Drama 101 in Cleveland

The problem is as described by the admin and cheech but also tied to one other thing in politics.

Religion.

We have too many politicians who dictate that sex is bad and paying for it is against the ideals of a made up rule book from ancient history.

This is just one of the examples of why they shouldn't allow religion to have any sway in politics and need to actually SEPARATE church and state from one another.

If they didn't have to pander to the all these religious groups they wouldn't give two shits ultimately about hookers and johns fucking.

There always seems an excuse or reason for failure. Until some city can be successful in legalizing drugs and not end up killing a bunch of people or increasing crime, I can't support it. I don't believe governments have the ability to manage anything well. Feel free to identify any successful transition for legalized drugs.

[QUOTE=Admin2;5973732]What went wrong in Portland was they passed decriminalization without the healthcare system being ready. This is what happens when an entire country decides to treat addiction as a health care issue and not a criminal issue.

[URL]https://transformdrugs.org/blog/drug-decriminalisation-in-portugal-setting-the-record-straight[/URL]

FYI "forced stays in rehab" is just a different kind of jail. Before Harry Anslinger made up all the lies about drugs and got them criminalized so he could get a job people used to be able to walk into a drug store and buy what they wanted, then they went home and took it and went to work the next day. I've been sober forever, availability of drugs doesn't make addicts, lack of community and childhood trauma is what creates addicts.

Before you throw out the next "but I don't want to pay for their drugs" line, for what you are currently spending to jail addicts you could give every junkie in the world all the dope they would ever use plus give them a place to live and still spend less tax payer money. It wouldn't be as satisfying as knowing you were locking those scumbags up but it would be less money.

A2.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Asmoth;5974890]The problem is as described by the admin and cheech but also tied to one other thing in politics.

Religion.

We have too many politicians who dictate that sex is bad and paying for it is against the ideals of a made up rule book from ancient history.

This is just one of the examples of why they shouldn't allow religion to have any sway in politics and need to actually SEPARATE church and state from one another.

If they didn't have to pander to the all these religious groups they wouldn't give two shits ultimately about hookers and johns fucking.[/QUOTE]Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.

These two areas are also big problems. Religion's beliefs are primarily (in reality) to control people thru fear of spending eternity in hell. A fantasy created by religionists that cannot be proven or disproven due to its nature. And, women support it because religion attempts to control the natural and biological desires of men.

Legalization in piecemeal fashion will never work because the other governments, state and federal, won't legalize drugs, and even if they did they would and will tax the hell out of it, just like alcohol and tobacco. If the government would just get the hell out of restricting drugs, and I mean local, state, AND federal, the problem would naturally decrease.

No smuggling. No gang wars over turf. No dealers glorifying drug use in order to increase their profit.

That wouldn't mean people wouldn't still use drugs. Always have always will. However, it would cost so much less to be able to buy whatever from your local pharmacy that crime would be dramatically reduced. After all, many men are addicts and they steal and do whatever they have to do to support their habits. Also, purity would be controlled, and for those who want to get off drugs their would be so much money available from the savings of not having hundreds of thousands in prison that it wouldn't be a problem.

Cheech.

[QUOTE=Budd2;5974993]Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.[/QUOTE]Agree with everything you said, just expanding on it. Many Americans would not be so supportive if they did their research beyond what they see in the news and look at the docket sheets for what really happens, not just in the hobby, but various other stuff as well. All of the "Karens" (and the male name equivalent of them) out there who go to Church on Sundays, pretend to be anti hooker, and pretend to be a do gooder, and then go abuse their server or cashier at the grocery store right after, would not be so supportive of being anti hooker if they realized they themselves have higher odds of walking into one of these stings then guys like us who have hobbied for years do LOL. Think about it, we have lived and breathed this shit, me and you Budd know a bogus post soon as it goes up, meanwhile some phony anti hooker dumbass like we discussed gets horny some random night, goes on SKG not knowing what he is doing, and picks a sting ad doing no research and gets an Eng in prostitution charge. All of a sudden magically they wouldn't be so supportive of being anti hooker. Same goes for these clown politicians trying to overturn Roe Vs Wade. They are all hypocrites with no scruples.

C92.

[QUOTE=Budd2;5974993]Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.[/QUOTE]As much as I'm not a fan of religion that's not just it in the us. There are places in the world that are more religious than the us. They allow prostitution and drugs or at least permit them without heavily trying to penalize their existence. The issue here is also racism and unrestrained capitalism. The fact this country was built under slavery and prison is the new slavery. They need people to fill up prison cells so allowing drugs and prostitution works against that goal.

