[QUOTE=BikeRider;2928226]
The gentleman had presented himself as a man of means. Yet, he asked the lady to pick him up from a sketchy strip mall. While in the car, he asks if she'll drive to a park (it was pouring rain) for "privacy". She refuses, and they hit Fridays. It went down hill from there. All I could think of was. I appreciate the prep-work mate![/QUOTE]Unfortunately there is a large segment of guys who see SBs as just a renamed version of upscale escorting, it sounds like that's what her date was expecting. To see what I mean just view some of the SB threads in some other cities. They post "reviews" and "reports", trade info on girls, swap them around like streetwalkers. I actually forget that whole side of things even exists, because if I get even a hint that a girl is a UTR, escort, or even a serial SB then I break contact with them.
A lot has been written here in the past about the definition of a "true" SB versus UTR / escort so I'm not sure I see value in going there again, especially with the increasing proliferation of bowl-related discussions in other cities on this forum (a situation that makes it increasingly more pointless to intelligently discuss the distinction).
The important thing to remember (and what I remind myself of constantly) is that my perspective is sometimes limited by my own bias. I barely give suspect-UTRs a second glance, therefore I tend to forget they exist on the site, but no doubt they are there. I can look through my e-mail at the ones that have viewed my profile or favorited me, and across various cities I probably get dozens of likely UTR hits per week, but mentally they don't exist to me.
And likewise, someone could cruise an SD site, and because of any number of factors (their behavior, their profile wording, etc.) the girls I would consider true SBs may not be responding to them. Therefore they are only able to set up dates with the UTRs, and come to the conclusion that this is what all SBs are.
