[QUOTE=Optional;6196263]Are there good spots in San Jose? I have never found any.[/QUOTE]Depends what your definition of "good" is of course. Unless you're going to whip out your passport, the Golden Triangle is best scene in the Hobby. Full stop.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Optional;6196263]Are there good spots in San Jose? I have never found any.[/QUOTE]Depends what your definition of "good" is of course. Unless you're going to whip out your passport, the Golden Triangle is best scene in the Hobby. Full stop.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6195458]These arguments don't make sense. What do public reviews have to do with boycotts? It's a stretch to say a boycott can "disrupt" a business, because you're assuming that this forum can influence a large number of mongers to boycott, or that a 2 week boycott would "disrupt" anything. A 2 week trend won't "disrupt" anyone's business. They will see that business went back up after 2 weeks, so no need to lower prices.
The assumption that girls move to different cities because of a boycott is also a stretch. Where have there been boycotts where girls moved to other cities? Girls move for different reasons, but to say that a boycott caused their lowered business is not shown. Girls change cities to get a fresh customer base, or prefer the type of customers in one city over another, or just want a change in scenery. None of these have anything to do with boycotts. But, girls changing cities doesn't "disrupt" a business nor will it result in lower prices.[/QUOTE]Hm, perhaps I wasn't too clear so let me try to explain it.
One of the biggest arguments I read on here is that this board is a tiny fraction of client base and thus is not read by many. Well, if that was the case, then orgs and girls wouldn't care about negative reviews and such, after all its just a tiny fraction, right? But, they do. So clearly having good or bad reviews on this board matters, otherwise why would they get shills to write glowing reviews and criticize negative reviews?
If it was negligible, people wouldn't care. So clearly this (and other similar ones) board has some pull in relation to business. It's not just insignificant.
I do agree that two weeks is not long enough. And too predictable.
As far as talking about setting up shop, I was replying to oww who said "I'm sure these orgs are just sitting back. And planning on setting up shop in other cities". I understood it as making an outlet during the boycott, but now I see he meant expansion. Idk about that tho. There's really only so many cities that have enough clientele for Kgirls and enough auxiliary pieces to make it work.
I believe one boycott back in the day did work in the bay, during rb times, but the means with which it was done doesn't appeal to me too much. If I were to believe the person who told me this, of course.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6195925]Sfk / Kbliss Tues. Rollcall. 2 new girls are coming soon.
Sfk Erika Eva Seyoen Aria.
Kbliss Jessica Erika Eva.[/QUOTE]Do SFK girls upcharge? There's no mention on their site.
One girl: Miso is listed as $350/ hr on SFK but on CGLA she's listed as $420/ hr (with BB upcharge). If SFK doesn't upcharge, why would anyone see her through CGLA unless they don't know about SFK?.
I will also follow the boycott, I think it is a great idea.
No nut November, no shave November and Boycott November. Solidarity nut brothers! I will be joining the boycott as well.
I will also abstain and boycott.
Whether it works remains to be seen.
[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;6195653]Just noticed Kiko looking pretty tasty from Candygirl is listing for $520 for BB with another $80 for MSOG which would be a new record high for this scene. Of course she's half Russian so maybe that's a bargain compared with whole Russians, LOL. But I'm sure her rates are pissing off many of the Boycott Mongers. Politics aside, I wouldn't fault any monger for crossing picket lines to report back because he's still TOFTT.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/kiko[/URL][/QUOTE]Is this the same girl who was like half Mongolian and half Russian and pisses all over you while you fuck her? Went by Scarlet I think? Huge tattoo on her back.
I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.
They don't upcharge or upsell. It's all inclusive but they did kick their prices up slightly.
[QUOTE=Monger5614;6196497]Do SFK girls upcharge? There's no mention on their site.
One girl: Miso is listed as $350/ hr on SFK but on CGLA she's listed as $420/ hr (with BB upcharge). If SFK doesn't upcharge, why would anyone see her through CGLA unless they don't know about SFK?.[/QUOTE]
As far as I am aware Nina hasn't worked in awhile. Webmaster just didn't update the site.
[QUOTE=Ghost626;6196333]Did website always had Nina coming soon? They updated her rate to 350 now.[/QUOTE]
Can anyone confirm if she's NK or SK?