You Hague's are all morons. Decriminalize drugs. Yeah, OK. While we're at it, let's put more guns in schools to stop school shootings. Let's arm the kids and give them heroin. You guys go to great lengths to defend junkie ******. Junkie ****** are not even human.

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5975318]You Hague's are all morons. Decriminalize drugs. Yeah, OK. While we're at it, let's put more guns in schools to stop school shootings. Let's arm the kids and give them heroin. You guys go to great lengths to defend junkie ******. Junkie ****** are not even human.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw08N8huTDE[/URL]

[QUOTE=PopGarden10;5975119]The issue here is also racism and unrestrained capitalism. The fact this country was built under slavery and prison is the new slavery. They need people to fill up prison cells so allowing drugs and prostitution works against that goal.[/QUOTE]I hear you. When it is legit for the government (through lobbying, campaign contributions, propaganda, money over everything, party before nation) and corporations (monopoly, stealing, underpaying employees. Etc) to practice unrestrained capitalism, why is is not legit for women to sell their bodies and take care of themselves?

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5973189]Eloquently said, here is mine. You ever watch Morgan Freeman in lean on me? You don't have to watch the whole thing, just this brief few second clip attached for this line.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWpAJ4Lcu4Q[/URL]

At the end of the day, they are branded as felons and put in the cages the elite have crafted for them, and no matter how hard they try, they can't make enough money at the jobs they can get as felons so they fall right back into addiction. Representing the cages that Morgan Freeman deserved everyone to be freed from. The difference between addiction and non addiction is all about environment. If people were all living comfortably and not worried about how to pay for necessities, all of this suffering would be non-existent. Here is an article that proves just that. Decriminalize.

[URL]https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/what-does-rat-park-teach-us-about-addiction[/URL]

C92.[/QUOTE]Awesome post. Courts provide remedies, not justice. The remedies serve the court and the justice system (there is no justice system, its a for profit system designed for and by the government). Its a clusterfuck.

[QUOTE=DeskJockey;5976267]Awesome post. Courts provide remedies, not justice. The remedies serve the court and the justice system (there is no justice system, its a for profit system designed for and by the government). Its a clusterfuck.[/QUOTE]Here's a novel idea, stop shooting heroin. You know what that leads to? Keeping a job. Not going to jail. Not contracting infections that lead to losing limbs.

[QUOTE=DeskJockey;5976258]. . . why is is not legit for women to sell their bodies and take care of themselves?[/QUOTE]In theory, laws against prostitution are intended to protect public health and welfare (including the suppression of sexually transmitted diseases), protect minors who might otherwise become involved in the sex industry, thwart other associated forms of crime, and curb the incentive to exploit women.

[URL]https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/prostitution-pathways-problems-and-prevention[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762352/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5976441]Here's a novel idea, stop shooting heroin. You know what that leads to? Keeping a job. Not going to jail. Not contracting infections that lead to losing limbs.[/QUOTE]Despite the good intentions, the "Just Say No" anti-drug marketing campaign started by Nancy Reagan was not as effective as it could have been.

An abstinence-only approach, coupled with harsher drug penalties, had negligible effect in preventing drug abuse.

[URL]https://landmarkrecovery.com/just-say-no-and-its-effects/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2636541/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Navritol;5976546] curb the incentive to exploit women.

[URL]https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/prostitution-pathways-problems-and-prevention[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762352/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yeah right, "curb the incentive to exploit women" when they go and bilk fines out of them with soliciting charges for doing what they want with their bodies. Seems like that's the courts exploiting them to me. If they gave a shit about stopping trafficking, they wouldn't be all over SKG like flies on shit and would focus their efforts elsewhere. SKG is filled with women that are either doing it to support their families, or maybe have a drug habit. Nobodys forcing them into it but themselves, and you know what? they are grown, they can do what they want thats their business. Its all political and those caught in the stings are nothing but potential pawns for Yost to try to get himself re elected. They don't give a flying shit about their taxpayers or any of their residents for that matter.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5977103]Yeah right . . . Nobodys forcing them into it but themselves, and you know what? they are grown, they can do what they want thats their business . . . [/QUOTE]Much of current theory on sex trafficking suggests it exists because a significant number of men are willing to pay for sex with women.

