Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]Chanel with M does have a c-section scar. I mentioned it in a review post over a year ago [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?10894-Los-Angeles-County-Asian-Providers&p=4133681&viewfull=1#post4133681]here[/URL].

[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4782312]So LA, I have to apologize for my dear NorCal. It seems we have more and more girls that want profit from your kind gestures of BBFS up charge. I am here to help you fight against that, and just in general, keep the talent good here in LA. Nothing against girls like Jamie, as her body merits that charge for those with deep pockets. And Jamie has been charging this since coming to LA long before COVID, so I won't fight against her. No beef. But I'm speaking about the many I've had the pleasure of BBFS for the NorCal price of less. I was doing the girl rounds and caught this orgs return: [URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL].

These girls were both most recently of M's shop. Sonia was formerly Paula and recently Aria listed on the KP, still on the page and booker confirmed she is on vacation till next month, aka down in LA. Sonia was in bay area last year too under other names and seem to travel around but gained some weight. Bit of a smoker but she will give you BBBJ. And has for many years. Just I don't merit the up charge for what you'll get. She isn't Jamie, far from it.[/QUOTE]We up here don't have kgirl upcharges for BBFS or any other services. Some (like three) providers here cost an extra 20 or 30, but they're all well established and the up charge is based on their status, not service. Which is the right strategy imo.

But then, I try to avoid BBFS (yes, I know I'm writing this in a bb topic).

Recently Jana aka Jane from sexyangels aka Hera from M appeared in the bay at ebk under yet another new name. Worst kgirl service / attitude I've ever had.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4783028]Chanel with M does have a c-section scar. I mentioned it in a review post over a year ago [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?10894-Los-Angeles-County-Asian-Providers&p=4133681&viewfull=1#post4133681]here[/URL].[/QUOTE]Is this what all the fuss is about?

[URL]https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sparrowmassage.com%2Fcsection-scar-massage&psig=AOvVaw230Pcbd_6wRSZX6vs_5CQo&ust=1589402855872000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCJi6v7yZr-kCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD[/URL]

[QUOTE=PumpNDump;4782767]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?[/QUOTE]It's a pretty important detail to me and it's a bit of a downer when I see that c-section scar or loose stomach skin. The lightest way I can put it is that I just don't have as much fun if I know I'm banging someone's mom haha. On the other hand, banging girls with tight bodies all around is like eating the freshest of fruit to me. It's almost all I need to get off even with a condom if it's the first date as long as they ain't too fat or ugly or old. Add bbfscip to a young good looking tight body and I'll repeat with her every week.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]Chanel SA is starting to interest me I'll look up her reviews and put her on my TDL. I also wonder what happened to Jane SA / Hera M. I thought she was pretty good too maybe she's back in NorCal or something. Anybody know?

Anyone partake? Is this really Evie / LA Jade? I saw her once in San Mateo, she was alright but those teeth will make you lose your boner. It brings her down to 5/10. Looks young in the face but you can tell she is older with a petite mom bod. CFS no BBFS allowed on my visit.

[QUOTE=JimThome;4783194]It's a pretty important detail to me and it's a bit of a downer when I see that c-section scar or loose stomach skin. The lightest way I can put it is that I just don't have as much fun if I know I'm banging someone's mom haha. On the other hand, banging girls with tight bodies all around is like eating the freshest of fruit to me. It's almost all I need to get off even with a condom if it's the first date as long as they ain't too fat or ugly or old. Add bbfscip to a young good looking tight body and I'll repeat with her every week.[/QUOTE]I've shared this sentiment couple of time in the past. I'm spending my hard earn money so I expect a certain service and visual that will turn me on and get me off. C sect is not a total turn off for me but it should be disclosed in reviews so that people can take that info and judge it however they want. For some it may be a tipping point of not wanting to see that provider. I'm torn between a young, tight body, no c sect vs an experienced, full of energy, c sect woman. For me if she got a c sect but makes it up with a tone body and with / without tattoo that hides it and great service and attitude, I think she's worth the time and money. C sect and saggy tits or skins should always be disclosed.