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6196817]They don't upcharge or upsell. It's all inclusive but they did kick their prices up slightly.[/QUOTE]Ok, that's good to know, thanks. I guess the booker at CGLA is just pocketing more $ for herself with the higher rates (for BB) compared to SFK. Unless its the same booker.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]520 for one session and the service wasn't even good? Christ, talk about GPS pricing smh. Even if her pics are real (I doubt they're 100% real), she looks like she went under the knife one too many times. 520 would be too high even if she provided great service. Its unfortunate you ended up TOFTT.
I started boycotting one week ago :-)
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]I tried inquiring about her but was told that she is 4. 2 and the listed 3. 2, was a mistake and will be fixed.
[QUOTE=PoopsAndGiggle;6196825]Can anyone confirm if she's NK or SK?[/QUOTE]I speak a little Korean and her accent sounds to be SK. NK has an accent that's noticeable.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6196418]Depends what your definition of "good" is of course. Unless you're going to whip out your passport, the Golden Triangle is best scene in the Hobby. Full stop.[/QUOTE]The Golden Triangle area in San Jose? Really? Wow I honestly didn't know anything was going on there at all. Any specific shops you would recommend over there?
[QUOTE=Anontt6;6196057]Except for one rare time, I never played the upcharge game and either got BBFS UTR (rare) or went to a place that included it. Haven't been to WLA in a while since 320 is hitting my ceiling.
A few days ago, a well known K-Girl reached out to me as we've known each other for a couple years now. She recently went indy and asked if I wanted to meet up, but wanted 340 hr BBFS MSOG, for a K-Girl in her early to mid 40's, or older. Made it clear I was going to pass because rates were too high. If I were going to spend 340, I'd go see Allie or Viki in WLA.[/QUOTE]If I was a betting man, I would say that sounds like Asuka.
A liberal application of bad reviews reinforces a judicious application of boycotting. Just sayin'.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Pwa251;6196708]Is this the same girl who was like half Mongolian and half Russian and pisses all over you while you fuck her? Went by Scarlet I think? Huge tattoo on her back.[/QUOTE]You're thinking of Hana that started with Jewelry. Unless she has undergone a lot of plastic surgery she does not look like that. Moreover, someone said that her service was poor. This is far from the truth about the Hana I am referring to. She was a multi-orgasmic sensual vixen. I think both points lend a convincing argument that it isn't her.
[QUOTE=Optional;6196263]Are there good spots in San Jose? I have never found any.[/QUOTE]Not sure what methods you used to look but SJ is a major hub for kgirls. While I'm not too familiar with the scene up there, I'm fairly certain there gems up there like there are down here in LA / OC.
She would probably be golden at three bills, but keepin' up with the Joneses is tough!
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6197139]If I was a betting man, I would say that sounds like Asuka.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]Damn 520 for a BBFS with bad service. I remember the pepsi duo was just 500 and that was an all out animal fest. Granted it was a special but still. RIP the 320 days TT.
[QUOTE=Member#2210;6197027]I started boycotting one week ago :-)[/QUOTE]LOL I haven't gone in 2 months now, I went from once a week to 2 x a month to 1 x every 3 weeks then Nicole went on vacation so just been saving money now past 2 months, I do plan on seeing her again once she returns as long as her rate is reasonable.
[QUOTE=NewGuy2000;6197044]I speak a little Korean and her accent sounds to be SK. NK has an accent that's noticeable.[/QUOTE]Even if you speak a little Korean, that's something they can easily hide, so there probably isn't much point in speculating.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6197142]You're thinking of Hana that started with Jewelry. Unless she has undergone a lot of plastic surgery she does not look like that. Moreover, someone said that her service was poor. This is far from the truth about the Hana I am referring to. She was a multi-orgasmic sensual vixen. I think both points lend a convincing argument that it isn't her.[/QUOTE]Rica / Suzzi / Hana had big tatoo on her back. We called her squirt / anal queen. She had unproportinal MM. It was almost 3. 5 years ago. She was Mongolian / Buryat. She also had d ifferen color of her eyes. Even if it is her the price is ridiculous.
[QUOTE=Optional;6197057]The Golden Triangle area in San Jose? Really? Wow I honestly didn't know anything was going on there at all. Any specific shops you would recommend over there?[/QUOTE]LSC is the gold standard by which all other agencies should be measured against. LKS is known for low-mileage HYAs; that they're still at 260 is just insane.