The argument is simple economic logic – without demand, an industry falls apart.

[URL]https://portcitydaily.com/local-news/2018/12/06/part-four-a-look-at-johns-the-men-whose-demand-drives-our-sex-trafficking-problem/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5977103]Yeah right . . . If they gave a shit about stopping trafficking, they wouldn't be all over SKG like flies on shit and would focus their efforts elsewhere. . . [/QUOTE]Yost's focus on STG is driven in large part by non-profits.

[URL]https://endsexualexploitation.org/about/[/URL]

[URL]https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/demand-for-prostitution-the-critical-role-of-market-dynamics-in-combating-sex-trafficking/[/URL]#_edn1.

[QUOTE=Navritol;5977145]Much of current theory on sex trafficking suggests it exists because a significant number of men are willing to pay for sex with women.

The argument is simple economic logic without demand, an industry falls apart.

[URL]https://portcitydaily.com/local-news/2018/12/06/part-four-a-look-at-johns-the-men-whose-demand-drives-our-sex-trafficking-problem/[/URL][/QUOTE]Well I suppose all are just theories I guess. I suppose I shouldn't care as much as I do about it anymore because it doesn't affect me. I just have a serious issue with them making a law essentially saying that adults can't make their own choices. Its adults choice to fuck each other, its the hookers pussy and the johns dick, neither of those things belong to the government. And by criminalizing it, ownership of us peasants by the government is what is implied. That is why I am the way I am, I might very well never monger for the rest of my life because I don't need to pay for it, and I will still have that outlook of live and let live. I can live out my remaining days knowing if I wanted to pay for it I easily could and have just as a big middle finger to the government. Honestly my main trigger to go out and monger would be to see Yost and others on the news saying exactly what your saying here. Its essentially taking the lazy way out. Get consenting SKG women and consenting men to make him look good on the news, and ignore the actual trafficking. Soon as I see him spew his bile in the news, it made me want to go out and monger because I know exactly what to do and what not to do. Now I stop myself for finance purposes, not because of some phony re election stunt, and I have figured out to control my anger now and just watch something else whenever I have to see him on the news.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5977260]. . . Get consenting SKG women and consenting men to make him look good on the news, and ignore the actual trafficking. Soon as I see him spew his bile in the news, it made me want to go out and monger because I know exactly what to do and what not to do. Now I stop myself for finance purposes, not because of some phony re election stunt, and I have figured out to control my anger now and just watch something else whenever I have to see him on the news.[/QUOTE]Did you intend to write STG women? I can't figure out what SKG stands for.

Theories with supportive data often drive politics.

It's legal in 10 of 16 counties in Nevada. So there is an enlightened view here in the USA.

It would be interesting to compare social stats in places like the Netherlands and Germany, where it's been legal, to the same in the USA.

I don't believe it will ever be legal in the all 50 of the USA during my lifetime.

Yost is on tract to be the next Ohio gub'nor after DeWine's second term is done.

His primary opponent will be Jim Renacci, the GOP Party boss in Medina County.

Of the two, I believe Renacci would be more liberal on decriminalizing sex for hire.

As a GOP Congressman in 2015, he was one of 60 GOPs who voted to uphold Obama's 2014 executive order banning federal contractors from making hiring decisions that discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

[QUOTE=Navritol;5977097]Despite the good intentions, the "Just Say No" anti-drug marketing campaign started by Nancy Reagan was not as effective as it could have been.

An abstinence-only approach, coupled with harsher drug penalties, had negligible effect in preventing drug abuse.

[URL]https://landmarkrecovery.com/just-say-no-and-its-effects/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2636541/[/URL][/QUOTE]Look, if a dumb ***** wants to shoot heroin, I don't give a fuck. But when she loses a leg because she's a strung out junkie, I'm definitely not going to feel any pity toward her.

[QUOTE=Navritol;5977290]Did you intend to write STG women? I can't figure out what SKG stands for.

Theories with supportive data often drive politics.

It's legal in 10 of 16 counties in Nevada. So there is an enlightened view here in the USA.

It would be interesting to compare social stats in places like the Netherlands and Germany, where it's been legal, to the same in the USA.

I don't believe it will ever be legal in the all 50 of the USA during my lifetime.

Yost is on tract to be the next Ohio gub'nor after DeWine's second term is done.

