KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=Twister100;5706634]Not unsurprising, the pics are not her but the stats are accurate. 5'4", 34 B, slim, fit, great body, pretty face. Late 20's or early 30's. Good English since she's been in LA for about 7 years. Blue toast, shower preview, DFK, rimming, MSOG, decent massage. Only negative was she requested CIM or COB instead of CIP. YMMV with DFK if you're a smoker as she mentioned she didn't like kissing smokers. Here for about another week.[/QUOTE]Sounds good. Thanks for the review.

As for no CIP, I guess technically that is still in line with her allowing BBFS (and thus the extra $100). CIP is, of course, better, but CIM at the end would still be OK.

[QUOTE=BobSizemore53;5704550]Not really. They're on hiatus until the 17th.

lolipopgirls.net and kangels.ch are the other two agencies available.[/QUOTE]Yes they are re branding new name and image concept is what I have heard. Excited to see what it is!

Anyone seen these new ones with KAngels?

I feel like they have reused Lexy's photos alot before. But not Chanels.

They are probably fake photos but if Chanel is another Coco that would be nice.

[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5706809]Sounds good. Thanks for the review.

As for no CIP, I guess technically that is still in line with her allowing BBFS (and thus the extra $100). CIP is, of course, better, but CIM at the end would still be OK.[/QUOTE]I saw Tera yesterday. She wasn't the girl on the pics, but still smoking hot tiny all natural spinner. She was not the friendliest, and was unable to accommodate the size of my equipment. Had cim instead. Then she rushed me out because she had another appointment scheduled right after mine. I wouldn't recommend unless you are smaller. She was incredibly hot though.

(And welcome everyone. This is my first post here).

[QUOTE=Ultimate90;5703516]It says on their website that Audrey is CFS only. Did you really get BBFS?[/QUOTE]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5712751]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.[/QUOTE]There was an Audrey at Kangels and one at Lolipop. You might be thinking of the Audrey at Kangels.

Saw Chanel at Kangels. Not the woman in the photo, but she's pretty and petite (the measurements were right). First time at kangels, so everything I'm comparing to is what I've heard about Coco. Overall, it was nice. Decent BBBJ, and her pussy was tight and I blew twice. We talked in between and I would have liked more interaction. She's a sweet enough girl but she doesn't have the passion people claim Coco has. I'll be seeing her next.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5712751]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.[/QUOTE]You just confirmed that your Audrey isn't the Audrey at lolipop.

I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?

[QUOTE=BackDoordRiver;5713306]Saw Chanel at Kangels. Not the woman in the photo, but she's pretty and petite (the measurements were right). First time at kangels, so everything I'm comparing to is what I've heard about Coco. Overall, it was nice. Decent BBBJ, and her pussy was tight and I blew twice. We talked in between and I would have liked more interaction. She's a sweet enough girl but she doesn't have the passion people claim Coco has. I'll be seeing her next.[/QUOTE]Chanel was previously here as Hi back around October 2021. I'd say mid to late 30's. Petite thin body with natural C cups. Agree she has a tight box and is nice enough but I didn't find her face attractive and she lacked the enthusiasm of Coco and Tera.

[QUOTE=PinkScott;5714023]I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?[/QUOTE]Lexi had a review that she wasn't really into it or it was a bad experience. That was on TER, but YMMV.

[QUOTE=PinkScott;5714023]I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?[/QUOTE]Lexy's body is accurate. The face has P.S. But is close enough. She's also well reviewed.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=355105[/URL]

The GSL and Lolipop girls generally look like their photos apart from any P.S. On their face.

Saw Tera this week and honestly I was not impressed. I personally feel that Tera's FBSA are all lower than Coco's.

Have any of you guys saw both Chanel and Coco before? Could you make a FBSA comparison? Or Chanel vs Tera?

[QUOTE=LeoLiang;5719271]Saw Tera this week and honestly I was not impressed. I personally feel that Tera's FBSA are all lower than Coco's.

Have any of you guys saw both Chanel and Coco before? Could you make a FBSA comparison? Or Chanel vs Tera?[/QUOTE]What the heck is "FBSA"?

Anyone know when Coco is coming back?