status. Pretty fast screening and nice neighbourhood in hb.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=OcAmper;5128578]In this Thread, you must use usual monetary notation, not this what turns into a confusing notation of $.

I take it, you spent $160, as in one hundred sixty?

The use of the $, is totally useless and only serves to add to endless confusion here.[/QUOTE]That's correct OCAmper the total was 160, my bad I thought it was the same in all forums.

Their number is listed on HX.