His primary opponent will be Jim Renacci, the GOP Party boss in Medina County.

Of the two, I believe Renacci would be more liberal on decriminalizing sex for hire.

As a GOP Congressman in 2015, he was one of 60 GOPs who voted to uphold Obama's 2014 executive order banning federal contractors from making hiring decisions that discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity.[/QUOTE]Dewine will thankfully blow out Whaley, then I pray for the democrats to win in 2026 by producing an actual candidate. I don't like Dewine because he is anti hooker / hobby as well, but Whaley is a scumbag and more anti hooker / hobby then him she created a john registry in Dayton. I pray Crossman wins this November, but you are right, if that fucker Yost wins this election, he very well could be the next governor which would be nauseating. This election is historic and crucial, we all MUST vote Crossman solely because Yost's "engaging in prostitution" statute of house bill 431! Think about that, he raised the penalty on adults meeting adults online, but didnt raise penalties on scumbags. and then has the audacity to call it "common sense legislation." And this is the fucker we want running our state? FOH!

There has not been a Dem win governor since 2007 in Ohio. Whaley is the worst candidate of all time at a good time because if she wins that absolutely giftwraps the spot to Yost in 2026, but because a lot don't like Dewine or even Yost for that matter, I think we have a great shot at possibly having him out of office for good with a Crossman victory and a Dewine victory this year, and then in 2026 a democrat winning the governor election because people are sick of dewine. its a long shot , but its very conceivable. Actual freedom could be in our future!

C92.

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5977300]Look, if a dumb ***** wants to shoot heroin, I don't give a fuck. But when she loses a leg because she's a strung out junkie, I'm definitely not going to feel any pity toward her.[/QUOTE]Good thing neither you nor a member of your family is addicted to alcohol and / or drugs.

People exposed to stress are more likely to abuse alcohol or other drugs.

[URL]https://headsup.scholastic.com/students/stress-and-drug-abuse/[/URL]

No single factor determines whether a person will become addicted to drugs.

The risk factors that contribute to addiction are biological or environmental, or combinations of both types of factors.

[URL]https://headsup.scholastic.com/teachers/do-you-know-your-risk-for-addiction/[/URL]

It can happen to anyone.

[URL]https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/49/7/513/236613[/URL]

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5977447]. . . There has not been a Dem win governor since 2007 in Ohio . . . a DeWine victory this year, and then in 2026 a democrat winning the governor . . . C92.[/QUOTE]You're correct on DeWine in 2022.

I wouldn't consider Whaley for any elected office.

The Yost. Renacci showdown won't happen until 2026.

Unfortunately, we haven't had a two-term Democratic governor since Dick Celeste 1982-1991.

Not likely we'll have another one anytime soon, unless, perhaps, if Sherrod Brown decides to leave the you S Senate.

It all boils down to the lack of liberty in this country.

Cheech.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5977447]Dewine will thankfully blow out Whaley, then I pray for the democrats to win in 2026 by producing an actual candidate. I don't like Dewine because he is anti hooker / hobby as well, but Whaley is a scumbag and more anti hooker / hobby then him she created a john registry in Dayton. I pray Crossman wins this November, but you are right, if that fucker Yost wins this election, he very well could be the next governor which would be nauseating. This election is historic and crucial, we all MUST vote Crossman solely because Yost's "engaging in prostitution" statute of house bill 431! Think about that, he raised the penalty on adults meeting adults online, but didnt raise penalties on scumbags. and then has the audacity to call it "common sense legislation." And this is the fucker we want running our state? FOH!

There has not been a Dem win governor since 2007 in Ohio. Whaley is the worst candidate of all time at a good time because if she wins that absolutely giftwraps the spot to Yost in 2026, but because a lot don't like Dewine or even Yost for that matter, I think we have a great shot at possibly having him out of office for good with a Crossman victory and a Dewine victory this year, and then in 2026 a democrat winning the governor election because people are sick of dewine. its a long shot , but its very conceivable. Actual freedom could be in our future!

C92.[/QUOTE]So you decide to vote for a candidate simply because he is pro-WG? No wonder this country is fucked.

Trump was clearly not opposed to paying ****** for sex. Look what that got us.

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5977914]So you decide to vote for a candidate simply because he is pro-WG? No wonder this country is fucked.

