Mmmmmmmm. Chloe. Nuf said.
[QUOTE=KingNoctis;4068732]Any info on Julie's girls?
Chloe.
Ej.
Heri.
Reply here or pm me (I can exchange info) .[/QUOTE]
Printable View
Mmmmmmmm. Chloe. Nuf said.
[QUOTE=KingNoctis;4068732]Any info on Julie's girls?
Chloe.
Ej.
Heri.
Reply here or pm me (I can exchange info) .[/QUOTE]
Pepsi is definitely past 50. I don't care what you all say. That's what asian women look like at 50. I heard she was working around 2000, so if she was in her early 30's then, that puts her at 50 now.
[QUOTE=Humyiy;4069665]Iriz does! She has the body of a sexy colombiana but she's 100% korean.
There was a hot kgirl a few years ago in mid ktown near the bowling alley that was curvy AF. I forget her name but she was hot. I think she had a few tattoos.[/QUOTE]You talking about that other half latina Rozel? She was one of the worst I had, but partly my fault because I wanted to bb her, and got shot down and then went limp. Then she got mad I got soft. Then she acted like her arm cramped up when she gave me a HJ.
I thought she had a funny looking face.
[QUOTE]If there were more demand and revenue potential on Sunday vs a Monday or Tuesday then there would likely be more availability on Sunday. Sunday is generally a day most go to church and / or spend time with their family and friends, providers too. Most find it difficult to get away on Sunday vs a Monday or Tuesday when girlfriends or spouses are at work. Also, pro football is on Sunday.[/QUOTE]I frequently went to kiss stable just because they were the only one open on Sunday morning. I loved how I could get from SGV to Ktown in 30 minutes, instead of the 1. 5 hour drive on weekdays.
Too bad kiss' old booker doesn't have any girls worth fucking right now.
Anyone know what happened to the old Ava with M? She used to work in Bellevue and Philly.
[QUOTE=NintyNine;4070642]Pepsi is definitely past 50. I don't care what you all say. That's what asian women look like at 50. I heard she was working around 2000, so if she was in her early 30's then, that puts her at 50 now.
You talking about that other half latina Rozel? She was one of the worst I had, but partly my fault because I wanted to bb her, and got shot down and then went limp. Then she got mad I got soft. Then she acted like her arm cramped up when she gave me a HJ.
I thought she had a funny looking face.
I frequently went to kiss stable just because they were the only one open on Sunday morning. I loved how I could get from SGV to Ktown in 30 minutes, instead of the 1. 5 hour drive on weekdays.
Too bad kiss' old booker doesn't have any girls worth fucking right now.[/QUOTE]I saw Rozel a few years back. It was heavily rumored and possibly confirmed by some posts that she was easy BB. Maybe not as easy as Yoona, but I thought I had it. I got denied and the session went to shit. I think I even got attitude from her after. Left a shitty review but probably did nothing. She is highly overrated and I never got why she had such high reviews. Maybe because she was "exotic looking" but TER reviewers tend to give everyone at least an 8, and the norm was 9. The reviews were too skewed so the average got way too high. Most K-girls were on average 7/7 realistically with some being an 8. Hardly any would be a 9/9.
I posted previously about lack of new girls (most recently and earlier this year. It looks like less girls are working and the talent is probably staying up north. I texted Casino's booker and no one new for this entire month. This was the same for 1-2 other places I asked. M seems to be the only one who does get new talent, but takes awhile for anyone here leave a review. Perhaps me and one other person here are on the final frontier willing to risk out new girls. I usually lose though.
Hey guys, I'm going be in LA. Anyone got info for kiss. This her right here.
But don't ask M. She'll snap at you.
