Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4781343]That is what she told me too and I agree with you.[/QUOTE]She told me the same thing 26.

[QUOTE=Francescoo;4781394]She does have a c section![/QUOTE]Huh. I have never noticed that.

So LA, I have to apologize for my dear NorCal. It seems we have more and more girls that want profit from your kind gestures of BBFS up charge. I am here to help you fight against that, and just in general, keep the talent good here in LA. Nothing against girls like Jamie, as her body merits that charge for those with deep pockets. And Jamie has been charging this since coming to LA long before COVID, so I won't fight against her. No beef. But I'm speaking about the many I've had the pleasure of BBFS for the NorCal price of less. I was doing the girl rounds and caught this orgs return: [URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL].

These girls were both most recently of M's shop. Sonia was formerly Paula and recently Aria listed on the KP, still on the page and booker confirmed she is on vacation till next month, aka down in LA. Sonia was in bay area last year too under other names and seem to travel around but gained some weight. Bit of a smoker but she will give you BBBJ. And has for many years. Just I don't merit the up charge for what you'll get. She isn't Jamie, far from it.

The other girl Reina is blurred out but this looks like Jade of M, formerly Evie of Baykisses. Thunder thighs, saggy ass, but small girl otherwise. This girl has had some spells with service. Norcal word of her crying during sessions haha, among many other things. And hot and cold with BBFS. The few (I admit I was one) got BBFS before with her. But she is pretty hard CFS for many. Rumor from another M girl is that she left because she didn't want to keep offering BBFS to get customers since she was not busy like the rest. M has her reputation of offering. I'm not 100% this is Jade in those pics, but her pattern matches girls coming back down to work from NorCal after leaving LA briefly, then changing names. Seems like she is CFS only here, but upcharging for 2 pops. Come on haha. I'll inquire with PO to confirm tomorrow unless someone sees her first. She isn't worth the service unless she decides to change.

I hate to ruin a girl's return really but I just don't justify these upcharges for 2 pops / BBFS. They weren't caliber of M's shop apparently and quite frankly LA. Go back to the Bay, or give it up as you have before many times. Support shops that don't upsell.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4781766]If her lips were moving don't believe it. CrunchEazy is pretty spot on with that 95% number. It was blowjob Min who alerted me to that. I thought she was in her 20's when I met her and she told me she was 34 or 35 if I remember correctly and said almost all the allegedly 20 somethings were in their thirties.[/QUOTE]This is entirely true. Most are in their thirties. There are only a slim handful of 26-28 yr olds, but many are at least 31, if not mid to late 30's. But hey, they're attractive so who cares as long as they do not look late 40's haha. Hobby on.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4781766]If her lips were moving don't believe it. CrunchEazy is pretty spot on with that 95% number. It was blowjob Min who alerted me to that. I thought she was in her 20's when I met her and she told me she was 34 or 35 if I remember correctly and said almost all the allegedly 20 somethings were in their thirties.[/QUOTE]Min looked early 30's though and Jamie doesn't IMHO. If you are into skinny or real slim girls then she is not for you. However I repeat. I would fuck her anyday. She is young, tan, athletic, firm, shapely with a nice bubble but ass, flat stomach pretty face and and an hourglass shape not a model body but definitely above the average Kgirl. If you like Ruby or Chanel of J then you would like Jamie. Maybe this helps?

[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4774857]She's in OC with CA-KDolls. She lives in LA, so I'm sure she'll be back before long.[/QUOTE]There's a Suzie who just arrived in Seattle, but her photos are in a password protected area. Wondering if she's the same one.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782460]Min looked early 30's though and Jamie doesn't IMHO. If you are into skinny or real slim girls then she is not for you. However I repeat. I would fuck her anyday. She is young, tan, athletic, firm, shapely with a nice bubble but ass, flat stomach pretty face and and an hourglass shape not a model body but definitely above the average Kgirl. If you like Ruby or Chanel of J then you would like Jamie. Maybe this helps?[/QUOTE]I'm not great at telling ages but when I met Min five years ago to me she could have been 25 or 26. Personally I prefer them more around 30 to 35. Usually much better skills and service.

[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]I don't know why all the fuss about a C section scar and losing sight of her great body. I'll take her body with a scar over most of the girls without one.

[QUOTE=SneakyHotBoy;4782093]Just wondering if I got bait and switched. Everyone's review of Jamie is that she has a banging body. She was a bit stout in my opinion. Also, a notable feature was the asymmetry of her nostrils. Did anyone else notice that or did I just get bait and switched?[/QUOTE]No, that's Jamie. Her looks are highly overrated / exaggerated. Compared with the top 10 of kgirls in looks (not even comparing with kpop stars or kmodels), she's not even close.

Just left 2 loads in her the other day. Both time in the shower! In the bedroom she gave me the best massage I have ever had, sports therapy massage therapists included! I was amazed at how much strength Viki had in that tiny frame! She found a knot in my shoulder and went to work like I never had done before! I guess in my middle age, I enjoy a good romp and rub down combo.

She's cute, bubbly personality, nice enhanced titties, firm bottom. Pics are accurate.

The only men point is that her voice is a little deep. O. O.

But she is fun in the shower, lots of DFK.

Who else gives a good roll and a strong, talented rub down? Viki is one for sure. Yoco is good too. Anyone else?

[QUOTE=HeavySetD;4781565]Thing with Jamie is just that. Feels transactional and / or mechanical. Yes she will peforrm, make out with you, take a load in her pussy or mouth etc, but she doesn't have that seductress attitude like Hugging up on you, trying to Dfk you like you're the last guy on Earth. She's just more like a fuck buddy that has a hot body and a cute face. Her facial expressions are quite blank unless you can get her to laugh or be inside her 6+ inches in deep, then you'll see that "bored" look on her face change real quick. Selling points for her are her hot body and youth. But don't except an Oscar winning performance with Jamie, she'll let you drop a load in her and take it with a smile but don't expect her eyes to give you a hint that she's on a natural high, she looks like she's bored to most clients. Seen her 5+ times and it's pretty much the same. Some days more cheerful but pretty much same experience every time.[/QUOTE]You are right on with your comments in IMO as well. It's a job and many put up a barrier emotionally to separate business from pleasure.

[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]I will verify.

[QUOTE=Francescoo;4781394]She does have a c section![/QUOTE]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]I've seen both, and recently. Youthful and near flawless bodies.