Trump was clearly not opposed to paying ****** for sex. Look what that got us.[/QUOTE]I HATE trump because of FOSTA he is anti hooker and yet he partook in the hobby himself. I don't care about hardly any other issue besides that, and basic human rights. Gas is already through the roof and our country is fucked, so yes, whether or not a politician is anti-hooker / john that is the main issue I'm looking at as well as basic human rights and ending mass incarceration. Besides, I've earned my spot in life and my right to have an opinion, I pay taxes to this shithole and oftentimes am PAID IN ADVANCE on my taxes so yeah, I'm entitled to my views. I will vote for the less anti hooker politician ever single time. Not saying Dettelbach was pro hooker, but I'm fairly sure if he beat Yost the "engaging in prostitution" portion of house bill 431 never would have happened (the other portion of that bill was necessary), he seems more neutral. So yeah, its still a 3rd degree misdemeanor with Dettelbach as opposed to a first with Yost. Any politician who is anti hooker/john I do NOT support, Repub or Dem, by having those views that shows they dont support basic human rights. Any politician who is neutral and going up against an anti hooker politician is automatically an ally of mine. Thats why I'm voting Crossman! as Cheech said a few posts down LIBERTY , JUSTICE, and BODILY AUTONOMY! Free the hookers and johns, end real modern day slavery, which is created by the government: slavery to our corrupt court system.

C92

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5978225]I HATE trump because of FOSTA he is anti hooker and yet he partook in the hobby himself. I don't care about hardly any other issue besides that, and basic human rights. Gas is already through the roof and our country is fucked, so yes, whether or not a politician is anti-hooker / john that is the main issue I'm looking at as well as basic human rights and ending mass incarceration. Besides, I've earned my spot in life and my right to have an opinion, I pay taxes to this shithole and oftentimes am PAID IN ADVANCE on my taxes so yeah, I'm entitled to my views. I will vote for the less anti hooker politician ever single time. Not saying Dettelbach was pro hooker, but I'm fairly sure if he beat Yost the "engaging in prostitution" portion of house bill 431 never would have happened (the other portion of that bill was necessary), he seems more neutral. So yeah, its still a 3rd degree misdemeanor with Dettelbach as opposed to a first with Yost. Any politician who is anti hooker/john I do NOT support, Repub or Dem, by having those views that shows they dont support basic human rights. Any politician who is neutral and going up against an anti hooker politician is automatically an ally of mine. Thats why I'm voting Crossman! as Cheech said a few posts down LIBERTY , JUSTICE, and BODILY AUTONOMY! Free the hookers and johns, end real modern day slavery, which is created by the government: slavery to our corrupt court system.

C92[/QUOTE]I agree with c92 . I wouldn't piss on Trump if he was on fire. Unfortunately most Republicans don't give 2 shits on human rights. Only thing I agree with them is 2nd amendment. But Even that is do for some change. Probably 28th amendment is in order. The whole Uber conservative anti abortion shit is way off base and against women's right imo.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5978225]I HATE trump because of FOSTA he is anti hooker and yet he partook in the hobby himself. I don't care about hardly any other issue besides that, and basic human rights. Gas is already through the roof and our country is fucked, so yes, whether or not a politician is anti-hooker / john that is the main issue I'm looking at as well as basic human rights and ending mass incarceration. Besides, I've earned my spot in life and my right to have an opinion, I pay taxes to this shithole and oftentimes am PAID IN ADVANCE on my taxes so yeah, I'm entitled to my views. I will vote for the less anti hooker politician ever single time. Not saying Dettelbach was pro hooker, but I'm fairly sure if he beat Yost the "engaging in prostitution" portion of house bill 431 never would have happened (the other portion of that bill was necessary), he seems more neutral. So yeah, its still a 3rd degree misdemeanor with Dettelbach as opposed to a first with Yost. Any politician who is anti hooker/john I do NOT support, Repub or Dem, by having those views that shows they dont support basic human rights. Any politician who is neutral and going up against an anti hooker politician is automatically an ally of mine. Thats why I'm voting Crossman! as Cheech said a few posts down LIBERTY , JUSTICE, and BODILY AUTONOMY! Free the hookers and johns, end real modern day slavery, which is created by the government: slavery to our corrupt court system.