[QUOTE=StopGoAnd33;4070721]Anyone know what happened to the old Ava with M? She used to work in Bellevue and Philly.[/QUOTE]
I tried her as well during her last tour of LA. No BB offered and I tend to agree. A bit over rated. It really wasn't anything special. Her posterior was larger than most Kgirls but didn't add to the experience. Crossed her off my list and wouldn't repeat. If she returns, I would not bother.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4070900]I saw Rozel a few years back. It was heavily rumored and possibly confirmed by some posts that she was easy BB. Maybe not as easy as Yoona, but I thought I had it. I got denied and the session went to shit. I think I even got attitude from her after. Left a shitty review but probably did nothing. She is highly overrated and I never got why she had such high reviews. Maybe because she was "exotic looking" but TER reviewers tend to give everyone at least an 8, and the norm was 9. The reviews were too skewed so the average got way too high. Most K-girls were on average 7/7 realistically with some being an 8. Hardly any would be a 9/9.
I posted previously about lack of new girls (most recently and earlier this year. It looks like less girls are working and the talent is probably staying up north. I texted Casino's booker and no one new for this entire month. This was the same for 1-2 other places I asked. M seems to be the only one who does get new talent, but takes awhile for anyone here leave a review. Perhaps me and one other person here are on the final frontier willing to risk out new girls. I usually lose though.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4070900]I saw Rozel a few years back. It was heavily rumored and possibly confirmed by some posts that she was easy BB. Maybe not as easy as Yoona, but I thought I had it. I got denied and the session went to shit. I think I even got attitude from her after. Left a shitty review but probably did nothing. She is highly overrated and I never got why she had such high reviews. Maybe because she was "exotic looking" but TER reviewers tend to give everyone at least an 8, and the norm was 9. The reviews were too skewed so the average got way too high. Most K-girls were on average 7/7 realistically with some being an 8. Hardly any would be a 9/9.
[/QUOTE]I read explicit bb reviews of rozel. Not going to lie, I would have loved to see my cream filling drip out of her, but honestly the only thing special about her was her plump lips and big ass.
I think I remember her eyes were kinda close together, so I didn't think she was that pretty.
She adhered strictly to a script and I prefer freestyle. Like you, I generally have low expectations on looks, so I'm only in it for the service.
Jenny or erika from sweetasiangem who's better?
OK, enough talk about the old girls. An update for a couple current providers:
Palace. Amy:
I haven't had good luck with many Palace girls lately and this is another dud. She is easily late 40's / early 50's. Ode to someone's earlier post, saggy ass shows her age. She was very eager to please and provided BBFS. I can't complain about her service; she was very eager to please but was too old and worn out for me. I just felt gross after our first round and took the massage and left early. If she were 20 years younger I might have had a good time. I'm sick and tired of Palace's misrepresentation of girls in the pictures.
M's Serena:
I had an pretty good time with her. She speaks zero English which made the session difficult. She has a great attitude and really aims to please. She loves to dance which was pretty sexy. Very young looking with a fairly tight body. She just seems to really enjoy sex and our first round was very hot and passionate. She provide some P2P and then immediately asked for a cover. No BBFS for me. I didn't fight it and went with the flow. Usually after round 1 I need a massage to recover, but her massage was horrible. It was so bad I decided to cut my time early and leave. She really wanted to go for a round 2, but I needed more time. For those that can go two rounds back to back might have more fun with her.
[QUOTE=NintyNine;4071856]I read explicit bb reviews of rozel. Not going to lie, I would have loved to see my cream filling drip out of her, but honestly the only thing special about her was her plump lips and big ass.
I think I remember her eyes were kinda close together, so I didn't think she was that pretty.
She adhered strictly to a script and I prefer freestyle. Like you, I generally have low expectations on looks, so I'm only in it for the service.[/QUOTE]Ohhh. And don't forget Rozel's bad breath. Saw her once; she was 6 or 7 in look and not that good of service. I did not push for BB at all as I wanted to get the hell out of her place.
Indeed the "9" and "10" were norm at TER and it was such a BS. About 10 years ago, I rated one Japanese provider from a well known booker "4" and "7" and I got banned from that booker. It took me a while to work my way back. The provider who was the same booker who banned me was a newbie and I wrote a glowing review of her because she was truly great and she became one of the gold standard and the booker forgive for my sin of low rating review but warned me on not to write crappy review again unless I discussed it with her first. And she made pact with me that if the provider is BAD, she will warn me about her look.
