[QUOTE=Tiger59; 1801498]Are you saying that Tulip now has changed hands. Kelly Tong no longer owner? Is this the place with black windows in strip shopping center, immediately next to a paint store?
T59[/QUOTE]That is the one.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Tiger59; 1801498]Are you saying that Tulip now has changed hands. Kelly Tong no longer owner? Is this the place with black windows in strip shopping center, immediately next to a paint store?
T59[/QUOTE]That is the one.
[QUOTE=Zipper34;1801122]Okay, this sounds very hard to believe. If true, they are going to be out of business in no time. Having a camera installed in the rooms of a AMP is illegal, as it is an invasion of privacy for us. It's like illegal voyeurism. You now have me tempted to go to this place to see if this is really going on actually. If they do have cameras in the rooms, they will not be open for long. It's possible the owner may have got overzealous because of the soccer moms complaining on the news about the AMPs in John Creek. I don't know, just my opinion here.[/QUOTE]The owner says they sale lotions in the front. She then rent out space to girls for bodyrubs. She just left the old massage up.
[QUOTE=JadedGuy; 1801795]Or the house is just making that they get their cut for the extra services. Assuming that the girl indeed was told by mamasan that the camera was inoperable.
This JC parlor is setting off alarm bells for various reasons every other day. Seems to be too many other alternatives to bother with it IMHO.[/QUOTE]Or, they are selling video to the reality porn industry."I'm ready for my close up Mr. Demille!"
Saphire is where the old Zing Zang used to be in the shopping center next to Tulip. Interesting that they have camera's, which I like is a big violation of privacy rights. The plot continues to thicken about that place.
[QUOTE=Tiger59; 1801498]Are you saying that Tulip now has changed hands. Kelly Tong no longer owner? Is this the place with black windows in strip shopping center, immediately next to a paint store?
T59[/QUOTE]
There is no way they work for the city. I wish they did, because I would run over get there, get recorded naked, then would have them change the name of the city to my name because that would be highly illegal, Nothing about that place seems right. A trainwreck waiting to happen.
[QUOTE=Zipper34;1801122]Okay, this sounds very hard to believe. If true, they are going to be out of business in no time. Having a camera installed in the rooms of a AMP is illegal, as it is an invasion of privacy for us. It's like illegal voyeurism. You now have me tempted to go to this place to see if this is really going on actually. If they do have cameras in the rooms, they will not be open for long. It's possible the owner may have got overzealous because of the soccer moms complaining on the news about the AMPs in John Creek. I don't know, just my opinion here.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Vette78Man;1801871]Saphire is where the old Zing Zang used to be in the shopping center next to Tulip. Interesting that they have camera's, which I like is a big violation of privacy rights. The plot continues to thicken about that place.[/QUOTE]Is Sapphire the new all-American girl parlor?
I felt like I was 16 again reading a penthouse forum, nice experience. Kinda like the old days in Clayton County and Doraville. Now the line is going to be out the door for her.
[QUOTE=Niteluvr; 1801457]Had planned to try out a new AMP today but they weren't open yet, so I stopped by M&M Aroma. Was greeted at the door by Amy, a 20-something Korean. It was nice to see a younger woman at Aroma since they're known for older women. Amy had that hardened pro look so I was kinda hesitant to stay but thought I might go for a romp with her. After a 5-minute cheapo massage, she asked what I wanted. I motioned for FS and asked how much. She said,"It's up to you," so I told her $120. She then began to lecture me like a newbie, saying,"Everyone else offers me a minimum of $140 or more. I don't ask them, they just tell me that's what they will give me and some want to give me much more." I was snickering under my breath. I wanted to tell her I've been mongering longer than she's been alive and I know the AMP game quite well, but stayed quiet and let her finish her rant. Told her again I'd give her $120. She refused so I told her I'd give her $40 for a HJ. Then she said she didn't feel comfortable and gave me the $60 house fee back. She left the room, returned with the house fee and I left. I'm now glad I did.
Went down the street to B Spa but they were closed. After that, decided to head up to Bally. The mamasan answered the door. I recognized her from her having worked at K Spa. She led me to a room and brought in Nicole, a 20-something with very long, very bleached hair and obvious bolt-ons. Nicole is not bad looking but I wanted to see the other girl before making a choice. Next was Anna, who is exactly what I was looking for. She claims to be 25, is about 5'2", very slender with a face like an Asian doll, hair tied up in a bun and has big tits. Those tits look great on her small frame. Gave her the house fee and got undressed. She returned and led me to the shower room where she rubbed her soapy hands all over, washing my ass crack and junk at least 3 times. We returned to the room where she gave me an OK back massage, not great, but we had a great time conversing in Korean. Turns out she's from an area of Seoul I know all too well, where they have the 2nd most famous RLD called "oh-pal-pal," which means 588. I even know her old high school as I would pass by it on the way to the RLD. Since I was living in Korea about the same time she would have been in high school, it made me wonder whether I had seen her years ago in her schoolgirl uniform (rare but possible) , not knowing I would be fucking her several years later at an AMP in Doraville, GA.