C92[/QUOTE]People, read this post as many times as you need to to realize why the mentally ill should not be allowed to vote.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5978225]I HATE trump because of FOSTA he is anti hooker and yet he partook in the hobby himself. I don't care about hardly any other issue besides that, and basic human rights. Gas is already through the roof and our country is fucked, so yes, whether or not a politician is anti-hooker / john that is the main issue I'm looking at as well as basic human rights and ending mass incarceration. Besides, I've earned my spot in life and my right to have an opinion, I pay taxes to this shithole and oftentimes am PAID IN ADVANCE on my taxes so yeah, I'm entitled to my views. I will vote for the less anti hooker politician ever single time. Not saying Dettelbach was pro hooker, but I'm fairly sure if he beat Yost the "engaging in prostitution" portion of house bill 431 never would have happened (the other portion of that bill was necessary), he seems more neutral. So yeah, its still a 3rd degree misdemeanor with Dettelbach as opposed to a first with Yost. Any politician who is anti hooker/john I do NOT support, Repub or Dem, by having those views that shows they dont support basic human rights. Any politician who is neutral and going up against an anti hooker politician is automatically an ally of mine. Thats why I'm voting Crossman! as Cheech said a few posts down LIBERTY , JUSTICE, and BODILY AUTONOMY! Free the hookers and johns, end real modern day slavery, which is created by the government: slavery to our corrupt court system.

C92[/QUOTE]The president does not control gas prices at all.

Why does everyone keep acting like he does.

Oil / gas companies are public companies with shareholders and their responsibility is to make as much profit as they can.

The president can't just magically wave a wand and be like, "Don't make so much money!

Unless you are advocating communism, Biden has shit to do with it.

In closing, Biden is a tool, but he isn't responsible for gas prices or inflation.

[QUOTE=Asmoth;5979714]The president does not control gas prices at all.

Why does everyone keep acting like he does.

Oil / gas companies are public companies with shareholders and their responsibility is to make as much profit as they can.

The president can't just magically wave a wand and be like, "Don't make so much money!

Unless you are advocating communism, Biden has shit to do with it.

In closing, Biden is a tool, but he isn't responsible for gas prices or inflation.[/QUOTE]So communism will give us lower gas prices? Hmmm.

[QUOTE=CleveLoser;5979858]So communism will give us lower gas prices? Hmmm.[/QUOTE]If what you say is true, then why does your good buddy biden say it's put inside fault gas is so high?

I believe our president is the one who is causing most of the b / s going on. He refuses to take blame for anything. Just one example is he is against fossil fuels, which is a major factor in what's happening with gas prices. Unfortunately we have a real putz for a president.

[QUOTE=Fuzzyek;5980063]I believe our president is the one who is causing most of the b / s going on. He refuses to take blame for anything. Just one example is he is against fossil fuels, which is a major factor in what's happening with gas prices. Unfortunately we have a real putz for a president.[/QUOTE]Biden is enept and useless but the issues we are dealing with today are a result of both parties screwing the common person for decades. 1 person (in this case the president) has little to do with how an economy functions in the short term (this includes gas prices). All politicians are a waste of air. They can't do anything to grant us freedom / rights, they can only take them away or limit them.

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5979057]People, read this post as many times as you need to to realize why the mentally ill should not be allowed to vote.[/QUOTE]Legally yes, I am considered retarded. I am an autistic savant with a very high IQ, but my papers only say autistic, so that's all that matters legally. If I wanted to I could live off of SSI and food stamps, but I choose to be a productive member of society and make something of myself. But at any time I could live on the dole if I wanted to, or needed to. You know who else is an autistic savant? NE Pats head coach.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU4xEwf66Rk[/URL] skip to 3:10 of this video and watch to about 3:45.

At the end of the day, you can say whatever you want, I'm still the guy that accurately predicted multiple stings before they were announced and before some of the arrests were even made including "operation fouled out," the 1/21/22 niles sting and the 1/5/22 sting, and many seniors will back this up. Coinciding with Yosts shtick of using sports references to name his operations, that's a Lombardi you can never take out of my trophy case. I did what prosecutors, cops, lawyers, doctors, and various other high ranking officials failed to do, I kept my weiner in my pants and researched the sting ads instead of just blindly showing up like a dumbass and that's why my nuts are drained and I've been with hot women while they had to go to court. How did I do it? Simple. I just took advantage the openings that the defense gave me. Not my fault they let the ads leak to sumosear and I followed the trails. Even if I never live out my dream of being a defense attorney, I have my single hit wonder, I am able to predict stings before they happen.

C92.