[QUOTE=Brick562;4071888]Jenny or erika from sweetasiangem who's better?[/QUOTE]Erika got some big ass tities if its really her.
[QUOTE=Panchito33;4071366]But don't ask M. She'll snap at you.[/QUOTE]Too late. It already happened. Did she stop working completely or is she going by a different name?
I asked earlier this week about who M had. Three new are working.
Bobbi. I saw this one and posted my review (Skip this one).
Serena. Someone said she was not good.
Third girl. Got a picture but never asked for a name. Anyone see her yet?
[QUOTE=Brick562;4071888]Jenny or erika from sweetasiangem who's better?[/QUOTE]Jenny is no BB.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4072421]Erika got some big ass tities if its really her.[/QUOTE]But, she looks better in the pics than in person. Still fun though. For me, first pop CIP, second pop all over those giant, beautiful tits. No regrets.
I made appt in the afternoon yesterday, when I got there, tried to reach booker, no response, 45 minutes past, I left unhappy. Their girls quality declined, now even booker is axshole, 2 hour past I text again, he said the phone was dead, he could not reply. WTF. I think he accidentally mess up schedule, because I saw other hobbyists went in that building.
Been texting Kiss's booker but haven't got any response.
Try to see Roya again.
Used this agency many times before.
Very odd.
Anyone used this agency recently or seen Roya recently?
Seen Roya last time in October.
Has anyone tried the [URL]https://www.ktownmassage.club[/URL] agency? How are the girls and are they BB?
Also, there is another booker who books for Jessi, Nari, Ara, Soyu, and Alice recommended by the booker (C) of Roya, Taylor, and Erin.
Anyone try them yet?
[QUOTE=KimchiPowerJP;4073077]I made appt in the afternoon yesterday, when I got there, tried to reach booker, no response, 45 minutes past, I left unhappy. Their girls quality declined, now even booker is axshole, 2 hour past I text again, he said the phone was dead, he could not reply. WTF. I think he accidentally mess up schedule, because I saw other hobbyists went in that building.[/QUOTE]You should of read past reports, including mine about that place. Booker always makes you wait when you get there because he's lazy. They wasted my time once on the way to an appointment awhile back. Booker failed to tell me the girl I wanted to see was "too sore" up until I was 10 minutes away and wasted my time. Pretty sure he is BS'ing you and not admitting his mistake. Probably overbooked or something happened with the girl. With you and a recent report, I would stay away from the Palace for good. Unreliable, fake pictures, very low quality girls who should be 100 or less. I don't believe they will improve and things are just getting worse there. I deleted their number a few months ago with some crappy girl I saw.
[QUOTE=ImMyself;4072875]Jenny is no BB.[/QUOTE]Is Erika bb?
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4070900]I saw Rozel a few years back. It was heavily rumored and possibly confirmed by some posts that she was easy BB. Maybe not as easy as Yoona, but I thought I had it. I got denied and the session went to shit. I think I even got attitude from her after. Left a shitty review but probably did nothing. She is highly overrated and I never got why she had such high reviews. Maybe because she was "exotic looking" but TER reviewers tend to give everyone at least an 8, and the norm was 9. The reviews were too skewed so the average got way too high. Most K-girls were on average 7/7 realistically with some being an 8. Hardly any would be a 9/9.
I posted previously about lack of new girls (most recently and earlier this year. It looks like less girls are working and the talent is probably staying up north. I texted Casino's booker and no one new for this entire month. This was the same for 1-2 other places I asked. M seems to be the only one who does get new talent, but takes awhile for anyone here leave a review. Perhaps me and one other person here are on the final frontier willing to risk out new girls. I usually lose though.[/QUOTE]I stopped trusting TER about 10 years ago or so. Before that, reviews tended to be a little more reliable, then a fleet of white knights came in and starting hyping the fuck out of Korean providers and inflating their reviews. For those that were around in the early 2000's and after, you know who I am talking about. After they arrived, I would rarely see anything less than 9/9, where as I would rate most 7 or 8 at best. They failed to realize that 7 out of 10 is still above average and felt the need to "protect" them from "slanderous" reviews.