Anyway, after the flip she asked what I wanted, saying "Il-bon (motioning a HJ) , ee-bon (motioning a BJ) or sam-bon (motioning for FS)." I told her "sam-bon" (number 3) and she immediately got naked, not even asking for the donation. I wondered how much she'd try to charge me for later but didn't really care. Anna's tits turned out to be D-cup bolt-ons, but were very nicely done and appeared and felt very real. I commented on them and she said she had a very good surgeon. She certainly got her money's worth. She offered them up for a quick suck and I obliged. She then licked my balls for a minute or so, applied the cover with her mouth and gave a nice CBJ to get me hard, then got on top. All she really did was rock her ass back and forth and I told her if she wanted to cum to go for it. She smiled and rocked faster for a couple of minutes, gave out a few moans and seemed to have an O. Anna then dismounted, sat facing me and began to kiss my face and chest. I told her that kissing my nips does nothing for me, so she laid down and spread her legs for mish. She has a very nice pussy with thick pussy lips. Anna has great muscle control and knows how to work a dick. In addition to being tight, she would clamp onto my dick on every outstroke to increase the sensation. She was really doing her best to make me happy and seemed to like getting fucked. Told her I wanted doggy, so she flipped over and stuck her ass up high, just the way I like it. I didn't last long enjoying such a fine view and let loose. She left, came back with a hot towel and cleaned me up. Asked her what the damage was and was told $140. After a fine session like that, I was only too happy to pay it. Anna is a great fuck, is very accommodating and doesn't have that shitty, businesslike attitude that most Korean AMP girls have. I plan on returning soon and taking that, um, pussy of hers down memory lane.
As the mamasan led me toward the door, Anna disappeared into another room as another monger was waiting for her. She's similar in quality to Sky (but not quite as curvy) and will have quite a following, if she doesn't already. I hope she sticks around for a long time. Korean providers like her are hard to find.
When I left Bally, I decided to stop by K Spa just to see the talent. I had no intention of staying for a session as my balls were drained. Only one girl was working and she's nothing to look at. As she walked into the room where I was waiting, I luckily got a phone call so made an excuse to leave. She gave me a sour look and voiced her displeasure in Korean that I was leaving, which basically translated to "Really! What nerve!"[/QUOTE]
Tulip is in the shopping plaza next door to the one Saphire is in. Tulip is still open and still providing a legit service. I walked into Saphire the other day and thought it interesting that the owner was selling so many lotions. All the providers were busy so I was unable to get any service. I am now glad I did not bother with the place as I have no desire to be caught on camera or filmed. This is a discreet and excellent hobby for me.
[QUOTE=Vette78Man;1801871]Saphire is where the old Zing Zang used to be in the shopping center next to Tulip. Interesting that they have camera's, which I like is a big violation of privacy rights. The plot continues to thicken about that place.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Vette78Man;1801874]There is no way they work for the city. I wish they did, because I would run over get there, get recorded naked, then would have them change the name of the city to my name because that would be highly illegal, Nothing about that place seems right. A trainwreck waiting to happen.[/QUOTE]VMan, Zipper, et al. Once again I stress I am NOT a lawyer, but from what I have read on the subject of cameras or recording devices in AMPs, bathrooms, changing rooms, etc. It is only an invasion of privacy and illegal if there is NO notification posted or document provided that informs customer or patron of their use. Be careful guys of those sign-in sheets, even if you are using fictitious info. As with everything you sign, read the fine print. It is not enough for an establishment to say the cameras were in plain site, the establishment must provide or post notification. I found a couple of articles to support all this, but they are not specific to GA and we all know how requirements are changing in GA regarding AMPs, especially in JC area.
I am not sure if this type of notification applies to dummy cameras or not. But IF the cameras are operational at this place or any others, I honestly think someone should drop JC Leo an anonymous tip about it. Fair is fair and if the soccer moms are going to pitch a fit and require sign-ups and such, then the reverse is also true. I have no tolerance when I read of guys getting rough or imo cheating these girls, but neither do I have any tolerance for a business that set guys up for bad consequences. Not sure about anybody else, but IF I wanted extras at a place, I sure wouldn't want a camera recording the event to refute any plausible deniability I might have. I could be wrong, but pretty sure that just the mere act of soliciting masturbation for hire (or other sexual favors) is illegal in GA.