[QUOTE=RoadKing1;5979923]If what you say is true, then why does your good buddy biden say it's put inside fault gas is so high?[/QUOTE]I don't think Biden is a communist. Thus the high gas prices.

[QUOTE=Fuzzyek;5980063]I believe our president is the one who is causing most of the b / s going on. He refuses to take blame for anything. Just one example is he is against fossil fuels, which is a major factor in what's happening with gas prices. Unfortunately we have a real putz for a president.[/QUOTE]Umm, back in April of 2020, trump declared low gas prices hurt the economy and he negotiated with OPEC to cut production for a number of years.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5980180]Legally yes, I am considered retarded. I am an autistic savant with a very high IQ, but my papers only say autistic, so that's all that matters legally. If I wanted to I could live off of SSI and food stamps, but I choose to be a productive member of society and make something of myself. But at any time I could live on the dole if I wanted to, or needed to. You know who else is an autistic savant? NE Pats head coach.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU4xEwf66Rk[/URL] skip to 3:10 of this video and watch to about 3:45.

At the end of the day, you can say whatever you want, I'm still the guy that accurately predicted multiple stings before they were announced and before some of the arrests were even made including "operation fouled out," the 1/21/22 niles sting and the 1/5/22 sting, and many seniors will back this up. Coinciding with Yosts shtick of using sports references to name his operations, that's a Lombardi you can never take out of my trophy case. I did what prosecutors, cops, lawyers, doctors, and various other high ranking officials failed to do, I kept my weiner in my pants and researched the sting ads instead of just blindly showing up like a dumbass and that's why my nuts are drained and I've been with hot women while they had to go to court. How did I do it? Simple. I just took advantage the openings that the defense gave me. Not my fault they let the ads leak to sumosear and I followed the trails..[/QUOTE]Savant means someone with an exceptional talent. I doubt you have any talent, let alone exceptional. Unless you include your ability to be stupid and suck cock. But please, do not vote.

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5980748]Savant means someone with an exceptional talent. I doubt you have any talent, let alone exceptional. Unless you include your ability to be stupid and suck cock. But please, do not vote.[/QUOTE]Even if that was facts, I'm still alot more talented then these high ranking officials walking into their own colleagues stings. The fact that i know the ads that get them before they get got practically qualifies me to be President in 2028. And yes, ill be voting.

L M F A O.

C92.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5980180]Legally yes, I am considered retarded. I am an autistic savant with a very high IQ, but my papers only say autistic, so that's all that matters legally. If I wanted to I could live off of SSI and food stamps, but I choose to be a productive member of society and make something of myself. But at any time I could live on the dole if I wanted to, or needed to. You know who else is an autistic savant? NE Pats head coach.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU4xEwf66Rk[/URL] skip to 3:10 of this video and watch to about 3:45.

At the end of the day, you can say whatever you want, I'm still the guy that accurately predicted multiple stings before they were announced and before some of the arrests were even made including "operation fouled out," the 1/21/22 niles sting and the 1/5/22 sting, and many seniors will back this up. Coinciding with Yosts shtick of using sports references to name his operations, that's a Lombardi you can never take out of my trophy case. I did what prosecutors, cops, lawyers, doctors, and various other high ranking officials failed to do, I kept my weiner in my pants and researched the sting ads instead of just blindly showing up like a dumbass and that's why my nuts are drained and I've been with hot women while they had to go to court. How did I do it? Simple. I just took advantage the openings that the defense gave me. Not my fault they let the ads leak to sumosear and I followed the trails. Even if I never live out my dream of being a defense attorney, I have my single hit wonder, I am able to predict stings before they happen.

C92.[/QUOTE]Like rain man but instead of math equations buzzing around it's different escort ads and phone numbers.

[QUOTE=Fuzzyek;5980063]I believe our president is the one who is causing most of the b / s going on. He refuses to take blame for anything. Just one example is he is against fossil fuels, which is a major factor in what's happening with gas prices. Unfortunately we have a real putz for a president.[/QUOTE]

Indeed, things were better with Trump.

Clorox wiped out Covid19.

Putin is no war criminal.
He simply wants Russia to be great again.

Trump admires him as a genius.

[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/28/politics/trump-putin-ukraine-russia-smart/index.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Cumshot19;5979057]People, read this post as many times as you need to to realize why the mentally ill should not be allowed to vote.[/QUOTE]Sounds like you may be taking the interlocutor's comments far too seriously than intended.