As for Rozel, I think she was hyped because of her "exotic" look, but she was a bit chubby IMO. I could also be biased since I prefer thin girls, but that's just me. Rozel gave me BB one time, but that was it. I think word got out and then everyone started pressuring / asking her for BB and she pushed back.
Regarding Joy / Glow / Pink, I've seen her off and on since the early 2000's. She's a bit of a nut case, but her body is my type which kept me coming back. BB is off the menu now but damn, I still enjoy seeing her skinny body and big fake tits.
So I'm visiting and my old booker isn't replying. Little head was doing the thinking and took ome for the team trying out an add on adlist [URL]https://losangeles.adlist24.com/escorts/a7495516[/URL].
We agreed on on hour rate and it was in south gate which was close by. I always take the full since I see it as a waste if I don't spend the few extra bucks. However, sometimes I feel I should with new providers. Especially my last few. Duds. Anyways. Essy set up. Arrive at location gives room number. Go up and see a fairly older asian. Dang. Put money down. Head needed to nut. She started with BBBJ ball licking and taint. Probably would have rimmed but didn't partake. She has big pussy lips for daty. More head then acg rcg and finally doggy. Decided I wanted to nut while sucked. Asians are usually only ones that can make me nut that way. She got the job done. The bad. She was at least 50. Didn't go for 2nd pop since I just wanted to get out of there. Didn't think I could muster up another hard on. The plus. Ass of a 20 year oldd. BBBJ was amazing. Took direction well. Even allowed some good face fucking making her gag. She allowed video midway. I saw that tight ass and pussy gripping my cock inasked to take a pic. She said ok. I pressed record and she was ok with it. Even let me record her sucking me till I popped. Vooker said see you again after I complained about her not being as young as they said. Promised me younger. We shall see. Anyways. They offer BBFS if your into it. I think its more.
If anyone is willing to share a booker please pm me. Been out if la area for a while but man I had fun with the mid-wilshire girls. I need that. Young BBBJ showers and security of a great session. Here for a few more days so I would appreciate it. I will probably go to lennox or try this add again amd see if I get younger today. Will report back. Stay safe.
[QUOTE=TDLeafs;4073156]Been texting Kiss's booker but haven't got any response.
Try to see Roya again.
Used this agency many times before.
Very odd.
Anyone used this agency recently or seen Roya recently?
Seen Roya last time in October.[/QUOTE]Not sure if it's the same Roya from Kiss's Booker. , but the booker for Erin seems to be booking Roya (if that is the same Roya).
[QUOTE=NotherMonger;4073264]I stopped trusting TER about 10 years ago or so. [/QUOTE]To be fair, a bunch of fuckers were inflating white girls scores too. Bunch of 9's and 10's when they didn't deserve it.
So it all evens out the bullshit.
What's everyone's opinion on this place? It's like the poorly designed version of TER, including the pretty lax quality in reviews. It's hard to sort out any girls, and I notice at least one shill from TER writing almost near perfects for K-girls. (Divadiver) I remember this guy and pornstar69. I know there were more than 2 of these shills for bookers over the years. On top of this, I see reviews for girls that haven't worked is months still getting somewhat recent reviews. I don't see many K-girls get reviews, much less honest ones. Should I just avoid this place?
[QUOTE=StopGoAnd33;4073179] booker who books for Jessi, Nari, Ara, Soyu, and Alice recommended by the booker (C) of Roya, Taylor, and Erin.
Anyone try them yet?[/QUOTE]Does the number end in 7226? I haven't tried them, but they may be associated with J and maybe could be an in to seeing J's girls. I'm just assuming this because some of the names are on the kdolls site.