The answer to Saphire and any other AMP with cameras is simple, IMHO, leave or don't go in the first place. Course that does make it easy for another AMP to hurt its competition's business, just by posting rumor or false report (and no, I am not implying that is the case here.) Nonetheless, stay safe gents.
I would have posted under craigslist postings, but I called this number and got a voicemail and apparently, she has a massage studio but I'm not sure. She did want $60 just for a 30 minute massage. I don't know if she's legit or not but I thought $60 was too much for a massage with no extras. If she would have asked a little less, it would have been nice to have a legit massage from a nice looking girl. She would just have to deal with my hard dick! Anyway, has anyone ever tried her?
[url]http://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/stp/3861168261.html[/url]
[QUOTE=SoftBallin101; 1801994]I would have posted under craigslist postings, but I called this number and got a voicemail and apparently, she has a massage studio but I'm not sure. She did want $60 just for a 30 minute massage. I don't know if she's legit or not but I thought $60 was too much for a massage with no extras. If she would have asked a little less, it would have been nice to have a legit massage from a nice looking girl. She would just have to deal with my hard dick! Anyway, has anyone ever tried her?
[url]http://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/stp/3861168261.html[/url][/QUOTE]Completely legit.
[QUOTE=SoftBallin101; 1801994]I would have posted under craigslist postings, but I called this number and got a voicemail and apparently, she has a massage studio but I'm not sure. She did want $60 just for a 30 minute massage. I don't know if she's legit or not but I thought $60 was too much for a massage with no extras. If she would have asked a little less, it would have been nice to have a legit massage from a nice looking girl. She would just have to deal with my hard dick! Anyway, has anyone ever tried her?
[url]http://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/stp/3861168261.html[/url][/QUOTE]That is Julie. A few of us have tried her but she doesn't give any extras. Also, there was a report on her that she can turn into a looney tune and scream at you if you get to her place and decide for some reason you don't stay for the massage. My opinion is to avoid her if you are looking for more than just a massage.
I am the furthest thing from a lawyer too, but I find it difficult to believe they have a right to video you while changing clothes, whether they tell you or not. I could be wrong, as usual. I find it interesting that they sell lotions. It s a good point about the sign in sheets, but no way would I go if I knew they were recording anything because on a bust, I am sure the recording devices would be confiscated and we would all show up on TMZ! My understanding is they have two girls working there, but have not heard from any monger that has had an experience there that I trust.
[QUOTE=AMP Fme; 1801990]VMan, Zipper, et al. Once again I stress I am NOT a lawyer, but from what I have read on the subject of cameras or recording devices in AMPs, bathrooms, changing rooms, etc. It is only an invasion of privacy and illegal if there is NO notification posted or document provided that informs customer or patron of their use. Be careful guys of those sign-in sheets, even if you are using fictitious info. As with everything you sign, read the fine print. It is not enough for an establishment to say the cameras were in plain site, the establishment must provide or post notification. I found a couple of articles to support all this, but they are not specific to GA and we all know how requirements are changing in GA regarding AMPs, especially in JC area.
I am not sure if this type of notification applies to dummy cameras or not. But IF the cameras are operational at this place or any others, I honestly think someone should drop JC Leo an anonymous tip about it. Fair is fair and if the soccer moms are going to pitch a fit and require sign-ups and such, then the reverse is also true. I have no tolerance when I read of guys getting rough or imo cheating these girls, but neither do I have any tolerance for a business that set guys up for bad consequences. Not sure about anybody else, but IF I wanted extras at a place, I sure wouldn't want a camera recording the event to refute any plausible deniability I might have. I could be wrong, but pretty sure that just the mere act of soliciting masturbation for hire (or other sexual favors) is illegal in GA.
The answer to Saphire and any other AMP with cameras is simple, IMHO, leave or don't go in the first place. Course that does make it easy for another AMP to hurt its competition's business, just by posting rumor or false report (and no, I am not implying that is the case here.) Nonetheless, stay safe gents.[/QUOTE]
According to the Ad yes. And I got my Z's and Y's mixed up, the old Ying Yang, not Zing Zang. Geeze.
[QUOTE=Niteluvr;1801876]Is Sapphire the new all-American girl parlor?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Wizard22;1801818]Or, they are selling video to the reality porn industry."I'm ready for my close up Mr. Demille!"[/QUOTE]This made me really fall out hehe. Poor bastards record me and try to sell it and they'll make less than what's needed for a morning coffee. And no, not even Starbucks.