[QUOTE=DaddyChill;6197172]Damn 520 for a BBFS with bad service. I remember the pepsi duo was just 500 and that was an all out animal fest. Granted it was a special but still. RIP the 320 days TT.[/QUOTE]What I find particularly concerning is the jump for bb, from +100 to +200. Upcharging for bb is already bad enough, but it wasn't that long ago when bb was advertised as +60 or even +40 in some cases.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6197484]What I find particularly concerning is the jump for bb, from +100 to +200. Upcharging for bb is already bad enough, but it wasn't that long ago when bb was advertised as +60 or even +40 in some cases.[/QUOTE]I think it's 420+80+200 now!
[QUOTE=HongKongBoy;6197577]I think it's 420+80+200 now![/QUOTE]Well shit. Oh the irony of this happening during the boycott.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]Thanks for taking one for the team. I saw that profile and thought wow. She is really going for the buck. She looks good but I'm sure all the other girls are good too at half the upcharge.
Humpday rollcall at sfk / kbliss.
Sfk Erika Eva Seyoen Aria Allie.
K bliss Jessica Erika Eva Allie.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;6196802]I will be joining as of right now. Should have just not gone today to try the new hya at CG. I'm sorry fellas, but I toftt for anyone who was thinking about Kiko who's charging 520 for BBFS. The girl's service is terrible. That is her pics and yes, she's very attractive but if the looks are a 9 and the service was bad, is 520 really worth it. That's something that anyone who's willing to spend that much will have to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]Yep. Those rates are laughable. I'll be surprised if she's active on any KGirl site for more than 10 days. Boycott or not, there just won't be enough business at that rate. If I'm wrong, then the KGirl scene really will have gone to shit. I'll miss it, but I won't be part of that kind of nonsense. Remember from now through 11/14: Just. Don't. Go.
I'm curious, which time slot is best to book kgirl? Morning? Afternoon? Evening? I'm guess morning is good just because they have more energy? I usually book around 3 pm or 4 pm not sure if that's a good time or not. I use to book them like 10 pm had no issues of them being too burnt out. What are you guys thoughts?
[QUOTE=Fantic5916;6197448]Rica / Suzzi / Hana had big tatoo on her back. We called her squirt / anal queen. She had unproportinal MM. It was almost 3. 5 years ago. She was Mongolian / Buryat. She also had d ifferen color of her eyes. Even if it is her the price is ridiculous.[/QUOTE]Her, right? I thought she was Uzbek and not Mongolian. But I can see Mongolian.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6197603]Well shit. Oh the irony of this happening during the boycott.[/QUOTE]I was going to see her for the half hour or her previous hour rate LOL. But now now her HH rate has skyrocketed up to 370! And her hr bb rate is 620 LOL. Hard pass.
Has to be a troll on us right?
Hard hard pass.
Stupid WG must be smoking crack if she thinks she's able to rip off the general horndog population at those rates.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6197603]Well shit. Oh the irony of this happening during the boycott.[/QUOTE]
Maybe they're jacking up the BB upcharge to help us all.
Not going BB is safer.
[QUOTE=WhyOhWhy;6197842]I'm curious, which time slot is best to book kgirl? Morning? Afternoon? Evening? I'm guess morning is good just because they have more energy? I usually book around 3 pm or 4 pm not sure if that's a good time or not. I use to book them like 10 pm had no issues of them being too burnt out. What are you guys thoughts?[/QUOTE]I would always booking mornings for many reasons. One being that first appointment means I'm the first penis and I don't have to worry about a previous guy's load earlier in the day. Secondly, it would make sense the girl gets more tired as the day goes on. Third being traffic, it's actually pretty good on the way back, but going there usually sucked due to morning commuters. YMMV on a girl's energy level when you book later in the day, some girls can handle it fine due to having more energy or not as many customers. In the past, I went for night appointments sometimes due to traffic issues but you'd run into the first points I mentioned earlier. Pre Covid, when the scene was alot more thriving and affordable, night time slots were taken pretty quick starting 5 until 10-12.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;6197854]Her, right? I thought she was Uzbek and not Mongolian. But I can see Mongolian.[/QUOTE]Saw the "girl" in the pics as Scarlett through SAG. Those are her pics. Found her attractive not young. Service was terrible. Told me about her "cold sore" after he had started. Last kgirl I paid up charge with and last time I used SAG. Was going to tell off booker but didn't see the point. Was going to post but it was her last day so didn't see the point. Got checked and in the clear.