[QUOTE=NeedAheRealBad;4073817]Does the number end in 7226? I haven't tried them, but they may be associated with J and maybe could be an in to seeing J's girls. I'm just assuming this because some of the names are on the kdolls site.[/QUOTE]No it ends with 6820.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4073794]What's everyone's opinion on this place? It's like the poorly designed version of TER, including the pretty lax quality in reviews. It's hard to sort out any girls, and I notice at least one shill from TER writing almost near perfects for K-girls. (Divadiver) I remember this guy and pornstar69. I know there were more than 2 of these shills for bookers over the years. On top of this, I see reviews for girls that haven't worked is months still getting somewhat recent reviews. I don't see many K-girls get reviews, much less honest ones. Should I just avoid this place?[/QUOTE]The problem with THEM is that they are trying to wear two hats- that as a listing site and that as a review site. Unfortunately they are doing neither very well. As a listing site they have outdated phone numbers and pictures lifted from other sources, so there are always complaints that bookers never respond, etc. When one tries to write a review it seems there's a set format in place where one can't update the gal's contact number, stats, etc. And so old information stays in place. Also, I don't know if there's any policy regarding the current availability of the gal being reviewed. Some of the reviews that pop up are for gals that have been long gone for a number of months. Should you avoid the place? Not necessarily- just put it in perspective. Perhaps it has some value if someone has had a truly miserable experience with a gal who is still around. Good luck.
[QUOTE=Ted213;4071291]Hey guys, I'm going be in LA. Anyone got info for kiss. This her right here.[/QUOTE]Post #1906 was asking if she is on vacation but no public reply.
[QUOTE=Brick562;4073254]Is Erika bb?[/QUOTE]Yep BB all the ways CIP, if you like big tits she's your girl.
Anyone esle speak to her? With smaller amount of girls offering guaranteed BB, I am still in contact with her. I was starting to get a little cold shoulder from her since she moved and now she isn't replying to my text. The board they use down there [URL]ECCIE.Net[/URL] shut down past few days. I was hoping she would come back despite moving to Texas. If she is gone for good, it isn't a huge loss either for me as well.
[QUOTE=KimchiPowerJP;4073077]I made appt in the afternoon yesterday, when I got there, tried to reach booker, no response, 45 minutes past, I left unhappy. Their girls quality declined, now even booker is axshole, 2 hour past I text again, he said the phone was dead, he could not reply. WTF. I think he accidentally mess up schedule, because I saw other hobbyists went in that building.[/QUOTE]That was inexcusable. They have two different numbers. If one phone is dead, which it should never have happened in the first place, he could have text you from the other phone / number. I've waited 10 to 15 minutes a few times in the past at the Palace, and I once waited a long 45 minutes for Pepsi. I was ready to leave when I got the text that she was finally ready. I was not happy, but then again I went over with Pepsi a few times too as she does not watch her clock. I routinely ask her if she has another appointment coming up as I don't want other fellow mongers wait awkwardly linger outside the building.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4074593]Yep BB all the ways CIP, if you like big tits she's your girl.[/QUOTE]I saw her about maybe 4 months ago and she was no BB for me. I didn't ask or hint at it so that could be it or maybe she didn't offer at that time? I've seen posts saying she wasn't BBFS for others as well so I guess it's YMWV?
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4073794]What's everyone's opinion on this place? It's like the poorly designed version of TER, including the pretty lax quality in reviews. It's hard to sort out any girls, and I notice at least one shill from TER writing almost near perfects for K-girls. (Divadiver) I remember this guy and pornstar69. I know there were more than 2 of these shills for bookers over the years. On top of this, I see reviews for girls that haven't worked is months still getting somewhat recent reviews. I don't see many K-girls get reviews, much less honest ones. Should I just avoid this place?[/QUOTE]Can't trust Erotic Monkey as I see wrong girl's review routinely, retired girl (Mag for example) gets reviewed after she went back to Korea. I guess some of us put up reviews for whoever with few sentences to get free access, and them doesn't seem to check the review before it gets posted. At least TER rejected couple of my reviews, and I had to edit them for resubmission. Plus, them reviewers don't seem to share BB experience when I know some of them are. I read them with skepticism, I'll probably not renew when my current membership expires. This forum offers more valuable intel.
I went to see Erica from Sweetasiangem the other day and that was a pretty bad encounter.
She has been getting a bunch of talk on here lately as being a pretty much sure thing on the BBFS aspect so I am commenting that maybe it is YMMV. For me it was no. She was also the first lady that I have ever talked to as she is putting the condom on. I mentioned that "many of your reviews say you don't use condoms", to which she said "condom is better". I didn't push it because I prefer condoms but she was so ugly that BBFS was probably the only way I could finish.