[QUOTE=JungleFun;4783353]I've shared this sentiment couple of time in the past. I'm spending my hard earn money so I expect a certain service and visual that will turn me on and get me off. C sect is not a total turn off for me but it should be disclosed in reviews so that people can take that info and judge it however they want. For some it may be a tipping point of not wanting to see that provider. I'm torn between a young, tight body, no c sect vs an experienced, full of energy, c sect woman. For me if she got a c sect but makes it up with a tone body and with / without tattoo that hides it and great service and attitude, I think she's worth the time and money. C sect and saggy tits or skins should always be disclosed.[/QUOTE]If she Chanel has a C section mark it's barely discernible. At least I never noticed it and I've been around the world with her body many times. In addition she has a body as tight as a rubber band and maybe tighter. One of the finest bodies scar or no scar.

[QUOTE=JimThome;4783232]Chanel SA is starting to interest me I'll look up her reviews and put her on my TDL. I also wonder what happened to Jane SA / Hera M. I thought she was pretty good too maybe she's back in NorCal or something. Anybody know?[/QUOTE]Hey guys, I've seen Chanel from SA recently. How does Jamie from KTE and Luna from SA compare to Chanel in terms of looks and overall experience?

Can someone pm me Ms number? I think I have it but I'm not sure. Either she's not answering back or I might have wrong number.

[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4783381]Can someone pm me Ms number? I think I have it but I'm not sure. Either she's not answering back or I might have wrong number.[/QUOTE]Check her girl's reviews.

[QUOTE=PumpNDump;4782767]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?[/QUOTE]You can say the same thing about tattoos, crooked teeth, hairy pussies, etc. It's all about individual preference. One thing that you could easily bust on is another's trip to flaccid town. Aesthetics do matter, to a point, for everyone.

Seriously, a scar? Let it go. This is just a generalization, so we (mongers) are there for one reason and that is too unload are man jizz into the girl and watch it ooze out of her warm muffin or pink taco?

Don't worry about whether she has a scar, mole or crooked teeth. Just open her up and spew and leave.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4783535]You can say the same thing about tattoos, crooked teeth, hairy pussies, etc. It's all about individual preference. One thing that you could easily bust on is another's trip to flaccid town. Aesthetics do matter, to a point, for everyone.[/QUOTE]I'm glad you added to a point. That's why looks are always YMMV but remember one man's point is another's obsession. That's why Chanel is not lacking for customers. Just read her reviews.

[QUOTE=TerrificEnigma;4783374]Hey guys, I've seen Chanel from SA recently. How does Jamie from KTE and Luna from SA compare to Chanel in terms of looks and overall experience?[/QUOTE]I'll give you my thoughts on Jamie. I saw her last year when she came down from bay area. I was eyeing her for awhile, with mongers up north saying she's young, good looking and BBFS cip friendly. So when she first came to OC I saw her. Mechanical and transactional. Hard no on BBFS. Service was forgetable at best. Now for looks, I can not fathom how you can give her a 8 or more in term of looks. Yes, relative to the current pool of girls she can be an 8. She's a solid 7 maybe 7. 5 as far as the face goes. She's young looking, as in 20's but looks can be deceiving with asian female. Her body is latina-like. I remember her thigh stood out the most. They are slightly bigger / thicker relative to her waist and overall thinness of her arm bones. Thighs are thick but tone and firm, like girls that do alot of acg / racg stance. You know what I'm talking about, when you squeeze them thighs you can feel the firmness from exercising. She got perky tits. Overall she's a 7 for looks and 7 for performance (generous 7).

In case you question my judgement, here's a list of girls I've seen in the past that I think is at least 7 and up (I'm sure I've left out a few due to too much alcohol lately):

Carrie, Moli, Chanel (current M), Flynn, Cona, Emma, Amora, Amanda (big tits), Shannon (really big tits), Kandy (with M under different namei think, up north now), Diana (m), Snow, Clara, Lily (m), Megan. All I can remember for now, back to drinking.