She is kind of fat and rather ugly. Obviously YMMV but I was having a difficult time just to be interested. Everything was bad. I ended up going limp during cfs and asked for BBBJ and that was barely OK. She was just not doing it for me on both the visual level and the technical level. I was finally able to CIM but it was a pretty bad nut. I tried to finish as fast as I could. When she went to use mouth wash I looked at my phone and saw I was at 25 minutes so got ready to go and paid the half hour rate.
The bad part for me is that I texted the booker at the 30 minute mark saying that I had paid for the half hour and had left. (true, I was in and out in 30 minutes) I don't think this was a problem because when the booker sent the initial confirmation of the date they gave me the price for the hour and half hour. The bad part was the booker texting me back saying that I asked for BBFS! I realize that this establishment is probably off limits to me now but I hope it does not affect my other contacts.
I just wanted to post this because maybe Erica is YMMV on BBFS. Maybe I got a different Erica, LOL. I don't know.
[QUOTE=LaMancha;4075183]I went to see Erica from Sweetasiangem the other day and that was a pretty bad encounter.
She has been getting a bunch of talk on here lately as being a pretty much sure thing on the BBFS aspect so I am commenting that maybe it is YMMV. For me it was no. She was also the first lady that I have ever talked to as she is putting the condom on. I mentioned that "many of your reviews say you don't use condoms", to which she said "condom is better". I didn't push it because I prefer condoms but she was so ugly that BBFS was probably the only way I could finish.
She is kind of fat and rather ugly. Obviously YMMV but I was having a difficult time just to be interested. Everything was bad. I ended up going limp during cfs and asked for BBBJ and that was barely OK. She was just not doing it for me on both the visual level and the technical level. I was finally able to CIM but it was a pretty bad nut. I tried to finish as fast as I could. When she went to use mouth wash I looked at my phone and saw I was at 25 minutes so got ready to go and paid the half hour rate.
The bad part for me is that I texted the booker at the 30 minute mark saying that I had paid for the half hour and had left. (true, I was in and out in 30 minutes) I don't think this was a problem because when the booker sent the initial confirmation of the date they gave me the price for the hour and half hour. The bad part was the booker texting me back saying that I asked for BBFS! I realize that this establishment is probably off limits to me now but I hope it does not affect my other contacts.
I just wanted to post this because maybe Erica is YMMV on BBFS. Maybe I got a different Erica, LOL. I don't know.[/QUOTE]It's too bad that you had such a bad experience. When I saw Erika, after she was done sucking my cock, she flipped onto her back, spread her legs, and just waited for me to go in bare, which I did. There was no cover in sight. This was only about six weeks ago. Also, I think most of the reporting on Erika has mentioned that she is not necessarily the hottest K-girl around. Many guys expect a 20 something year old spinner. Erika is definitely not that. I don't personally think she is terribly ugly or anything though. I will say that she wasn't hot enough for me to repeat though.
If you want a young, gorgeous K-girl and you don't require BBFS, I recommend Stella T from Eros. She is young, DDG in my opinion, and really gives amazing GFE. She is totally independent and therefore expensive, but worth it. If you treat her well and repeat, she will blow you mind.
[QUOTE=LaMancha;4075183]I went to see Erica from Sweetasiangem the other day and that was a pretty bad encounter.
She has been getting a bunch of talk on here lately as being a pretty much sure thing on the BBFS aspect so I am commenting that maybe it is YMMV. For me it was no. She was also the first lady that I have ever talked to as she is putting the condom on. I mentioned that "many of your reviews say you don't use condoms", to which she said "condom is better". I didn't push it because I prefer condoms but she was so ugly that BBFS was probably the only way I could finish.
She is kind of fat and rather ugly. Obviously YMMV but I was having a difficult time just to be interested.[/QUOTE]No such thing as a sure thing when it comes to BBFS, as has been stated numerous times on this board. Looks like you missed this report below. Also, I think girls really hate it when they hear, "So and so said you don't use condoms". This is probably why she reported you to her booker.
[QUOTE=ScoopDaDrop;4067639]I saw Erika for the first time this weekend and she is definitely stumpy. No ass either really rather flat forna thick girl but ass doesn't look bad in doggie. Not a looker at all and just generally Not much to look at. Lips were chapped as fuck it was like kissing an alligator.
No BBFS but I didn't initiate hint nor push for it either.
I just wasn't really into the session.[/QUOTE]
I'm almost certain that the Booker made the comment about you asking for BBFS only because you cut your appt to 30 minutes after confirming and booking for 1 hour. If you paid for the whole hour, I doubt that the booker would've said anything to you about asking for BBFS.
[QUOTE=LaMancha;4075183]I went to see Erica from Sweetasiangem the other day and that was a pretty bad encounter.
She has been getting a bunch of talk on here lately as being a pretty much sure thing on the BBFS aspect so I am commenting that maybe it is YMMV. For me it was no. She was also the first lady that I have ever talked to as she is putting the condom on. I mentioned that "many of your reviews say you don't use condoms", to which she said "condom is better". I didn't push it because I prefer condoms but she was so ugly that BBFS was probably the only way I could finish.
She is kind of fat and rather ugly. Obviously YMMV but I was having a difficult time just to be interested. Everything was bad. I ended up going limp during cfs and asked for BBBJ and that was barely OK. She was just not doing it for me on both the visual level and the technical level. I was finally able to CIM but it was a pretty bad nut. I tried to finish as fast as I could. When she went to use mouth wash I looked at my phone and saw I was at 25 minutes so got ready to go and paid the half hour rate.
The bad part for me is that I texted the booker at the 30 minute mark saying that I had paid for the half hour and had left. (true, I was in and out in 30 minutes) I don't think this was a problem because when the booker sent the initial confirmation of the date they gave me the price for the hour and half hour. The bad part was the booker texting me back saying that I asked for BBFS! I realize that this establishment is probably off limits to me now but I hope it does not affect my other contacts.
I just wanted to post this because maybe Erica is YMMV on BBFS. Maybe I got a different Erica, LOL. I don't know.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=LaMancha;4075183]I went to see Erica from Sweetasiangem the other day and that was a pretty bad encounter.
She has been getting a bunch of talk on here lately as being a pretty much sure thing on the BBFS aspect so I am commenting that maybe it is YMMV. For me it was no. She was also the first lady that I have ever talked to as she is putting the condom on. I mentioned that "many of your reviews say you don't use condoms", to which she said "condom is better". I didn't push it because I prefer condoms but she was so ugly that BBFS was probably the only way I could finish.
She is kind of fat and rather ugly. Obviously YMMV but I was having a difficult time just to be interested. Everything was bad. I ended up going limp during cfs and asked for BBBJ and that was barely OK. She was just not doing it for me on both the visual level and the technical level. I was finally able to CIM but it was a pretty bad nut. I tried to finish as fast as I could. When she went to use mouth wash I looked at my phone and saw I was at 25 minutes so got ready to go and paid the half hour rate.
The bad part for me is that I texted the booker at the 30 minute mark saying that I had paid for the half hour and had left. (true, I was in and out in 30 minutes) I don't think this was a problem because when the booker sent the initial confirmation of the date they gave me the price for the hour and half hour. The bad part was the booker texting me back saying that I asked for BBFS! I realize that this establishment is probably off limits to me now but I hope it does not affect my other contacts.
I just wanted to post this because maybe Erica is YMMV on BBFS. Maybe I got a different Erica, LOL. I don't know.[/QUOTE]Well I mean.
First you asked for BBFS and got rejected.
Second you left 30 early because she rejected you.
There you go. If you stay a full normal 1 hour then nothing will be asked or told between girl and booker. If you somehow left 30 m early then booker will ask the girl "what's happened" and of course the girl will sell you out since she is not happy with you leaving early and less money.
If you pay full 1 hour rate and leave early then it will be fine. I think the problem is that you short paid / leave early than expected.
I once left early and short paid then I got a call from booker.